FREE SPIRIT, BRETHREN OF THE.
- Meaning and Origin (§ 1).
- Mystic Pantheism Wide-spread (§ 2).
- Various Groups (§ 3).
Brethren of the Free Spirit is a name under which
the heresiologists of the Middle Ages classed,.various extreme developments of quietistic and pantheistic mysticism. Modern scholars
also have
accepted the existence of a pantheistic sect, sharply
marked off from the fellowship of the Church,
usually recruited from the laity, and handing down
its doctrines practically unaltered from the thir
teenth to the sixteenth century. It is possible to
show, however, that the phenomena classed under
this title have points of such radical difference
as to destroy the conception of one single pan
theistic tradition reproducing itself
i. Meaning through more than one century by
and means of an actual sect; and that the
Origin. origin of this pantheistic quietistic mys
ticism is found not among the ordi
nary laity but in the monasteries and among the
Beghards and Beguines, who came so strongly
under monastic influence; also that in the follow
ing centuries the boundaries between monastic
mysticism and sectarian pantheism were never
very stable. There is no adequate ground for be
lieving that the teachings of
Amalric of Bena (q.v.)
found acceptance among a section of the French
Waldenses, and then about 1215 spread from east
ern France into western and southern Germany.
The earliest authentic information about the ap
pearance of this sort of mysticism on German soil
shows certain Swabian heretics about 1250 teach
ing a radical pantheism and determinism. Start
ing from the belief in the divine essence of the soul
and of all earthly things, they considered the as
cension of the soul to God the goal of all religion.
This was to be attained by abstraction from all
earthly activity and also from moral and religious
commandments which distracted the soul from its
purpose of union with the Godhead. The " per
fect man " who has reached this goal is sinless;
his will is God's will; the Church's laws and means
of grace are without significance for him. All
value was taken both from moral effort and from
ecclesiastical ordinances by the belief that every
human act had been predestined from eternity.
All this points to these doctrines being'a straggling
offshoot of the monastic mysticism of the school of
Saint-Victor, as drawn by its adherents from Dio
nysius the Areopagite. When Richard of
Saint
Victor (q.v.) says of the soul united with God
(De
prepar. dnimi ad contempl., ii. 13)
"Here first the
soul recovers its* ancient dignity, and asserts its
claim to the innate glory of its own freedom,"
he uses expressions only too easily misunder
stood by extravagant mystics, and serving them
as a foundation for their doctrine of spiritual
freedom.
The decrees of the Council of Vienne (1311)
against
the Beguines and Beghards shows that the
church authorities of that time were disposed to
tax these communities throughout Germany with
similar pantheistic heresies. The consequences of
this view have been that up to the present day it
has been usual to attribute a. much wider exten
sion than the facts justify to the pan
s. Mystic theistic doctrines, and. to consider the
Pantheism characteristics of the orthodox Beg
Wide-spread. uines and . Beghards, e.g., their es
teem for poverty and mendicancy, as
distinguishing the heretical mystics. The fact is,
however, that it is (difficult to draw a sharp line of
demarcation between orthodox and heretical mys
ticism. How true this is. may be seen not only
from the complaint of David of Augsburg that the
friends of mysticism were persecuted on no other
ground than as heretics or as possessed by demons,
but also from the accusations of spreading alleged heresies which were brought against Tauler, Suso, and
Ruysbroeck, to say nothing of Eckhart. Among
the cloistered women of the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries the line of demarcation was even
more fluctuating. The ecstatic-mystical life and
the visionary condition of many of them produces
frequent expressions from which to pantheism is
but a short step. It can scarcely be denied that
this pantheism won many adherents through the
influence of the great German mystics of the fourteenth century. The theory that close personal
relations existed between Eckhart and the "Free
Spirit" heretics at Strasburg and Cologne is unproved and unlikely; but the sectarian pantheistic
mysticism was unquestionably aided and influenced by his speculations. In a well known passage of Suso's
Büchlein der Wahrheit
(ch. vi.), in
which he is arguing with the leaders of the pantheistic mystics, the latter quote Eckhart as a high
authority. This attempt to show him as on their
side, however unjustifiable, throws light on the
close correspondence between the propositions condemned as his by John XXII. in 1329 and the extracts given by Mosheim from a lost sectarian book
De novem ruptTbua;
apparently the papal censure
was based not upon Eckhart's authentic writings
but upon this pantheistic treatise which was given
out as his.
