Page 104
Elders in Israel mi. Levity
lasted till the time of Solomon (I Kings viii. 1, 3). In proportion as the royal power developed, that of the elders declined. The case of Ahab (I Kings xx. 7 aqq.) was an exception. In the administration the elders had no part since the royal officers were the executives (I Kings iv. 1 sqq., xx. 15); but they constituted a part of the nobility. That they retained such influence was due to the fact that the royal government was satisfied with receiving the revenues and did not otherwise interfere with the affairs of the communities.
During the exile, the genealogical register was preserved; the settlement seems to have been by families, and. the heads of the families took their places at the head of the settlements and acted for the families and the community (Ezek. xxi. 1 sqq., viii. 1; Jer. xxix. 1). The return from the exile was by families (Ears ii.; Neh. vii.). At the head of the families stood the chief of the fathers (Ears i. 5, ii. 88; Neh. vii. 70). The new commonwealth was organized along those lines; the
After elders of the Jews formed the national the Exile. government; they directed the build ing of the temple; with them the Persian governor treated (Ears v. 3 sqq., vi. 7 aqq. ). In the time of Ezra and Nehemiah the organization consisted of twelve " princes," representatives of the tribes, who dwelt at Jerusalem (Neh. xi. 1), whereas the local government of the country-com munities was in the hands of city-elders and judges (Ears x. 14). The Jerusalem college of sardm became afterward the aristocratic aerate of the Oerouaia, first mentioned in the time of Antiochua the Great (Josephus, Ant. XII., iii. 3; cf. I Mace. vii. 33). From I Mace. xii. 6, xiv. 20 it is clear that the " Geroueia of the nation " and " the elders of Israel " were identical. The term aynedrion was first used in Herod's time, it became the common deaignati.n (Matt. v. 22; xxvi. 59) alongside of preabyterion (Luke xxii. 66; Acts xxii. 5) and hoofs (Acts v. 21). (I. BENZIN(3E$.)BIBLIOGRAPHY: O. $eeeemann. DM Adtesten im A. T., LeiPaia. 1895: Bensinger. ArchGoiopie. PP. 298-329; Nowack. ArchdoTopie, i. 300 sqq., 320 eqq.; J. F. McCurdy, History, Prophecy and the Monuments, vol. ii., New York, 1898; Amram, in JBL, 1900; E. Day, Social Life of the Hebrew, ib. 1901; A. Bilahler, Dye Bynedrion in Jerusalem. Vienna. 1902; $eh8rer, (ieschichta, ii. 178 eqq., Erg transl. II, ii. passim; DB, i. 878-877; EB, ii. 1908-07, iii. 2717-18; JE, v. 92.
ELECT, ELECTION. See PREDESTINATION.ELEUTHERUS, el"iii-thA'rva: Pope, c. 174189. He is first heard of as deacon to Pope Anicetus (c. 154-169); from his name it is probable that he was a Greek. During his pontificate the Church at Rome was little molested by the government, there being but one martyrdom (that of Apollonius, q.v.). It was much troubled, however, by heresy. Marcionitea, Valentinians, and other sectaries formed influential congregations by the aide of the true Church, and Eleutherua had to continue the struggle against the Montaniata begun by his predeoesaor, Soter. Gallic Christians about 178 sent him letters on the subject by the hand of Ireneus, then a presbyter of Lyons, whom they commend warmly. Their aim was probably to exhort the pope to be steadfast against Montaniam (cf. Salmon
THE NEW SCHAFF-HERZOG 104in DCB, iii. 937-J38), and their admonition may have had the more weight as the Churches of Lyons and Vienna were then undergoing severe persecution (Eusebius, Hilt. eccl., v. 1-2). The Liber pontificalis gives much detailed but worthless information about Eleutherus. It includes the statement that he received a letter from a British king, Lucius by name, " that he might be made a Christian by his mandate," which is generally admitted to be a fabrication of the seventh century, devised to support the claims of the Roman party in England against the British Church (see CELTIC CHURCH IN BRITAIN AND IRELAND). Bade knew of the statement and refers to it in three places (De temporum rations, 331; Hist. eccl., i. 4, v. 24), and it was often repeated and much elaborated in later times.
The first mention of the Lucius legend is in the recension of the Libor Ponti:ficalia known as the Catalogue Falicianus, written about 530. It is not in the earlier Catalogue, written shortly after 353. Gildss knows nothing of it. The more important of Bede's references (Hint. eccl., i. 4) is se follows: " In the hundred and fifty-sixth year of the incarnation of the Lord, Marcus Antoninue Verna became emperor, the fourteenth from Augustus, with his brother, Aurelius Commodus. In their time, while Eleutherus, a holy man, held the pontificate of the Roman Church, Lucius, king of the Britons, sent to him a letter, asking that he might be made s Christian by his command. And presently he attained his pious request, and the Britons retained the faith which they received, uncorrupted end entire, in peace and tranquillity, until the time of the emperor Diocletian." The Historic Britouum (end of the eighth century; see NENNIQa) reads Euchariatua for Eleutherua and has all the chieftains of Britain baptised with Lucius. The Libor Landaveuede (twelfth century) names the messengers of Lucius and locates the narrative in Wales. At about the same time William of Malmeebury localises it at Glastonbury. Geoffrey of Monmouth names the mieeionsries sent and makes them found three archbishoprics and twenty-eight bishoprics. The Welsh triads (of uncertain date) connect the story with Llandaff. A compilation of the time of Edward II. gives a letter from Eleutherus to Lucius. Later Lucius became a benefactor to the Church and the schools, and, being confused with a continental teacher of the same name, was represented as missionary and martyr.
BIBLIOGRAPHY: Eueebius, Hilt, eccl., iv. 22; v. proemium, 3-6. 22. Liber panliftdais, ed. Ducheene, i. 4-b, 138, Paris, 1888, cf. pp. cii.-civ.; J. Langen, Oesehichte der rgmiachan %irche his sum Pont%fi7cate Leo's 1., i. lb7-1b9, Bonn, 1881; Harnsak, atur, II. i. 144-148; Bower, Popes, i. 1b-17. For the Lucius Legend, W. Bright, Chapters o/ Early English Church History, pp. 3-b, Ox ford, 1897; Haddsn and Stubbs, Councils, i. 2b-28; L. Duahesne, in Rem Celdque, vi (1870), 491-493; Chronica minors, ed. T. Mommeen in M(3H, iii., Aud, ant., uii (1898), llb-118, 184; Plummer, note to Bede's Hist. mi., i. 4; H. Zimmer, Nennius virdicatua, pp. 141-1b4, Berlin, 1893.
ELEVATION OF THE HOST. See Mesa.ELI: A (high) priest at Shiloh near the clone of the period of the Judges, among whom he is also reckoned. Descent from Aaron is claimed for him through Ithamar (I Sam. ii. 27 aqq.; I Chron. xxiv. 6). It was Eli who promised the granting of her petition to the praying Hannah ( I Sam. i. 9, 13 aqq. ), to whom she afterward entrusted Samuel, the object of that petition (verse 25 eqq.), to become his minister in his old age and then his successor. Eli seems to have been a mild, gentle bearer of the office, who had the interests of the sanctuary at heart; but he was lax in the discipline of his sons, Hophni and Phinehae, who shamelessly abused their priestly