INVESTITURE: In ecclesiastical language, the
ceremony of inducting an abbot or bishop into his
office. The subject is interesting mainly in connection
with a long controversy between
the papacy and secular rulers over the
right of investiture, which constitutes
an important chapter of medieval history.
The Earlier Practise.
Even before the fall of the
Roman Empire there are evidences of imperial influence
upon the nomination of bishops, going in
some cases as far as direct nomination. In the
Frankish kingdoms both the Merovingian and Carolingian
rulers repeatedly named the bishops in their
territories; and even when the election was made
by the clergy and people, they either designated
the acceptable candidate beforehand, or claimed
the right to confirm the election. The influence of
the secular power was still more distinctly felt in
the case of abbeys erected after the Roman period;
the idea of the jurisdiction of a landowner, raised
to a higher power in the case of abbeys on royal
land, brought it to pass that royal nomination of
the abbots was the rule, election by the chapter the
exception. To these powers the Othos and the
Franconian dynasty held fast. The acquisition by
bishops and abbots of large territories and extensive
political rights, which reached its height in the
tenth and eleventh centuries, created a spiritual
aristocracy not less important than the secular,
which it was necessary for the kings to keep in hand
by retaining the decisive voice in the filling of the
offices--a claim which was not then felt to involve
any invasion of the essential rights of the Church.
In older times the nomination and confirmation had
been made by a royal edict; but under the later
Carolingians, whether an election had taken place
or not, the actual installation was made by a solemn
and formal ceremony, including the giving of the
sovereign's hand and the taking of an oath by the
candidate. After Otho I. the most usual form was
the giving to the new bishop or abbot of his predecessor's
pastoral staff, to which Henry III. added
the delivery of the episcopal ring. The whole
ceremony resembled the investiture of a temporal
vassal; and since it conveyed not only spiritual,
but temporal, jurisdiction, it began in the eleventh
century to be designated by the term
investitura.
The Contest in Germany.
The first determined opposition to the system
came from the ecclesiastical reformers of the eleventh
century. It was directed primarily
against simoniacal bargains, but
soon went further. Cardinal Humbert,
in his treatise
Adversus simoniacos
(1057-58), came out decisively against
lay investiture. In 1059 and 1063 two Roman
synods condemned the bestowal of the minor
ecclesiastical offices by laymen; in 1060 synods at
Vienne and Tours took the same position in regard
to bishoprics and abbeys; and in 1068 the filling
of the see of Milan gave occasion for these principles
to be put into practise. But the first actual clash
came when Gregory VIL, in the Lent synod of
1075, directly denied the right of the German king
to grant investiture, and enforced his denial so
vigorously that Henry IV. was obliged to take up
the challenge by the attempt to depose Gregory
at the Synod of Worms in 1076, thus opening a
struggle which lasted for forty-six years. Gregory
and his successors maintained their position. The
Roman synod of 1080 laid down positive regulations,
based upon primitive Christian practise, for
the election of bishops by the clergy and people,
giving the pope a deciding voice as to the validity
of the election. Victor III., Urban II., and Paschal
II. reiterated the same views, but had no better
success than Gregory in enforcing them against
Henry IV. and V. The ultimate solution of the
difficulty was prepared rather by the literary discussions,
in which a gradual perception appeared
of the distinction between the spiritual office and
the secular rights. This opened the way to attempts
at accommodation. After some failures, efforts led
in 1122 to the Concordat of Worms between Henry
V. and Calixtus II., which ended the struggle and
formed the basis of the later practise until the
downfall of the German empire (for provisions see
C
ONCORDATS AND D
ELIMITING B
ULLS, I.). Episcopal
and abbatial elections were to be conducted
in Italy and Burgundy without any royal interference
in Germany in the presence of the king, and
with provision for his advisory assistance in contested
elections. The agreement was not an unqualified
victory for either side, but the papacy in
the end profited most by it. After the contested
imperial election of 1198 (see I
NNOCENT III.), the
influence of the emperor on elections rapidly declined,
while that of the popes, especially under
the skilful management of Innocent Ill., increased
in the same proportion.
France.
In France during the eleventh century much the
same conditions existed as in Germany; but when
the conflict arose it was not made so
much a question of principle or conducted
with so much bitterness. The
French bishops had not so much secular power,
nor did they to the same extent constitute a spiritual
aristocracy. Again, the king claimed to invest
only a part of the bishops and abbots, while the
majority were nominated and installed by the great
vassals. Speaking generally, the right of nomination
was abolished by the beginning of the twelfth
century, and free election became the rule; but
until the end of the century, and even longer, the
kings and some of the local magnates still maintained
the right of permitting and of confirming
the election, and the kings and some great nobles
still conferred secular rights and claimed the revenues
of these temporalities during a vacancy.
England.
The reforming party had less success in England.
Under the Anglo-Saxon and Danish kings the appointment
to bishoprics and the great
abbeys was in the king's hands; the
Normans introduced investiture and
the oath of allegiance. The prohibition of lay investiture
by Gregory VII. was inoperative here.
It was not until Anselm, in 1101, came back to
England a confirmed Gregorian and refused the
oath of allegiance that there was any real investiture
controveray there. It ended in 1107 by the king's
renouncing the formality of investiture with ring
and staff, but retaining the oath of allegiance and
the other rights of his predecessors. In spite of
Stephen's promise that bishops and abbots should
be canonically elected, the assent of the English
kings continued the decisive factor. The English
clergy did not win the right of absolutely free election
even at a later period, while Innocent III. (q.v.)
forced King John to allow the papacy to share the
royal influence.
(SIEGFRIED RIETSCHEL.)
