GODLINESS: The most usual translation in the
English New Testament of the Greek
eusebeia. This word and its adjective
(evseUs), like the equivalent
theosebeia and
theosebes, are found a few times
in the Old Testament Apocrypha (Wisd. of Sol. x.
12; Baruch v. 4), and in the New Testament first
in the historical books with reference to pre-Christian piety
(John ix. 31;
Acts x. 2, 7)
and then in the later epistles mainly of Christian piety
(I Tim. ii. 2, 10, iii. 16, iv. 7, 8, vi. 3, 5, 6, 11;
II Tim. iii. 5, 12;
Tit. i. 1, ii. 12;
II Pet. i. 6, 7, iii. 11).
The reason for this infrequency of occurrence is evidently
that the notion eusebeia, derived from the heathen religion and morals, denotes piety
in its complete generality comprising all forms of religion, whereas
in the Biblical writings the uniqueness of the Old
Testament and Christian knowledge and worship of
God is placed foremost in opposition to all other
religious ideas. When once this uniqueness of
Christian piety was firmly established, the general
designation could be applied in the latest New Testament writings without running the risk of mis-
God Godliness understanding. The result was that this generic
term actually received the more special meaning of
Christian piety as the root of all Christian morality.
To show godliness is to lead a
Christian-moral life
(
I Tim. ii. 10, vi. 11;
II Pet. i. 7);
in this sense it is profitable unto all things
(
I Tim. iv. 8).
See
Piety.
F. Sieffert
In the modern acceptation of the word, godliness
is the religious bearing of man, his disposition and
his actions, in relation to God; or religiousness.
Its forms are as varied as the differences in
religions, yet heathen
(Acts xvii. 22-23),
Jewish
(Luke xxiii. 50;
Acts x. 2),
Mohammedan, and Christian godliness are revelations of the same fundamental disposition of man toward the deity. It manifests
itself by the same means with all: viz.,
by prayer and sacrifice; the first denoting reverence and
reliance, the other the expression partly of gratitude, partly of the sense of guilt. Godliness, even
where not inspired by Christianity, must not be
underrated. It often supplies the want of right
knowledge by warmth of feeling, by zealous deed,
or by superior work. As long as, for an individual
or a nation, the period of ignorance lasts, its devotion is agreeable (Gk.
dektos) to the deity. Only
when it is retained in conscious opposition to the
proclaimed divine truth and the change of mind
(Gk. metanoia)' is refused does it lose its religious
value.
Christian godliness is founded on the pure knowledge of God. But this knowledge, if merely theoretical, can exist combined with actual ungodliness
(James ii. 19).
Therefore, as a
second point, there
must be the feeling of entire dependence on God,
the holy fear of him, which, wherever it is not in
the spirit of bondage, but of adoption
(Rom. viii. 15),
marks a sensation of bliss, of delight in God. Godliness is perfect if man retains the pure knowledge
of God and the filial awe of him, with conscious will,
as his most precious good and relies entirely on God;
if he becomes a man of God
(I Tim. vi. 11),
if his heart is firmly established in its innermost direction
toward God
(Heb. xiii. 9).
This godliness is the soul of personal religion, the root of all true virtue,
the vigor of true morality. Its immediate expression is the offering incumbent upon the true Christian; unrestrained self-sacrifice to God
(Rom. xii. 1),
prayer and confession
(Heb. xiii. 15),
and brotherly love
(Heb. xiii. 16).
It must exercise a notable influence on all the doings of a Christian. The godly
man walks before God (Gen. xvii.1), follows him with
all his heart
(I Kings xiv. 8),
walks in his truth
(Ps. lxxxvi. 11),
in the spirit
(Gal. v. 25),
in Jesus Christ
(Col. ii. 6),
in the light
(I John i. 7);
he lives unto God
(Gal. ii. 19),
and unto Christ
(Phil. i. 21).
Individually godliness expresses itself in many a
way; it develops by degrees, in conformity with age,
sex and temper. Mary and Martha show two types
(Luke x. 38-42).
The model of
a child's devotion and godliness is Jesus in the temple when he was
twelve years old; the godliness of old age is displayed in Simeon and Anna. Peter, John, Paul are
godly men, yet very different from each other.
Sound godliness exists where knowledge, feeling, and
will are well balanced. But as the normal natural
man is realized in one person only, so is the normal
God-Parents godly man; all others, at the beat, are merely on
the way of approximation to him. Truth and sin
cerity are the criteria of godliness; where they are
wanting, it becomes cant and
hypocrisy, a mere
semblance
(
II Tim. iii. 5)
or gain-seeking
(
I Tim. vi. 5).
Carl Burger.
Bibliography:
The lexicons upon the words, particularly
that of Cremer and that of H. Greer, Gotha, 1902,
Edinburgh, 1886. Also the works upon
New Testament The
ology, particularly that of Beysahlag, Edinburgh,
1896.