SERMONS
AND
COLLATIONS
17
knowing
things
unless
the
active
intellect
keeps
on
enlightening
it.
Now
observe.
What
the
active
intellect
does
for
the
natural
man
that
and
far
more
does
God
do
for
the
solitary
soul
:
he
turns
out
active
intellect
and
installing
himself
in
its
stead
he
himself
assumes
the
duties
of
the
active
intellect.
When
a
man
is
quite
idle,
when
his
intellect
is
at
rest
within
him,
then
God
takes
up
the
work
:
he
himself
is
the
agent
who
produces
himself
in
the
passive
intellect.
What
happens
is
this.
The
active
intellect
cannot
give
what
it
has
not
got
:
it
cannot
have
two
ideas
together,
but
first
one
and
then
the
other.
What
though
light
and
air
sliow
multitudes
of
forms
and
colours
all
at
once,
thou
canst
only
observe
them
one
after
another.
And
so
with
thy
active
intellect,
which
resembles
the
eye.
But
when
God
acts
in
lieu
of
thy
active
intellect
he
engenders
many
images
together
in
one
point.
Suppose
God
prompts
thee
to
some
one
good
deed,
thy
powers
are
all
proffered
for
all
virtuous
things,
thy
mind
being
straightway
set
on
good
in
general.
All
thy
possibilities
for
good
take
shape
and
come
into
thy
mind
collectively,
focussed
to
one
point.
Clearly
this
is
not
the
work
of
thine
own
intellect
which
has
in
no
wise
the
perfection
nor
plenitude
for
it
;
rather
is
it
the
work
and
product
of
him
who
has
all
forms
at
once
in
himself.
As
Paul
says
:
‘
I
can
do
all
things
in
him
who
strengtheneth
me
;
in
him
I
am
undivided.’
Know
then,
the
ideas
of
these
acts
are
not
thine
own
:
they
belong
to
the
author
of
thy
nature
who
has
planted
therein
both
their
energy
and
form.
Lay
no
claim
thereto,
for
it
is
his
not
thine.
True,
thou
rcccivest
it
temporally,
but
it
is
gotten
and
born
of
God
beyond
time',
in
eternity
above
images.
Thou
wilt
say,
perhaps
:
From
the
moment
my
intellect
is
divested
of
its
natural
activity
and
no
longer
has
either
form
or
action
of
its
own,
what
is
preserving
it
?
It
must
have
a
hold
somewhere
;
the
powers,
whether
memory,
intellect
or
will,
are
bound
to
have
some
lodgment
somewhere,
some
place
to
work
in.
The
answer
is
this.
Intellect’s
object
and
sustenance
is
essence,
not
accident,
just
pure
unadulterated
being
in
itself.
On
descrying
something
real
the
intellect
forthwith
relics
upon
it,
comes
to
rest
thereon,
pronouncing
its
intellectual
word
concerning
the
object
attained.
As
long
as
intellect
fails
to
find
the
actual
truth
of
things,
does
not
touch
bedrock
in
them,
it
stays
in
a
condition
of
quest
and
expectation,
it
never
settles
down
to
rest,
but
labours
incessantly
to
trace
things
to
their
cause,
that
is,
it
is
seeking
and
waiting.
It
spends
perhaps
a
year
or
more
in
research
on
some
natural
fact,
finding
out
what
it
is,
only
to
work
as
long
again
stripping
off
what
it
is
not.
All
this
time
it
has
nothing
to
go
by,
it
makes
no
pronouncement
at
all
in
the
absence
of
experimental
knowledge
of
the
ground
of
truth.
Intellect
never
rests
in
this
2