Word Pictures in the New Testament
Luke
A.T. Robertson
Chapter 1
1:1 Forasmuch as [epeidēper]. Here alone in the N.T., though common
in literary Attic. Appears in the papyri. A triple compound [epei] = since,
[dē] = admittedly true, [per] = intensive particle to emphasize importance).
Many [polloi]. How many no one knows, but certainly more than two
or three. We know that Luke used the Logia of Jesus written by Matthew in Aramaic
(Papias) and Mark’s Gospel. Undoubtedly he had other written sources.
Have taken in hand [epecheirēsan]. A literal translation of [epicheireō]
(from [cheir], hand and [epi], upon). Both Hippocrates and
Galen use this word in their introduction to their medical works. Here only in the
N.T., though a common literary word. Common in the papyri for undertaking with no
idea of failure or blame. Luke does not mean to cast reflection on those who preceded
him. The apocryphal gospels were all much later and are not in his mind. Luke had
secured fuller information and planned a book on a larger scale and did surpass
them with the result that they all perished save Mark’s Gospel and what Matthew
and Luke possess of the Logia of Jesus. There was still room for Luke’s book. That
motive influences every author and thus progress is made. To draw up, a narrative
[anataxasthai diēgēsin]. Ingressive aorist middle infinitive. This verb [anataxasthai]
has been found only in Plutarch’s Moral. 968 CD about an elephant “rehearsing”
by moonlight certain tricks it had been taught (Moulton and Milligan, Vocabulary).
That was from memory going regularly through the thing again. But the idea in the
word is plain enough. The word is composed of [tassō], a common verb for
arranging things in proper order and [ana], again. Luke means to say that
those before him had made attempts to rehearse in orderly fashion various matters
about Christ. “The expression points to a connected series of narratives in some
order [taxis], topical or chronological rather than to isolated narratives”
(Bruce). “They had produced something more than mere notes or anecdotes”
(Plummer). [Diēgēsis] means leading or carrying a thing through,
not a mere incident. Galen applies this word some seventy-five times to the writing
of Hippocrates. Which have been fulfilled [tōn peplērōphorēmenōn].
Perfect passive participle from [plērophoreō] and that from [plērēs]
(full) and [pherō] (to bring). Hence to bring or make full.
The verb is rare outside of the LXX and the N.T. Papyri examples occur for finishing
off a legal matter or a financial matter in full. Deissmann (Light from the Ancient
East, pp. 86f.) gives examples from the papyri and inscriptions for
completing a task or being convinced or satisfied in mind. The same ambiguity occurs
here. When used of persons in the N.T. the meaning is to be convinced, or fully
persuaded (Ro 4:21; 14:5; Heb 6:11; 10:22). When used of things it
has the notion of completing or finishing (2Ti 4:5, 17). Luke is here
speaking of “matters” [pragmatōn]. Luke may refer to the matters connected
with Christ’s life which have been brought to a close among us or accomplished.
Bruce argues plausibly that he means fulness of knowledge “concerning the things
which have become widely known among us Christians.” In Col 2:2 we have “fulness of understanding”
[tēs plērophorias tēs suneseōs].
In modern Greek the verb means to inform. The careful language of Luke here really
pays a tribute to those who had preceded him in their narratives concerning Christ.
1:2 Even as [kathōs]. This particle was condemned
by the Atticists though occurring occasionally from Aristotle on. It is in the papyri.
Luke asserts that the previous narratives had their sound basis. Delivered unto
us [paredōsan hēmin]. Second aorist active indicative of [paradidōmi]. Luke
received this tradition along with those who are mentioned above (the many).
That is he was not one of the “eyewitnesses.” He was a secondary, not a primary,
witness of the events. Tradition has come to have a meaning of unreliability with
us, but that is not the idea here. Luke means to say that the handing down was dependable,
not mere wives’ fables. Those who drew up the narratives had as sources of knowledge
those who handed down the data. Here we have both written and oral sources. Luke
had access to both kinds. Which from the beginning were eyewitnesses and ministers
of the word [hoi ap’ archēs autoptai kai hupēretai genomenoi tou logou].
“Who” is better than “which” for the article here. The word for eyewitnesses
[autoptai] is an old Greek word and appears in the papyri also. It means
seeing with one’s own eyes. It occurs here only in the N.T. We have the very word
in the medical term autopsy.Greek medical writers often had the word. It
is a different word from [epoptai] (eyewitness) in 2Pe 1:16, a word used of those who beheld heavenly mysteries. The word for
“ministers” [hupēretai], under rowers or servants we have had already in Mt 5:25; 26:58;
Mr 14:54, 65, which see. We shall see it again in
Lu 4:20 of the attendant in the synagogue. In the sense of a preacher of
the gospel as here, it occurs also in Ac 26:16. Here “the word” means the gospel message, as in Ac 6:4; 8:4, etc.
From the beginning apparently refers to the beginning
of the ministry of Jesus as was true of the apostles (Ac 1:22) and
of the early apostolic preaching (Ac 10:37-43). The Gospel of Mark
follows this plan. The Gospel of Luke goes behind this in chapters 1 and 2 as does
Matthew in chapters 1 and 2.
But Luke is not here referring to himself. The matters
about the childhood of Jesus Christ would not form part of the traditional preaching
for obvious reasons.
1:3 It seemed good to me also [edoxe kamoi]. A natural
conclusion and justification of Luke’s decision to write his narrative. They had
ample reason to draw up their narratives. Luke has more reason to do so because
of his fuller knowledge and wider scope. Having traced the course of all things
[parēkolouthēkoti pāsin]. The perfect active participle of a common verb
of the ancient Greek. Literally it means to follow along a thing in mind, to trace
carefully. Both meanings occur abundantly in the ancient Greek. Cadbury (Appendix
C to Beginnings of Christianity, Vol. II, pp. 489ff.) objects to
the translation “having traced” here as implying research which the word does not
here mean. Milligan (Vocabulary) is somewhat impressed by this argument.
See my discussion of the point in Chapter XVI of Studies in the Text of the N.T.
(The Implications in Luke’s Preface) where the point is made that Luke here
claims fulness of knowledge before he began to write his book. He had the traditions
of the eyewitnesses and ministers of the word and the narratives previously drawn
up. Whether he was a personal contemporary with any or all of these events we do
not know and it is not particularly pertinent. He had mentally followed along
by the side of these events. Galen used this verb for the investigation of symptoms.
Luke got himself ready to write before he began by full and accurate knowledge of
the subject. [Akribōs] (accurately) means going into minute details,
from [akron], the topmost point. And he did it from the first [anōthen].
He seems to refer to the matters in Chapters 1:5-2:52, the Gospel of the Infancy.
In order [kathexēs]. Chronological
order in the main following Mark’s general outline. But in 9:51-18:10
the order is often topical. He has made careful investigation
and his work deserves serious consideration. Most excellent Theophilus [kratiste
Theophile]. The name means god-lover or god-beloved. He may have been a believer
already. He was probably a Gentile. Ramsay holds that “most excellent” was a title
like “Your Excellency” and shows that he held office, perhaps a Knight. So of Felix
(Ac 23:26) and Festus (Ac 26:25). The adjective does
not occur in the dedication in Ac 1:1.
1:4 Mightest know [epignōis]. Second aorist active
subjunctive of [epiginōskō]. Full knowledge [epi-], in addition
to what he already has. The certainty [tēn asphaleian]. Make no slip
[sphallō], to totter or fall, and [a] privative). Luke promises
a reliable narrative. “Theophilus shall know that the faith which he has embraced
has an impregnable historical foundation” (Plummer). The things [logōn].
Literally “words,” the details of the words in the instruction. Wast instructed
[katēchēthēs]. First aorist passive indicative. Not in O.T. and rare in ancient
Greek. Occurs in the papyri. The word [ēcheō] is our word echo (cf. 1Th 1:8 for [exēchētai], has sounded forth). [Katēcheō]
is to sound down, to din, to instruct, to give oral instruction. Cf. 1Co 14:9; Ac 21:21,24; 18:25; Gal 6:6. Those men doing the teaching were
called catechists and those receiving it were called catechumens.Whether
Theophilus was still a catechumen is not known. This Preface by Luke is in splendid
literary Koinē and is not surpassed by those in any Greek writer (Herodotus,
Thucydides, Polybius). It is entirely possible that Luke was familiar with
this habit of Greek historians to write prefaces since he was a man of culture.
1:5 There was [egeneto]. Not the usual [en]
for “was,” but there arose or came into notice. With this verse the literary
Koinē of verses 1 to 4 disappears. To the end of chapter 2 we have the most
Hebraistic (Aramaic) passage in Luke’s writings, due evidently to the use
of documents or notes of oral tradition. Plummer notes a series of such documents
ending with 1:80, 2:40,
2:52. If the mother of Jesus was still alive, Luke could have
seen her. She may have written in Aramaic an account of these great events. Natural
reserve would keep her from telling too much and from too early publicity. Luke,
as a physician, would take special interest in her birth report. The supernatural
aspects disturb only those who do not admit the real Incarnation of Jesus Christ
and who are unable to believe that God is superior to nature and that the coming
of the Son of God to earth justifies such miraculous manifestations of divine power.
Luke tells his story from the standpoint of Mary as Matthew gives his from the standpoint
of Joseph. The two supplement each other. We have here the earliest documentary
evidence of the origins of Christianity that has come down to us (Plummer).
Herod, King of Judea [Hērōidou basileōs tēs Ioudaias]. This note of
time locates the events before the death of Herod the Great (as he was called later),
appointed King of Judea by the Roman Senate B.C. 40 at the suggestion of Octavius
and Antony. He died B.C. 4. Of the course of Abijah [ex ephēmerias Abia].
Not in old Greek, but in LXX and modern Greek. Papyri have a verb derived from it,
[ephēmereō]. Daily service (Ne 13:30; 1Ch 25:8) and then a
course of priests who were on duty for a week (1Ch 23:6; 28:13).
There were 24 such courses and that of Abijah was the eighth (1Ch 24:10;
2Ch 8:14). Only four of these courses (Jedaiah, Immer, Pashur, Harim)
returned from Babylon, but these four were divided into twenty-four with the old
names. Each of these courses did duty for eight days, sabbath to sabbath, twice
a year. On sabbaths the whole course did duty. At the feast of tabernacles all twenty-four
courses were present. Of the daughters of Aaron [ek tōn thugaterōn Aarōn].
“To be a priest and married to a priest’s daughter was a double distinction” (Plummer).
Like a preacher married to a preacher’s daughter.
1:6 Righteous before God [dikaioi enantion tou theou].
Old Testament conception and idiom. Cf. 2:25 about Simeon. Expanded in Old Testament language. Picture of “noblest
product of Old Testament education” (Ragg) is Zacharias and Elisabeth, Mary
and Joseph, Simeon and Anna who were “privileged to see with clear eyes the dawn
of the New Testament revelation.”
1:7 Because that [kathoti]. Good Attic word, according
to what. Only in Luke and Acts in the N.T. In the papyri. Well stricken in years
[probebēkotes en tais hēmerais autōn]. Wycliff has it right: “Had gone far
in their days.” Perfect active participle. See also verse 18.
1:8 While he executed the priest’s office [en tōi hierateuein
auton]. A favourite idiom in Luke, [en] with the articular infinitive
and the accusative of general reference where the genitive absolute could have been
used or a temporal conjunction and finite verb. It is proper Greek, but occurs often
in the LXX, which Luke read, particularly in imitation of the Hebrew infinitive
construct. The word [hierateuō] does not appear in the ancient Greek, but
in the LXX and this one example in Luke. It is on the Rosetta Stone and the early
inscriptions so that the word was simply applied by the LXX translators from current
usage.
1:9 His lot was [elache]. Literally, he obtained
the lot. Second aorist active indicative of [lagchanō], to obtain by
lot, a very old verb from Homer on. It is used either with the genitive as here,
or the accusative as in Ac 1:17; 2Pe 1:1. Papyri show examples with the accusative. It was only once
in a lifetime that a priest obtained the lot of going [eiselthōn], here nominative
aorist active participle agreeing with the subject of [elache] into the sanctuary
[ton naon], not [to hieron], the outer courts) and burning
incense on the golden altar. “It was the great moment of Zacharias’s life, and his
heart was no doubt alert for the supernatural” (Ragg). The fortunate lot
was “a white stone” to which Re 2:17 may refer. Burn incense [tou thumiasai]. Here only
in the N.T. Occurs on inscriptions. Hobart finds it used by medical writers for
fumigating herbs. “Ascending the steps to the Holy Place, the priests spread the
coals on the golden altar, and arranged the incense, and the chief operating priest
was then left alone within the Holy Place to await the signal of the president to
burn the incense. It was probably at this time that the angel appeared to Zacharias”
(Vincent).
1:10 Were praying without [ēn proseuchomenon exō].
Periphrastic imperfect indicative picturing the posture of the people while the
clouds of incense rose on the inside of the sanctuary.
1:11 Appeared [ōphthē]. First aorist passive indicative.
It is the form used by Paul of the resurrection appearances of Jesus (1Co
15:5-8). There is no use in trying to explain away the reality of the angel.
We must choose between admitting an objective appearance and a myth (Plummer).
1:13 Is heard [eisēkousthē]. First aorist passive
indicative. A sort of timeless aorist, “was heard” when made, and so “is heard”
now. Probably the prayer was for a son in spite of the great age of Elisabeth, though
the Messianic redemption is possible also. John [Iōanēn]. The word
means that God is gracious. The mention of the name should have helped Zacharias
to believe. The message of the angel (verses 13-17) takes on a metrical form when turned into Hebrew (Ragg)
and it is a prose poem in Greek and English like 1:30-33, 35-37, 42-45, 46-55, 68-70;
2:10-12, 14, 29-32, 34-35. Certainly Luke has
preserved the earliest Christian hymns in their oldest sources. He is the first
critic of the sources of the Gospels and a scholarly one.
1:14 Gladness [agalliasis]. Only in the LXX and
N.T. so far as known. A word for extreme exultation. Rejoice [charēsontai].
Second future passive indicative. The coming of a prophet will indeed be an occasion
for rejoicing.
1:15 Strong drink [sikera]. A Hebrew word transliterated
into Greek, an intoxicating drink. Here only in the N.T. John was to be a personal
“dry” or Nazarite (Nu 6:3). Shall not drink [ou mē piēi].
Strong prohibition, double negative and second aorist subjunctive. The Holy Ghost
[pneumatos hagiou]. The Holy Spirit in contrast to the physical excitement
of strong drink (Plummer). Luke uses this phrase 53 times, 12 in the Gospel,
Mark and John 4 each, Matthew 5 times. Even from his mother’s womb [eti
ek koilias mētros autou]. A manifest Hebraism. Cf. verse 41.
1:17 Before his face [enōpion autou]. Not in the
ancient Greek, but common in the papyri as in LXX and N.T. It is a vernacular
Koinē word, adverb used as preposition from adjective [enōpios], and
that from [ho en ōpi ōn] (the one who is in sight). Autou
here seems to be “the Lord their God” in verse 16 since the Messiah has not yet been mentioned, though he was to be actually
the Forerunner of the Messiah. In the spirit and power of Elijah [en pneumati
kai dunamei Eleiā]. See Isa 40:1-11; Mal 3:1-5. John will deny that he is actually Elijah in person,
as they expected (Joh 1:21), but Jesus will call him Elijah in spirit
(Mr 9:12; Mt 17:12). Hearts of fathers [kardias paterōn].
Paternal love had died out. This is one of the first results of conversion, the
revival of love in the home. Wisdom [phronēsei]. Not [sophia],
but a word for practical intelligence. Prepared [kateskeuasmenon].
Perfect passive participle, state of readiness for Christ. This John did. This is
a marvellous forecast of the character and career of John the Baptist, one that
should have caught the faith of Zacharias.
1:18 Whereby [kata ti]. According to what. It was
too good to be true and Zacharias demanded proof and gives the reason (for, [gar]
for his doubt. He had prayed for this blessing and was now sceptical like the disciples
in the house of Mary about the return of Peter (Ac 12:14f.).
1:19 Gabriel [Gabriēl]. The Man of God (Da
8:6; 9:21). The other angel whose name is given in Scripture is Michael
(Da 10:13,21; Jude 1:9; Re 12:7). The description of himself is a
rebuke to the doubt of Zacharias.
1:20 Thou shalt be silent [esēi siōpōn]. Volitive
future periphrastic. Not able to speak [mē dunamenos lalēsai]. Negative
repetition of the same statement. His dumbness will continue “until” [achri hēs
hēmeras] the events come to pass “because” [anth’ hōn]. The words were
to become reality in due season [kairon], not [chronos], time).
1:21 Were waiting [ēn prosdokōn]. Periphrastic imperfect
again. An old Greek verb for expecting. Appears in papyri and inscriptions. It denotes
mental direction whether hope or fear. They marvelled [ethaumazon].
Imperfect tense, were wondering. The Talmud says that the priest remained only a
brief time in the sanctuary. While he tarried [en tōi chronizein].
See verse 8 for the same idiom.
1:22 Perceived [epegnōsan]. Second aorist indicative.
Clearly knew because he was not able to pronounce the benediction from the steps
(Nu 6:24-26). Continued making signs (ēn dianeuōn].
Periphrastic imperfect again. He nodded and beckoned back and forth [dia],
between). Further proof of a vision that caused his dumbness.
1:23 Ministration [leitourgias]. Our word liturgy.
A common word in ancient Greek for public service, work for the people [leōs
ergon]. It is common in the papyri for the service of the Egyptian priesthood
as we see it in the LXX of Hebrew priests (see also Heb 8:6; 9:21; 2Co 9:12; Php 2:17, 30).
1:24 Conceived [sunelaben]. Luke uses this word
eleven times and it occurs only five other times in the N.T. It is a very old and
common Greek word. He alone in the N.T. has it for conceiving offspring (1:24, 31, 36;
2:21) though Jas 1:15 uses it of lust producing sin. Hobart (Medical Language of Luke,
p. 91) observes that Luke has almost as many words for pregnancy and barrenness
as Hippocrates [en gastri echein], 21:23; [egkuos], 2:5;
[steira], 1:7; [ateknos],
20:28). Hid [periekruben]. Only here in the N.T., but
in late Koinē writers. Usually considered second aorist active indicative
from [perikruptō], though it may be the imperfect indicative of a late form
[perikrubō]. If it is aorist it is the constative aorist. The preposition
[peri] makes it mean completely (on all sides) hid.
1:25 My reproach [oneidos mou]. Keenly felt by a
Jewish wife because the husband wanted an heir and because of the hope of the Messiah,
and because of the mother’s longing for a child.
1:26 Was sent [apestalē]. Second aorist passive
indicative of [apostellō] from which apostle comes. The angel Gabriel
is God’s messenger to Mary as to Zacharias (1:19).
1:27 Betrothed [emnēsteumenēn]. Perfect passive
participle. Betrothal usually lasted a year and unfaithfulness on the part of the
bride was punished with death (De 23:24f.).
1:28 Highly favoured [kecharitōmenē]. Perfect passive
participle of [charitoō] and means endowed with grace [charis], enriched
with grace as in Eph 1:6, non ut mater gratiae, sed ut filia gratiae (Bengel).
The Vulgate gratiae plena “is right, if it means ‘full of grace which
thou hast received’; wrong, if it means ‘full of grace which thou hast to
bestow”’ (Plummer). The oldest MSS. do not have “Blessed art thou among
women” here, but in verse 42.
1:29 Cast in her mind [dielogizeto]. Imperfect indicative.
Note aorist [dietarachthē]. Common verb for reckoning up different reasons.
She was both upset and puzzled.
1:30 Favour [charin]. Grace. Same root as [chairō]
(rejoice) and [charitoō] in verse 28. To find favour is a common O.T. phrase. [Charis] is a very ancient
and common word with a variety of applied meanings. They all come from the notion
of sweetness, charm, loveliness, joy, delight, like words of grace, Lu 4:22, growing grace, Eph 4:29,
with grace, Col 4:6. The notion of kindness is in it also, especially of God towards
men as here. It is a favourite word for Christianity, the Gospel of the grace of
God (Ac 20:24) in contrast with law or works (Joh 1:16).
Gratitude is expressed also (Lu 6:32), especially to God (Ro
6:17). With God [para tōi theōi]. Beside God.
1:31 Conceive in thy womb [sullēmpsēi en gastri].
Adding [en gastri] to the verb of 1:24. Same idiom in Isa 7:14 of Immanuel. Jesus [Iēsoun].
As to Joseph in Mt 1:21, but without the explanation of the meaning. See on Matthew.
1:32 The Son of the Most High [huios Hupsistou].
There is no article in the Greek, but the use of Most High in verse 35 clearly of God as here. In Lu 6:35 we find “sons of the Most High” [huioi Hupsistou] so that
we cannot insist on deity here, though that is possible. The language of 2Sa 7:14; Isa 9:7 is combined here.
1:33 Shall be no end [ouk estai telos]. Luke reports
the perpetuity of this Davidic kingdom over the house of Jacob with no Pauline interpretation
of the spiritual Israel though that was the true meaning as Luke knew. Joseph was
of the house of David (Lu 1:27) and Mary also apparently (Lu
2:5).
