Chapter XXXVII.—Other Turgid and Ridiculous Theories About the Origin of the Æons and Creation, Stated and Condemned.

Now listen to some other buffooneries^69246924    Oehler gives good reasons for the reading “ingenia circulatoria,” instead of the various readings of other editors. of a master who is a great swell among them,^69256925    Insignioris apud eos magistri. and who has pronounced his dicta with an even priestly authority. They run thus: There comes, says he, before all things Pro-arche, the inconceivable, and indescribable, and nameless, which I for my own part call Monotes (Solitude). With this was associated another power, to which also I give the name of Henotes (Unity). Now, inasmuch as Monotes and Henotes—that is to say, Solitude and Union—were only one being, they produced, and yet not in the way of production,^69266926    Non proferentes. Another reading is “non proserentes” (not generating). the intellectual, innascible, invisible beginning of all things, which human language^69276927    Sermo. has called Monad (Solitude).^69286928    Or, solitariness. This has inherent in itself a consubstantial force, which it calls Unity^69296929    Or, Union. These powers, accordingly, Solitude or Solitariness, and Unity, or Union, propagated all the other emanations of Æons.^69306930    Compare our Irenæus, I. 2, 3. [Vol. I. p. 316.] Wonderful distinction, to be sure! Whatever change Union and Unity may undergo, Solitariness and Solitude is profoundly supreme. Whatever designation you give the power, it is one and the same.