EPICUREANISM: The philosophy of Epicurus (342-270 b.c.), more particularly his ethics. The term is also applied loosely to any hedonistic tendency in morals. Building upon the materialistic metaphysics of Democritus, and the hedonistic teachings of Aristippus, Epicurus reached the view that happiness, or pleasure, is the chief good and the only possible end of rational action. In popular thought Epicureanism has received a crude interpretation not justified by the teachings of its founder. According to Epicurus, pleasure, though
153 |
With Epicures the cardinal virtue is the insight necessary to regulate the desires and thus secure an ultimate preponderance of pleasure over pain. From this virtue all others follow. On the whole, his teaching is hardly less rigorous than that of the Stoics, who expressly made virtue the end of conduct. A virtuous life, Epicures holds, is the condition of a happy life; if one is consistently virtuous, his life can be only one of happiness. He taught a prudential justice. The just man spares himself the annoyance to which an unjust man is subjected by his fellows. Fear of the gods and fear of death Epicures considered superstitions disturbing to a happy life, because, as happy and imperishable creatures, the gods have nothing to do with the affairs of this world. Unlike other philosophers of his time Epicures believed in the freedom of the will. Epicureanism was long popular in Rome and was one of the four philosophical schools endowed by Marcus Aurelius. Through his De natura rerun Lucretius became the chief literary representative of Epicurean philosophy. The teachings of Epicures, revived by Pierre Gaseendi (q.v.) became extremely popular in the time of the English deists and the French encyclopediste.
Bibliography: P. von Gisycki, Ueber das Leben and Moralphilosophis des Epikurw, Berlin, 1879; E. PHeideru EudSmonismus and Epoismus, Leipsic. 1880: W. Wallace, Epicureanism, London, 1880; W. L. Courtney, Studies in Philosophy, ib. 1882; T. C. Baring, The scheme of Epicurus. ib. 1884; F. W. Newman, Epicureanism, in Miscellanies, vol. iv., ib. 1891: P. Cassel, Epikwoa der Philosoph, Berlin, 1892; E. Zeiler, Stoics, BI'
and Sceptics, London, 1892; H. O. Newland. Epicureanism, ib. 1900; J. Masson. Lucretius, Epicurean and Post, ib., 1908; and the general works by A. W. Benn (c Philosophers, ib. 1882), B. Erdmsnn (HisR of Philosophy, ib. 1893), and W. Windelband (Hist. of Ancient Philosophy, ib. 1900). Additional literature is indicated in J. M. Baldwin, Dictionary o' Philosophy and Psychology, iii. 1, pp. 192-194, 351-352, New York, 1905.
Calvin College. Last modified on 08/11/06. Contact the CCEL. |