1:35 Shall overshadow thee [episkiasei]. A figure
of a cloud coming upon her. Common in ancient Greek in the sense of obscuring and
with accusative as of Peter’s shadow in Ac 5:15. But we have seen it used of the shining bright cloud at the Transfiguration
of Jesus (Mt 17:5; Mr 9:7; Lu 9:34). Here it is like the Shekinah
glory which suggests it (Ex 40:38) where the cloud of glory represents
the presence and power of God. Holy, the Son of God [Hagion huios theou].
Here again the absence of the article makes it possible for it to mean “Son of God.”
See Mt 5:9. But this title, like the Son of Man [Ho huios tou anthrōpou]
was a recognized designation of the Messiah. Jesus did not often call himself Son
of God (Mt 27:43), but it is assumed in his frequent use of the Father,
the Son (Mt 11:27; Lu 10:21; Joh 5:19ff.). It is the title used by
the Father at the baptism (Lu 3:22) and on the Mount of Transfiguration
(Lu 9:35). The wonder of Mary would increase at these words.
The Miraculous Conception or Virgin Birth of Jesus is thus plainly set forth in
Luke as in Matthew. The fact that Luke was a physician gives added interest to his
report.
1:36 Kinswoman [suggenis]. Not necessarily cousin,
but simply relative.
1:37 No word [ouk rhēma]. [Rhēma] brings
out the single item rather than the whole content [logos]. So in verse 38.
1:39 Arose [anastāsa]. Luke is very fond of this
word, sixty times against twenty-two in the rest of the N.T. Into the hill country
[eis tēn orinēn]. Luke uses this adjective twice in this context (here and 1:65) instead of
[to oros], the mountains. It is an old word
and is in the LXX, but nowhere else in the N.T. The name of the city where Zacharias
lived is not given unless Judah here means Juttah (Jos 15:55). Hebron
was the chief city of this part of Judea.
1:40 Saluted [ēspasato]. Her first glance at Elisabeth
showed the truth of the angel’s message. The two mothers had a bond of sympathy.
1:41 Leaped [eskirtēsen]. A common enough incident
with unborn children (Ge 25:22), but Elisabeth was filled with the
Holy Spirit to understand what had happened to Mary.
1:42 With a loud cry [kraugēi megalēi]. A moment
of ecstatic excitement. Blessed art thou [eulogēmenē]. Perfect passive
participle. A Hebraistic equivalent for the superlative.
1:43 The mother of my Lord [hē mētēr tou Kuriou mou].
See Ps 110:1. Only by the help of the Holy Spirit could Elisabeth know that Mary
was to be the mother of the Messiah.
1:45 For [hoti]. It is not certain whether [hoti]
here is “that” or “because.” It makes good sense either way. See also 7:16. This is the first beatitude in the New Testament and it is similar
to the last one in the Gospels spoken to Thomas to discourage his doubt (Joh
20:29). Elisabeth wishes Mary to have full faith in the prophecy of the
angel. This song of Elisabeth is as real poetry as is that of Mary (1:47-55)
and Zacharias (1:68-70). All three spoke under the power of the Holy
Spirit. These are the first New Testament hymns and they are very beautiful. Plummer
notes four strophes in Mary’s Magnificat (46-48, 49, 50,
51-53, 54, 55).
Every idea here occurs in the Old Testament, showing that Mary’s mind was full of
the spiritual message of God’s word.
1:46 Doth magnify [megalunei]. Latin, magnificat.Harnack
argues that this is also the song of Elisabeth because a few Latin MSS. have it
so, but Mary is correct. She draws her material from the O.T. and sings in the noblest
strain.
1:47 Hath rejoiced [ēgalliasen]. This is aorist
active indicative. Greek tenses do not correspond to those in English. The verb
[agalliaō] is a Hellenistic word from the old Greek [agallō]. It means
to exult. See the substantive [agalliasis] in Lu 1:14,44. Mary is not excited like Elisabeth, but breathes a spirit of
composed rapture. My spirit [to pneuma mou]. One need not press unduly
the difference between “soul” [psuchē] in verse 46 and “spirit” here. Bruce calls them synonyms in parallel clauses. Vincent
argues that the soul is the principle of individuality while the spirit is the point
of contact between God and man. It is doubtful, however, if the trichotomous theory
of man (body, soul, and spirit) is to be insisted on. It is certain that
we have an inner spiritual nature for which various words are used in Mr 12:30). Even the distinction between intellect, emotions, and will is challenged
by some psychologists. God my Saviour [tōi theōi tōi sotēri mou].
Article with each substantive. God is called Saviour in the O.T. (De 32:15,
Ps 24:5; 95:1).
1:48 The low estate [tēn tapeinōsin]. The bride
of a carpenter and yet to be the mother of the Messiah. Literal sense here as in 1:52. Shall call me blessed [makariousin me]. So-called Attic
future of an old verb, to felicitate. Elisabeth had already given her a beatitude
[makaria], 1:45). Another occurs in 11:27. But this is a very different thing from the worship of Mary (Mariolatry)
by Roman Catholics. See my The Mother of Jesus: Her Problems and Her Glory.
1:50 Fear [phoboumenois]. Dative of the present
middle participle. Here it is reverential fear as in Ac 10:2; Col 3:22. The bad sense of dread appears in Mt 21:46; Mr 6:20; Lu 12:4.
1:51 Showed strength [epoiēsen kratos]. “Made might”
(Wycliff). A Hebrew conception as in Ps 118:15. Plummer notes six aorist indicatives in this sentence (51-63),
neither corresponding to our English idiom, which translates here by “hath” each
time. Imagination [dianoiāi]. Intellectual insight, moral understanding.
1:52 Princes [dunastas]. Our word dynasty is from
this word. It comes from [dunamai], to be able.
1:54 Hath holpen [antelabeto]. Second aorist middle
indicative. A very common verb. It means to lay hold of with a view to help or succour.
Servant [paidos]. Here it means “servant,” not “son” or “child,” its
usual meaning.
1:58 Had magnified [emegalunen]. Aorist active indicative.
Same verb as in verse 46. Rejoiced with her [sunechairon autēi]. Imperfect tense
and pictures the continual joy of the neighbours, accented also by [sun-]
(cf. Php 2:18) in its mutual aspect.
1:59 Would have called [ekaloun]. Conative imperfect,
tried to call.
1:62 Made signs [eneneuon]. Imperfect tense, repeated
action as usual when making signs. In 1:22 the verb used of Zacharias is [dianeuōn]. What he would have
him called [to ti an theloi kaleisthai auto]. Note article [to]
with the indirect question, accusative of general reference. The optative with [an]
is here because it was used in the direct question (cf. Ac 17:18), and is simply retained in the indirect. What would
he wish him to be called? (if he could speak), a conclusion of the fourth-class
condition.
1:63 Tablet [pinakidion]. Diminutive of [pinakis]. In
Aristotle and the papyri for writing tablet, probably covered with wax. Sometimes
it was a little table, like Shakespeare’s “the table of my memory” (Hamlet, i.5).
It was used also of a physician’s note-book. Wrote, saying [egrapsen legōn].
Hebrew way of speaking (2Ki 10:6).
1:64 Immediately [parachrēma]. Nineteen times in
the N.T., seventeen in Luke. Opened [aneōichthē]. First aorist passive
indicative with double augment. The verb suits “mouth,” but not “tongue” [glōssa].
It is thus a zeugma with tongue. Loosed or some such verb to be supplied.
1:65 Fear [phobos]. Not terror, but religious awe
because of contact with the supernatural as in the case of Zacharias (1:12).
Were noised abroad [dielaleito]. Imperfect passive. Occurs in Polybius. In
the N.T. only here and Lu 6:11. It was continuous talk back and forth between [dia] the people.
1:66 What then [ti ara]. With all these supernatural
happenings they predicted the marvellous career of this child. Note [Ti],
what, not [Tis], who. Cf. Ac 12:18. They laid them up [ethento], second aorist middle
indicative) as Mary did (2:19). The hand of the Lord
[cheir Kuriou]. Luke’s explanation in addition to the supernatural events.
The expression occurs only in Luke’s writing (Ac 11:21; 13:11).
1:67 Prophesied [eprophēteusen]. Under the guidance
of the Holy Spirit. This Benedictus [Eulogētos], Blessed)
of Zacharias (68-79) may be what is referred to in verse 64 “he began to speak blessing God” [eulogōn]. Nearly every phrase
here is found in the O.T. (Psalms and Prophets). He, like Mary, was full
of the Holy Spirit and had caught the Messianic message in its highest meaning.
1:68 Hath visited [epeskepsato]. An old Greek word
with a Hebraic colouring to look into with a view to help. The papyri have plenty
of examples of the verb in the sense of inspecting, examining. Redemption
[lutrōsin] here originally referred to political redemption, but with a moral
and spiritual basis (verses 75, 77).
1:69 Horn of salvation [keras sōtērias]. A common
metaphor in the O.T. (1Sa 2:10; 2Sa 23:3, etc.). It represents strength
like the horns of bulls. Cf. Ps. 132:17.
1:70 Since the world began [ap’ aiōnos]. Better
“from of old” (Weymouth, American Revision).
1:73 The oath which he sware [horkon hon ōmosen].
Antecedent attracted to case of the relative. The oath appears in Ge 22:16-18. The oppression of the Gentiles seems to be in the mind of Zacharias.
It is not certain how clearly he grasped the idea of the spiritual Israel as Paul
saw it in Galatians and Romans.
1:74 Delivered [rhusthentas]. First aorist passive
participle of an old verb, [rhuomai]. The accusative case appears, where the
dative could have been used to agree with [hēmin], because of the infinitive
[latreuein] (verse 74) to serve (from latros, for hire). But Plato uses
the word of service for God so that the bad sense does not always exist.
1:75 In holiness and righteousness [en hosiotēti kai
dikaiosunēi]. Not a usual combination (Eph 4:24; Tit 1:8; 1Th 2:10).
The Godward and the manward aspects of conduct (Bruce). [Hosios],
the eternal principles of right, [dikaios], the rule of conduct before men.
1:76 Yea and thou [kai su de]. Direct address to
the child with forecast of his life (cf. 1:13-17). Prophet [prophētēs]. The word here directly
applied to the child. Jesus will later call John a prophet and more than a prophet.
The Lord [Kuriou]. Jehovah as in 1:16.
1:77 Knowledge of salvation [gnōsin sōtērias]. “This
is the aim and end of the work of the Forerunner” (Plummer).
1:78 Tender mercy [splagchna eleous]. Bowels of
mercy literally (1Pe 3:8; Jas 3:11). Revised margin has it, hearts
of mercy. The dayspring from on high [anatolē ex hupsous]. Literally,
rising from on high, like the rising sun or stars (Isa 60:19). The
word is used also of a sprouting plant or branch (Jer 23:5; Zec 6:12),
but that does not suit here. Shall visit [epeskepsetai], correct text,
cf. 1:68.
1:79 To shine upon [epiphānai]. First aorist active
infinitive of [epiphainō] (liquid verb). An old verb to give light,
to shine upon, like the sun or stars. See also Ac 27:20; Tit 2:11; 3:4. The shadow of death [skiāi thanatou].
See Ps 107:10, where darkness and shadow of death are combined as here. Cf. also Isa 9:1.
See on Mt 4:16. To guide [tou kateuth–nai]. Genitive of
the articular infinitive of purpose. The light will enable them in the dark to see
how to walk in a straight path that leads to “the way of peace.” We are still on
that road, but so many stumble for lack of light, men and nations.
1:80 Grew [ēuxane]. Imperfect active, was growing.
Waxed strong [ekrataiouto]. Imperfect again. The child kept growing
in strength of body and spirit. His shewing [anadeixeōs autou]. Here
alone in the N.T. It occurs in Plutarch and Polybius. The verb appears in a sacrificial
sense. The boy, as he grew, may have gone up to the passover and may have seen the
boy Jesus (Lu 2:42-52), but he would not know that he was to be the
Messiah. So these two boys of destiny grew on with the years, the one in the desert
hills near Hebron after Zacharias and Elisabeth died, the other, the young Carpenter
up in Nazareth, each waiting for “his shewing unto Israel.”
Chapter 2
2:1 Decree from Caesar Augustus [dogma para Kaisaros Augoustou].
Old and common word from [dokeō], to think, form an opinion. No such decree
was given by Greek or Roman historians and it was for long assumed by many scholars
that Luke was in error. But papyri and inscriptions have confirmed Luke on every
point in these crucial verses 2:1-7. See W.M. Ramsay’s books (Was Christ Born at Bethelehem?
Luke the Physician. The Bearing of Recent Discovery on the Trustworthiness
of the N.T.). The World [tēn oikoumenēn]. Literally,
the inhabited (land, [gēn]. Inhabited by the Greeks, then by the Romans,
then the whole world (Roman world, the world ruled by Rome). So Ac 11:28; 17:6. Should be enrolled [apographesthai]. It was
a census, not a taxing, though taxing generally followed and was based on the census.
This word is very old and common. It means to write or copy off for the public records,
to register.
2:2 The first enrolment [apographē prōtē]. A definite
allusion by Luke to a series of censuses instituted by Augustus, the second of which
is mentioned by him in Ac 5:37. This second one is described by Josephus and it was supposed by
some that Luke confused the two. But Ramsay has shown that a periodical fourteen-year
census in Egypt is given in dated papyri back to A.D. 20. The one in Ac 5:37 would then be A.D. 6. This is in the time of Augustus. The first
would then be B.C. 8 in Egypt. If it was delayed a couple of years in Palestine
by Herod the Great for obvious reasons, that would make the birth of Christ about
B.C. 6 which agrees with the other known data When Quirinius [Kurēniou].
Genitive absolute. Here again Luke has been attacked on the ground that Quirinius
was only governor of Syria once and that was A.D. 6 as shown by Josephus (Ant.XVIII.
I.I). But Ramsay has proven by inscriptions that Quirinius was twice in
Syria and that Luke is correct here also. See summary of the facts in my Luke
the Historian in the Light of Research, pp. 118-29.
2:3 Each to his own city [hekastos eis tēn heautou polin].
A number of papyri in Egypt have the heading enrolment by household [apographē
kat’ oikian]. Here again Luke is vindicated. Each man went to the town where
his family register was kept.
2:5 To enrol himself with Mary [apograpsasthai sun Mariam].
Direct middle. “With Mary” is naturally taken with the infinitive as here. If so,
that means that Mary’s family register was in Bethlehem also and that she also belonged
to the house of David. It is possible to connect “with Mary” far back with “went
up” [anebē] in verse 4, but it is unnatural to do so. There is no real reason for doubting that
Mary herself was a descendant of David and that is the obvious way to understand
Luke’s genealogy of Jesus in Lu 3:23-38). The Syriac Sinaitic expressly says that both Joseph and Mary
were of the house and city of David. Betrothed [emnēsteumenēn]. Same
verb as in 1:27, but here it really means “married” or “espoused” as
Mt 1:24f. shows. Otherwise she could not have travelled with Joseph. Great
with child [enkuōi]. Only here in N.T. Common Greek word.
2:6 That she should be delivered [tou tekein autēn].
For the bearing the child as to her. A neat use of the articular infinitive,
second aorist active, with the accusative of general reference. From [tiktō],
common verb.
2:7 Her firstborn [ton prōtotokon]. The expression
naturally means that she afterwards had other children and we read of brothers and
sisters of Jesus. There is not a particle of evidence for the notion that Mary refused
to bear other children because she was the mother of the Messiah. Wrapped in
swaddling clothes [esparganōsen]. From [sparganon], a swathing
band. Only here and verse 12 in the N.T., but in Euripides, Aristotle, Hippocrates, Plutarch. Frequent
in medical works. In a manger [en phatnēi]. In a crib in a stall whether
in a cave (Justin Martyr) or connected with the inn we do not know. The
cattle may have been out on the hills or the donkeys used in travelling may have
been feeding in this stall or another near. In the inn [en tōi katalumati].
A lodging-house or khan, poor enough at best, but there was not even room in this
public place because of the crowds for the census. See the word also in Lu 22:11; Mr 14:14 with the sense of guest-room (cf. 1Ki 1:13). It is the Hellenistic equivalent for [katagōgeion]
and appears also in one papyrus. See Ex 4:24. There would sometimes be an inner court, a range or arches, an open
gallery round the four sides. On one side of the square, outside the wall, would
be stables for the asses and camels, buffaloes and goats. Each man had to carry
his own food and bedding.
2:8 Abiding in the field [agraulountes]. From [agros],
field and [aulē], court. The shepherds were making the field their court.
Plutarch and Strabo use the word. Keeping watch [phulassontes phulakas].
Cognate accusative. They were bivouacking by night and it was plainly mild weather.
In these very pastures David had fought the lion and the bear to protect the sheep
(1Sa 17:34f.). The plural here probably means that they watched by
turns. The flock may have been meant for the temple sacrifices. There is no way
to tell.
2:9 Stood by them [epestē autois]. Ingressive aorist
active indicative. Stepped by their side. The same word in Ac 12:7 of the angel there. Paul uses it in the sense of standing by in Ac 22:20). It is a common old Greek word, [ephistēmi]. Were sore
afraid [ephobēthēsan phobon megan]. First aorist passive indicative with
cognate accusative (the passive sense gone), they feared a great fear.
2:10 I bring you good tidings of great joy [euaggelizomai
h–min charan megalēn]. Wycliff, “I evangelize to you a great joy.” The active
verb [euaggelizō] occurs only in late Greek writers, LXX, a few papyri examples,
and the N.T. The middle (deponent) appears from Aristophanes on. Luke and
Paul employ both substantive [euaggelion] and verb [euaggelizō] very
frequently. It is to Paul’s influence that we owe their frequency and popularity
in the language of Christendom (George Milligan, The Epistles to the Thessalonians,
p. 143). The other Gospels do not have the verb save Mt 11:5 and that in a quotation (Isa 61:1).
2:11 [Is born] [etechthē]. First aorist passive
indicative from [tiktō]. Was born. Saviour [sōtēr]. This great
word is common in Luke and Paul and seldom elsewhere in the N.T. (Bruce).
The people under Rome’s rule came to call the emperor “Saviour” and Christians took
the word and used it of Christ. See inscriptions (Deissmann, Light from the Ancient
East, p. 344). Christ the Lord [Christos Kurios]. This
combination occurs nowhere else in the N.T. and it is not clear what it really means.
Luke is very fond of [Kurios] (Lord) where the other Gospels have
Jesus. It may mean “Christ the Lord,” “Anointed Lord,” “Messiah, Lord,” “The Messiah,
the Lord,” “An Anointed One, a Lord,” or “Lord Messiah.” It occurs once in the LXX
(La 4:20) and is in Ps. of Sol. 17:36. Ragg suggests that our phrase
“the Lord Jesus Christ” is really involved in “A Saviour (Jesus) which is
Christ the Lord.” See on Mt 1:1 for Christ and Mt 21:3 for Lord.
2:13 Host [stratias]. A military term for a band
of soldiers common in the ancient Greek. Bengel says: “Here the army announces peace.”
Praising [ainountōn]. Construction according to sense (plural, though
[stratias] is singular).
2:14 Among men in whom he is well pleased [en anthrōpois
eudokias]. The Textus Receptus (Authorized Version also has [eudokia],
but the genitive [eudokias] is undoubtedly correct, supported by the oldest
and best uncials.) (Aleph, A B D W). C has a lacuna here. Plummer
justly notes how in this angelic hymn Glory and Peace correspond, in the highest
and on earth, to God and among men of goodwill. It would be possible to connect
“on earth” with “the highest” and also to have a triple division. There has been
much objection raised to the genitive [eudokias], the correct text. But it
makes perfectly good sense and better sense. As a matter of fact real peace on earth
exists only among those who are the subjects of God’s goodwill, who are characterized
by goodwill toward God and man. This word [eudokia] we have already had in Mt 11:26. It does not occur in the ancient Greek. The word is confined to
Jewish and Christian writings, though the papyri furnish instances of [eudokēsis]. Wycliff
has it “to men of goodwill.”
2:15 Said to one another [elaloun pros allēlous].
Imperfect tense, inchoative, “began to speak,” each to the other. It suggests also
repetition, they kept saying, Now [dē]. A particle of urgency.
This thing [to rhēma touto]. A Hebraistic and vernacular use of [rhēma]
(something said) as something done. See on Lu 1:65. The ancient Greek used
[logos] in this same way.
2:16 With haste [speusantes]. Aorist active participle
of simultaneous action. Found [aneuran]. Second aorist active indicative
of a common Greek verb [aneuriskō], but only in Luke in the N.T. The compound
[ana] suggests a search before finding.
2:17 Made known [egnōrisan]. To others (verse 18) besides Joseph and Mary. The verb is common from Aeschylus on,
from the root of [ginōskō] (to know). It is both transitive and intransitive
in the N.T.
2:19 Kept [sunetērei]. Imperfect active. She kept
on keeping together [sun-] all these things. They were meat and drink to
her. She was not astonished, but filled with holy awe. The verb occurs from Aristotle
on. She could not forget. But did not Mary keep also a Baby Book? And may not Luke
have seen it? Pondering [sunballousa]. An old Greek word. Placing
together for comparison. Mary would go over each detail in the words of Gabriel
and of the shepherds and compare the sayings with the facts so far developed and
brood over it all with a mother’s high hopes and joy.
