MANDE, mdn'de, HENDRIg: Dutch mystic of the Windesheim community; b. at Dort c. 1360; d. in the monastery of Sion, near Beverwijk, 1431.
want of which, as contrasted with Christianity, it
failed to attain popularity. Even more
r. The dangerous than this was a religion
Religion which, rising in the Orient, united in
Character- itself the charms of the new with the
ized. allurements of the old as represented
in the mysteries - which were so
attractive to the peoples of that time. This was
Mithraism, of which Renan once rightly remarked,
New York, 1908; and the literature on totemism under C01IPAPATIVE RELIOIoN.
On the history of Christian marriage consult: Bingham, Oripines, passim (using the index); DCA, ii. 1092-1115; G. E. Howard, A History of Matrimonial Institutions, chiefly in England and the United Stotts, 3 vole., Chicago, 1904; E. Saalfeld, Luthers Lehre von der Ehe Leipsic, 1882; W. Kawerau, Die Reformation and die Ehe, Halle, 1892; J. F. Bingham, Christian Marriage; the Ceremony, History and Significance, New York, 1900.
On the theory of marriage consult: W. Glock, Christ liehe Ehe and ihre modernen Gegner, Carlsruhe, 1881 C. Th6nes, Die christliche Anschauunp der Ehe, Leyden, 1881; W. Humphrey, Christian Marriage, London, 1886 (Roman Catholic); A. H. Huth, Marriage of Near Kin, ib. 1887; A. Richard, Marriage and Divorce, ib. 1888 (religious, practical and political); H. A. Smith, in Is Marriage a Failure? ib. 1888 (a popular handbook); O. D. Watkins, Holy Matrimony, i b. 1895; A. M. Caird, The Morality of Marriage, ib. 1897; D. F. Wilcox, Ethical Marriage, Ann Arbor, 1900; M. W. Allen, Marriage, its Duties and Privileges, Chicago, 1901; P. A. Morrow, Social Diseases and Marriage, Philadelphia, 1904; L. F. Poet, Ethical Principles of Marriage and Divorce, Chicago, 1908; H. H. Henson, Christian Marriage, London, 1907.
On the law of marriage and its history consult: J. P. Bishop, Commentaries on As Law of Marriage and Divorce, 2 vols., Boston, 1881; G. Mansells, De impedimentis mat· rimonii dirimentibua, Rome, 1891; P. Brillaud, Traitk des emptchements de mariape, Paris, 1884; J. Freisen, Geeehichte des canonischen Eherechts, TQbingen, 1888; A. Esmein, Le Mariape en droit mnonique, 2 vole., Paris, 1891; F. Heiner, Grundriss des katholisden EherecJUa, Monster, 1892; F. H. Geffeken, Zur Geschichts der EhescJuidunp vor Gratian, Leipsic, 1894; G. Revess, Dos Trauerfahr der Witwe, Stuttgart, 1902; L. Gaueueeh, Dos Ehehindernis der h6heren Weihe, Vienna, 1902; M. Leitner, Lehrbuch des katholiachen E herechts Paderborn, 1902.
For marriage law and the general status in different countries, consult for France: E. Kelly, The French Law of Marriage, London, 1885; G. Baidry-Laeantinerie, Du contrat de mariape, 3 vole., Paris, 1901. For Germany: C. Barasetti, Das Eherecht, Hanover, 1895; C. Sartorius, Kommentar gum Personenatandpesets in der vom Jan. 1, 1800, an geUenden Faseunp, Munich, 1902. For England: W. Ernst, Treatise on Marriage and Divorce, London, 1879; J. T. Hammick, The Marriage Law of England, i b. 1887; D. M. Ford, Matrimonial Law, ib. 1888; C. Crawley, The Law of Husband and Wife, ib. 1892. For the United States: J. Fulton, The Laws of Marriage, New York, 1883; W. L. Snyder, The Geography cq/ Marriage, New York, 1889 (on the complexities of marriage law in the U. S.); C. D. Wright, Report on Marriage and Divorce in the U. S., Washington, 1889; L. J. Robinson, Law of Husband and Wife, Boston, 1890; J. P. Bishop, Commentaries on Marriage, Divorce and Separation, 2 vole., Chicago, 1891; F. Keeser. Law of Marriage and Divorce, Boston, 1908; J. M. Donovan, Law of Marriage, Annulment, Domicile, Divorce, Sioux Falls, 1908.