Index [<< | >>]
Second Part of the Second Part [<< | >>]
Question: 85 [<< | >>]
In due sequence we must consider those acts whereby external things are
offered to God. These give rise to a twofold consideration: (1) Of things
given to God by the faithful; (2) Of vows, whereby something is promised
to Him.
Under the first head we shall consider sacrifices, oblations,
first-fruits, and tithes. About sacrifices there are four points of
inquiry:
(1) Whether offering a sacrifice to God is of the law of nature?
(2) Whether sacrifice should be offered to God alone?
(3) Whether the offering of a sacrifice is a special act of virtue?
(4) Whether all are bound to offer sacrifice?
Index [<< | >>]
Second Part of the Second Part [<< | >>]
Question: 85 [<< | >>]
Article: 1 [<< | >>]
Objection 1: It would seem that offering a sacrifice to God is not of the
natural law. Things that are of the natural law are common among all men.
Yet this is not the case with sacrifices: for we read of some, e.g.
Melchisedech (Gn. 14:18), offering bread and wine in sacrifice, and of
certain animals being offered by some, and others by others. Therefore
the offering of sacrifices is not of the natural law.
Objection 2: Further, things that are of the natural law were observed by all
just men. Yet we do not read that Isaac offered sacrifice; nor that Adam
did so, of whom nevertheless it is written (Wis. 10:2) that wisdom
"brought him out of his sin." Therefore the offering of sacrifice is not
of the natural law.
Objection 3: Further, Augustine says (De Civ. Dei x, 5,19) that sacrifices are
offered in signification of something. Now words which are chief among
signs, as he again says (De Doctr. Christ. ii, 3), "signify, not by
nature but by convention," according to the Philosopher (Peri Herm. i,
2). Therefore sacrifices are not of the natural law.
On the contrary, At all times and among all nations there has always
been the offering of sacrifices. Now that which is observed by all is
seemingly natural. Therefore the offering of sacrifices is of the natural
law.
I answer that, Natural reason tells man that he is subject to a higher
being, on account of the defects which he perceives in himself, and in
which he needs help and direction from someone above him: and whatever
this superior being may be, it is known to all under the name of God. Now
just as in natural things the lower are naturally subject to the higher,
so too it is a dictate of natural reason in accordance with man's natural
inclination that he should tender submission and honor, according to his
mode, to that which is above man. Now the mode befitting to man is that
he should employ sensible signs in order to signify anything, because he
derives his knowledge from sensibles. Hence it is a dictate of natural
reason that man should use certain sensibles, by offering them to God in
sign of the subjection and honor due to Him, like those who make certain
offerings to their lord in recognition of his authority. Now this is what
we mean by a sacrifice, and consequently the offering of sacrifice is of
the natural law.
Reply to Objection 1: As stated above (FS, Question [95], Article [2]), certain things belong
generically to the natural law, while their determination belongs to the
positive law; thus the natural law requires that evildoers should be
punished; but that this or that punishment should be inflicted on them is
a matter determined by God or by man. In like manner the offering of
sacrifice belongs generically to the natural law, and consequently all
are agreed on this point, but the determination of sacrifices is
established by God or by man, and this is the reason for their difference.
Reply to Objection 2: Adam, Isaac and other just men offered sacrifice to God in
a manner befitting the times in which they lived, according to Gregory,
who says (Moral. iv, 3) that in olden times original sin was remitted
through the offering of sacrifices. Nor does Scripture mention all the
sacrifices of the just, but only those that have something special
connected with them. Perhaps the reason why we read of no sacrifice being
offered by Adam may be that, as the origin of sin is ascribed to him, the
origin of sanctification ought not to be represented as typified in him.
Isaac was a type of Christ, being himself offered in sacrifice; and so
there was no need that he should be represented as offering a sacrifice.
Reply to Objection 3: It is natural to man to express his ideas by signs, but the
determination of those signs depends on man's pleasure.
Index [<< | >>]
Second Part of the Second Part [<< | >>]
Question: 85 [<< | >>]
Article: 2 [<< | >>]
Objection 1: It would seem that sacrifice should not be offered to the most
high God alone. Since sacrifice ought to be offered to God, it would seem
that it ought to be offered to all such as are partakers of the Godhead.
Now holy men are made "partakers of the Divine nature," according to 2
Pt. 1:4; wherefore of them is it written (Ps. 81:6): "I have said, You
are gods": and angels too are called "sons of God," according to Job 1:6.