2:21 His name was called Jesus [kai eklēthē to onoma
autou Iēsous]. The [kai] is left untranslated or has the sense of “then”
in the apodosis. The naming was a part of the ceremony of circumcision as is shown
also in the case of John the Baptist (Lu 1:59-66).
2:22 The days of their purification [hai hēmerai tou
katharismou autōn]. The old manuscripts have “their” [autōn] instead
of “her” [autēs] of the later documents. But it is not clear whether “their”
refers to Mary and Joseph as is true of “they brought” or to Mary and the child.
The mother was Levitically unclean for forty days after the birth of a son (Le
12:1-8). To present him to the Lord [parastēsai tōi Kuriōi].
Every first-born son was thus redeemed by the sacrifice (Ex 13:2-12)
as a memorial of the sparing of the Israelitish families (Nu 18:15f.).
The cost was about two dollars and a half in our money.
2:23 In the law of the Lord [en nomōi Kuriou]. No
articles, but definite by preposition and genitive. Vincent notes that “law” occurs
in this chapter five times. Paul (Gal 4:4) will urge that Jesus “was
made under the law” as Luke here explains. The law did not require that the child
be brought to Jerusalem. The purification concerned the mother, the presentation
the son.
2:24 A pair of turtledoves, or two young pigeons [Zeugos
trugonōn ē duo nossous peristerōn]. The offspring of the poor, costing about
sixteen cents, while a lamb would cost nearly two dollars. The “young of pigeons”
is the literal meaning.
2:25 Devout [eulabēs]. Used only by Luke (Ac
2:5; 8:2; 22:12) in the N.T. Common in ancient Greek from Plato on. It means
taking hold well or carefully [eu] and [labein] and so reverently,
circumspectly. Looking for the consolation of Israel [prosdechomenos paraklēsin
tou Israel]. Old Greek verb to admit to one’s presence (Lu 15:2)
and then to expect as here and of Anna in verse 38. Paraklēsin here means the Messianic hope
(Isa 11:10; 40:1),
calling to one’s side for cheer. Upon him [ep’ auton]. This is the
explanation of his lively Messianic hope. It was due to the Holy Spirit. Simeon
and Anna are representatives of real piety in this time of spiritual dearth and
deadness.
2:26 It had been revealed unto him [ēn autōi kechrēmatismenon].
Periphrastic past perfect passive indicative. Common Greek verb. First to transact
business from [chrēma] and that from [chraomai], to use, make use
of; then to do business with public officials, to give advice (judges, rulers, kings),
then to get the advice of the Delphic and other oracles (Diodorus, Plutarch).
The LXX and Josephus use it of God’s commands. A Fayum papyrus of 257 B.C. has the
substantive [chrēmastismos] for a divine response (cf. Ro 11:4). See Deissmann, Light From the Ancient East, p. 153.
Before [prin ē]. Classic Greek idiom after a negative to have subjunctive
as here (only example in the N.T.) or the optative after past tense as in Ac 25:16 (subjunctive changed to optative in indirect discourse).
Elsewhere in the N.T. the infinitive follows [prin] as in Mt 1:18.
2:27 When the parents brought in the child Jesus [en
tōi eisagagein tous goneis to paidion Iēsoun]. A neat Greek and Hebrew idiom
difficult to render into English, very common in the LXX; In the bringing the
Child Jesus as to the parents. The articular infinitive and two accusatives
(one the object, the other accusative of general reference). After the
custom of the law [kata to eithismenon tou nomou]. Here the perfect passive
participle [eithismenon], neuter singular from [ethizō] (common Greek
verb, to accustom) is used as a virtual substantive like [to ethos]
in 1:8. Luke alone in the N.T. uses either word save [ethos] in Joh 19:40, though [eiōtha] from [ethō], occurs also in Mt 27:15; Mr 10:1.
2:28 Then he [kai autos]. [Kai] as in 2:21. [Autos], emphatic subject, he after the parents. Arms
[agkalas]. Old Greek word, here only in the N.T. It means the curve or inner
angle of the arm.
2:29 Now lettest thou [nun apolueis]. Present active
indicative, Thou art letting. The Nunc Dimittis, adoration and praise.
It is full of rapture and vivid intensity (Plummer) like the best of the
Psalms. The verb [apoluō] was common for the manumission of slaves and Simeon
here calls himself “thy slave [doulon sou], Lord [Despota], our despot).”
See 2Pe 2:1.
2:31 Of all the peoples [pantōn tōn laōn]. Not merely
Jews. Another illustration of the universality of Luke’s Gospel seen already in 1:70 in the hymn of Zacharias. The second strophe of the song according to
Plummer showing what the Messiah will be to the world after having shown what the
Messiah is to Simeon.
2:32 Revelation to the Gentiles [apokalupsin ethnōn].
Objective genitive. The Messiah is to be light [phōs] for the Gentiles in
darkness (1:70) and glory [doxa] for Israel (cf. Ro 9:1-5; Isa 49:6). The word [ethnos] originally meant just
a crowd or company, then a race or nation, then the nations other than Israel (the
people, [ho laos] or the people of God. The word Gentile is Latin from
gens, a tribe or nation. But the world-wide mission of the Messiah comes out
clearly in these early chapters in Luke.
2:33 His father and his mother [ho patēr autou kai hē
mētēr]. Luke had already used “parents” in 2:27. He by no means intends to deny the Virgin Birth of Jesus so plainly
stated in 1:34-38. He merely employs here the language of ordinary custom. The late
MSS. wrongly read “and Joseph” instead of “his father.” Were marvelling [ēn
thaumazontes]. The masculine gender includes the feminine when both are referred
to. But [ēn] is singular, not [ēsan], the normal imperfect plural
in this periphrastic imperfect. This is due to the wide space between copula and
participle. The copula [ēn] agrees in number with [ho patēr] while
the participle coming last agrees with both [ho pater kai hē mētēr] (cf. Mt 17:3; 22:40). If one wonders why they marvelled at Simeon’s words
after what they had heard from Gabriel, Elisabeth, and the Shepherds, he should
bear in mind that every parent is astonished and pleased at the fine things others
see in the child. It is a mark of unusual insight for others to see so much that
is obvious to the parent. Simeon’s prophecy had gone beyond the angel’s outline
and it was surprising that he should know anything about the child’s destiny.
2:34 Is set for the falling and the rising up of many in Israel
[Keitai eis ptōsin kai anastasin pollōn en tōi Israēl]. Present indicative
of the old defective verb appearing only in present and imperfect in the N.T. Sometimes
it is used as the passive of [tithēmi] as here. The falling of some and the
rising up of others is what is meant. He will be a stumbling-block to some (Isa
8:14; Mt 21:42,44; Ro 9:33; 1Pe 2:16f.) who love darkness rather than light
(Joh 3:19), he will be the cause of rising for others (Ro
6:4,9; Eph 2:6). “Judas despairs, Peter repents: one robber blasphemes,
the other confesses” (Plummer). Jesus is the magnet of the ages. He draws
some, he repels others. This is true of all epoch-making men to some extent.
Spoken against [antilegomenon]. Present passive participle, continuous
action. It is going on today. Nietzsche regarded Jesus Christ as the curse of the
race because he spared the weak.
2:35 A sword [rhomphaia]. A large sword, properly
a long Thracian javelin. It occurs in the LXX of Goliath’s sword (1Sa 17:51).
How little Mary understood the meaning of Simeon’s words that seemed so out of place
in the midst of the glorious things already spoken, a sharp thorn in their roses,
a veritable bitter-sweet. But one day Mary will stand by the Cross of Christ with
this Thracian javelin clean through her soul, [stabat Mater Dolorosa] (Joh
19:25). It is only a parenthesis here, and a passing cloud perhaps passed
over Mary’s heart already puzzled with rapture and ecstasy. May be revealed
[apokaluphthōsin]. Unveiled. First aorist passive subjunctive after [hopōs
an] and expresses God’s purpose in the mission of the Messiah. He is to test
men’s thoughts [dialogismoi] and purposes. They will be compelled to take
a stand for Christ or against him. That is true today.
2:36 One Anna a prophetess [Hanna prophētis]. The
word [prophētis] occurs in the N.T. only here and Re 2:20). In old Greek writers it means a woman who interprets oracles. The
long parenthesis into verse 37 tells of her great age. Montefiore makes it 106 as she was 15 when married,
married 7 years, a widow 84.
2:37 Which departed not [hē ouk aphistato]. Imperfect
indicative middle. She kept on not leaving. The Spirit kept her in the temple as
he led Simon to the temple (Plummer). The case of “the temple” [tou hierou]
is ablative. Night and day [nukta kai hēmeran]. Accusative of duration
of time, all night and all day. She never missed a service in the temple.
2:38 Coming up [epistāsa]. Second aorist active
participle. The word often has the notion of coming suddenly or bursting in as of
Martha in Lu 10:40). But here it probably means coming up and standing by and so hearing
Simeon’s wonderful words so that her words form a kind of footnote to his. Gave
thanks [anthōmologeito]. Imperfect middle of a verb [anthomologeō]
in common use in Greek writers and in the LXX though here alone in the N.T. It had
the idea of a mutual agreement or of saying something before one [anti].
Anna was evidently deeply moved and repeated her thanksgiving and kept speaking
[elalei], imperfect again) “to all them that were looking for [prosdechomenois],
as in 1:35 of Simeon) the redemption of Jerusalem [lutrōsin Ierousalēm]. ”
There was evidently a group of such spirits that gathered in the temple either men
around her and Simeon or whom she met from time to time. There was thus a nucleus
of old saints in Jerusalem prepared for the coming of the Messiah when he at last
appears as the Messiah in Jerusalem (John 2 and 3). These probably all passed
away. But they had a happy hour of hope and joy. The late MSS. have “in Jerusalem”
but “of Jerusalem” is correct. What they meant by the “redemption of Jerusalem”
is not clear, whether political or spiritual or both. Simeon was looking for the
consolation of Israel (2:25) and Zacharias (1:68)
sang of redemption for Israel (Isa 40:2).
2:39 To their own city Nazareth [eis polin heautōn Nazaret].
See on Mt 2:23 about Nazareth. Luke tells nothing of the flight to Egypt and the
reason for the return to Nazareth instead of Bethlehem, the place of the birth of
Jesus as told in Mt 2:13-23. But then neither Gospel gives all the details of this period.
Luke has also nothing about the visit of the wise men (Mt 2:1-12)
as Matthew tells nothing of the shepherds and of Simeon and Anna (Lu 2:8-28).
The two Gospels supplement each other.
2:40 The child grew [ēuxane]. Imperfect indicative
of a very ancient verb [auxanō]. This child grew and waxed strong [ekrataiouto],
imperfect middle), a hearty vigorous little boy [paidion]. Both verbs
Luke used in 1:80 of the growth of John the Baptist as a child. Then he used also [pneumati],
in spirit. Here in addition to the bodily development Luke has “filled with wisdom”
[plēroumenon sophiāi]. Present passive participle, showing that the process
of filling with wisdom kept pace with the bodily growth. If it were only always
true with others! We need not be troubled over this growth in wisdom on the part
of Jesus any more than over his bodily growth. “The intellectual, moral, and spiritual
growth of the Child, like the physical, was real. His was a perfect humanity developing
perfectly, unimpeded by hereditary or acquired defects. It was the first instance
of such a growth in history. For the first time a human infant was realizing the
ideal of humanity” (Plummer). The grace of God [charis theou].
In full measure.
2:41 Every year [kat’ etos]. This idiom only here
in the N.T., a common Greek construction. Every male was originally expected to
appear at the passover, pentecost, and tabernacles (Ex 23:14-17; 34:23; De
16:16). But the Dispersion rendered that impossible. But pious Palestinian
Jews made a point of going at least to the passover. Mary went with Joseph as a
pious habit, though not required by law to go.
2:42 Twelve years old [etōn dōdeka]. Predicate genitive.
Luke does not say that Jesus had not been to Jerusalem before, but at twelve a Jewish
boy became a “son of the law” and began to observe the ordinances, putting on the
phylacteries as a reminder. They went up [anabainontōn autōn]. Genitive
absolute with present active participle, a loose construction here, for the incident
narrated took place after they had gone up, not while they were gong
up. “On their usual going up” (Plummer).
2:43 When they had fulfilled the days [teleiōsantōn
tas hēmeras]. Genitive absolute again, but aorist participle (effective aorist).
“The days” may mean the full seven days (Ex 12:15f.; Le 23:6-8; De
16:3), or the two chief days after which many pilgrims left for home.
As they were returning [en tōi hupostrephein antous]. The articular infinitive
with [en], a construction that Luke often uses (1:21; 2:27).
The boy, Jesus [Iēsous ho pais]. More exactly, “Jesus the boy.” In
verse 40 it was “the child “ [to paidion], here it is “the boy” [ho pais],
no longer the diminutive form). It was not disobedience on the part of “the
boy” that made him remain behind, but intense interest in the services of the temple;
“involuntary preoccupation” (Bruce) held him fast.
2:44 In the company [en tēi sunodiāi]. The caravan
going together on the road or way [sun, hodos], a journey in company, then
by metonymy the company itself. A common Greek word (Plutarch, Strabo, etc.).
The women usually went ahead and the men followed. Joseph may have thought Jesus
was with Mary and Mary that he was with Joseph. “The Nazareth caravan was so long
that it took a whole day to look through it” (Plummer). They sought for
him [anezētoun auton]. Imperfect active. Common Greek verb. Note force
of [ana]. They searched up and down, back and forth, a thorough search and
prolonged, but in vain.
2:45 Seeking for him [anazētountes auton]. Present
participle of the same verb. This was all that was worth while now, finding the
lost boy.
2:46 After three days [meta hēmeras treis]. One
day out, one day back, and on the third day finding him. In the temple [en
tōi hierōi]. Probably on the terrace where members of the Sanhedrin gave public
instruction on sabbaths and feast-days, so probably while the feast was still going
on. The rabbis probably sat on benches in a circle. The listeners on the ground,
among whom was Jesus the boy in a rapture of interest. Both hearing them and
asking them questions [kai akouonta autōn kai eperōtōnta autous]. Paul
sat at the feet of Gamaliel (Ac 22:3). Picture this eager boy alive
with interest. It was his one opportunity in a theological school outside of the
synagogue to hear the great rabbis expound the problems of life. This was the most
unusual of all children, to be sure, in intellectual grasp and power. But it is
a mistake to think that children of twelve do not think profoundly concerning the
issues of life. What father or mother has ever been able to answer a child’s questions?
2:47 Were amazed [existanto]. Imperfect indicative
middle, descriptive of their continued and repeated astonishment. Common verb [existēmi]
meaning that they stood out of themselves as if their eyes were bulging out. The
boy had a holy thirst for knowledge (Plummer), and he used a boy’s way of
learning. At his understanding [epi tēi sunesei]. Based on [epi],
the grasp and comprehension from [suniēmi], comparing and combining things.
Cf. Mr 12:33. His answers [tais apokrisesin autou]. It is not difficult
to ask hard questions, but this boy had astounding answers to their questions, revealing
his amazing intellectual and spiritual growth.
2:48 They were astonished [exeplagēsan]. Second
aorist passive indicative of an old Greek word [ekplēssō], to strike out,
drive out by a blow. Joseph and Mary “were struck out” by what they saw and heard.
Even they had not fully realized the power in this wonderful boy. Parents often
fail to perceive the wealth of nature in their children.
2:49 Son [teknon]. Child, literally. It was natural
for Mary to be the first to speak. Why [Ti]. The mother’s reproach
of the boy is followed by a confession of negligence on her part and of Joseph (sorrowing,
[odunōmenoi]. Thy father [ho pater sou]. No contradiction in
this. Alford says: “Up to this time Joseph had been so called by the holy child
himself, but from this time never.” Sought [ezētoumen]. Imperfect
tense describing the long drawn out search for three days. How is it that
[Ti hoti]. The first words of Jesus preserved to us. This crisp Greek idiom
without copula expresses the boy’s amazement that his parents should not know that
there was only one possible place in Jerusalem for him. I must be [dei
einai me]. Messianic consciousness of the necessity laid on him. Jesus often
uses [dei] (must) about his work. Of all the golden dreams of any
boy of twelve here is the greatest. In my Father’s house [en tois tou
patros mou]. Not “about my Father’s business,” but “in my Father’s house” (cf. Ge 41:51). Common Greek idiom. And note “my,” not “our.” When the
boy first became conscious of his peculiar relation to the Father in heaven we do
not know. But he has it now at twelve and it will grow within him through the years
ahead in Nazareth.
2:50 They understood not [ou sunēkan]. First aorist
active indicative (one of the k aorists). Even Mary with all her previous
preparation and brooding was not equal to the dawning of the Messianic consciousness
in her boy. “My Father is God,” Jesus had virtually said, “and I must be in His
house.” Bruce observes that a new era has come when Jesus calls God “Father,” not
[Despotes]. ”Even we do not yet fully understand” (Bruce) what Jesus
the boy here said.
2:51 He was subject unto them [ēn hupotassomenos autois].
Periphrastic imperfect passive. He continued subject unto them, this wondrous boy
who really knew more than parents and rabbis, this gentle, obedient, affectionate
boy. The next eighteen years at Nazareth (Lu 3:23) he remained growing
into manhood and becoming the carpenter of Nazareth (Mr 6:3) in succession
to Joseph (Mt 13:55) who is mentioned here for the last time. Who
can tell the wistful days when Jesus waited at Nazareth for the Father to call him
to his Messianic task? Kept [dietērei]. Imperfect active. Ancient
Greek word [diatēreō], but only here and Ac 15:29 in the N.T. though in Ge 37:11. She kept thoroughly [dia] all these recent sayings (or things,
[rhēmata]. In 2:19 [sunetērei] is the word used of Mary after the shepherds left.
These she kept pondering and comparing all the things. Surely she has a full heart
now. Could she foresee how destiny would take Jesus out beyond her mother’s reach?
2:52 Advanced in wisdom and stature [proekopten tēi
sophiāi kai hēlikiāi]. Imperfect active, he kept cutting his way forward as
through a forest or jungle as pioneers did. He kept growing in stature [hēlikia]
may mean age, as in 12:25, but stature here) and in wisdom (more than mere knowledge).
His physical, intellectual, moral, spiritual development was perfect. “At each stage
he was perfect for that stage” (Plummer). In favour [chariti].
Or grace. This is ideal manhood to have the favour of God and men.
Chapter 3
3:1 Now in the fifteenth year [en etei de pentekaidekatōi]. Tiberius
Caesar was ruler in the provinces two years before Augustus Caesar died. Luke makes
a six-fold attempt here to indicate the time when John the Baptist began his ministry.
John revived the function of the prophet [Ecce Homo], p. 2) and it was a momentous event after centuries of prophetic silence.
Luke begins with the Roman Emperor, then mentions Pontius Pilate Procurator of Judea,
Herod Antipas Tetrarch of Galilee (and Perea), Philip, Tetrarch of Iturea
and Trachonitis, Lysanias, Tetrarch of Abilene (all with the genitive absolute construction)
and concludes with the high-priesthood of Annas and Caiaphas (son-in-law and successor
of Annas). The ancients did not have our modern system of chronology, the
names of rulers as here being the common way. Objection has been made to the mention
of Lysanias here because Josephus (Ant.XXVII. I) tells of a Lysanias
who was King of Abila up to B.C. 36 as the one referred to by Luke with the wrong
date. But an inscription has been found on the site of Abilene with mention of “Lysanias
the tetrarch” and at the time to which Luke refers (see my Luke the Historian
in the Light of Research, pp. 167f.). So Luke is vindicated again by
the rocks.
3:2 The Word of God came unto John [egeneto rhēma theou
epi Iōanēn]. The great epoch marked by [egeneto] rather than [ēn].
[Rhēma theou] is some particular utterance of God (Plummer), common in LXX,
here alone in the N.T. Then John is introduced as the son of Zacharias according
to Chapter 1. Matthew describes him as the Baptist, Mark as the Baptizer. No other
Gospel mentions Zacharias. Mark begins his Gospel here, but Matthew and Luke have
two Infancy Chapters before. Luke alone tells of the coming of the word to John.
All three Synoptics locate him “in the wilderness” [en tēi erēmōi] as here, Mr 1:4; Mt 3:1 (adding “of Judea”).
3:3 All the region round about Jordan [pāsan perichōron
tou Iordanou]. The wilderness was John’s abode (1:80) so that
he began preaching where he was. It was the plain (Ge 13:10f.) or
valley of the Jordan, El Ghor, as far north as Succoth (2Ch 4:17).
Sometimes he was on the eastern bank of the Jordan (Joh 10:40), though
usually on the west side. His baptizing kept him near the river. The baptism
of repentance unto remission of sins [baptisma metanoias eis aphesin hamartiōn].
The same phrase as in Mr 1:4, which see for discussion of these important words. The word remission
[aphesis] “occurs in Luke more frequently than in all the other New Testament
writers combined” (Vincent). In medical writers it is used for the relaxing
of disease.
3:4 As it is written [hōs gegraptai]. The regular
formula for quotation, perfect passive indicative of [graphō]. Isaiah the
prophet [Esaiou tou prophētou]. The same phrase in Mr 1:2 (correct text)
and Mt 3:3. Mark, as we have seen, adds a quotation from Mal 3:1 and
Luke gives verses 4 and 5 of Isa. 40 not in
Matthew or Mark (Lu 3:5,6). See Mt 3:3; Mr 1:3 for discussion of Luke 4:4.
