BackContentsNext

DEMON, DEMONISM. Background of Demonology (§ 1). Nature of Demons (§ 2). The Se'irim and Shedhim (§ 3). Other Hebrew Demonic Conceptions (§ 4).

The Greek daimon (diminutive, daimonion), the

original of the English " demon," did not connote

necessarily the idea of evil. It was rather neutral,

and might even be used as a synonym of theos,

" god "; it was also generally employed to desig

nate a tutelary genius (Lat. lar, lemur, genius), and

came to be applied to any departed soul. In the

Septuagint of the Old Testament, in the New Tes

tament, and in Christian usage the connotation is

sinister and always involves an evil

r. Back- spirit. The origin of the idea of de

ground of mons lies far back in the empirical

Demon- dualism of man's animistic concep

ology. tions, according to which all nature is

peopled with spirits which are believed

constantly to affect or control human acts and des

tiny (see COMPARATIVE RELIGION, VI., 1, a, § 4).

Man's efforts may turn out to his satisfaction or

to his disappointment, and he attributes the re

sults to the assistance or hindrance of spirits whom

he regards as good or bad according as they seem

to assist or to thwart his efforts. This primitive

bipartition of the spirit-world into good spirits

(which may become angels) and bad (which be

come demons) persists through many stages of un

folding in civilization and in religion, and remains

as a belief even in the period of enlightenment.

Traces of animistic belief have not been wholly

eradicated from the Old Testament; cf., e.g., the

serpent of Gen. iii. which has speech, mentality,

and evil purpose, and also the anointing by Jacob

of the stone to which he attributed his wonderful

dream (Gen. xxviii. 18). The narrative in Num.

xxii. 22-34 presupposes a belief in the vocal power

of animals, though the impression given by the

narration is rather that of miraculous impartation

of speech to an otherwise mute animal. The en

tire religious provenience out of which the Hebrew

religion sprang is full of demonism (see AssYRIA,

VIL, § 8; BABYLONIA, VIL,1, §§ 4-6). The Baby

Ionian religion divided its spirits into good and bad.

These were again classified and grouped, and to the

classes and groups names were given, though in

general the individual demons did not receive

names. This is in accordance with the general law

that only in the more developed stages do the

spirits become so individualized as to be named.

This appears in the Hebrew representation, where

in the earlier writings individual spirits are merely

referred without individualization to classes (cf.

the unnamed " evil spirit " which tormented Saul,

I Sam. xvi. 14-15, and the " evil spirit " which by

divine commission came between Abimelech and

the Shechemites, Judges ix. 23), while Satan, not

at first as devil, but as one belonging to God's com

pany, or at least admitted to his presence (Job i.

6 sqq.; Zeeh. iii. 1 sqq.), Azazel, and Asmodeus

(see below) emerge as personal spirits possessing

names Only in the late (postexilic) literature. A

wealth of demonic conceptions quite equal to the

Babylonian is found also in the Arabic religion, according to which demons swarm in the regions of air, earth, and water, lying in wait for the unwary. The magic and incantations of Arabic folk-lore are hardly less prominent and numerous than those of Babylonia, and where these exist belief in demonology is sure to be found (see DIVINATION; and MAGIC).

The characteristics of the demons in the Semitic sphere are like those of demons among other peoples. These beings, whose power is greatest during the hours of darkness, are responsible for ills of the flesh, of the mentality, and of the spiritual life. They cause disease, aberration of mind, and perverseness toward the gods; they con-

e. Nature trol the atmosphere and bring storms; of Demons. by their mastery of the waters they bring floods and destruction; they enter the bodies of human beings, are especially dangerous to women and children, and at the crit ical periods of life are alert to work them harm. They may be warded off by attention to the proper ritual, by the use of drugs and herbs, and by the potency of incantations and charms (the later Jews regarded the shema, " Hear, O Israel," of Deut. vi. 4 as a protection). Yet they may be welcomed by the individual and become so at home in his person that he becomes virtually one of their num ber. In accordance with their perverse nature, the demons have their dwelling-places in spots shunned by mortals-in the deserts, among ruins and in cities which have been destroyed by the enemy, among graves, in miasmatic morasses, and in like places. The demonology of the Old Testament and the New exhibits many of these traces. Yet it is to be observed that not even in its monotheism does the religion of Israel show a loftier elevation above the faiths of the surrounding peoples than in its demonology. The most numerous traces appear in the period of depression when national disaster had enforced contact with the pregnant demonism of Babylonians, Persians, and the in vading Arabs. As a matter of course, the nature of demons is ever va.~ncly treated, and the exact no tions about them are difficult to determine. De mons were regarded as not of flesh and blood (cf. Eph. vi. 12), yet they ate and drank, reproduced their kind, and might be wounded and killed. They were pictured with the passions and even the lusts of mankind (cf. Tobit vi. 14). They were above the laws of nature, and could transform themselves into various shapes, even into those of angels of light (cf. II Cor. xi. 14). In Judaism they were regarded as especially the opponents of the Messiah (see DEMONIAC). Their origin is seldom accounted for in popular belief. They come down as elemental spirits in the common belief of the people, and their number is added to as the souls of the departed become regarded as malignant. When an angelology develops, the angels are re garded as falling from their high estate and adding to the number of the demons. So in the earlier stag s of the Hebrew religion demons are not ac counted for; but in late Jewish works, especially in the Book of Enoch (see PsEUDEPIGRAPHA), the de mons are largely derived from the episode narrated

