Chapter 13

13:1 On that day [en tēi hēmerai ekeinēi]. So this group of parables is placed by Matthew on the same day as the blasphemous accusation and the visit of the mother of Jesus. It is called “the Busy Day,” not because it was the only one, but simply that so much is told of this day that it serves as a specimen of many others filled to the full with stress and strain. Sat by the seaside [ekathēto para tēn thalassan]. The accusative case need give no difficulty. Jesus came out of the stuffy house and took his seat [ekathēto], imperfect) along the shore with the crowds stretched up and down, a picturesque scene.

13:2 And all the multitude stood on the beach [kai pas ho ochlos epi ton aigialon histēkei]. Past perfect tense of [histēmi] with imperfect sense, had taken a stand and so stood. Note accusative also with [epi] upon the beach where the waves break one after the other [aigialos] is from [hals], sea, and [agnumi], to break, or from [aissō], to rush). Jesus had to get into a boat and sit down in that because of the crush of the crowd.

13:3 Many things in parables [polla en parabolais]. It was not the first time that Jesus had used parables, but the first time that he had spoken so many and some of such length. He will use a great many in the future as in Luke 12 to 18 and Matt. 24 and 25. The parables already mentioned in Matthew include the salt and the light (5:13-16), the birds and the lilies (6:26-30), the splinter and the beam in the eye (7:3-5), the two gates (7:13f.), the wolves in sheep’s clothing (7:15), the good and bad trees (7:17-19), the wise and foolish builders (7:24-27), the garment and the wineskins (9:16f.), the children in the market places (11:16f.). It is not certain how many he spoke on this occasion. Matthew mentions eight in this chapter (the Sower, the Tares, the Mustard Seed, the Leaven, the Hid Treasure, the Pearl of Great Price, the Net, the Householder). Mark adds the Parable of the Lamp (Mr 4:21; Lu 8:16), the Parable of the Seed Growing of Itself (Mr 4:26-29), making ten of which we know. But both Mark (Mr 4:33) and Matthew (13:34) imply that there were many others. “Without a parable spake he nothing unto them” (Mt 13:34), on this occasion, we may suppose. The word parable [parabolē] from [paraballō], to place alongside for measurement or comparison like a yardstick) is an objective illustration for spiritual or moral truth. The word is employed in a variety of ways (a) as for sententious sayings or proverbs (Mt 15:15; Mr 3:23; Lu 4:23; 5:36-39; 6:39), for a figure or type (Heb. 9:9; 11:19); (b) a comparison in the form of a narrative, the common use in the Synoptic Gospels like the Sower; (c) “A narrative illustration not involving a comparison” (Broadus), like the Rich Fool, the Good Samaritan, etc. “The oriental genius for picturesque speech found expression in a multitude of such utterances” (McNeile). There are parables in the Old Testament, in the Talmud, in sermons in all ages. But no one has spoken such parables as these of Jesus. They hold the mirror up to nature and, as all illustrations should do, throw light on the truth presented. The fable puts things as they are not in nature, Aesop’s Fables, for instance. The parable may not be actual fact, but it could be so. It is harmony with the nature of the case. The allegory [allēgoria] is a speaking parable that is self-explanatory all along like Bunyan’s Pilgrim’s Progress. All allegories are parables, but not all parables are allegories. The Prodigal Son is an allegory, as is the story of the Vine and Branches (Joh 15). John does not use the word parable, but only [paroimia], a saying by the way (Joh 10:6; 16:25,29). As a rule the parables of Jesus illustrate one main point and the details are more or less incidental, though sometimes Jesus himself explains these. When he does not do so, we should be slow to interpret the minor details. Much heresy has come from fantastic interpretations of the parables. In the case of the Parable of the Sower (13:3-8) we have also the careful exposition of the story by Jesus (18-23) as well as the reason for the use of parables on this occasion by Jesus (9-17).

Behold, the sower went forth [idou ēlthen ho speirōn]. Matthew is very fond of this exclamation [idou]. It is “the sower,” not “a sower.” Jesus expects one to see the man as he stepped forth to begin scattering with his hand. The parables of Jesus are vivid word pictures. To understand them one must see them, with the eyes of Jesus if he can. Christ drew his parables from familiar objects.