3:5 Valley [pharagx]. Here only in the N.T., though
in the LXX and ancient Greek. It is a ravine or valley hedged in by precipices.
Shall be filled [plērōthēsetai]. Future passive indicative of [plēroō]. In
1845 when the Sultan visited Brusa the inhabitants were called out to clear the
roads of rocks and to fill up the hollows. Oriental monarchs often did this very
thing. A royal courier would go ahead to issue the call. So the Messiah sends his
herald (John) before him to prepare the way for him. Isaiah described the
preparation for the Lord’s triumphal march and John used it with great force.
Hill [bounos]. Called a Cyrenaic word by Herodotus, but later Greek writers
use it as does the LXX. Brought low [tapeinōthēsetai]. Future passive
indicative of [tapeinoō]. Literal meaning here of a verb common in the metaphorical
sense. Crooked [skolia]. Common word, curved, opposite of [orthos]
or [euthus], straight.
3:6 All flesh [pāsa sarx]. Used in the N.T. of the
human race alone, though in the LXX brutes are included. The salvation of God
[to sotērion tou theou]. The saving act of God. This phrase aptly describes
Luke’s Gospel which has in mind the message of Christ for all men. It is the universal
Gospel.
3:7 To the multitude that went out [tois exporeuomenois
ochlois]. Plural, Multitudes. The present participle also notes the repetition
of the crowds as does [elegen] (imperfect), he used to say. Mt 3:7-10 singles out the message of John to the Pharisees and Sadducees,
which see for discussion of details. Luke gives a summary of his preaching to the
crowds with special replies to these inquiries: the multitudes, 10, 11, the publicans 12,13, the soldiers
14. To be baptized of him [baptisthēnai hup’ autou]. This is
the purpose of their coming. Mt 3:7 has simply “to his baptism.” John’s metaphors are from the wilderness
(vipers, fruits, axe, slave boy loosing sandals, fire, fan, thrashing-floor, garner,
chaff, stones). Who warned you? [tis hepedeixen humin;]. The
verb is like our “suggest” by proof to eye, ear, or brain (Lu 6:47; 12:5;
Ac 9:16; 20:35; Mt 3:7). Nowhere else in the N.T. though common ancient
word [hupodeiknumi], show under, point out, give a tip or private hint).
3:10 Asked [epērōtōn]. Imperfect tense, repeatedly
asked. What then must we do? [ti oun poiēsōmen;]. Deliberative aorist
subjunctive. More exactly, What then are we to do, What then shall we
do? Same construction in verses 12, 14. The [oun] refers to the severe things already said by John
(Lu 3:7-9).
3:11 Coats [chitōnas]. The inner and less necessary
undergarment. The outer indispensable [himation] is not mentioned. Note the
specific and different message to each class. John puts his finger on the weaknesses
of the people right before him.
3:12 Also publicans [kai telōnai]. We have had the
word already in Matthew (Mt 5:46; 9:10; 11:19;
18:17; 21:31f.) and
Mark (Mr 11:15f.). It is sometimes coupled with harlots and other
sinners, the outcasts of society. The word is made up from [telos], tax,
and [ōneomai], to buy, and is an old one. The renter or collector of taxes
was not popular anywhere, but least of all when a Jew collected taxes for the Romans
and did it by terrible graft and extortions. Extort [prassete]. The
verb means only to do or practice, but early the tax-collectors learned how to “do”
the public as regular “blood-suckers.” Lucian links them with crows and sycophants.
3:14 Soldiers also [kai strateuomenoi]. Men on service,
militantes rather than milites (Plummer). So Paul in 2Ti 2:4. An old word like
[stratiōtēs], soldier. Some of these soldiers
acted as police to help the publicans. But they were often rough and cruel. Do
violence to no man [mēdena diaseisēte]. Here only in the N.T., but in
the LXX and common in ancient Greek. It means to shake (seismic disturbance, earthquake)
thoroughly [dia] and so thoroughly to terrify, to extort money or property
by intimidating (3Macc. 7:21). The Latin employs concutere, so. It
was a process of blackmail to which Socrates refers (Xenophon, Memorabilia,
ii. 9,1). This was a constant temptation to soldiers. Might does not make
right with Jesus. Neither exact anything wrongfully [mēde sukophantēsēte].
In Athens those whose business it was to inform against any one whom they might
find exporting figs out of Attica were called fig-showers or sycophants [sukophantai].
From [sukon], fig, and [phainō], show. Some modern scholars reject
this explanation since no actual examples of the word meaning merely a fig-shower
have been found. But without this view it is all conjectural. From the time of Aristophanes
on it was used for any malignant informer or calumniator. These soldiers were tempted
to obtain money by informing against the rich, blackmail again. So the word comes
to mean to accuse falsely. The sycophants came to be a regular class of informers
or slanderers in Athens. Socrates is quoted by Xenophon as actually advising Crito
to employ one in self-defence, like the modern way of using one gunman against another.
Demosthenes pictures a sycophant as one who “glides about the market like a scorpion,
with his venomous sting all ready, spying out whom he may surprise with misfortune
and ruin and from whom he can most easily extort money, by threatening him with
an action dangerous in its consequences” (quoted by Vincent). The word occurs
only in Luke in the N.T., here and in Lu 19:8 in the confession of Zaccheus. It occurs in the LXX and often in
the old Greek. Be content with your wages [arkeisthe tois opsōniois humōn].
Discontent with wages was a complaint of mercenary soldiers. This word for wages
was originally anything cooked [opson], cooked food), and bought
(from [ōneomai], to buy). Hence, “rations,” “pay,” wages. [Opsarion],
diminutive of [opson], was anything eaten with bread like broiled fish. So
[opsōnion] comes to mean whatever is bought to be eaten with bread and then
a soldier’s pay or allowance (Polybius, and other late Greek writers) as
in 1Co 9:7. Paul uses the singular of a preacher’s pay (2Co 11:8)
and the plural of the wages of sin (Ro 6:23) = death (death is the
diet of sin).
3:15 Were in expectation [prosdokōntos]. Genitive
absolute of this striking verb already seen in 1:21. Reasoned [dialogizomenōn]. Genitive absolute again. John’s
preaching about the Messiah and the kingdom of God stirred the people deeply and
set them to wondering. Whether haply he were the Christ [mēpote autos
eiē ho Christos]. Optative [eiē] in indirect question changed from the
indicative in the direct (Robertson, Grammar, p. 1031). John wrought
no miracles and was not in David’s line and yet he moved people so mightily that
they began to suspect that he himself [autos] was the Messiah. The Sanhedrin
will one day send a formal committee to ask him this direct question (Joh
1:19).
3:16 He that is mightier than I [ho ischuroteros mou].
Like Mr 1:7, “the one mightier than I.” Ablative case [mou] of comparison.
John would not turn aside for the flattery of the crowd. He was able to take his
own measure in comparison with the Messiah and was loyal to him (see my John
the Loyal). Compare Lu 3:16 with Mr 1:7f. and
Mt 3:11f. for discussion of details. Luke has “fire” here after “baptize
with the Holy Ghost” as Mt 3:11, which see. This bold Messianic picture in the Synoptic Gospels shows
that John saw the Messiah’s coming as a judgment upon the world like fire and the
fan of the thrashing-floor, and with unquenchable fire for the chaff (Lu
3:17; Mt 3:12). But he had the spiritual conception also, the baptism in
the Holy Spirit which will characterize the Messiah’s Mission and so will far transcend
the water baptism which marked the ministry of John.
3:18 Many other exhortations [polla men oun kai hetera].
Literally, many and different things did John [evangelize], [euaggelizeto],
to the people. Luke has given a bare sample of the wonderful messages of the Baptist.
Few as his words preserved are they give a definite and powerful conception of his
preaching.
3:19 Reproved [elegchomenos]. Present passive participle
of [elegchō], an old verb meaning in Homer to treat with contempt, then to
convict (Mt 18:15), to expose (Eph 5:11), to reprove
as here. The substantive [elegchos] means proof (Heb 11:1)
and [elegmos], censure (2Ti 3:16). Josephus (Ant.XVIII.
V.4) shows how repulsive this marriage was to Jewish feeling. Evil things
[ponērōn]. Incorporated into the relative sentence. The word is from [ponos,
poneō], toil, work, and gives the active side of evil, possibly with the notion
of work itself as evil or at least an annoyance. The “evil eye” [ophthalmos ponēros]
in Mr 7:22) was a “mischief working eye” (Vincent). In Mt 6:23
it is a diseased eye. So Satan is “the evil one”
(Mt 5:37; 6:13, etc.). It is a very common adjective in the N.T. as in the older Greek.
Had done [epoiēsen]. Aorist active indicative, not past perfect, merely
a summary constative aorist, he did.
3:20 Added [prosethēken]. First aorist active indicative
(kappa aorist). Common verb [prostithēmi] in all Greek. In N.T. chiefly
in Luke and Acts. Hippocrates used it of applying wet sponges to the head and Galen
of applying a decoction of acorns. There is no evidence that Luke has a medical
turn to the word here. The absence of the conjunction [hoti] (that)
before the next verb [katekleisen] (shut up) is asyndeton. This verb
literally means shut down, possibly with a reference to closing down the
door of the dungeon, though it makes sense as a perfective use of the preposition,
like our “shut up” without a strict regard to the idea of “down.” It is an old and
common verb, though here and Ac 26:10 only in the N.T. See Mt 14:3 for further statement about the prison.
3:21 When all the people were baptised [en tōi baptisthēnai
hapanta ton laon]. The use of the articular aorist infinitive here with [en]
bothers some grammarians and commentators. There is no element of time in the aorist
infinitive. It is simply punctiliar action, literally “in the being baptized as
to all the people.” Luke does not say that all the people were baptized before Jesus
came or were baptized at the same time. It is merely a general statement that Jesus
was baptized in connexion with or at the time of the baptizing of the people as
a whole. Jesus also having been baptized [kai Iēsou baptisthentos].
Genitive absolute construction, first aorist passive participle. In Luke’s sentence
the baptism of Jesus is merely introductory to the descent of the Holy Spirit and
the voice of the Father. For the narrative of the baptism see Mr 1:9; Mt 3:13-16.
And praying [kai proseuchomenou]. Alone
in Luke who so often mentions the praying of Jesus. Present participle and so naturally
meaning that the heaven was opened while Jesus was praying though not necessarily
in answer to his prayer. The heaven was opened [aneōichthēnai ton ouranon].
First aorist passive infinitive with double augment, whereas the infinitive is not
supposed to have any augment. The regular form would be [anoichthēnai] as
in D (Codex Bezae). So the augment appears in the future indicative [kateaxei]
(Mt 12:20) and the second aorist passive subjunctive [kateagōsin]
(Joh 19:31). Such unusual forms appear in the Koinē.This infinitive
here with the accusative of general reference is the subject of [egeneto]
(it came to pass). Mt 3:16 uses the same verb, but Mr 1:10 has [schizomenous], rent asunder.
3:22 Descended [katabēnai]. Same construction as
the preceding infinitive. The Holy Ghost [to pneuma to hagion]. The
Holy Spirit. Mr 1:10 has merely the Spirit [to pneuma] while Mt 3:16
has the Spirit of God [pneuma theou]. In a bodily form
[sōmatikōi eidei]. Alone in Luke who has also “as a dove” [hōs peristeran]
like Matthew and Mark. This probably means that the Baptist saw the vision that
looked like a dove. Nothing is gained by denying the fact or possibility of the
vision that looked like a dove. God manifests his power as he will. The symbolism
of the dove for the Holy Spirit is intelligible. We are not to understand that this
was the beginning of the Incarnation of Christ as the Cerinthian Gnostics held.
But this fresh influx of the Holy Spirit may have deepened the Messianic consciousness
of Jesus and certainly revealed him to the Baptist as God’s Son. And a voice
came out of heaven [kai phōnēn ex ouranou genesthai]. Same construction
of infinitive with accusative of general reference. The voice of the Father to the
Son is given here as in Mr 1:11, which see, and Mt 3:17 for discussion of the variation there. The Trinity here manifest
themselves at the baptism of Jesus which constitutes the formal entrance of Jesus
upon his Messianic ministry. He enters upon it with the Father’s blessing and approval
and with the power of the Holy Spirit upon him. The deity of Christ here appears
in plain form in the Synoptic Gospels. The consciousness of Christ is as clear on
this point here as in the Gospel of John where the Baptist describes him after his
baptism as the Son of God (Joh 1:34).
3:23 Jesus Himself [autos Iēsous]. Emphatic intensive
pronoun calling attention to the personality of Jesus at this juncture. When he
entered upon his Messianic work. When he began to teach [archomenos].
The words “to teach” are not in the Greek text. The Authorized Version “began to
be about thirty years of age,” is an impossible translation. The Revised Version
rightly supplies “to teach” [didaskein] after the present participle [archomenos]. Either
the infinitive or the participle can follow [archomai], usually the infinitive
in the Koinē.It is not necessary to supply anything (Ac 1:22).
Was about thirty years of age [ēn hōsei etōn triakonta]. Tyndale has
it right “Jesus was about thirty yere of age when he beganne.” Luke does not commit
himself definitely to precisely thirty years as the age of Christ. The Levites entered
upon full service at that age, but that proves nothing about Jesus. God’s prophets
enter upon their task when the word of God comes to them. Jesus may have been a
few months under or over thirty or a year or two less or more. Being Son (as
was supposed) of Joseph, the son of Heli (ōn huios hōs enomizeto Iōsēph
tou Helei]. For the discussion of the genealogy of Jesus see on Mt 1:1-17.
The two genealogies differ very widely and many theories have been proposed about
them. At once one notices that Luke begins with Jesus and goes back to Adam, the
Son of God, while Matthew begins with Abraham and comes to “Joseph the husband of
Mary of whom was born Jesus who is called Christ” (Mt 1:16). Matthew
employs the word “begot” each time, while Luke has the article [tou] repeating
[huiou] (Son) except before Joseph. They agree in the mention of
Joseph, but Matthew says that “Jacob begat Joseph” while Luke calls “Joseph the
son of Heli.” There are other differences, but this one makes one pause. Joseph,
of course, did not have two fathers. If we understand Luke to be giving the real
genealogy of Jesus through Mary, the matter is simple enough. The two genealogies
differ from Joseph to David except in the cases of Zorobabel and Salathiel. Luke
evidently means to suggest something unusual in his genealogy by the use of the
phrase “as was supposed” [hōs enomizeto]. His own narrative in Lu 1:26-38 has shown that Joseph was not the actual father of Jesus. Plummer
objects that, if Luke is giving the genealogy of Jesus through Mary, [huios]
must be used in two senses here (son as was supposed of Joseph, and grandson through
Mary of Heli). But that is not an unheard of thing. In neither list does
Matthew or Luke give a complete genealogy. Just as Matthew uses “begat” for descent,
so does Luke employ “son” in the same way for descendant. It was natural for Matthew,
writing for Jews, to give the legal genealogy through Joseph, though he took pains
to show in Mt 1:16,18-25 that Joseph was not the actual father of Jesus. It was equally
natural for Luke, a Greek himself and writing for the whole world, to give the actual
genealogy of Jesus through Mary. It is in harmony with Pauline universality (Plummer)
that Luke carries the genealogy back to Adam and does not stop with Abraham. It
is not clear why Luke adds “the Son of God” after Adam (3:38). Certainly
he does not mean that Jesus is the Son of God only in the sense that Adam is. Possibly
he wishes to dispose of the heathen myths about the origin of man and to show that
God is the Creator of the whole human race, Father of all men in that sense. No
mere animal origin of man is in harmony with this conception.
Chapter 4
4:1 Full of the Holy Spirit [plērēs pneumatos hagiou]. An evident
allusion to the descent of the Holy Spirit on Jesus at his baptism (Lu 3:21f.).
The distinctness of the Persons in the Trinity is shown there, but with evident
unity. One recalls also Luke’s account of the overshadowing of Mary by the Holy
Spirit (1:35). Mt 4:1 says that “Jesus was led of the Spirit” while Mr 1:12 states that “the Spirit driveth him forth” which see for discussion.
“Jesus had been endowed with supernatural power; and He was tempted to make use
of it in furthering his own interests without regard to the Father’s will” (Plummer).
Was led by the Spirit [ēgeto en toi pneumati]. Imperfect passive,
continuously led. [En] may be the instrumental use as often, for Mt 4:1 has here [hupo] of direct agency. But Matthew has the aorist
passive [anēchthē] which may be ingressive as he has [eis tēn erēmon]
(into the wilderness) while Luke has [en tōi erēmōi] (in the wilderness).
At any rate Luke affirms that Jesus was now continuously under the guidance of the
Holy Spirit. Hence in this same sentence he mentions the Spirit twice. During
the forty days [hēmerās tesserakonta]. Accusative of duration of time,
to be connected with “led” not with “tempted.” He was led in the Spirit during these
forty days (cf. De 8:2, forty years). The words are amphibolous also in Mr 1:13. Mt 4:2 seems to imply that the three recorded temptations came at the close
of the fasting for forty days. That can be true and yet what Luke states be true
also. These three may be merely specimens and so “representative of the struggle
which continued throughout the whole period” (Plummer).
4:2 Being tempted [peirazomenos]. Present passive
participle and naturally parallel with the imperfect passive [ēgeto] (was
led) in verse 1. This is another instance of poor verse division which should have come
at the end of the sentence. See on Mt 4:1; Mr 1:13 for the words “tempt” and “devil.”
The devil challenged the Son of man though also the Son of God. It was a contest
between Jesus, full of the Holy Spirit, and the slanderer of men. The devil had
won with Adam and Eve. He has hopes of triumph over Jesus. The story of this conflict
is given only in Mt 4:1-11; Lu 4:1-13. There is a mere mention of it in Mr 1:12f. So then here is a specimen of the Logia of Jesus (Q), a
non-Markan portion of Matthew and Luke, the earliest document about Christ. The
narrative could come ultimately only from Christ himself. It is noteworthy that
it bears all the marks of the high conception of Jesus as the Son of God found in
the Gospel of John and in Paul and Hebrews, the rest of the New Testament in fact,
for Mark, Matthew, Luke, Acts, Peter, and Jude follow in this same strain. The point
is that modern criticism has revealed the Messianic consciousness of Jesus as God’s
Son at his Baptism and in his Temptations at the very beginning of his ministry
and in the oldest known documents about Christ (The Logia, Mark’s Gospel).
He did eat nothing [ouk ephagen ouden]. Second aorist (constative)
active indicative of the defective verb [esthiō]. Mark does not give the fast. Mt 4:2 has the aorist active participle [nēsteusas] which usually
means a religious fast for purposes of devotion. That idea is not excluded by Luke’s
words. The entrance of Jesus upon his Messianic ministry was a fit time for this
solemn and intense consecration. This mental and spiritual strain would naturally
take away the appetite and there was probably nothing at hand to eat. The weakness
from the absence of food gave the devil his special opportunity to tempt Jesus which
he promptly seized. When they were completed [suntelestheisōn autōn].
Genitive absolute with the first aorist passive participle feminine plural because
[hemerōn] (days) is feminine. According to Luke the hunger [epeinasen],
became hungry, ingressive aorist active indicative) came at the close of
the forty days as in Mt 4:2.
4:3 The Son of God [huios tou theou]. No article
as in Mt 4:3. So refers to the relationship as Son of God rather than to the office
of Messiah. Manifest reference to the words of the Father in Lu 3:22. Condition of the first class as in Matthew. The devil assumes that
Jesus is Son of God. This stone [tōi lithōi toutōi]. Perhaps pointing
to a particular round stone that looked in shape and size like a loaf of bread.
Stanley (Sinai and Palestine, p. 154) on Mt. Carmel found crystallizations
of stones called “Elijah’s melons.” The hunger of Jesus opened the way for the diabolic
suggestion designed to inspire doubt in Jesus toward his Father. Matthew has “these
stones.” Bread [artos]. Better “loaf.” For discussion of this first
temptation see on Mt 4:3f. Jesus felt the force of each of the temptations without
yielding at all to the sin involved. See discussion on Matthew also for reality
of the devil and the objective and subjective elements in the temptations. Jesus
quotes De 8:3 in reply to the devil.
4:5 The world [tēs oikoumenēs]. The inhabited world.
In Mt 4:8 it is [tou kosmou]. In a moment of time [en stigmēi
chronou]. Only in Luke and the word [stigmē] nowhere else in the N.T.
(from [stizō], to prick, or puncture), a point or dot. In Demosthenes,
Aristotle, Plutarch. Like our “second” of time or tick of the clock. This panorama
of all the kingdoms of the world and the glory of them in a moment of time was mental,
a great feat of the imagination (a mental satanic “movie” performance),
but this fact in no way discredits the idea of the actual visible appearance of
Satan also. This second temptation in Luke is the third in Matthew’s order. Luke’s
order is geographical (wilderness, mountain, Jerusalem). Matthew’s is climacteric
(hunger, nervous dread, ambition). There is a climax in Luke’s order also
(sense, man, God). There is no way to tell the actual order.
4:6 All this authority [tēn exousian tautēn hapasan]. Mt 4:9 has “all these things.” Luke’s report is more specific. And the
glory of them [kai tēn doxan autōn]. Mt 4:8 has this in the statement of what the devil did, not what he said.