BIBLIOGRAPHY:
For Germany consult: F. A. Staudenmaier,
Geschichte der Bischofswahlen, Mainz, 1830; H. Gerdes ,
Die Bischofswahlen in Deutschland, Göttingen, 1878; P.
Hinschius, Kirchenrecht, ii, 530 sqq, Berlin, 1878; F.
Franziss, Der deutsche Episcopat . . . 1039-56, Regensburg,
1879-80; R. Reese, Die staatsrechtliche Stellung der
Bischöfe Burgunds und Italiens unter Friedrich I., Göttingen,
1885; C. Mirbt, Die Publizistik im Zeitalter Gregors VII.,
pp. 463 sqq., Leipsic, 1894; E. Friedberg, Kirchenrecht;
pp. 312 sqq., ib. 1895; C. Willing, Zur Geschichte des
Investiturstreits, Liegnitz, 1896. A. Hauck, KD vol. iii.
For France: A. Cauchie, Louvain, 1890-91;
P. Imbart de la Tour, Les Élections épiscopales . . . ix.-
xii. siècles, Paris, 1891; A. Luchaire, Hist. des institutions
monarchiques de la France . . . (987-1180), ii. 68 sqq.,
ib. 1891; P. Viollet, Hist. des institutions politiques et
administratives de la France, ii. 317 sqq., Paris, 1898.
For England: E. A. Freeman, Reign of William Rufus,
London, 1882; M. Schmitz, Der englische Investiturstreit;
Innsbruck, 1884; W. Hunt, The English Church . . .
(597-1066), London, 1899; W. R. W. Stephens, The
English Church . . . (1066-1272), pp. 119-131 et passim,
ib. 1901; J. Drehmann, Papst Leo. IX. und die Simonie.
Beitrag zur Untersuchung der Vorgeschichte des Investiturstreits Leipsic, 1908. Consult also W. E. Addis, Catholic
Dictionary, pp. 497-498, London, 1903; KL, vi. 844-863;
and the literature under the articles on the popes named
in the text and under ANSELM.
IONA: An island of the Inner Hebrides, off the
west coast of Scotland, separated from the Rose of
Mull by Iona Sound. It forms a part of Argyllshire,
and lies from 35 to 40 miles to the westward of
Oban, from which it is reached by steamer. The
name should be Ioua, the form with n having arisen
from a mistaken reading of u. In Irish it occurs as
I-Columcille, "the Island of Columba." The popular
name at present is Eecholuim-cille. The island
is about three and a half miles long from northeast
to southwest, and from a mile to a mile and a half
in breadth. It is rocky and sandy, with boggy
hollows between the hills, the highest of which
rises to 330 feet. Its area is estimated at from
1,600 to 2,000 acres, less than half of it arable, and
not more than a third actually under cultivation.
The pastures on the aides of the knolls and ravines
support a few hundred sheep and a smaller number
of cattle. The population in 1901 was 213, engaged
in agriculture and fishing.
Iona owes its fame to its association with Columba
and the monastery founded there by him in 563.
The Irish annals state that the island was given to
him by his kinsman, Conall, king of the Dalriad
Scots. Bede, however, says he received it from the
Picts as a result of his successful missionary labor
among them. Bede's statement is the more probable,
but possibly both accounts are true, as Iona
was debatable ground between the Scots and the
Picts. For Columba's work there and the earlier
history of the monastery, see the articles COLUMBA;
CELTIC CHURCH IN BRITAIN AND IRELAND; ADAMNAN.
The island was repeatedly ravaged by the
Danes during the ninth and tenth centuries; on
one of these occasions (806) sixty-eight monks
suffered martyrdom. The ruined buildings were
restored again and again with remarkable pertinacity.
Between 814 and 831 the monastery was
rebuilt with stone and a shrine was erected to St.
Columba. In 878 the shrine and relics were taken
to Ireland. Queen Margaret rebuilt the monastery
between 1059 and 1093. A Benedictine abbey and
nunnery were established in the island in 1203. The
remains still existing date mostly from the twelfth
and thirteenth centuries although the chapel of
St. Oran (Odhrain) may be of the time of Queen
Margaret. It is of red granite, and has as its western
doorway a Norman arch with beak-headed ornament,
and stands in the Reilig Odhrain, the ancient
burial-place of the Monastery, said also to have
been the burial-place of the Scottish and Pictish
kings till the time of Malcolm III, (d. 1093), as well
as of certain English, Irish, and Norwegian kings.
North of this cemetery are the remains of the
thirteenth-century Benedictine abbey. In connection
RELIGIOUS ENCYCLOPEDIA
with the cloisters is a Norman arcade of somewhat
older date. The Church of St. Mary, commonly
called the Cathedral, dates probably from the
thirteenth century. It is built of red granite, in
cruciform shape, with nave, transept, and choir,
and has a central tower seventy-five feet in height.
BIBLIOGRAPHY: Besides the authorities mentioned under
COLUMBA, CULDEES, especially Reeves (1857), pp. 334-369,
413-433, consult: L. Maclean, A Historical Account
of Iona, Edinburgh, 1833; C. A. and J. C. Buckless, The
Cathedral or Abbey Church of Iona, London, 1866 (drawings
with descriptive letterpress and an account of the early
Celtic Church and the mission of St. Columba by A. Ewing,
Bishop of Iona and the Isles); the Duke of Argyll, Iona,
London, 1870; J. Drummond, Sculptured Monuments in
Iona and the West Highlands, Edinburgh, 1881; J. Healy,
Insula Sanctorum, pp. 291-363, Dublin, 1890; W. Bright,
Chapters of Early English Church History, passim, Oxford,
1897; A. Macmillan, lona, its History and Antiquities,
London, 1898.