Thus sacrifice should be offered to all these.
Objection 2: Further, the greater a person is the greater the honor due to him
from man. Now the angels and saints are far greater than any earthly
princes: and yet the subjects of the latter pay them much greater honor,
by prostrating before them, and offering them gifts, than is implied by
offering an animal or any other thing in sacrifice. Much more therefore
may one offer sacrifice to the angels and saints.
Objection 3: Further, temples and altars are raised for the offering of
sacrifices. Yet temples and altars are raised to angels and saints.
Therefore sacrifices also may be offered to them.
On the contrary, It is written (Ex. 22:20): "He that sacrificeth to gods
shall be put to death, save only to the Lord."
I answer that, As stated above (Article [1]), a sacrifice is offered in order
that something may be represented. Now the sacrifice that is offered
outwardly represents the inward spiritual sacrifice, whereby the soul
offers itself to God according to Ps. 50:19, "A sacrifice to God is an
afflicted spirit," since, as stated above (Question [81], Article [7]; Question [84], Article [2]), the
outward acts of religion are directed to the inward acts. Again the soul
offers itself in sacrifice to God as its beginning by creation, and its
end by beatification: and according to the true faith God alone is the
creator of our souls, as stated in the FP, Question [90], Article [3]; FS, Question [118], Article [2],
while in Him alone the beatitude of our soul consists, as stated above
(FS, Question [1], Article [8]; FS, Question [2], Article [8]; FS, Question [3], Articles [1],7,8). Wherefore just as
to God alone ought we to offer spiritual sacrifice, so too ought we to
offer outward sacrifices to Him alone: even so "in our prayers and
praises we proffer significant words to Him to Whom in our hearts we
offer the things which we designate thereby," as Augustine states (De
Civ. Dei x, 19). Moreover we find that in every country the people are
wont to show the sovereign ruler some special sign of honor, and that if
this be shown to anyone else, it is a crime of high-treason. Therefore,
in the Divine law, the death punishment is assigned to those who offer
Divine honor to another than God.
Reply to Objection 1: The name of the Godhead is communicated to certain ones,
not equally with God, but by participation; hence neither is equal honor
due to them.
Reply to Objection 2: The offering of a sacrifice is measured not by the value of
the animal killed, but by its signification, for it is done in honor of
the sovereign Ruler of the whole universe. Wherefore, as Augustine says
(De Civ. Dei x, 19), "the demons rejoice, not in the stench of corpses,
but in receiving divine honors."
Reply to Objection 3: As Augustine says (De Civ. Dei viii, 19), "we do not raise
temples and priesthoods to the martyrs, because not they but their God is
our God. Wherefore the priest says not: I offer sacrifice to thee, Peter
or Paul. But we give thanks to God for their triumphs, and urge ourselves
to imitate them."
Index [<< | >>]
Second Part of the Second Part [<< | >>]
Question: 85 [<< | >>]
Article: 3 [<< | >>]
Objection 1: It would seem that the offering of sacrifice is not a special act
of virtue. Augustine says (De Civ. Dei x, 6): "A true sacrifice is any
work done that we may cleave to God in holy fellowship." But not every
good work is a special act of some definite virtue. Therefore the
offering of sacrifice is not a special act of a definite virtue.
Objection 2: Further, the mortification of the body by fasting belongs to
abstinence, by continence belongs to chastity, by martyrdom belongs to
fortitude. Now all these things seem to be comprised in the offering of
sacrifice, according to Rm. 12:1, "Present your bodies a living
sacrifice." Again the Apostle says (Heb. 13:16): "Do not forget to do
good and to impart, for by such sacrifices God's favor is obtained." Now
it belongs to charity, mercy and liberality to do good and to impart.
Therefore the offering of sacrifice is not a special act of a definite
virtue.
Objection 3: Further, a sacrifice is apparently anything offered to God. Now
many things are offered to God, such as devotion, prayer, tithes,
first-fruits, oblations, and holocausts. Therefore sacrifice does not
appear to be a special act of a definite virtue.
On the contrary, The law contains special precepts about sacrifices, as
appears from the beginning of Leviticus.