13:4 As he sowed [en tōi speirein auton]. Literally, “in the sowing as to him,” a neat Greek idiom unlike our English temporal conjunction. Locative case with the articular present infinitive. By the wayside [para tēn hodon]. People will make paths along the edge of a ploughed field or even across it where the seed lies upon the beaten track. Devoured [katephagen]. “Ate down.” We say, “ate up.” Second aorist active indicative of [katesthiō] (defective verb).

13:5 The rocky places [ta petrōdē]. In that limestone country ledges of rock often jut out with thin layers of soil upon the layers of rock. Straightway they sprang up [eutheōs exaneteilen]. “Shot up at once” (Moffatt). Double compound [ex], out of the ground, [ana], up). Ingressive aorist of [exanatellō].

13:6 The sun was risen [hēliou anateilantos]. Genitive absolute. “The sun having sprung up” also, same verb except the absence of [ex] [anatellō, exanatellō].

13:7 The thorns grew up [anebēsan hai akanthai]. Not “sprang up” as in verse 5, for a different verb occurs meaning “came up” out of the ground, the seeds of the thorns being already in the soil, “upon the thorns” [epi tas akanthas] rather than “among the thorns.” But the thorns got a quick start as weeds somehow do and “choked them” [apepnixan auta], effective aorist of [apopnigō], “choked them off” literally. Luke (Lu 8:33) uses it of the hogs in the water. Who has not seen vegetables and flowers and corn made yellow by thorns and weeds till they sicken and die?

13:8 Yielded fruit [edidou karpon]. Change to imperfect tense of [didōmi], to give, for it was continuous fruit-bearing. Some a hundredfold [ho men hekaton]. Variety, but fruit. This is the only kind that is worth while. The hundredfold is not an exaggeration (cf. Ge 26:12). Such instances are given by Wetstein for Greece, Italy, and Africa. Herodotus (i. 93) says that in Babylonia grain yielded two hundredfold and even to three hundredfold. This, of course, was due to irrigation as in the Nile Valley.

13:9 He that hath ears let him hear [ho echōn ōta akouetō], So also in 11:15 and 13:43. It is comforting to teachers and preachers to observe that even Jesus had to exhort people to listen and to understand his sayings, especially his parables. They will bear the closest thought and are often enigmatical.

13:10 Why speakest thou unto them in parables? [dia ti en parabolais laleis autois]. Already the disciples are puzzled over the meaning of this parable and the reason for giving them to the people. So they “came up” closer to Jesus and asked him. Jesus was used to questions and surpassed all teachers in his replies.

13:11 To know the mysteries [gnōnai ta mustēria]. Second aorist active infinitive of [ginōskō]. The word [mustērion] is from [mustēs], one initiated, and that from [mueō] [muō], to close or shut (Latin, mutus). The mystery-religions of the east had all sorts of secrets and signs as secret societies do today. But those initiated knew them. So the disciples have been initiated into the secrets of the kingdom of heaven. Paul will use it freely of the mystery once hidden, but now revealed, now made known in Christ (Ro 16:25; 1Co 2:7, etc.). In Php 4:12 Paul says: “I have learned the secret or been initiated” [memuēmai]. So Jesus here explains that his parables are open to the disciples, but shut to the Pharisees with their hostile minds. In the Gospels [mustērion] is used only here and in the parallel passages (Mr 4:11; Lu 8:10).

13:13 Because seeing [hoti blepontes]. In the parallel passages in Mr 4:12 and Lu 8:10 we find [hina] with the subjunctive. This does not necessarily mean that in Mark and Luke [hina=hoti] with the causal sense, though a few rare instances of such usage may be found in late Greek. For a discussion of the problem see my chapter on “The Causal Use of Hina” in Studies in Early Christianity (1928) edited by Prof. S.J. Case. Here in Matthew we have first “an adaptation of Isa 6:9f. which is quoted in full in v. 14f.” (McNeile). Thus Matthew presents “a striking paradox, ‘though they see, they do not (really) see’” (McNeile). Cf. Joh 9:41. The idiom here in Matthew gives no trouble save in comparison with Mark and Luke which will be discussed in due turn. The form [suniousin] is an omega verb form [suniō] rather than the [mi] verb [suniēmi] as is common in the Koinē.

13:14 Is fulfilled [anaplēroutai]. Aoristic present passive indicative. Here Jesus points out the fulfilment and not with Matthew’s usual formula [hina] or [hopōs plōrēthēi to rhēthen] (see 1:22). The verb [anaplēroō] occurs nowhere else in the Gospels, but occurs in the Pauline Epistles. It means to fill up like a cup, to fill another’s place (1Co 14:16), to fill up what is lacking (Php 2:30). Here it means that the prophecy of Isaiah is fully satisfied in the conduct of the Pharisees and Jesus himself points it out. Note two ways of reproducing the Hebrew idiom (infinitive absolute), one by [akoēi] the other by [blepontes]. Note also the strong negative [ou mē] with aorist subjunctive.

