BackContentsNext

WIMPINA, vim-pi'na (KOCH), KONRAD: Cath olic theologian; b. at Buchen (29 m. e.n.e. of Hei delberg) about 1465; d. at Amorbach (44 m. s.s.e. of Frankfort) May 17, 1531. The family name was Koch, but Konrad called himself Wimpina, prob ably because his family originally had their home in the neighboring Wimpfen-on-the-Neckar. In 1479 he entered the University of Leipsic, became a Thomist in philosophy; in 1491 he was received into the council of the philosophical faculty; in 1494 was rector, and the same year dean of his fac ulty, at a later time vice-chancellor for three years. After 1486 he devoted himself also to the study of theology, and in 1495 became subdeacon. In 1500 he became involved with his former teacher and friend Polich in a passionate dispute concerning Humanism and Scholasticism, or, as the opponents formulated it, over the question whether the art of poetry is the source of theology. In assigning a very low place to poetry, Wimpina aroused the Humanists against himself, while Polich became one of their stanchest defenders. In 1505 Joachim I. and his brother Albrecht called Wilnpina to the newly established University of Frankfort as its first rector. In 1518 he became involved in a dis pute with Luther concerning indulgences, and into this dispute Tetzel was drawn, participating on Jan. 20, 1518, in Frankfort in a disputation concerning theses which had been formulated by Wimpina in opposition to Luther. Wimpina thus appears as one of the earliest literary opponents of Luther, and he devoted the following years to an intensive refu tation of the doctrine of Luther, at first only in dis putations, then, in 1528, he published his great work of refutation Anacephalmosis, a production of in tense intellectual labor. It represents Lutheranism as the rallying-point of the sects and heresies of all times. All heresy, Wimpina states, is directed fun damentally against the Church as a divine founda tion. Wxclif is the father of the doctrine of the Hussites, and that is the source of the Lutheran heresy. By a necessity of nature the pope, Wim pina argues, stands above the emperor and possesses not only doctrinal power, but also executive and dis ciplinary power. Wimpina went to the Diet of Augsburg as the theologian of Joachim I. When at the beginning of the diet without the knowledge of Luther the Articles of Schwabach (see Schwabach Articles) had been printed and communicated to Joachim, Wimpina together with kiis Bran denburg colleagues Mensing, Redorfer,.9nnd Elgers ma published as refutation Christlicher Unterricht gegen die Bekanntnus M. Luthers. He was also one of the circle of theologians to whom was entrusted the confutation of the Augsburg Confession, but Wimpina's part was evidently small. After the diet he accompanied his elector to Cologne. Then he returned to his native state and lived thereafter in the Benedictine monastery of Amorbach. Besides his great work Anacephaheosis (1528) he published Prwcepta coaugmentandm Rethoricm orationis, of Ars epistolandi (e. 1486); Alm newly edited by C. F. Eberhard, Leipsic, 1802); Tractatus de erroribus philosophorum (1493); Congestio textus nova proprietatum logicalium cum ..eommentatione (1498); Apologeticus in same theologia, defensionem (1500);. De D. Ann& trinubio (1518); `De signis et insomniis (1529); Farrago miseellaneorum (1531; contains his Leipsic writings); his anti-Luther wri tings are in Sectarum, errorum . . . librorum panes tres (Frankfort, 1528).

(G. Kawerau.)

Bibliography: J. C. Beckmann, Notitia Universitatis Franeofurtance, Frankfort, 1707; J. Gropp, Xtas mine annarum . monasterii . . . in Amorbach, Frankfort, 1736; G. Bauch, in Zeitschrift des Vereins für Geschichte und Alterthum Schlesiens, xxx (1896), 133 sqq.; idem in Neues Archiv für sachische Gesellschaft, xviii (1897), 293 sqq.; idem, Geschichte des Leipziger Fruhhumanismus, Leipsic, 1899; idem, Die Anfdnge der Universitat Frankfurt, Freiburg, 1903; E. Friedlander, Matrikel der UniversitSt Frankfurt, pp. 1-2, 48, Leipsic, 1887; N. Müller, in TSK, 1893, pp. 83 sqq., 1894, pp. 389 sqq.; G. Erler, Die Main rikel der Universiit Leipzig, Leipsic, 1895-97; N. Paulus, in Der Katholik, 1900, ii. 281 sqq.; idem, Die deutschen Dominikaner im Kampfe gegen Luther, pp. 134 sqq., Freiburg, 1903; J. Negwer, Konrad Wimpina, Breslau, 1907-1909; ADS, xliii. 330 sqq.; KL, xii. 1682-85.

BackContentsNext


CCEL home page
This document is from the Christian Classics Ethereal Library at
Calvin College. Last modified on 08/11/06. Contact the CCEL.
Calvin seal: My heart I offer you O Lord, promptly and sincerely