For it hath been delivered unto me [hoti emoi paradedotai]. Perfect
passive indicative. Satan here claims possession of world power and Jesus does not
deny it. It may be due to man’s sin and by God’s permission. Jesus calls Satan the
ruler of this world (Joh 12:31; 14:30; 16:11). To whomsoever I
will [hoi an thelō]. Present subjunctive with [an] in an indefinite
relative sentence. This audacious claim, if allowed, makes one wonder whether some
of the world rulers are not, consciously or unconsciously, agents of the devil.
In several American cities there has been proven a definite compact between the
police and the underworld of crime. But the tone of Satan here is one of superiority
to Jesus in world power. He offers him a share in it on one condition.
4:7 Wilt worship before me [proskunēsēis enōpion emou]. Mt 4:9 has it more bluntly “worship me.” That is what it really comes to,
though in Luke the matter is more delicately put. It is a condition of the third
class [ean] and the subjunctive). Luke has it “thou therefore if”
[su oun ean], in a very emphatic and subtle way. It is the ingressive aorist
[proskunēsēis], just bow the knee once up here in my presence. The temptation
was for Jesus to admit Satan’s authority by this act of prostration (fall down and
worship), a recognition of authority rather than of personal merit. It
shall all be thine [estai sou pāsa]. Satan offers to turn over all the
keys of world power to Jesus. It was a tremendous grand-stand play, but Jesus saw
at once that in that case he would be the agent of Satan in the rule of the world
by bargain and graft instead of the Son of God by nature and world ruler by conquest
over Satan. The heart of Satan’s program is here laid bare. Jesus here rejected
the Jewish idea of the Messiah as an earthly ruler merely. “He rejects Satan as
an ally, and thereby has him as an implacable enemy” (Plummer.)
4:8 Thou shalt worship [proskunēseis]. Satan used
this verb to Jesus who turns it against him by the quotation from De 6:13. Jesus clearly perceived that one could not worship both Satan and
God. He had to choose whom he would serve. Luke does not give the words, “Get thee
hence, Satan” (Mt 4:10), for he has another temptation to narrate.
4:9 Led him [ēgagen]. Aorist active indicative of
[agō]. Mt 4:5 has [paralambanei] (dramatic present).
The wing of the temple [to pterugion tou hierou]. See on Mt 4:5.
It is not easy to determine precisely what it was. From hence [enteuthen].
This Luke adds to the words in Matthew, which see. To guard thee [tou
diaphulaxai se]. Not in Mt 4:6 quoted by Satan from Ps 91:11,12. Satan does not misquote this Psalm, but he misapplies it and
makes it mean presumptuous reliance on God. This compound verb is very old, but
occurs here alone in the N.T. and that from the LXX. Luke repeats [hoti]
(recitative [hoti] after [gegraptai], is written) after this
part of the quotation.
4:12 It is said [eirētai]. Perfect passive indicative,
stands said, a favourite way of quoting Scripture in the N.T. In Mt 4:7 we have the usual “it is written” [gegraptai]. Here Jesus quotes De 6:16. Each time he uses Deuteronomy against the devil. The LXX is quoted.
It is the volitive future indicative with [ouk], a common prohibition. Jesus
points out to the devil that testing God is not trusting God (Plummer).
4:13 Every temptation [panta peirasmon]. These three
kinds exhaust the avenues of approach (the appetites, the nerves, the ambitions).
Satan tried them all. They formed a cycle (Vincent). Hence “he was in all
points tempted like as we are” (Heb 4:15). “The enemy tried all his
weapons, and was at all points defeated” (Plummer). Probably all during
the forty days the devil tempted him, but three are representatives of all. For
a season [achri kairou]. Until a good opportunity should return, the
language means. We are thus to infer that the devil returned to his attack from
time to time. In the Garden of Gethsemane he tempted Jesus more severely than here.
He was here trying to thwart the purpose of Jesus to go on with his Messianic plans,
to trip him at the start. In Gethsemane the devil tried to make Jesus draw back
from the culmination of the Cross with all its agony and horror. The devil attacked
Jesus by the aid of Peter (Mr 8:33), through the Pharisees (Joh
8:40ff.), besides Gethsemane (Lu 22:42, 53).
4:14 Returned [hupestrepsen]. Luke does not fill
in the gap between the temptations in the wilderness of Judea and the Galilean Ministry.
He follows the outline of Mark. It is John’s Gospel alone that tells of the year
of obscurity (Stalker) in various parts of the Holy Land. In the power
of the Spirit [en tēi dunamei tou pneumatos]. Luke in these two verses
(14, 15) gives a description of the Galilean Ministry with three marked
characteristics (Plummer): the power of the spirit, rapid spread of Christ’s
fame, use of the Jewish synagogues. Luke often notes the power of the Holy Spirit
in the work of Christ. Our word dynamite is this same word [dunamis] (power).
A fame (phēmē]. An old Greek word found in the N.T. only here and Mt 9:26. It is from [phēmi], to say. Talk ran rapidly in every direction.
It assumes the previous ministry as told by John.
4:15 And he taught [kai autos edidasken]. Luke is
fond of this mode of transition so that it is not certain that he means to emphasize
“he himself” as distinct from the rumour about him. It is the imperfect tense, descriptive
of the habit of Jesus. The synagogues were an open door to Jesus before the hostility
of the Pharisees was aroused. Being glorified [doxazomenos]. Present
passive participle, durative action like the imperfect [edidasken]. General
admiration of Jesus everywhere. He was the wonder teacher of his time. Even the
rabbis had not yet learned how to ridicule and oppose Jesus.
4:16 Where he had been brought up [hou ēn tethrammenos].
Past perfect passive periphrastic indicative, a state of completion in past time,
from [trephō], a common Greek verb. This visit is before that recorded in Mr 6:1-6; Mt 13:54-58 which was just before the third tour of Galilee. Here
Jesus comes back after a year of public ministry elsewhere and with a wide reputation
(Lu 4:15). Luke may have in mind 2:51, but for some time now Nazareth had not been his home and that fact
may be implied by the past perfect tense. As his custom was [kata to eiōthos
autōi]. Second perfect active neuter singular participle of an old [ethō]
(Homer), to be accustomed. Literally according to what was customary to
him [autōi], dative case). This is one of the flashlights on the
early life of Jesus. He had the habit of going to public worship in the synagogue
as a boy, a habit that he kept up when a grown man. If the child does not form the
habit of going to church, the man is almost certain not to have it. We have already
had in Matthew and Mark frequent instances of the word synagogue which played such
a large part in Jewish life after the restoration from Babylon. Stood up
[anestē]. Second aorist active indicative and intransitive. Very common verb.
It was the custom for the reader to stand except when the Book of Esther was read
at the feast of Purim when he might sit. It is not here stated that Jesus had been
in the habit of standing up to read here or elsewhere. It was his habit to go to
the synagogue for worship. Since he entered upon his Messianic work his habit was
to teach in the synagogues (Lu 4:15). This was apparently the first
time that he had done so in Nazareth. He may have been asked to read as Paul was
in Antioch in Pisidia (Ac 13:15). The ruler of the synagogue for
that day may have invited Jesus to read and speak because of his now great reputation
as a teacher. Jesus could have stood up voluntarily and appropriately because of
his interest in his home town. To read [anagnōnai]. Second aorist
active infinitive of [anaginōskō], to recognize again the written characters
and so to read and then to read aloud. It appears first in Pindar in the sense of
read and always so in the N.T. This public reading aloud with occasional comments
may explain the parenthesis in Mt 24:15 (Let him that readeth understand).
4:17 Was delivered [epedothē]. First aorist passive
indicative of [epididōmi], to give over to, a common verb. At the proper
stage of the service “the attendant” or “minister” [hupēretēs], under rower)
or “beadle” took out a roll of the law from the ark, unwrapped it, and gave it to
some one to read. On sabbath days some seven persons were asked to read small portions
of the law. This was the first lesson or Parashah.This was followed by a
reading from the prophets and a discourse, the second lesson or Haphtarah.This
last is what Jesus did. The book of the prophet Isaiah [biblion tou prophētou
Esaiou]. Literally, “a roll of the prophet Isaiah.” Apparently Isaiah was handed
to Jesus without his asking for it. But certainly Jesus cared more for the prophets
than for the ceremonial law. It was a congenial service that he was asked to perform.
Jesus used Deuteronomy in his temptations and now Isaiah for this sermon. The Syriac
Sinaitic manuscript has it that Jesus stood up after the attendant handed him the
roll. Opened [anoixas]. Really it was unrolled [anaptuxas]
as Aleph D have it. But the more general term [anoixas] (from [anoigō],
common verb) is probably genuine. [Anaptussō] does not occur in the
N.T. outside of this passage if genuine. Found the place [heuren ton topon].
Second aorist active indicative. He continued to unroll (rolling up the other side)
till he found the passage desired. It may have been a fixed lesson for the day or
it may have been his own choosing. At any rate it was a marvellously appropriate
passage (Isa 61:1,2 with one clause omitted and some words from Isa 58:6). It is a free quotation from the Septuagint. Where it
was written [hou ēn gegrammenon]. Periphrastic pluperfect passive again
as in 4:16.
4:18 Anointed me [echrisen me]. First aorist active
indicative of the verb [chriō] from which Christ [Christos]
is derived, the Anointed One. Isaiah is picturing the Jubilee year and the release
of captives and the return from the Babylonian exile with the hope of the Messiah
through it all. Jesus here applies this Messianic language to himself. “The Spirit
of the Lord is upon me” as was shown at the baptism (Lu 3:21) where
he was also “anointed” for his mission by the Father’s voice (3:22).
To the poor [ptōchois]. Jesus singles this out also as one of the
items to tell John the Baptist in prison (Lu 7:22). Our word Gospel
is a translation of the Greek [Euaggelion], and it is for the poor. He
hath sent me [apestalken me]. Change of tense to perfect active indicative.
He is now on that mission here. Jesus is God’s Apostle to men (Joh
17:3, Whom thou didst send). Proclaim [kēruxai]. As a herald
like Noah (2Pe 2:5). To the captives [aichmalōtois].
Prisoners of war will be released [aichmē], a spear point, and [halōtos],
from [haliskomai], to be captured). Captured by the spear point.
Common word, but here only in the N.T. Set at liberty [aposteilai].
First aorist active infinitive of [apostellō]. Same verb as [apestalken],
above. Brought in here from Isa 58:6. Plummer suggests that Luke inserts it here from memory. But Jesus
could easily have turned back the roll and read it so. Them that are bruised
[tethrausmenous]. Perfect passive participle of [thrauō], an old verb,
but here only in the N.T. It means to break in pieces broken in heart and often
in body as well. One loves to think that Jesus felt it to be his mission to mend
broken hearts like pieces of broken earthenware, real rescue-mission work. Jesus
mends them and sets them free from their limitations.
4:19 The acceptable year of the Lord [eniauton Kuriou
dekton]. He does not mean that his ministry is to be only one year in length
as Clement of Alexandria and Origen argued. That is to turn figures into fact. The
Messianic age has come, Jesus means to say. On the first day of the year of Jubilee
the priests with sound of trumpet proclaimed the blessings of that year (Le
25:8-17). This great passage justly pictures Christ’s conception of his
mission and message.
4:20 He closed the book [ptuxas to biblion]. Aorist
active participle of [ptussō]. Rolled up the roll and gave it back to the
attendant who had given it to him and who put it away again in its case. Sat
down [ekathisen]. Took his seat there as a sign that he was going to
speak instead of going back to his former seat. This was the usual Jewish attitude
for public speaking and teaching (Lu 5:3; Mt 5:1; Mr 4:1; Ac 16:13).
Were fastened on him [ēsan atenizontes autōi]. Periphrastic imperfect
active and so a vivid description. Literally, the eyes of all in the synagogue were
gazing fixedly upon him. The verb [atenizō] occurs in Aristotle and the Septuagint.
It is from the adjective [atenēs] and that from [teinō], to stretch,
and copulative or intensive [a], not [a] privative. The word occurs
in the N.T. here and in 22:56, ten times in Acts, and in 2Co 3:7, 13. Paul uses it of the steady eager gaze of the people at Moses
when he came down from the mountain when he had been communing with God. There was
something in the look of Jesus here that held the people spellbound for the moment,
apart from the great reputation with which he came to them. In small measure every
effective speaker knows what it is to meet the eager expectations of an audience.
4:21 And he began to say [ērxato de legein]. Aorist
ingressive active indicative and present infinitive. He began speaking. The moment
of hushed expectancy was passed. These may or may not be the first words uttered
here by Jesus. Often the first sentence is the crucial one in winning an audience.
Certainly this is an arresting opening sentence. Hath been fulfilled [peplērōtai].
Perfect passive indicative, stands fulfilled. “Today this scripture (Isa
61:1, 2, just read) stands fulfilled in your ears.” It was a most amazing
statement and the people of Nazareth were quick to see the Messianic claim involved.
Jesus could only mean that the real year of Jubilee had come, that the Messianic
prophecy of Isaiah had come true today, and that in him they saw the Messiah of
prophecy. There are critics today who deny that Jesus claimed to be the Messiah.
To be able to do that, they must reject the Gospel of John and all such passages
as this one. And it is no apocalyptic eschatological Messiah whom Jesus here sets
forth, but the one who forgives sin and binds up the broken-hearted. The words were
too good to be true and to be spoken here at Nazareth by one of their own townsmen!
4:22 Bare him witness [emarturoun]. Imperfect active,
perhaps inchoative. They all began to bear witness that the rumours were not exaggerations
(4:14) as they had supposed, but had foundation in fact if this discourse
or its start was a fair sample of his teaching. The verb [martureō] is a
very old and common one. It is frequent in Acts, Paul’s Epistles, and the Johannine
books. The substantive [martur] is seen in our English [martyr], one
who witnesses even by his death to his faith in Christ. And wondered [kai
ethaumazon]. Imperfect active also, perhaps inchoative also. They began to marvel
as he proceeded with his address. This verb is an old one and common in the Gospels
for the attitude of the people towards Jesus. At the words of grace [epi
tois logois tēs charitos]. See on Lu 1:30; 2:52 for this wonderful word [charis]
so full of meaning and so often in the N.T. The genitive case (case of genus or
kind) here means that the words that came out of the mouth of Jesus in a
steady stream (present tense, [ekporeuomenois] were marked by fascination
and charm. They were “winning words” as the context makes plain, though they were
also “gracious” in the Pauline sense of “grace.” There is no necessary antithesis
in the ideas of graceful and gracious in these words of Jesus. Is not this Joseph’s
son? [Ouchi huios estin Iōsēph houtos;]. Witness and wonder gave way
to bewilderment as they began to explain to themselves the situation. The use of
[ouchi] intensive form of [ouk] in a question expects the answer “yes.”
Jesus passed in Nazareth as the son of Joseph as Luke presents him in 3:23. He does not stop here to correct this misconception because the truth
has been already amply presented in 1:28-38; 2:49. This popular conception of Jesus as the son of Joseph appears
also in Joh 1:45. The puzzle of the people was due to their previous knowledge of
Jesus as the carpenter (Mr 6:3; the carpenter’s son, Mt 13:55). For him now to appear as the Messiah in Nazareth where
he had lived and laboured as the carpenter was a phenomenon impossible to credit
on sober reflection. So the mood of wonder and praise quickly turned with whispers
and nods and even scowls to doubt and hostility, a rapid and radical transformation
of emotion in the audience.
4:23 Doubtless [pantōs]. Adverb. Literally, at any
rate, certainly, assuredly. Cf. Ac 21:22; 28:4. This parable [tēn parabolēn tautēn]. See discussion
on Mt 13. Here the word has a special application to a crisp proverb which involves
a comparison. The word physician is the point of comparison. Luke the physician
alone gives this saying of Jesus. The proverb means that the physician was expected
to take his own medicine and to heal himself. The word [parabolē] in the
N.T. is confined to the Synoptic Gospels except Heb 9:9; 11:19. This use for a proverb occurs also in Lu 5:36; 6:39. This proverb in various forms appears not only among the Jews,
but in Euripides and Aeschylus among the Greeks, and in Cicero’s Letters.Hobart
quotes the same idea from Galen, and the Chinese used to demand it of their physicians.
The point of the parable seems to be that the people were expecting him to make
good his claim to the Messiahship by doing here in Nazareth what they had heard
of his doing in Capernaum and elsewhere. “Establish your claims by direct evidence”
(Easton). This same appeal (Vincent) was addressed to Christ on
the Cross (Mt 27:40,42). There is a tone of sarcasm towards Jesus
in both cases. Heard done [ēkousamen genomena]. The use of this second
aorist middle participle [genomena] after [ēkousamen] is a neat Greek
idiom. It is punctiliar action in indirect discourse after this verb of sensation
or emotion (Robertson, Grammar, pp. 1040-42, 1122-24). Do also
here [poiēson kai hōde]. Ingressive aorist active imperative. Do it here
in thy own country and town and do it now. Jesus applies the proverb to himself
as an interpretation of their real attitude towards himself.
4:24 And he said [eipen de]. Also in 1:13. The interjection of these words here by Luke may indicate a break in
his address, though there is no other indication of an interval here. Perhaps they
only serve to introduce solemnly the new proverb like the words Verily I say
unto you [amēn legō humin]. This proverb about the prophet having no
honour in his own country Jesus had already applied to himself according to Joh 4:44. Both Mr 6:4 and Mt 13:57 give it in a slightly altered form on the last visit of Jesus to
Nazareth. The devil had tempted Jesus to make a display of his power to the people
by letting them see him floating down from the pinnacle of the temple (Lu
4:9-11).
4:25 Three years and six months [etē tria kai mēnas
hex]. Accusative of duration of time without [epi] (doubtful).
The same period is given in Jas 5:17, the popular Jewish way of speaking. In 1Ki 18:1 the rain
is said to have come in the third year. But the famine
probably lasted still longer.
4:26 Unto Zarephath [eis Sarepta]. The modern village
Surafend on the coast road between Tyre and Sidon. Unto a woman that was a widow
[pros gunaika chēran]. Literally, unto a woman a widow (like our vernacular
widow woman). This is an illustration of the proverb from the life of Elijah
(1Ki 17:8,9). This woman was in the land of Sidon or Phoenicia, a
heathen, where Jesus himself will go later.
4:27 In the time of Elisha the prophet [epi Elisaiou
tou prophētou]. This use of [epi] with the genitive for “in the time
of” is a good Greek idiom. The second illustration of the proverb is from the time
of Elisha and is another heathen, Naaman the Syrian [Naiman ho Syros].
He was the lone leper that was cleansed by Elisha (2Ki 5:1,14).
4:28 They were all filled with wrath [eplēsthēsan pantes
thumou]. First aorist passive indicative of the common verb [pimplēmi]
followed by the genitive case. The people of Nazareth at once caught on and saw
the point of these two Old Testament illustrations of how God in two cases blessed
the heathen instead of the Jewish people. The implication was evident. Nazareth
was no better than Capernaum if as good. He was under no special obligation to do
unusual things in Nazareth because he had been reared there. Town pride was insulted
and it at once exploded in a burst of rage.
4:29 They rose up and cast him forth [anastantes exebalon].
Second aorist ingressive active participle and second aorist effective active indicative.
A movement towards lynching Jesus. Unto the brow of the hill [hēos ophruos
tou orous]. Eyebrow [ophrus], in Homer, then any jutting prominence.
Only here in the N.T. Hippocrates speaks of the eyebrow hanging over. Was built
[ōikodomēto]. Past perfect indicative, stood built. That they might throw
him down headlong [hōste katakrēmnisai auton]. Neat Greek idiom with
[hōste] for intended result, “so as to cast him down the precipice.” The
infinitive alone can convey the same meaning (Mt 2:2; 20:28; Lu 2:23).
[Krēmnos] is an overhanging bank or precipice from [kremannumi], to
hang. [Kata] is down. The verb occurs in Xenophon, Demosthenes, LXX, Josephus.
Here only in the N.T. At the southwest corner of the town of Nazareth such a cliff
today exists overhanging the Maronite convent. Murder was in the hearts of the people.
By pushing him over they hoped to escape technical guilt.
4:30 He went his way [eporeueto]. Imperfect tense,
he was going on his way.
4:31 Came down [katēlthen]. Mr 1:21 has the historical present, they go into [eisporeuontai].
Capernaum (Tell Hum) is now the headquarters of the Galilean ministry,
since Nazareth has rejected Jesus. Lu 4:31-37 is parallel with Mr 1:21-28 which he manifestly uses. It is the first of Christ’s miracles
which they give. Was teaching them [ēn didaskōn autous]. Periphrastic
imperfect. Mark has [edidasken] first and then [en didaskōn]. ”Them”
here means the people present in the synagogue on the sabbath, construction according
to sense as in Mr 1:22.
4:32 Rest of the sentence as in Mark, which see, except that Luke
omits “and not as their scribes” and uses [hoti ēn] instead of [hōs echōn].
4:33 Which had [echōn]. Mark has [en]. A
spirit of an unclean demon [pneuma daimoniou akathartou]. Mark has “unclean
spirit.” Luke’s phrase here is unique in this combination. Plummer notes that Matthew
has [daimonion] ten times and [akatharton] twice as an epithet of
[pneuma]; Mark has [daimonion] thirteen times and [akatharton]
eleven times as an epithet of [pneuma]. Luke’s Gospel uses [daimonion]
twenty-two times and [akatharton] as an epithet, once of [daimonion]
as here and once of [pneuma]. In Mark the man is in [en] the power
of the unclean spirit, while here the man “has” a spirit of an unclean demon.