400

[Page 400]

401

[Page 401]

402

[Page 402]

403

[Page 403]

404

[Page 404]

405

[Page 405]

406

[Page 406]

407

[Page 407]

408

[Page 408]

409

[Page 409]

410

[Page 410]

411

[Page 411]

412

[Page 412]

413

[Page 413]

414

[Page 414]

415

[Page 415]

416

[Page 416]

417

[Page 417]

418

[Page 418]

419

[Page 419]

420

[Page 420]

421

[Page 421]

422

[Page 422]

423

[Page 423]

424

[Page 424]

425

[Page 425]

426

[Page 426]

427

[Page 427]

428

[Page 428]

429

[Page 429]

430

[Page 430]

431

[Page 431]

432

[Page 432]

433

[Page 433]

434

[Page 434]

435

[Page 435]

436

[Page 436]

437

[Page 437]

438

[Page 438]

439

[Page 439]

440

[Page 440]

441

[Page 441]

442

[Page 442]

443

[Page 443]

444

[Page 444]

445

[Page 445]

446

[Page 446]

447

[Page 447]

448

[Page 448]

449

RELIGIOUS ENCYCWPT' DIA bit~a and the Healing AX. 449

of an established rule. As early as the fifth century the bishops of Rome assumed the right of deviating from the decrees formulated by the ecumenical councils where such departures involved a mere abandonment of detail without injury to the essence of canonical prescription, or were found necessary for the preservation of the spirit of the law. Similar powers were exercised by the provincial synods and bishops; but from the middle of the eleventh century the reference of applications for exemption (q.v.) to the bishop of Rome became general, and once the supreme legislative power of the pope had been established the highest power of dispensation was deduced therefrom. In theory the exercise of this function was justified only by the welfare or necessities of the Church, but in practise the papal discretion became absolute. After the fourteenth century the practise became a source of papal revenue; for though theoretically the grant of exemption was not purchasable, yet the charges connected with the administration of this department fell upon the applicant and were made heavy for the express purpose of discourar ging frequent recourse to this mode of evading the law. The Council of Trent confirmed the pope in possession of his absolute power, unlimited even by the decrees of a general council, and sanctioned the exercise of the dispensatory power by others than the pope, but only in eases of extreme necessity or where the aim is some benefit for the Church admitting of no delay.

Upon the principle that the power of dispensation follows from that of legislation, the pope alone may grant exemption from a universal law or a law of limited application emanating from the pope or a general council. Dispensations in foro &vterno are issued through the office of the Dataria, and those in foro interno by the Panitentiaraa; the former requiring in every case the papal decision, the latter only in certain exceptional cases. The formal modes of granting dispensation are in forma commiaaaria, whereby a mandate is addressed to the territo. rial bishop authorizing him after due investigation to act in the name of the pope; or in forma gratima, wherein the act of concession is addressed directly to the petitioner, a favor extended, however, only in such exceptional cases as that of Ovwigs or bishops. The acceptance of the grant of dispensation by the petitioner is not necessary to render it efficacious.

The independent exercise of the power by the bishops is restricted to cases specified in the Cor pua juris and established by the Council of Trent, outside of which the papal authorization is neces-

Such authorization (facultatm; see FACUI, alas) is conferred for a regular number of years and within a prescribed sphere of action. The doctrine that bishops may make use of the power of dispensation in emergencies where communication with Rome is impossible or hazardous finds its sanction in a constructive papal authorization. Bishops and provincial and diocesan synods Possess the independent power of dispensation in the matter of rules and regulations of local validity; here too, however, the papal authority may intervene.

111.-29 (P. HlrlecRlvat.) BIHwOOEArwl: M. A. 8tiegler, in Archio f

Hirc*vwht, Mains, 1897-98; H. Brandhuber von Etsohfeld, Ueber Dispanwgon and Diepmuationrr-hR Vienna. 1888; E. Friedberg, Do& peltende Vsrfo"unot der evanpetiwhen Landeskirehen. Leipsio, 1888. Consult also J. H. Blunt, Di4io~ of Doctrinal and Historical The. o1m, pp. Wb-"20, London. 1870.

BackContentsNext