The opponents of the teaching of the "Free
Spirit," e. g. Tauler, Rulman Merawin, Gerson,
Ruysbroeck, and Geert Groote, give the impres-
sion that they are combating, not an
3. Various organized sect, but a morbid tendency
Groups. and an exaggeration of mystical piety.
The confusion frequently found in
writers of that period between
the adherents of this
pantheistic mysticism and the Fraticelli and Apos
tolic Brethren springs partly from ignorance of the
points in which they differed widely, and partly
from the use of the expression "sects spiritus
libertatis" as a common designation for quite dis
tinct heresies. This has led some modern writers
into the supposition that the teachings of the Ger
man heretical mystics had been spread in the four
teenth century among the Italian Fraticelli and
Apostolicals, as well as through the so-called
"
Turlupins" (q.v.), in France. It is clear that the at
tempt to trace the development and organization
of a single definite pantheistic sect in the Middle
Ages must be unsuccessful. The
records of the
tribunals, however, make us acquainted with vari
ous groups of this kind and with a whole series of
individual representatives of heretical mysticism.
The condemnation of Margareta Porete, a Beguine
of Hainault, who was executed in Paris in 1318,
precedes the Council of Vienne. In her writings
the soul, "annihilated" in God, is released from
the obligation to practise virtue, which, however,
comes naturally to the soul united with God.
Probably similar to hers was the teaching of the
mystical work of Marie de Valenciennes, contro
verted by Gerson, which, appealing to an alleged
Biblical counsel "Ama et fac quod vis," denied
the binding force of the moral law for those who
were filled with the mystical love of God. With
the Flemish poetess and visionary
Hadewich Blommaerdine (q.v.), the pantheistic element
is not
prominent. About the same time in Cologne, a
Netherlander, Walther, burned c. 1322, was the
center of a wide-spread pantheistic movement, in
the contemporary descriptions of which we meet
for the first time with the nocturnal Adamite
orgies (see
Adamites). In southern Germany
Berthold of Rorbach (q.v.), burned 1356 at
Speyer, and Hermann Kachener of Nuremberg,
who recanted at Würzburg in 1342, were the
apostles of a similar movement. Another
interesting group is that of the "
Friends of God"
(q.v.), whose leader, Nicholas of Basel was burned
at Vienna in 1396. Pantheistic-antinomian elements are mingled with apocalyptic views of
the
Joachim type in the "
Homines intelligentim"
(q.v.). The sources for the history of these heresies in the fifteenth century are so confused that
little can be made of them. That pantheistic ideas
still had power in the Reformation period is
shown
by the rise of the Loist sect at Antwerp (1525-1545), and the Libertine or Spiritual party (see
Libertines,3) which after 1529 spread from the
Netherlands through France, western Germany,
and Switzerland,
as well as by certain developments of the Anabaptist movement.
(Herman Haupt.)
Bibliography:
Sources are: P. Fredericq, Corpus documentorum inquisitionis Neerlandicle, vols. i.-ii., Ghent,
1889-96; Ulanoweki, in
Scriptures rerum Polonicarum,
xiii. 233-250, Cracow, 1889. Consult: H. C. Lea, Hist.
of Inquisition, vol. ii., passim, New York, 1888; C. U.
Hahn, Geschichte der Ketzer, ii. 470, Stuttgart, 1847; J.
C. L. Gieseler, Kirchengeschichte, II. ii. 642 sqq., Bonn,
1849, Eng. transl., ed. H. B. Smith, ii. 590 sqq.,
New York, 1871; W. Moll, Kerkgeschiedenis van Nederland, II., iii. 59 sqq., Utrecht, 1869; W. Preger, Geschichte
der deutschen Mystik, vols. i.-iii., Leipsic, 1874-93; H.
Haupt, ZKG, v. 478, vii. 503, xii. 35; H. Reuter, Geschichte
der religidsen AufklBrung, ii. 240 sqq., Berlin, 1877; W.
Wattenbaeh, in Sibunpsberichte der Berliner Akademie,
1887, pp. 517 sqq.; J. J. I. von Döllinger, Sektengeschichte,
ii. 378 sqq., 702 sqq., Munich, 1890; Neander, Christian
Church, iv. 633, v. 393, 401, 408.