With a loud voice [phōnēi megalēi]. Not in Mark. Really a scream caused
by the sudden contact of the demon with Jesus.
4:34 Ah! [Ea]. An interjection frequent in the Attic
poets, but rare in prose. Apparently second person singular imperative of [eaō],
to permit. It is expressive of wonder, fear, indignation. Here it amounts to a diabolical
screech. For the rest of the verse see discussion on Mr 1:24 and Mt 8:29. The
muzzle [phimos] occurs literally in 1Co 9:9, 1Ti 5:18, and metaphorically here and Mr 1:25; 4:39;
Mt 22:12.
4:35 Had thrown him down in the midst [rhipsan auton
eis to meson]. First aorist (effective) participle of [rhiptō],
an old verb with violent meaning, to fling, throw, hurl off or down. Having done
him no hurt [mēden blapsan auton]. Luke as a physician carefully notes
this important detail not in Mark. [Blaptō], to injure, or hurt, occurs in
the N.T. only here and in Mr 16:18, though a very common verb in the old Greek.
4:36 Amazement came [egeneto thambos]. Mark has
[ethambēthēsan]. They spake together one with another [sunelaloun
pros allēlous]. Imperfect indicative active and the reciprocal pronoun. Mark
has simply the infinitive [sunzētein] (question). For [hoti].
We have here an ambiguous [hoti] as in 1:45, which can be either the relative “that” or the casual [hoti]
“because” or “for,” as the Revised Version has it. Either makes good sense. Luke
adds here [dunamei] (with power) to Mark’s “authority” [exousian].
And they come out [exerchontai]. So Luke where Mark has “and they
obey him” [kai upakouousin autōi].
4:37 Went forth a rumour [exeporeueto ēchos]. Imperfect
middle, kept on going forth. Our very word [echo] in this word. Late Greek
form for [ēchō] in the old Greek. Used for the roar of the waves on the shore.
So in Lu 21:25. Vivid picture of the resounding influence of this day’s work in
the synagogue, in Capernaum.
4:38 He rose up [anastas]. Second aorist active
participle of [anistēmi], a common verb. B. Weiss adds here “from the teacher’s
seat.” Either from his seat or merely leaving the synagogue. This incident of the
healing of Peter’s mother-in-law is given in Mr 1:29-34 and Mt 8:14-17, which see for details.
Into the house of Simon [eis
tēn oikian Simōnos]. “Peter’s house” (Mt 8:14). “The house of
Simon and Andrew” (Mr 1:29). Paul’s reference to Peter’s wife (1Co
9:5) is pertinent. They lived together in Capernaum. This house came also
to be the Capernaum home of Jesus. Simon’s wife’s mother [penthera tou
Simōnos]. The word [penthera] for mother-in-law is old and well established
in usage. Besides the parallel passages (Mr 1:30; Mt 8:14; Lu 4:38)
it occurs in the N.T. only in Lu 12:53. The corresponding word [pentheros], father-in-law, occurs
in Joh 18:13 alone in the N.T. Was holden with a great fever [ēn sunechomenē
puretōi megalōi]. Periphrastic imperfect passive, the analytical tense accenting
the continuous fever, perhaps chronic and certainly severe. Luke employs this verb
nine times and only three others in the N.T. (Mt 4:24 passive with diseases
here; 2Co 5:14 active; Php 1:23 passive). In Ac 28:8 the passive
“with dysentery” is like the construction here and is
a common one in Greek medical writers as in Greek literature generally. Luke uses
the passive with “fear,” Lu 8:37, the active for holding the hands over the ears (Ac 7:57)
and for pressing one or holding together (Lu 8:45; 19:43; 22:63),
the direct middle for holding oneself to preaching (Ac 18:5). It
is followed here by the instrumental case. Hobart (Medical Language of Luke,
p. 3) quotes Galen as dividing fevers into “great” [megaloi] and
“small” [smikroi].
4:39 He stood over her [epistas epanō autēs]. Second
aorist active participle. Only in Luke. Surely we are not to take Luke to mean that
Jesus here took the exorcist’s position and was rebuking a malignant personality.
The attitude of Jesus is precisely that of any kindly sympathetic physician. Mr 1:31; Mt 8:15 mention the touch of her hand rather than the tender look
over her head. Rebuked [epetimēsen]. Only in Luke. Jesus bade the
fever leave her as he spoke to the wind and the waves and Luke uses this same verb
(8:24). Rose up and ministered [anastāsa diēkonei].
Second aorist active participle as in verse 38, but inchoative imperfect tense [diēkonei], from [diakoneō]
(note augment of compound verb). She rose up immediately, though a long
high fever usually leaves one very weak. The cure was instantaneous and complete.
She began to minister at once and kept it up.
4:40 When the sun was setting [dunontos tou hēliou].
Genitive absolute and present participle [dunō], late form of [duō]
picturing the sunset scene. Even Mr 1:32 has here the aorist indicative [edusen] (punctiliar active).
It was not only cooler, but it was the end of the sabbath when it was not regarded
as work (Vincent) to carry a sick person (Joh 5:10). And
also by now the news of the cure of the demoniac of Peter’s mother-in-law had spread
all over the town. Had [eichon]. Imperfect tense including all the
chronic cases. With divers diseases [nosois poikilais]. Instrumental
case. For “divers” say “many coloured” or “variegated.” See on Mt 4:24; Mr 1:34.
Brought [ēgagon]. Constative summary second aorist active indicative
like Mt 8:16, [prosenegkan], where Mr 1:32 has the imperfect [epheron], brought one after another.
He laid his hands on every one of them and healed them [ho de heni hekastōi
autōn tas cheiras epititheis etherapeuen autous]. Note the present active participle
[epititheis] and the imperfect active [etherapeuen], picturing the
healing one by one with the tender touch upon each one. Luke alone gives this graphic
detail which was more than a mere ceremonial laying on of hands. Clearly the cures
of Jesus reached the physical, mental, and spiritual planes of human nature. He
is Lord of life and acted here as Master of each case as it came.
4:41 Came out [exērcheto], singular, or [exērchonto],
plural). Imperfect tense, repetition, from one after another. Thou art
the Son of God [Su ei ho huios tou theou]. More definite statement of
the deity of Jesus than the witness of the demoniac in the synagogue (Lu
4:34; Mr 1:24), like the words of the Father (Lu 3:22) and
more so than the condition of the devil (Lu 4:3, 9). In the Canterbury
Revision “devils” should always be “demons” [daimonia] as here. Suffered
them not to speak [ouk eia auta lalein]. Imperfect third singular active
of [eaō], very old and common verb with syllabic augment [ei]. The
tense accents the continued refusal of Jesus to receive testimony to his person
and work from demons. Cf. Mt 8:4 to the lepers. Because they knew [hoti ēideisan]. Causal,
not declarative, [hoti]. Past perfect of the second perfect [oida]. That
he was the Christ [ton Christon auton einai]. Infinitive in indirect
assertion with the accusative of general reference. [Ton Christon] = the
Anointed, the Messiah.
4:42 When it was day [genomenēs hēmeras]. Genitive
absolute with aorist middle participle. Mr 1:35 notes it was “a great while before day” (which see for discussion)
when Jesus rose up to go after a restless night. No doubt, because of the excitement
of the previous sabbath in Capernaum. He went out to pray (Mr 1:35).
Sought after him [epezētoun auton]. Imperfect active indicative. The
multitudes kept at it until “they came unto him” [ēlthon heōs autou], aorist
active indicative). They accomplished their purpose, [heōs autou],
right up to him. Would have stayed him [kateichon auton]. Better,
They tried to hinder him. The conative imperfect active of [katechō],
an old and common verb. It means either to hold fast (Lu 8:15), to
take, get possession of (Lu 14:9) or to hold back, to retain, to
restrain (Phm 1:13; Ro 1:18; 7:6; 2Th 2:6; Lu 4:42). In this passage
it is followed by the ablative case. That he should not go from them [tou
mē poreuesthai ap’ autōn]. Literally, “from going away from them.” The use of
[mē] (not) after [kateichon] is the neat Greek idiom of the
redundant negative after a verb of hindering like the French ne (Robertson,
Grammar, p. 1171) .
4:43 I must [me dei]. Jesus felt the urge to go
with the work of evangelism “to the other cities also,” to all, not to a favoured
few. For therefore was I sent [hoti epi touto apestalēn]. “A phrase
of Johannine ring” (Ragg). Second aorist passive indicative of [apostellō]. Christ
is the great Apostle of God to men.
4:44 Was preaching [ēn kērussōn]. Periphrastic imperfect
active, describing his first tour of Galilee in accord with the purpose just stated.
One must fill in details, though Mr 1:39 and Mt 8:23-25 tell of the mass of work done on this campaign.
Chapter 5
5:1 Pressed upon him [epikeisthai]. Luke in this paragraph (5:1-11;
Mr 1:16-20; Mt 4:18-22) does not follow the chronology of Mark as he usually
does. It seems reasonably clear that the renewed call of the four fishermen came
before the first tour of Galilee in Lu 4:42-44. It is here assumed that Luke is describing in his own way the
incident given in Mark and Matthew above. Luke singles out Simon in a graphic way.
This verb [epikeisthai] is an old one and means to [lie upon], rest
upon as of a stone on the tomb (Joh 11:38) or of fish on the burning
coals (Joh 21:9). So it is used of a tempest (Ac 27:20)
and of the urgent demands for Christ’s crucifixion (Lu 23:23). Here
it vividly pictures the eager crowds around Jesus. [En tōi epikeisthai] is
a favourite idiom with Luke as we have already seen, [en] with the articular
infinitive in the locative case. That [kai]. [Kai] does not
technically mean the declarative conjunction “that,” but it is a fair rendering
of the somewhat awkward idiom of Luke to a certain extent imitating the Hebrew use
of wav.Was standing [ēn hestōs]. Periphrastic second past perfect
of [histēmi] which here is equal to a practical imperfect. By the lake
[para tēn limnēn]. The use of the accusative with [para], alongside,
after a verb of rest used to be called the pregnant use, came and was standing.
But that is no longer necessary, for the accusative as the case of extension is
the oldest of the cases and in later Greek regains many of the earlier uses of the
other cases employed for more precise distinctions. See the same idiom in verse 2.
We need not here stress the notion of extension. “With characteristic
accuracy Luke never calls it a sea, while the others never call it a lake” (Plummer).
5:2 Two boats [ploia duo]. Some MSS. have [ploiaria],
little boats, but [ploia] was used of boats of various sizes, even of ships
like [nēes]. The fishermen [hoi haleeis]. It is an old Homeric
word that has come back to common use in the Koinē.It means “sea-folk” from
[hals], sea. Were washing [eplunon]. Imperfect active, though
some MSS. have aorist [eplunan]. Vincent comments on Luke’s use of five verbs
for washing: this one for cleaning, [apomassō] for wiping the dust from one’s
feet (10:11), [ekmassō] of the sinful woman wiping Christ’s
feet with her hair (7:38, 44), [apolouō] of washing away sins
(symbolically, of course) as in Ac 22:16, and [louō] of washing the body of Dorcas (Ac 9:37)
and the stripes of the prisoners (Ac 16:33). On “nets” see on Mt
4:20; Mr 1:18.
5:3 To put out a little [epanagagein oligon]. Second
aorist infinitive of the double compound verb [ep-an-agō], found in Xenophon
and late Greek writers generally. Only twice in the N.T. In Mt 21:18 in the sense of leading back or returning and here in the sense
of leading a ship up upon the sea, to put out to sea, a nautical term. Taught
[edikasken]. Imperfect active, picturing Jesus teaching from the boat in
which he was seated and so safe from the jam of the crowd. “Christ uses Peter’s
boat as a pulpit whence to throw the net of the Gospel over His hearers” (Plummer).
5:4 Had left speaking [epausato lalōn]. He ceased
speaking (aorist middle indicative and present active participle, regular Greek
idiom). Put out into the deep [epanagage eis to bathos]. The
same double compound verb as in verse 3, only here second aorist active imperative second person singular. Let
down [chalasate]. Peter was master of the craft and so he was addressed
first. First aorist active imperative second person plural. Here the whole crew
are addressed. The verb is the regular nautical term for lowering cargo or boats
(Ac 27:17, 30). But it was used for lowering anything from a higher
place (Mr 2:4; Ac 9:25; 2Co 11:33). For a catch [eis agran].
This purpose was the startling thing that stirred up Simon.
5:5 Master [epistata]. Used only by Luke in the
N.T. and always in addresses to Christ (8:24, 45; 9:33, 49;
17:13).
Common in the older writers for superintendent or overseer (one standing over another).
This word recognizes Christ’s authority. We toiled [kopiasantes].
This verb is from [kopos] [work, toil] and occurs from Aristophanes
on. It used to be said that the notion of weariness in toil appears only in the
LXX and the N.T. But Deissmann (Light from the Ancient East, pp. 312f.)
cites examples from inscriptions on tombstones quite in harmony with the use in
the N.T. Peter’s protest calls attention also to the whole night of fruitless toil.
But at thy word [epi de tōi rhēmati sou]. On the base of [epi]. Acquiescence
to show his obedience to Christ as “Master,” but with no confidence whatsoever in
the wisdom of this particular command. Besides, fishing in this lake was Peter’s
business and he really claimed superior knowledge on this occasion to that of Jesus.
5:6 They inclosed [sunekleisan]. Effective aorist
active indicative with perfective compound [sun]. They shut together. Were
breaking [dierēsseto]. Imperfect passive singular [diktua] being
neuter plural). This is the late form of the old verb [diarēgnumi]. The
nets were actually tearing in two [dia-] and so they would lose all the fish.
5:7 They beckoned [kateneusan]. Possibly they were
too far away for a call to be understood. Simon alone had been ordered to put out
into the deep. So they used signs. Unto their partners [tois metechois].
This word [metochos], from [metechō], to have with, means participation
with one in common blessings (Heb 3:1,14; 6:4; 12:8). While [koinōnos]
(verse 10 here of James and John also) has the notion of personal fellowship,
partnership. Both terms are here employed of the two pairs of brothers who have
a business company under Simon’s lead. Help them [sullabesthai]. Second
aorist middle infinitive. Take hold together with and so to help. Paul uses it in Php 4:3. It is an old word that was sometimes employed for seizing a prisoner
(Lu 22:54) and for conception (con-capio) by a woman
(Lu 1:24). So that they began to sink [hōste buthizesthai
auta]. Consecutive use of [hōste] and the infinitive (present tense,
inchoative use, beginning to sink). An old verb from [buthos]. In
the N.T. only here and 1Ti 6:9.
5:8 Fell down at Jesus’ knees [prosepesen tois gonasin
Iēsou]. Just like Peter, from extreme self-confidence and pride (verse 5) to abject humilation. But his impulse here was right and sincere.
His confession was true. He was a sinful man.
5:9 For he was amazed [thambos gar perieschen].
Literally, For a wonder held him round. Aorist active indicative. It held
Peter fast and all the rest.
5:10 Thou shalt catch men [esēi zōgrōn]. Periphrastic
future indicative, emphasizing the linear idea. The old verb [Zōgreō] means
to catch alive, not to kill. So then Peter is to be a catcher of men, not of fish,
and to catch them alive and for life, not dead and for death. The great Pentecost
will one day prove that Christ’s prophecy will come true. Much must happen before
that great day. But Jesus foresees the possibilities in Simon and he joyfully undertakes
the task of making a fisher of men out of this poor fisher of fish.
5:11 They left all, and followed him [aphentes panta
ēkolouthēsan]. Then and there. They had already become his disciples. Now they
leave their business for active service of Christ. The conduct of this group of
business men should make other business men to pause and see if Jesus is calling
them to do likewise.
5:12 Behold [kai idou]. Quite a Hebraistic idiom,
this use of [kai] after [egeneto] (almost like [hoti] with
[idou] (interjection) and no verb. Full of leprosy [plērēs
lepras]. Mr 1:40 and Mt 8:2 have simply “a leper” which see. Evidently a bad case full of sores
and far advanced as Luke the physician notes. The law (Le 13:12f.)
curiously treated advanced cases as less unclean than the earlier stages. Fell
on his face [pesōn epi prosōpon]. Second aorist active participle of
[piptō], common verb. Mr 1:40 has “kneeling” [gonupetōn] and Mt 8:40 “worshipped” [prosekunei]. All three attitudes were possible
one after the other. All three Synoptics quote the identical language of the leper
and the identical answer of Jesus. His condition of the third class turned on the
“will” [thelēis] of Jesus who at once asserts his will [thēlō] and
cleanses him. All three likewise mention the touch [hēpsato], verse 13) of Christ’s hand on the unclean leper and the instantaneous cure.
5:14 To tell no man [mēdeni eipein]. This is an
indirect command after the verb “charged” [parēggeilen]. But Luke changes
(constructio variata) to the direct quotation, a common idiom in
Greek and often in Luke (Ac 1:4f.). Here in the direct form he follows Mr 1:43; Mt 8:4. See discussion there about the direction to go to the priest
to receive a certificate showing his cleansing, like our release from quarantine
(Le 13:39; 14:2-32). For a testimony unto them [eis marturion
autois]. The use of [autois] (them) here is “according to sense,”
as we say, for it has no antecedent in the context, just to people in general. But
this identical phrase with absence of direct reference occurs in Mark and Matthew,
pretty good proof of the use of one by the other. Both Mt 8:4; Lu 5:14 follow Mr 1:44.
5:15 So much the more [māllon]. Mr 1:45 has only “much” [polla], many), but Mark tells more
about the effect of this disobedience. Went abroad [diērcheto]. Imperfect
tense. The fame of Jesus kept going. Came together [sunērchonto].
Imperfect tense again. The more the report spread, the more the crowds came.
5:16 But he withdrew himself in the deserts and prayed
[autos de ēn hupochōrōn en tais erēmois kai proseuchomenos]. Periphrastic
imperfects. Literally, “But he himself was with drawing in the desert places and
praying.” The more the crowds came as a result of the leper’s story, the more Jesus
turned away from them to the desert regions and prayed with the Father. It is a
picture of Jesus drawn with vivid power. The wild enthusiasm of the crowds was running
ahead of their comprehension of Christ and his mission and message. [Hupochōreō]
(perhaps with the notion of slipping away secretly, [hupo-] is a very common
Greek verb, but in the N.T. occurs in Luke alone. Elsewhere in the N.T. [anachōreō]
(to go back) appears.
5:17 That [kai]. Use of [kai] = [hoti]
(that) like the Hebrew wav, though found in Greek also. He
[autos]. Luke sometimes has [autos] in the nominative as unemphatic
“he” as here, not “he himself.” Was teaching [ēn didaskōn]. Periphrastic
imperfect again like our English idiom. Were sitting by [ēsan kathēmenoi].
Periphrastic imperfect again. There is no “by” in the Greek. Doctors of the law
[nomodidaskaloi]. A compound word formed after analogy of [hierodidaskalos],
but not found outside of the N.T. and ecclesiastical writers, one of the very few
words apparently N.T. in usage. It appears here and Ac 5:34; 1Ti 1:7. It is not likely that Luke and Paul made the word, but
they simply used the term already in current use to describe teachers and interpreters
of the law. Our word “doctor” is Latin for “teacher.” These “teachers of the law”
are called elsewhere in the Gospels “scribes” [grammateis] as in Matthew
and Mark (see on Mt 5:20; 23:34) and Lu 5:21; 19:47; 21:1; 22:2. Luke also employs [nomikos] (one skilled
in the law, [nomos] as in 10:25. One thinks of our LL.D. (Doctors of Civil and Canon Law),
for both were combined in Jewish law. They were usually Pharisees (mentioned here
for the first time in Luke) for which see on Mt 3:7,20). Luke will often
speak of the Pharisees hereafter. Not all the “Pharisees” were “teachers of the
law” so that both terms often occur together as in verse 21 where Luke has separate articles
[hoi grammateis kai hoi Pharisaioi],
distinguishing between them, though one article may occur as in Mt 5:20 or no article as here in
verse 17. Luke alone mentions the presence here of these Pharisees and doctors
of the law “which were come” [hoi ēsan elēluthotes], periphrastic past perfect
active, had come). Out of every village of Galilee and Judea and Jerusalem
[ek pasēs kōmēs tēs Galilaias kai Ioudaias kai Ierousalēm]. Edersheim (Jewish
Social Life) observes that the Jews distinguished Jerusalem as a separate
district in Judea. Plummer considers it hyperbole in Luke to use “every village.”
But one must recall that Jesus had already made one tour of Galilee which stirred
the Pharisees and rabbis to active opposition. Judea had already been aroused and
Jerusalem was the headquarters of the definite campaign now organized against Jesus.