13:15 Is waxed gross [epachunthē]. Aorist passive tense. From [pachus], thick, fat, stout. Made callous or dull — even fatty degeneration of the heart. Dull of hearing [tois ōsin bareōs ēkousan]. Another aorist. Literally, “They heard (or hear) heavily with their ears.” The hard of hearing are usually sensitive. Their eyes they have closed [tous ophthalmous autōn ekammusan]. The epic and vernacular verb [kammuō] is from [katamuō] (to shut down). We say shut up of the mouth, but the eyes really shut down. The Hebrew verb in Isa 6:10 means to smear over. The eyes can be smeared with wax or cataract and thus closed. “Sealing up the eyes was an oriental punishment” (Vincent). See Isa 29:10; 44:18. Lest [mēpote]. This negative purpose as a judgment is left in the quotation from Isaiah. It is a solemn thought for all who read or hear the word of God. And I should heal them [kai iasomai autous]. Here the LXX changes to the future indicative rather than the aorist subjunctive as before.

13:16 Blessed are your eyes [humōn de makarioi hoi ophthalmoi]. A beatitude for the disciples in contrast with the Pharisees. Note position of “Happy” here also as in the Beatitudes in Mt 5.

13:18 Hear then ye the parable [humeis oun akousate tēn parabolēn]. Jesus has given in 13:13 one reason for his use of parables, the condemnation which the Pharisees have brought on themselves by their spiritual dulness: “Therefore I speak to them in parables” [dia touto en parabōlais antois lalō]. He can go on preaching the mysteries of the kingdom without their comprehending what he is saying, but he is anxious that the disciples really get personal knowledge [gnōnai], verse 11) of these same mysteries. So he explains in detail what he means to teach by the Parable of the Sower. He appeals to them (note position of [h–meis] to listen as he explains.

13:19 When anyone heareth [pantos akouontos]. Genitive absolute and present participle, “while everyone is listening and not comprehending” [mē sunientos], “not putting together” or “not grasping.” Perhaps at that very moment Jesus observed a puzzled look on some faces.

Cometh the evil one and snatcheth away [erchetai ho ponēros kai harpazei]. The birds pick up the seeds while the sower sows. The devil is busy with his job of snatching or seizing like a bandit or rogue the word of the kingdom before it has time even to sprout. How quickly after the sermon the impression is gone. “This is he” [houtos estin]. Matthew, like Mark, speaks of the people who hear the words as the seed itself. That creates some confusion in this condensed form of what Jesus actually said, but the real point is clear. The seed sown in his heart [to esparmenon en tēi kardiāi autou], perfect passive participle of [speirō], to sow) and “the man sown by the wayside” [ho para tēn hodon spareis], aorist passive participle, along the wayside) are identified. The seed in the heart is not of itself responsible, but the man who lets the devil snatch it away.

13:21 Yet hath he not root in himself [ouk echei de rhizan en heautōi]. Cf. Col 2:7 and Eph 3:18 [errizōmemoi]. Stability like a tree. Here the man has a mushroom growth and “endureth for a while” [proskairos], temporary, quick to sprout, quick to stumble [skandalizetai]. What a picture of some converts in our modern revivals. They drop away overnight because they did not have the root of the matter in them. This man does not last or hold out.

Tribulation [thlipseōs]. From [thlibō], to press, to oppress, to squeeze (cf. 7:14). The English word is from the Latin tribulum, the roller used by the Romans for pressing wheat. Cf. our “steam roller” Trench (Synonyms of the N.T., pp. 202–4): “When, according to the ancient law of England, those who wilfully refused to plead, had heavy weights placed on their breasts, and were pressed and crushed to death, this was literally [thlipsis].” The iron cage was [stenochōria].

13:22 Choke the word [sunpnigei ton logon]. We had [apepnixan] (choked off) in 13:7. Here it is [sunpnigei] (choke together), historical present and singular with both subjects lumped together. “Lust for money and care go together and between them spoil many an earnest religious nature” (Bruce), “thorns” indeed. The thorns flourish and the character sickens and dies, choked to death for lack of spiritual food, air, sunshine.