I answer that, As stated above (FS, Question [18], Articles [6],7), where an act of one virtue is directed to the end of another virtue it partakes somewhat of its species; thus when a man thieves in order to commit fornication, his theft assumes, in a sense, the deformity of fornication, so that even though it were not a sin otherwise, it would be a sin from the very fact that it was directed to fornication. Accordingly, sacrifice is a special act deserving of praise in that it is done out of reverence for God; and for this reason it belongs to a definite virtue, viz. religion. But it happens that the acts of the other virtues are directed to the reverence of God, as when a man gives alms of his own things for God's sake, or when a man subjects his own body to some affliction out of reverence for God; and in this way the acts also of other virtues may be called sacrifices. On the other hand there are acts that are not deserving of praise save through being done out of reverence for God: such acts are properly called sacrifices, and belong to the virtue of religion.
Reply to Objection 1: The very fact that we wish to cling to God in a spiritual
fellowship pertains to reverence for God: and consequently the act of any
virtue assumes the character of a sacrifice through being done in order
that we may cling to God in holy fellowship.
Reply to Objection 2: Man's good is threefold. There is first his soul's good
which is offered to God in a certain inward sacrifice by devotion, prayer
and other like interior acts: and this is the principal sacrifice. The
second is his body's good, which is, so to speak, offered to God in
martyrdom, and abstinence or continency. The third is the good which
consists of external things: and of these we offer a sacrifice to God,
directly when we offer our possession to God immediately, and indirectly
when we share them with our neighbor for God's sake.
Reply to Objection 3: A "sacrifice," properly speaking, requires that something
be done to the thing which is offered to God, for instance animals were
slain and burnt, the bread is broken, eaten, blessed. The very word
signifies this, since "sacrifice" is so called because a man does
something sacred [facit sacrum]. On the other hand an "oblation" is
properly the offering of something to God even if nothing be done
thereto, thus we speak of offering money or bread at the altar, and yet
nothing is done to them. Hence every sacrifice is an oblation, but not
conversely. "First-fruits" are oblations, because they were offered to
God, according to Dt. 26, but they are not a sacrifice, because nothing
sacred was done to them. "Tithes," however, are neither a sacrifice nor
an oblation, properly speaking, because they are not offered immediately
to God, but to the ministers of Divine worship.
Index [<< | >>]
Second Part of the Second Part [<< | >>]
Question: 85 [<< | >>]
Article: 4 [<< | >>]
Objection 1: It would seem that all are not bound to offer sacrifices. The
Apostle says (Rm. 3:19): "What things soever the Law speaketh, it
speaketh to them that are in the Law." Now the law of sacrifices was not
given to all, but only to the Hebrew people. Therefore all are not bound
to offer sacrifices.
Objection 2: Further, sacrifices are offered to God in order to signify
something. But not everyone is capable of understanding these
significations. Therefore not all are bound to offer sacrifices.
Objection 3: Further, priests [*'Sacerdotes': Those who give or administer
sacred things (sacra dantes): cf. 1 Cor. 4:1] are so called because they
offer sacrifice to God. But all are not priests. Therefore not all are
bound to offer sacrifices.
On the contrary, The offering of sacrifices of is of the natural law, as
stated above (Article [1]). Now all are bound to do that which is of the natural
law. Therefore all are bound to offer sacrifice to God.
I answer that, Sacrifice is twofold, as stated above (Article [2]). The first
and principal is the inward sacrifice, which all are bound to offer,
since all are obliged to offer to God a devout mind. The other is the
outward sacrifice, and this again is twofold. There is a sacrifice which
is deserving of praise merely through being offered to God in
protestation of our subjection to God: and the obligation of offering
this sacrifice was not the same for those under the New or the Old Law,
as for those who were not under the Law. For those who are under the Law
are bound to offer certain definite sacrifices according to the precepts
of the Law, whereas those who were not under the Law were bound to
perform certain outward actions in God's honor, as became those among
whom they dwelt, but not definitely to this or that action. The other
outward sacrifice is when the outward actions of the other virtues are
performed out of reverence for God; some of which are a matter of
precept; and to these all are bound, while others are works of
supererogation, and to these all are not bound.
Reply to Objection 1: All were not bound to offer those particular sacrifices
which were prescribed in the Law: but they were bound to some sacrifices
inward or outward, as stated above.
Reply to Objection 2: Though all do not know explicitly the power of the
sacrifices, they know it implicitly, even as they have implicit faith, as
stated above (Question [2], Articles 6,7).
Reply to Objection 3: The priests offer those sacrifices which are specially
directed to the Divine worship, not only for themselves but also for
others. But there are other sacrifices, which anyone can offer to God for
himself as explained above (Articles [2],3).