One must bear in mind that Joh 4:1-4 shows that Jesus had already left Jerusalem and Judea because of
the jealousy of the Pharisees. They are here on purpose to find fault and to make
charges against Jesus. One must not forget that there were many kinds of Pharisees
and that not all of them were as bad as these legalistic and punctilious hypocrites
who deserved the indictment and exposure of Christ in Mt 23. Paul himself is a specimen of the finer type of Pharisee which, however,
developed into the persecuting fanatic till Jesus changed his whole life. The
power of the Lord was with him to heal [dunamis Kuriou ēn eis to iāsthai
auton]. So the best texts. It is neat Greek, but awkward English: “Then was
the power of the Lord for the healing as to him (Jesus).” Here [Kuriou]
refers to Jehovah. Dunamis (dynamite) is one of the common words
for “miracles” [dunameis]. What Luke means is that Jesus had the power of
the Lord God to heal with. He does not mean that this power was intermittent. He
simply calls attention to its presence with Jesus on this occasion.
5:18 That was palsied [hos ēn paralelumenos]. Periphrastic
past perfect passive where Mr 2:3; Mt 9:2 have [paralutikon] (our paralytic). Luke’s
phrase is the technical medical term (Hippocrates, Galen, etc.) rather than
Mark’s vernacular word (Ramsay, Luke the Physician, pp. 57f.).
They sought [ezētoun]. Conative imperfect.
5:19 By what way they might bring him in [poias eis
enegkōsin auton]. Deliberative subjunctive of the direct question retained in
the indirect. The housetop [to dōma]. Very old word. The flat roof
of Jewish houses was usually reached by outside stairway. Cf. Ac 10:9 where Peter went for meditation. Through the tiles [dia
tōn keramōn]. Common and old word for the tile roof. Mr 2:4 speaks of digging a hole in this tile roof. Let him down [kathēkan
auton]. First aorist (k aorist) effective active of [kathiēmi],
common verb. Mr 2:4 has historical present [chalōsi], the verb used by Jesus to
Peter and in Peter’s reply (Lu 5:4f.). With his couch [sun
tōi klinidiōi]. Also in verse 24. Diminutive of [klinē] (verse 18) occurring in Plutarch and Koinē writers. Mr 2:4 has [krabatton] (pallet). It doubtless was a pallet
on which the paralytic lay. Into the midst before Jesus [eis to meson
emprosthen tou Iēsou]. The four friends had succeeded, probably each holding
a rope to a corner of the pallet. It was a moment of triumph over difficulties and
surprise to all in the house (Peter’s apparently, Mr 2:1).
5:20 Their faith [tēn pistin autōn]. In all three
Gospels. Man [anthrōpe]. Mark and Matthew have “child” or “Son” [teknon].
Are forgiven [apheōntai]. This Doric form of the perfect passive indicative
is for the Attic [apheintai]. It appears also in Lu 5:23; 7:47,48; Joh 20:23; 1Jo 2:12. Mr 2:6; Mt 9:2 have the present passive [aphientai]. Possibly this
man’s malady was due to his sin as is sometimes true (Joh 5:14).
The man had faith along with that of the four, but he was still a paralytic when
Jesus forgave his sins.
5:21 But God alone [ei mē monos ho theos]. Mark
has [heis] (one) instead of [monos] (alone).
5:22 Perceiving [epignous]. Same form (second aorist
active participle of [epiginōskō], common verb for knowing fully)
in Mr 2:8. Reason ye [dialogizesthe] as in Mr 2:8. Mt 9:4 has [enthumeisthe].
5:24 He saith unto him that was palsied [eipen tōi paralelumenōi].
This same parenthesis right in the midst of the words of Jesus is in Mr 2:11; Mt 9:6, conclusive proof of interrelation between these documents.
The words of Jesus are quoted practically alike in all three Gospels, the same purpose
also [hina eidēte] (second perfect active subjunctive).
5:25 Whereon he lay [eph’ ho katekeito]. Imperfect,
upon which he had been lying down. Luke uses this phrase instead of repeating [klinidion]
(verse 24). Glorifying God [doxazōn ton theon]. As one can
well imagine.
5:26 Amazement [ekstasis]. Something out of its
place, as the mind. Here the people were almost beside themselves as we say with
the same idiom. See on Mr 5:42. So they kept glorifying God (imperfect tense, [edoxazon]
and at the same time “were filled with fear” [eplēsthēsan phobou], aorist
passive). Strange things [paradoxa]. Our very word paradox,
contrary to [para] received opinion [doxa]. Plato, Xenophon, and Polybius
use it. Here alone in the N.T.
5:27 A publican named Levi [telōnen onomati Leuein]. Mr 2:13 has also “The son of Alphaeus” while Mt 9:9 calls him “Matthew.” He had, of course, both names. All three use
the same words [epi to telōnion] for the place of toll. See discussion of
publican [telōnēs] on Mt 9:9. All three Gospels give the command of Jesus, Follow me [akolouthei].
5:28 He forsook all [katalipōn panta]. This detail
in Luke alone. He left his profitable business for the service of Christ. Followed
him [ēkolouthei autōi]. Imperfect active, perhaps inchoative. He began
at once to follow him and he kept it up. Both Mr 2:14; Mt 9:9 have the aorist [ēkolouthēsen], perhaps ingressive.
5:29 A great feast [dochēn megalēn]. Here and in Lu 14:13 only in the N.T. The word [dochē], from [dechomai],
means reception. Occurs in Plutarch and LXX. Levi made Jesus a big reception.
Publicans and others [telōnōn kai allōn]. Luke declines here to use “sinners”
like Mr 2:15 and Mt 9:10 though he does so in verse 30 and
in 15:1. None but social outcasts would eat with publicans at such a feast or
barbecue, for it was a very large affair. Were sitting at meat with them
[ēsan met’ autōn katakeimenoi]. Literally, were reclining with them (Jesus
and the disciples). It was a motley crew that Levi had brought together,
but he showed courage as well as loyalty to Jesus.
5:30 The Pharisees and their scribes [hoi Pharisaioi
kai hoi grammateis autōn]. Note article with each substantive and the order,
not “scribes and Pharisees,” but “the Pharisees and the scribes of them” (the Pharisees).
Some manuscripts omit “their,” but Mr 2:16 (the scribes of the Pharisees) shows that it is correct here.
Some of the scribes were Sadducees. It is only the Pharisees who find fault here.
Murmured [egogguzon]. Imperfect active. Picturesque onomatopoetic
word that sounds like its meaning. A late word used of the cooing of doves. It is
like the buzzing of bees, like [tonthorruzō] of literary Greek. They were
not invited to this feast and would not have come if they had been. But, not being
invited, they hang on the outside and criticize the disciples of Jesus for being
there. The crowd was so large that the feast may have been served out in the open
court at Levi’s house, a sort of reclining garden party. The publicans and sinners
[tōn telōnōn kai hamartōlōn]. Here Luke is quoting the criticism of the critics.
Note one article making one group of all of them.
5:31 They that are whole [hoi hugiainontes]. Old
Greek word for good health from [hugiēs], sound in body. So also in Lu 7:10; 15:27; 3Jo 1:2. This is the usual word for good health used by Greek
medical writers. Mr 2:17; Mt 9:12 have [hoi ischuontes] (those who have strength).
5:32 To repentance [eis metanoian]. Alone in Luke
not genuine in Mr 2:17; Mt 9:12. Only sinners would need a call to repentance, a change
of mind and life. For the moment Jesus accepts the Pharisaic division between “righteous”
and “sinners” to score them and to answer their criticism. At the other times he
will show that they only pretend to be “righteous” and are “hypocrites” in reality.
But Jesus has here blazed the path for all soul-winners. The self-satisfied are
the hard ones to win and they often resent efforts to win them to Christ.
5:33 Often [pukna]. Only in Luke. Common word for
thick, compact, often. And make supplications [kai deēseis poiountai].
Only in Luke. But thine [hoi de soi]. Sharp contrast between the conduct
of the disciples of Jesus and those of John and the Pharisees who here appear together
as critics of Christ and his disciples (Mr 2:18; Mt 9:14), though
Luke does not bring that out sharply. It is probable that Levi had his reception
for Jesus on one of the Jewish fast days and, if so, this would give special edge
to their criticism.
5:34 Can ye [mē dunasthe]. So Luke, adding make,
[poiēsai], where Mark and Matthew have [mē dunantai]. All three have
[mē] and expect the answer no.
5:35 Then in those days [tote en ekeinais tais hēmerais].
Here Mr 2:20 has “then in that day,” and Mt 9:15 only “then.”
5:36 Also a parable [kai parabolēn]. There are three
parables here in the answer of Jesus (the bridegroom, the patch on the garment,
the wineskin). They are not called parables save here, but they are parables
and Luke’s language means that. Rendeth [schisas]. This in Luke alone.
Common verb. Used of splitting rocks (Mt 27:51. Our word schism
comes from it. Putteth it [epiballei]. So Mt 9:16 when Mr 2:21 has [epiraptei] (sews on). The word for “piece” or
“patch” [epiblēma] in all the three Gospels is from the verb [epiballō],
to clap on, and is in Plutarch, Arrian, LXX, though the verb is as old as Homer.
See on Matthew and Mark for distinction between [kainos] (fresh),
[neos] (new), and [palaios] (old). He will rend
the new [kai to kainon schisei]. Future active indicative. So the best
MSS. Will not agree [ou sumphōnēsei]. Future active indicative. So
the best manuscripts again. With the old [tōi palaiōi]. Associative
instrumental case. Instead of this phrase in Luke, Mr 2:21; Mt 9:16 have “a worse rent” [cheiron schisma].
5:38 Must be put [blēteon]. This verbal adjective
in [-teos] rather than [-tos] appears here alone in the N.T. though
it is common enough in Attic Greek. It is a survival of the literary style. This
is the impersonal use and is transitive in sense here and governs the accusative
“new wine” [oinon neon], though the agent is not expressed (Robertson,
Grammar, p. 1097).
5:39 The old is good [Ho palaios chrēstos estin].
So the best MSS. rather that [chrēstoteros], comparative (better).
Westcott and Hort wrongly bracket the whole verse, though occurring in Aleph, B
C L and most of the old documents. It is absent in D and some of the old Latin MSS.
It is the philosophy of the obscurantist, that is here pictured by Christ. “The
prejudiced person will not even try the new, or admit that it has any merits. He
knows that the old is pleasant, and suits him; and that is enough; he is not going
to change” (Plummer). This is Christ’s picture of the reactionary Pharisees.
Chapter 6
6:1 On a sabbath [en sabbatōi]. This is the second sabbath on which
Jesus is noted by Luke. The first was Lu 4:31-41. There was another in Joh 5:1-47. There is Western and Syrian (Byzantine) evidence for
a very curious reading here which calls this sabbath “secondfirst” [deuteroprōtōi].
It is undoubtedly spurious, though Westcott and Hort print it in the margin. A possible
explanation is that a scribe wrote “first” [prōtōi] on the margin because
of the sabbath miracle in Lu 6:6-11. Then another scribe recalled Lu 4:31 where a sabbath is mentioned and wrote “second” [deuterōi]
also on the margin. Finally a third scribe combined the two in the word [deuteroprōtōi]
that is not found elsewhere. If it were genuine, we should not know what it means.
Plucked [etillon]. Imperfect active. They were plucking as they went
on through [diaporeuesthai]. Whether wheat or barley, we do not know, not
our “corn” (maize). Did eat [ēsthion]. Imperfect again. See
on Mt 12:1f.; Mr 2:23f. for the separate acts in supposed violence of the sabbath
laws. Rubbing them in their hands [psōchontes tais chersin]. Only
in Luke and only here in the N.T. This was one of the chief offences. “According
to Rabbinical notions, it was reaping, threshing, winnowing, and preparing food
all at once” (Plummer). These Pharisees were straining out gnats and swallowing
camels! This verb [psōchō] is a late one for [psaō], to rub.
6:3 Not even this [oude touto]. This small point
only in Luke. What [ho]. Literally, which. Mr 2:25; Mt 12:3 have [ti] (what).
6:4 Did take [labōn]. Second aorist active participle
of [lambanō]. Not in Mark and Matthew. See Mt 12:1-8; Mr 2:23-28 for discussion of details about the shewbread and the
five arguments in defence of his conduct on the sabbath (example of David, work
of the priests on the sabbath, prophecy of Ho 6:6, purpose of the sabbath for man, the Son of Man lord of the sabbath).
It was an overwhelming and crushing reply to these pettifogging ceremonialists to
which they could not reply, but which increased their anger. Codex D transfers verse 5 to after
verse 10 and puts here the following: “On the same day beholding one working on
the sabbath he said to him: Man, if you know what you are doing, happy are you;
but if you do not know, cursed are you and a transgressor of the law.”
6:6 On another sabbath [en heterōi sabbatōi]. This
was a second [heteron], as it often means), but not necessarily the
next, sabbath. This incident is given by all three synoptics (Mr 3:1-6; Mt
12:9-14; Lu 6:6-11. See Matt. and Mark for details. Only Luke notes that
it was on a sabbath. Was this because Luke as a physician had to meet this problem
in his own practise? Right hand [hē dexia]. This alone in Luke, the
physician’s eye for particulars.
6:7 The scribes and the Pharisees [hoi grammateis kai
hoi Pharisaioi]. Only Luke here though Pharisees named in Mt 12:14 and Pharisees and Herodians in Mr 3:6. Watched him [paretērounto auton]. Imperfect middle,
were watching for themselves on the side [para]. Mr 3:2 has the imperfect active [paretēroun]. Common verb, but the
proposition [para] gave an extra touch, watching either assiduously like
the physician at the bedside or insidiously with evil intent as here. Would heal
[therapeusei]. But the present active indicative [therapeuei] may
be the correct text here. So Westcott and Hort. That they might find out how
to accuse him [hina heurōsin katēgorein autou]. Second aorist active
subjunctive of [heuriskō] and the infinitive with it means to find out how
to do a thing. They were determined to make a case against Jesus. They felt sure
that their presence would prevent any spurious work on the part of Jesus.
6:8 But he knew their thoughts [autos de ēidei tous
dialogismous autōn]. In Luke alone. Imperfect in sense, second past perfect
in form [ēidei] from [oida]. Jesus, in contrast to these spies (Plummer),
read their intellectual processes like an open book. His hand withered [xēran
tēn cheira]. Predicate position of the adjective. So in Mr 3:3. Stand forth [stēthi]. Luke alone has this verb, second
aorist active imperative. Mr 3:3 has Arise into the midst [egeire eis to meson]. Luke
has Arise and step forth into the midst [egeire kai stēthi eis to meson].
Christ worked right out in the open where all could see. It was a moment of excitement
when the man stepped forth [estē] there before them all.
6:9 I ask you [eperōtō humās]. They had questions
in their hearts about Jesus. He now asks in addition [ep’] an open question
that brings the whole issue into the open. A life [psuchēn]. So the
Revised Version. The rabbis had a rule: Periculum vitae pellit sabbatum.But
it had to be a Jew whose life was in peril on the sabbath. The words of Jesus cut
to the quick. Or to destroy it [ē apolesai]. On this very day these
Pharisees were plotting to destroy Jesus (verse 7).
6:10 He looked round about on them all [periblepsamenos].
First aorist middle participle as in Mr 3:5, the middle voice giving a personal touch to it all. Mark adds “with
anger” which Luke here does not put in. All three Gospels have the identical command:
Stretch forth thy hand [exteinon tēn cheira sou]. First aorist active
imperative. Stretch out, clean out, full length. All three Gospels also have
the first aorist passive indicative [apekatestathē] with the double augment
of the double compound verb [apokathistēmi]. As in Greek writers, so here
the double compound means complete restoration to the former state.
6:11 They were filled with madness [eplēsthēsan anoias]
First aorist passive (effective) with genitive: In 5:26 we saw the people filled with fear. Here is rage that is kin to insanity,
for [anoias] is lack of sense [a] privative and [nous], mind).
An old word, but only here and 2Ti 3:9 in the N.T. Communed [dielaloun], imperfect active,
picturing their excited counsellings with one another. Mr 3:6 notes that they bolted out of the synagogue and outside plotted even
with the Herodians how to destroy Jesus, strange co-conspirators these against the
common enemy. What they might do to Jesus [ti an poiēsaien Iēsou].
Luke puts it in a less damaging way than Mr 3:6; Mt 12:14. This aorist optative with [an] is the deliberative
question like that in Ac 17:18 retained in the indirect form here. Perhaps Luke means, not that
they were undecided about killing Jesus, but only as to the best way of doing it.
Already nearly two years before the end we see the set determination to destroy
Jesus. We see it here in Galilee. We have already seen it at the feast in Jerusalem
(Joh 5:18) where “the Jews sought the more to kill him.” John and
the Synoptics are in perfect agreement as to the Pharisaic attitude toward Jesus.
6:12 He went out into the mountains to pray [exelthein
auton eis to oros proseuxasthai]. Note [ex-] where Mr 3:13 has goeth up [anabainei]. Luke alone has “to pray”
as he so often notes the habit of prayer in Jesus. He continued all night
[ēn dianuktereuōn]. Periphrastic imperfect active. Here alone in the N.T.,
but common in the LXX and in late Greek writers. Medical writers used it of whole
night vigils. In prayer to God [en tēi proseuchēi tou theou]. Objective
genitive [tou theou]. This phrase occurs nowhere else. [Proseuchē]
does not mean “place of prayer” or synagogue as in Ac 16:13, but the actual prayer of Jesus to the Father all night long. He
needed the Father’s guidance now in the choice of the Apostles in the morning.
6:13 When it was day [hote egeneto hēmera]. When
day came, after the long night of prayer. He chose from them twelve [eklexamenos
ap’ autōn dōdeka]. The same root [leg] was used for picking out, selecting
and then for saying. There was a large group of “disciples” or “learners” whom he
“called” to him [prosephōnēsen], and from among whom he chose (of himself,
and for himself, indirect middle voice [eklexamenos]. It was a crisis in
the work of Christ. Jesus assumed full responsibility even for the choice of Judas
who was not forced upon Jesus by the rest of the Twelve. “You did not choose me,
but I chose you,” (Joh 15:16) where Jesus uses [exelexasthe]
and [exelexamēn] as here by Luke. Whom also he named apostles [hous
kai apostolous ōnomasen]. So then Jesus gave the twelve chosen disciples this
appellation. Aleph and B have these same words in Mr 3:14 besides the support of a few of the best cursives, the Bohairic Coptic
Version and the Greek margin of the Harclean Syriac. Westcott and Hort print them
in their text in Mr 3:14, but it remains doubtful whether they were not brought into Mark
from Lu 6:13 where they are undoubtedly genuine. See Mt 10:2 where the connection with sending them out by twos in the third tour
of Galilee. The word is derived from [apostellō], to send (Latin, mitto)
and apostle is missionary, one sent. Jesus applies the term to himself [apesteilas], Joh 17:3) as does Heb 3:1. The word is applied to others, like Barnabas, besides these twelve
including the Apostle Paul who is on a par with them in rank and authority, and
even to mere messengers of the churches (2Co 8:23). But these twelve
apostles stand apart from all others in that they were all chosen at once by Jesus
himself “that they might be with him” (Mr 3:14), to be trained by
Jesus himself and to interpret him and his message to the world. In the nature of
the case they could have no successors as they had to be personal witnesses to the
life and resurrection of Jesus (Ac 1:22). The selection of Matthias
to succeed Judas cannot be called a mistake, but it automatically ceased. For discussion
of the names and groups in the list see discussion on Mt 10:1-4; Mr 3:14-19.
6:16 Which was the traitor [hos egeneto prodotēs].
Who became traitor, more exactly, [egeneto], not [ēn]. He gave no signs
of treachery when chosen.
6:17 He came down with them [katabas met’ autōn].
Second aorist active participle of [katabainō], common verb. This was the
night of prayer up in the mountain (Mr 31:3; Lu 6:12) and the choice
of the Twelve next morning. The going up into the mountain of Mt 5:1 may simply be a summary statement with no mention of what Luke has
explained or may be a reference to the elevation, where he “sat down” (Mt
5:1), above the plain or “level place” [epi topou pedinou] on the
mountain side where Jesus “stood” or “stopped” [estē]. It may be a level
place towards the foot of the mountain. He stopped his descent at this level place
and then found a slight elevation on the mountain side and began to speak. There
is not the slightest reason for making Matthew locate this sermon on the mountain
and Luke in the valley as if the places, audiences, and topics were different. For
the unity of the sermon see discussion on Mt 5:1f. The reports in Matthew and Luke
begin alike, cover the same general ground and end alike. The report in Matthew
is longer chiefly because in Chapter 5, he gives the argument showing the contrast
between Christ’s conception of righteousness and that of the Jewish rabbis. Undoubtedly,
Jesus repeated many of the crisp sayings here at other times as in Luke 12, but
it is quite gratuitous to argue that Matthew and Luke have made up this sermon out
of isolated sayings of Christ at various times. Both Matthew and Luke give too much
that is local of place and audience for that idea. Mt 5:1 speaks of “the multitudes” and “his disciples.” Lu 6:17 notes “a great multitude of his disciples, and a great number of
the people from all Judea and Jerusalem, and the sea coast of Tyre and Sidon.” They
agree in the presence of disciples and crowds besides the disciples from whom the
twelve apostles were chosen. It is important to note how already people were coming
from “the sea coast of Tyre and Sidon” “to hear him and to be healed [iathēnai],
first aorist passive of [iaomai] of their diseases.”
6:18 With unclean spirits [apo pneumatōn akathartōn].
In an amphibolous position for it can be construed with “troubled,” (present passive
participle [enochloumenoi] or with “were healed” (imperfect passive, [etherapeuonto].
