Tichonius, an African Donatist
Tichonius (Tychonius), an African Donatist, whose personal history
is very little known, but who was conspicuous in the Donatist controversy, chiefly
because Augustine mentions him in his letters to Parmenian and elsewhere. He appears
to have flourished between 380 and 420, but according to Tillemont his date may
be as early as 370. He was apparently a layman with a strong turn for church matters,
including theology, was well versed in Scripture, and though a Donatist, revolted
from the exclusive views of the sect, and occupied a position intermediate, as Neander
says, between it and the church (Ch. Hist. iii. 280, ed. Clark; cf. Dr. Sparrow
Simpson, St. Aug. and Afr. Ch. Divisions [1910], p. 51). Early in his career,
perhaps 370–373 he published a work maintaining the universality of the church,
and that no misconduct of a portion can annul the promise of God or contaminate
Christians elsewhere. Consequently Catholic Christians in Africa were not cut off
from the church of Christ, but still in communion with it. He pointed out the arbitrary
character of the Donatist test of holiness, summing it up in the epigrammatic phrase,
"quod volumus sanctum est" (Aug. c. Parm. i. 1; ii. 13, 31; see
988also ii. 21, 40, and 22, 42; iii. 3, 17; Ep. 93, 43). In support
of his argument he quoted the decision of a council at Carthage of 270 bishops,
who, having debated for 75 days, concluded, as the words of Augustine seem to imply,
that traditors ought to be invited to receive rebaptism, but if they declined to
do so ought to be admitted to communion. He adds that down to the time of Macarius,
A.D. 348, communion was not refused
to Catholics by Donatists (Aug. Ep. 93, 43). Of this council no other record
exists than the statement of Tichonius, who gives it no date. His book has perished,
but is probably the same either as the one in three books mentioned by Gennadius
under the title Bellum Intestinum, or the one entitled Expositiones Diversarum
Causarum, unless these two titles refer to one book only, in which, says Gennadius,
Tichonius mentions some ancient councils (de Scr. Eccl. 18). Though denounced
strongly for his inconsistency by St. Augustine, he appears to have continued his
allegiance to the Donatists (Aug. de Doctr. Chr. iii. 30; Gennad. u.s.),
and while still belonging to them wrote another book entitled The Seven Rules
or Keys of Christian Life, which was discussed by Augustine in his work de
Doctr. Christ. iii. 30–42. Its main heads are: (1) The church is the Lord's
body, indivisible from Him, so that in Scripture language applicable to Him is applied
also to the church. (2) The two-fold Body of the Lord, i.e. the distinction
between bad and good people in the church. (3) The promises and the law. (4) Genus
and species. Readers must be careful not to ascribe to the one what belongs to the
other, e.g. in explaining
Ezek. xxxvi. 23, which must be compared with N.T. and the promise
of baptism there contained. The "new land" is the church to be gathered from all
nations, but not yet revealed. (5) Concerning Jewish expressions denoting time,
as "three days and three nights," etc., and also such numbers as 7, 10, 12, etc.
(6) Concerning what he calls Recapitulation. (7) The personality of Satan. Tichonius
also wrote a commentary on the Revelation, which, Gennadius tells us, he interpreted
entirely in a spiritual sense—that the human body is an abode of angels ("angelicam
stationem corpus esse"); that the Millennium in a personal sense is doubtful, that
there is only one resurrection in which human bodies of every sort and age will
rise, and that of the two resurrections mentioned, one is to be understood of the
growth of grace in the soul of man and in the church. The Seven Rules are printed
at length in the Bibl. Max. Patr. (Lyons, 1677), vi. 49, and Bibl. Patr.
Galland. (Venice, 1765), viii. 107. Prof. F. C. Burkitt pub. a critical ed. of them
in the Camb. Texts and Studies 1894), iii. 1.
[H.W.P.]