13:23 Verily beareth fruit [dē karpophorei]. Who in reality [dē] does bear fruit (cf. Mt 7:16-20). The fruit reveals the character of the tree and the value of the straw for wheat. Some grain must come else it is only chaff, straw, worthless. The first three classes have no fruit and so show that they are unfruitful soil, unsaved souls and lives. There is variety in those who do bear fruit, but they have some fruit. The lesson of the parable as explained by Jesus is precisely this, the variety in the results of the seed sown according to the soil on which it falls. Every teacher and preacher knows how true this is. It is the teacher’s task as the sower to sow the right seed, the word of the kingdom. The soil determines the outcome. There are critics today who scout this interpretation of the parable by Jesus as too allegorical with too much detail and probably not that really given by Jesus since modern scholars are not agreed on the main point of the parable. But the average Christian sees the point all right. This parable was not meant to explain all the problems of human life.

13:24 Set he before them [parethēken]. So again in 13:31. He placed another parable beside [para] the one already given and explained. The same verb [paratheinai] occurs in Lu 9:16. Is likened [hōmoiōthē]. Timeless aorist passive and a common way of introducing these parables of the kingdom where a comparison is drawn (18:23; 22:2; 25:1). The case of [anthrōpōi] is associative instrumental.

13:25 While men slept [en tōi katheudein tous anthrōpous]. Same use of the articular present infinitive with [en] and the accusative as in 13:4. Sowed tares also [epespeiren ta zizania]. Literally “sowed upon,” “resowed” (Moffatt). The enemy deliberately sowed “the darnel” [zizania] is not “tares,” but “darnel,” a bastard wheat) over [epi] the wheat, “in the midst of the wheat.” This bearded darnel, lolium temulentum, is common in Palestine and resembles wheat except that the grains are black. In its earlier stages it is indistinguishable from the wheat stalks so that it has to remain till near the harvest. Modern farmers are gaining more skill in weeding it out.

13:26 Then appeared also [tote ephanē kai]. The darnel became plain [ephanē], second aorist passive, effective aorist of [phainō] to show) by harvest.

13:29 Ye root up the wheat with them [ekrizōsēte hama autois ton siton]. Literally, “root out.” Easy to do with the roots of wheat and darnel intermingled in the field. So [sullegontes] is not “gather up,” but “gather together,” here and verses 28 and 30. Note other compound verbs here, “grow together” [sunauxanesthai], “burn up” [katakausai], burn down or completely), “bring together” [sunagete].

13:30 My barn [tēn apothēkēn mou]. See already 3:12; 6:26. Granary, storehouse, place for putting things away.

13:31 Is like [homoia estin]. Adjective for comparison with associative instrumental as in 13:13, 44, 45, 47, 52. Grain of mustard seed [kokkōi sinapeōs]. Single grain in contrast with the collective [sperma] (17:20). Took and sowed [labōn espeiren]. Vernacular phrasing like Hebrew and all conversational style. In Koinē.

13:32 A tree [dendron]. “Not in nature, but in size” (Bruce). “An excusable exaggeration in popular discourse.”

13:33 Is like unto leaven [homoia estin zumēi]. In its pervasive power. Curiously enough some people deny that Jesus here likens the expanding power of the Kingdom of heaven to leaven, because, they say, leaven is the symbol of corruption. But the language of Jesus is not to be explained away by such exegetical jugglery. The devil is called like a lion by Peter (1Pe 5:8) and Jesus in Revelation is called the Lion of the Tribe of Judah (Re 5:5). The leaven permeates all the “wheaten meal” [aleurou] till the whole is leavened. There is nothing in the “three measures,” merely a common amount to bake. Dr. T.R. Glover in his Jesus of History suggests that Jesus used to notice his mother using that amount of wheat flour in baking bread. To find the Trinity here is, of course, quite beside the mark. The word for leaven, [zumē], is from [zeō], to boil, to seethe, and so pervasive fermentation.

13:35 I will utter [ereuxomai]. To cast forth like a river, to gurgle, to disgorge, the passion of a prophet. From Ps 19:2; 78:2. The Psalmist claims to be able to utter “things hidden from the foundation of the world” and Matthew applies this language to the words of Jesus. Certain it is that the life and teaching of Jesus throw a flood of light on the purposes of God long kept hidden [kekrummena].

13:36 Explain unto us [diasaphēson hēmin]. Also in 18:31. “Make thoroughly clear right now” (aorist tense of urgency). The disciples waited till Jesus left the crowds and got into the house to ask help on this parable. Jesus had opened up the Parable of the Sower and now they pick out this one, passing by the mustard seed and the leaven.

13:38 The field is the world [ho de agros estin ho kosmos]. The article with both “field” and “world” in Greek means that subject and predicate are coextensive and so interchangeable. It is extremely important to understand that both the good seed and the darnel (tares) are sown in the world, not in the Kingdom, not in the church. The separation comes at the consummation of the age [sunteleia aiōnos], 39), the harvest time. They all grow together in the field (the world).

13:41 Out of his kingdom [ek tēs basileias autou]. Out from the midst of the kingdom, because in every city the good and the bad are scattered and mixed together. Cf. [ek mesou tōn dikaiōn] in 13:49 “from the midst of the righteous.” What this means is that, just as the wheat and the darnel are mixed together in the field till the separation at harvest, so the evil are mixed with the good in the world (the field). Jesus does not mean to say that these “stumbling-blocks” [ta skandala] are actually in the Kingdom of heaven and really members of the Kingdom. They are simply mixed in the field with the wheat and God leaves them in the world till the separation comes. Their destiny is “the furnace of fire” [tēn kaminon tou puros].

13:43 Shine forth [eklampsousin]. Shine out as the sun comes from behind a cloud (Vincent) and drive away the darkness after the separation has come (cf. Da 12:3).

13:44 And hid [kai ekrupsen]. Not necessarily bad morality. “He may have hid it to prevent it being stolen, or to prevent himself from being anticipated in buying a field” (Plummer). But if it was a piece of sharp practice, that is not the point of the parable. That is, the enormous wealth of the Kingdom for which any sacrifice, all that one has, is not too great a price to pay.

13:46 He went and sold [apelthōn pepraken]. Rather eagerly and vividly told thus, “He has gone off and sold.” The present perfect indicative, the dramatic perfect of vivid picture. Then he bought it. Present perfect, imperfect, aorist tenses together for lively action. [Emporōi] is a merchant, one who goes in and out, travels like a drummer.

13:47 A net [sagēnēi]. Drag-net. Latin, sagena, English, seine. The ends were stretched out and drawn together. Only example of the word in the N.T. Just as the field is the world, so the drag-net catches all the fish that are in the sea. The separation comes afterwards. Vincent pertinently quotes Homer’s Odyssey (xxii. 384-389) where the slain suitors in the halls of Ulysses are likened to fishes on the shore caught by nets with myriad meshes.

13:48 Vessels [aggē]. Here only in the N.T. In Mt 25:4 we have [aggeia].

13:52 Made a disciple to the kingdom of heaven [matheteutheis tēi basileiāi tōn ouranōn]. First aorist passive participle. The verb is transitive in 28:19. Here a scribe is made a learner to the kingdom. “The mere scribe, Rabbinical in spirit, produces only the old and stale. The disciple of the kingdom like the Master, is always fresh-minded, yet knows how to value all old spiritual treasures of Holy Writ, or Christian tradition” (Bruce). So he uses things fresh [kaina] and ancient [palaia]. “He hurls forth” [ekballei] both sorts.

13:54 Is not this the carpenter’s son? [ouch houtos estin ho tou tektōnos huios?]. The well-known, the leading, or even for a time the only carpenter in Nazareth till Jesus took the place of Joseph as the carpenter. What the people of Nazareth could not comprehend was how one with the origin and environment of Jesus here in Nazareth could possess the wisdom which he appeared to have in his teaching [edidasken]. That has often puzzled people how a boy whom they knew could become the man he apparently is after leaving them. They knew Joseph, Mary, the brothers (four of them named) and sisters (names not given). Jesus passed here as the son of Joseph and these were younger brothers and sisters (half brothers and sisters technically).

13:57 And they were offended in him [kai eskandalizonto en autōi]. Graphic imperfect passive. Literally, “They stumbled at him,” “They were repelled by him” (Moffatt), “They turned against him” (Weymouth). It was unpardonable for Jesus not to be commonplace like themselves. Not without honour [ouk estin atimos]. This is a proverb found in Jewish, Greek, and Roman writers. Seen also in the Logia of Jesus (Oxyr. Papyri i. 3).

13:58 Mighty works [dunameis]. Powers. The “disbelief” [apistian] of the townspeople blocked the will and the power of Jesus to work cures.