The healings were repeated as often as they came. Note here both verbs, [iaomai]
and [therapeuō], used of the miraculous cures of Jesus. [Therapeuō]
is the verb more commonly employed of regular professional cures, but no such distinction
is made here.
6:19 Sought to touch him [ezētoun haptesthai autou].
Imperfect active. One can see the surging, eager crowd pressing up to Jesus. Probably
some of them felt that there was a sort of virtue or magic in touching his garments
like the poor woman in Lu 8:43f. (Mr 5:23; Mt 9:21. For power came forth from
him [hoti dunamis par’ autou exērcheto]. Imperfect middle, power was
coming out from him. This is the reason for the continual approach to Jesus.
And healed them all [kai iāto pantas]. Imperfect middle again. Was
healing all, kept on healing all. The preacher today who is not a vehicle of power
from Christ to men may well question why that is true. Undoubtedly the failure to
get a blessing is one reason why many people stop going to church. One may turn
to Paul’s tremendous words in Php 4:13: “I have strength for all things in him who keeps on pouring power
into me” [panta ischuō en tōi endunamounti me]. It was at a time of surpassing
dynamic spiritual energy when Jesus delivered this greatest of all sermons so far
as they are reported to us. The very air was electric with spiritual power. There
are such times as all preachers know.
6:20 And he lifted up his eyes [kai autos eparas tous
opthalmous autou]. First aorist active participle from [epairō]. Note
also Luke’s favourite use of [kai autos] in beginning a paragraph. Vivid
detail alone in Luke. Jesus looked the vast audience full in the face. Mt 5:2 mentions that “he opened his mouth and taught them” (began to teach
them, inchoative imperfect, [edidasken]. He spoke out so that the great crowd
could hear. Some preachers do not open their mouths and do not look up at the people,
but down at the manuscript and drawl along while the people lose interest and even
go to sleep or slip out. Ye poor [hoi ptōchoi]. The poor, but
“yours” [humetera] justifies the translation “ye.” Luke’s report is direct
address in all the four beatitudes and four woes given by him. It is useless to
speculate why Luke gives only four of the eight beatitudes in Matthew or why Matthew
does not give the four woes in Luke. One can only say that neither professes to
give a complete report of the sermon. There is no evidence to show that either saw
the report of the other. They may have used a common source like Q (the Logia of
Jesus) or they may have had separate sources. Luke’s first beatitude corresponds
with Matthew’s first, but he does not have “in spirit” after “poor.” Does Luke represent
Jesus as saying that poverty itself is a blessing? It can be made so. Or does Luke
represent Jesus as meaning what is in Matthew, poverty of spirit? The kingdom
of God [hē basileia tou theou]. Mt 5:3 has “the kingdom of heaven” which occurs alone in Matthew though he
also has the one here in Luke with no practical difference. The rabbis usually said
“the kingdom of heaven.” They used it of the political Messianic kingdom when Judaism
of the Pharisaic sort would triumph over the world. The idea of Jesus is in the
sharpest contrast to that conception here and always. See on Mt 3:2 for discussion
of the meaning of the word “kingdom.” It is the favourite word of Jesus for the
rule of God in the heart here and now. It is both present and future and will reach
a glorious consummation. Some of the sayings of Christ have apocalyptic and eschatological
figures, but the heart of the matter is here in the spiritual reality of the reign
of God in the hearts of those who serve him. The kingdom parables expand and enlarge
upon various phases of this inward life and growth.
6:21 Now [nun]. Luke adds this adverb here and in
the next sentence after “weep.” This sharpens the contrast between present sufferings
and the future blessings. Filled [chortasthēsesthe]. Future passive
indicative. The same verb in Mt 5:6. Originally it was used for giving fodder [chortos] to animals,
but here it is spiritual fodder or food except in Lu 15:16; 16:21. Luke here omits “and thirst after righteousness.” Weep
[klaiontes]. Audible weeping. Where Mt 5:4 has “mourn” [penthountes]. Shall laugh [gelasete].
Here Mt 5:4 has “shall be comforted.” Luke’s words are terse.
6:22 When they shall separate you [hotan aphorisōsin
humās]. First aorist active subjunctive, from [aphorizō], common verb
for marking off a boundary. So either in good sense or bad sense as here. The reference
is to excommunication from the congregation as well as from social intercourse.
Cast out your name as evil [exbalōsin to onoma humōn hōs ponēron].
Second aorist active subjunctive of [ekballō], common verb. The verb is used
in Aristophanes, Sophocles, and Plato of hissing an actor off the stage. The name
of Christian or disciple or Nazarene came to be a byword of contempt as shown in
the Acts. It was even unlawful in the Neronian persecution when Christianity was
not a religio licita.For the Son of man’s sake [heneka tou huiou
tou anthrōpou]. Jesus foretold what will befall those who are loyal to him.
The Acts of the Apostles is a commentary on this prophecy. This is Christ’s common
designation of himself, never of others save by Stephen (Ac 7:56)
and in the Apocalypse (Re 1:13; 14:14). But both Son of God and Son
of man apply to him (Joh 1:50,52; Mt 26:63f.). Christ was a real
man though the Son of God. He is also the representative man and has authority over
all men.
6:23 Leap for joy [skirtēsate]. Old verb and in
LXX, but only in Luke in the N.T. (here and 1:41, 44). It answers to Matthew’s (Mt 5:12) “be exceeding
glad.” Did [epoioun]. Imperfect active, the habit of “their fathers”
(peculiar to both here). Mt 5:12 has “persecuted.” Thus they will receive a prophet’s reward (Mt
1:41.
6:24 But woe unto you that are rich [Plēn ouai humin
tois plousiois]. Sharp contrast [plēn]. As a matter of fact the rich
Pharisees and Sadducees were the chief opposers of Christ as of the early disciples
later (Jas 5:1-6). Ye have received [apechete]. Receipt
in full [apechō] means as the papyri show. Consolation [paraklēsin].
From [parakaleō], to call to one’s side, to encourage, to help, to cheer.
6:25 Now [nun]. Here twice as in verse 21 in contrast with future punishment. The joys and sorrows in these two
verses are turned round, measure for measure reversed. The Rich Man and Lazarus
(Lu 16:19-31) illustrate these contrasts in the present and the future.
6:26 In the same manner did their fathers [ta auta epoioun
hoi pateres autōn]. Literally, their fathers did the same things to the false
prophets. That is they spoke well [kalōs], finely of false prophets. Praise
is sweet to the preacher but all sorts of preachers get it. Of you [humas].
Accusative case after words of speaking according to regular Greek idiom, to speak
one fair, to speak well of one.
6:27 But I say unto you that hear [Alla humin legō tois
akouousin]. There is a contrast in this use of [alla] like that in Mt 5:44. This is the only one of the many examples given by Mt 5 of the sharp antithesis between what the rabbis taught and what Jesus
said. Perhaps that contrast is referred to by Luke. If necessary, [alla]
could be coordinating or paratactic conjunction as in 2Co 7:11 rather than adversative as apparently here. See Mt 5:43f. Love of enemies is in the O.T., but Jesus ennobles the word, [agapaō],
and uses it of love for one’s enemies.
6:28 That despitefully use you [tōn epēreazontōn humās].
This old verb occurs here only in the N.T. and in 1Pe 3:16, not being genuine in Mt 5:44.
6:29 On the cheek [epi tēn siagona]. Mt 5:39 has “right.” Old word meaning
jaw or jawbone, but in the N.T. only
here and Mt 5:39, which see for discussion. It seems an act of violence rather than
contempt. Sticklers for extreme literalism find trouble with the conduct of Jesus
in Joh 18:22f. where Jesus, on receiving a slap in the face, protested against
it. Thy cloke [to himation], thy coat [ton chitōna].
Here the upper and more valuable garment [himation] is first taken, the under
and less valuable [chitōn] last. In Mt 5:40 the process (apparently a legal one) is reversed. Withhold
not [mē kōlusēis]. Aorist subjunctive in prohibition against committing
an act. Do not hinder him in his robbing. It is usually useless anyhow with modern
armed bandits.
6:30 Ask them not again [mē apaitei]. Here the present active
imperative in a prohibition, do not have the habit of asking back. This common verb
only here in the N.T., for [aitousin] is the correct text in Lu 12:20). The literary flavour of Luke’s Koinē style is seen in his frequent
use of words common in the literary Greek, but appearing nowhere else in the N.T.
6:31 As ye would [kathōs thelete]. In Mt 7:12 the Golden Rule begins: [Panta hosa ean thelēte]. Luke has “likewise”
[homoiōs] where Matthew has [houtōs]. See on Matthew for discussion of the saying.
6:32 What thank have ye? [poia h–min charis estin;]. What grace
or gratitude is there to you? Mt 5:46 has [misthon] (reward).
6:33 Do good [agathopoiēte]. Third-class condition,
[ean] and present subjunctive. This verb not in old Greek, but in LXX.
Even sinners [kai hoi hamartōloi]. Even the sinners, the article distinguishing
the class. Mt 5:46 has “even the publicans” and 5:47 “even the Gentiles.” That completes the list of the outcasts for “sinners”
includes “harlots” and all the rest.
6:34 If ye lend [ean danisēte]. Third-class condition,
first aorist active subjunctive from [danizō] (old form [daneizō]
to lend for interest in a business transaction (here in active to lend and Mt 5:42 middle to borrow and nowhere else in N.T.), whereas [kichrēmi]
(only Lu 11:5 in N.T.) means to loan as a friendly act. To receive again
as much [hina apolabōsin ta isa]. Second aorist active subjunctive of
[apolambanō], old verb, to get back in full like [apechō] in 6:24. Literally here, “that they may get back the equal” (principal and interest,
apparently). It could mean “equivalent services.” No parallel in Matthew.
6:35 But [plēn]. Plain adversative like [plēn]
in verse 24. Never despairing [mēden apelpizontes]. [Mēden] is read
by A B L Bohairic and is the reading of Westcott and Hort. The reading [mēdena]
is translated “despairing of no man.” The Authorized Version has it “hoping for
nothing again,” a meaning for [apelpizō] with no parallel elsewhere. Field
(Otium Nor. iii. 40) insists that all the same the context demands
this meaning because of [apelpizein] in verse 34, but the correct reading there is [elpizein], not [apelpizein]. Here
Field’s argument falls to the ground. The word occurs in Polybius, Diodorus, LXX
with the sense of despairing and that is the meaning here. D and Old Latin documents
have nihil desperantes, but the Vulgate has nihil inde sperantes (hoping
for nothing thence) and this false rendering has wrought great havoc in
Europe. “On the strength of it Popes and councils have repeatedly condemned the
taking of any interest whatever for loans. As loans could not be had without interest,
and Christians were forbidden to take it, money lending passed into the hands of
the Jews, and added greatly to the unnatural detestation in which Jews were held”
(Plummer). By “never despairing” or “giving up nothing in despair” Jesus
means that we are not to despair about getting the money back. We are to help the
apparently hopeless cases. Medical writers use the word for desperate or hopeless
cases. Sons of the Most High [huoi Hupsistou]. In 1:32 Jesus is called “Son of the Highest” and here all real children or sons
of God (Lu 20:36) are so termed. See also 1:35, 76 for the use of “the Highest” of God. He means the same thing that
we see in Mt 5:45,48 by “your Father.” Toward the unthankful and evil [epi
tous acharistous kai ponērous]. God the Father is kind towards the unkind and
wicked. Note the one article with both adjectives.
6:36 Even as your Father [kathōs ho patēr humōn].
In Mt 5:48 we have [hōs ho patēr humōn]. In both the perfection of the
Father is placed as the goal before his children. In neither case is it said that
they have reached it.
6:37 And judge not [kai mē krinete]. [Mē]
and the present active imperative, forbidding the habit of criticism. The common
verb [krinō], to separate, we have in our English words critic, criticism,
criticize, discriminate. Jesus does not mean that we are not to form opinions, but
not to form them rashly, unfairly, like our prejudice. Ye shall not be judged
[ou mē krithēte]. First aorist passive subjunctive with double negative ou
[mē], strong negative. Condemn not [mē katadikazete]. To give
judgment [dikē, dixazō] against [kata] one. [Mē] and present
imperative. Either cease doing or do not have the habit of doing it. Old verb.
Ye shall not be condemned [ou mē katadikasthēte]. First aorist passive
indicative again with the double negative. Censoriousness is a bad habit. Release
[apoluete]. Positive command the opposite of the censoriousness condemned.
6:38 Pressed down [pepiesmenon]. Perfect passive
participle from [piezō], old verb, but here alone in the N.T., though the
Doric form [piazō], to seize, occurs several times (Joh 7:30,32,44).
Shaken together [sesaleumenon]. Perfect passive participle again from
common verb [saleuō]. Running over [huperekchunnomenon]. Present
middle participle of this double compound verb not found elsewhere save in A Q in Joe 2:24. [Chunō] is a late form of [cheō]. There is asyndeton
here, no conjunction connecting these participles. The present here is in contrast
to the two preceding perfects. The participles form an epexegesis or explanation
of the “good measure” [metron kalon]. Into your bosom [eis ton kolpon
humōn]. The fold of the wide upper garment bound by the girdle made a pocket
in common use (Ex 4:6; Pr 6:27; Ps 79:12; Isa 65:6f.; Jer 32:18).
So Isa 65:7: I will measure their former work unto their bosom. Shall be
measured to you again [antimetrēthēsetai]. Future passive indicative
of the verb here only in the N.T. save late MSS. in Mt 7:2. Even here some MSS. have [metrēthēsetai]. The [anti]
has the common meaning of in turn or back, measured back to you in requital.
6:39 Also a parable [kai parabolēn]. Plummer thinks
that the second half of the sermon begins here as indicated by Luke’s insertion
of “And he spake [eipen de] at this point. Luke has the word parable some
fifteen times both for crisp proverbs and for the longer narrative comparisons.
This is the only use of the term parable concerning the metaphors in the Sermon
on the Mount. But in both Matthew and Luke’s report of the discourse there are some
sixteen possible applications of the word. Two come right together: The blind leading
the blind, the mote and the beam. Matthew gives the parabolic proverb of the blind
leading the blind later (Mt 15:14). Jesus repeated these sayings
on various occasions as every teacher does his characteristic ideas. So Luke 6:40; Mt 10:24, Lu 6:45;
Mt 12:34f. Can [Mēti dunatai]. The use of [mēti]
in the question shows that a negative answer is expected. Guide [hodēgein].
Common verb from [hodēgos] (guide) and this from [hodos] (way)
and [hēgeomai], to lead or guide. Shall they not both fall? [ouchi
amphoteroi empesountai;]. [Ouchi], a sharpened negative from [ouk],
in a question expecting the answer Yes. Future middle indicative of the common verb
[empiptō]. Into a pit [eis bothunon]. Late word for older [bothros].
6:40 The disciple is not above his master [ouk estin
mathētēs huper ton didaskalon]. Literally, a learner (or pupil) is not
above the teacher. Precisely so in Mt 10:24 where “slave” is added with “lord.” But here Luke adds: “But everyone
when he is perfected shall be as his master” [katērtismenos de pās estai hōs
ho didaskalos autou]. The state of completion, perfect passive participle, is
noted in [katērtismenos]. The word is common for mending broken things or
nets (Mt 4:21) or men (Ga 6:1). So it is a long process
to get the pupil patched up to the plane of his teacher.
6:41 Mote [karphos] and beam [dokon].
See on Mt 7:3-5 for discussion of these words in this parabolic proverb kin to
several of ours today.
6:42 Canst thou say [dunasai legein]. Here Mt 7:4 has wilt thou say [ereis]. Beholdest not [ou
blepōn]. Mt 7:4 has “lo” [idou]. Thou hypocrite [hupokrita].
Contrast to the studied politeness of “brother” [adelphe] above. Powerful
picture of blind self-complacence and incompetence, the keyword to argument here.
6:44 Is known [ginōsketai]. The fruit of each tree
reveals its actual character. It is the final test. This sentence is not in Mt 7:17-20, but the same idea is in the repeated saying (Mt 7:16, 20):
“By their fruits ye shall know them,” where the verb epignōsesthe means full
knowledge. The question in Mt 7:16 is put here in positive declarative form. The verb is in the plural
for “men” or “people,” [sullegousin]. See on Mt 7:16. Bramble bush
[batou]. Old word, quoted from the LXX in Mr 12:26; Lu 20:37 (from Ex 3:6) about the burning bush that Moses saw, and by
Stephen (Ac 7:30,35) referring to the same incident. Nowhere else in the N.T. “Galen
has a chapter on its medicinal uses, and the medical writings abound in prescriptions
of which it is an ingredient” (Vincent). Gather [trugōsin].
A verb common in Greek writers for gathering ripe fruit. In the N.T. only here and Re 14:18f. Grapes [staphulēn]. Cluster of grapes.
6:45 Bringeth forth [propherei]. In a similar saying
repeated later. Mt 12:34f. has the verb [ekballei] (throws out, casts out),
a bolder figure. “When men are natural, heart and mouth act in concert. But otherwise
the mouth sometimes professes what the heart does not feel” (Plummer).
6:46 And do not [kai ou poieite]. This is the point
about every sermon that counts. The two parables that follow illustrate this point.
6:47 Hears and does [akouōn kai poiōn]. Present
active participles. So in Mt 7:24. (Present indicative.) I will show you [hupodeixō
humin]. Only in Luke, not Matthew.
6:48 Digged and went deep [eskapsen kai ebathunen].
Two first aorist indicatives. Not a hendiadys for dug deep. [Skaptō],
to dig, is as old as Homer, as is [bathunō], to make deep. And laid a
foundation [kai ethēken themelion]. That is the whole point. This wise
builder struck the rock before he laid the foundation. When a flood arose
[plēmmurēs genomenēs]. Genitive absolute. Late word for flood, [plēmmura],
only here in the N.T., though in Job 40:18. Brake against [proserēxen]. First aorist active
indicative from [prosrēgnumi] and in late writers [prosrēssō], to
break against. Only here in the N.T. Mt 7:25 has [prosepesan], from [prospiptō], to fall against.
Could not shake it [ouk ischusen saleusai autēn]. Did not have strength
enough to shake it. Because it had been well builded [dia to kalōs oikodomēsthai
autēn]. Perfect passive articular infinitive after [dia] and with accusative
of general reference.
6:49 He that heareth and doeth not [ho de akousas kai
mē poiēsas]. Aorist active participle with article. Particular case singled
out (punctiliar, aorist). Like a man [homoios estin anthrōpōi].
Associative instrumental case after [homoios] as in verse 47. Upon the earth [epi tēn gēn]. Mt 7:26 has “upon the sand” [epi tēn ammon], more precise and worse
than mere earth. But not on the rock. Without a foundation [chōris themeliou].
The foundation on the rock after deep digging as in verse 48. It fell in [sunepesen]. Second aorist active of [sunpiptō],
to fall together, to collapse. An old verb from Homer on, but only here in the N.T.
The ruin [to rēgma]. The crash like a giant oak in the forest resounded
far and wide. An old word for a rent or fracture as in medicine for laceration of
a wound. Only here in the N.T.
Chapter 7
7:1 After [epeidē, epei and dē]. This conjunction was written [epei
dē] in Homer and is simple [epei] with the intensive [dē] added
and even [epei dē per] once in N.T. (Lu 1:1). This is the
only instance of the temporal use of [epeidē] in the N.T. The causal sense
occurs only in Luke and Paul, for [epei] is the correct text in Mt 21:46. Had ended [eplērōsen]. First aorist active indicative.
There is here a reference to the conclusion of the Sermon on the Mount, but with
nothing concerning the impression produced by the discourse such as is seen in Mt 7:28. This verse really belongs as the conclusion of
Chapter 6, not as
the beginning of Chapter 7. In the ears of the people [eis tas akoas tou
laou]. [Akoē] from [akouō], to hear, is used of the sense of hearing
(1Co 12:17), the ear with which one hears (Mr 7:35; Heb 5:11),
the thing heard or the report (Rom 10:16) or oral instruction (Ga
3:2,5). Both Mt 8:5-13; Lu 7:1-10 locate the healing of the centurion’s servant in Capernaum
where Jesus was after the Sermon on the Mount.
7:2 Centurion’s servant [Hekatontarchou tinos doulos].
Slave of a certain centurion (Latin word [centurio], commander of a century
or hundred). Mr 15:39,44 has the Latin word in Greek letters, [kenturiōn]. The centurion
commanded a company which varied from fifty to a hundred. Each cohort had six centuries.
Each legion had ten cohorts or bands (Ac 10:1). The centurions mentioned
in the N.T. all seem to be fine men as Polybius states that the best men in the
army had this position. See also Lu 23:47. The Greek has two forms of the word, both from [hekaton],
hundred, and [archō], to rule, and they appear to be used interchangeably.
So we have [hekatontarchos]; here, the form is [-archos], and [hekatontarchēs],
the form is [-archēs] in verse 6. The manuscripts differ about it in almost every instance. The [-archos]
form is accepted by Westcott and Hort only in the nominative save the genitive singular
here in Lu 7:2 and the accusative singular in Ac 22:25. See like variation between them in Mt 8:5,8 [-archos] and
Mt 8:13 [archēi]. So also [-archon] (Ac 22:25)
and [-archēs] (Ac 22:26). Dear to him [autōi entimos].
Held in honour, prized, precious, dear (Lu 14:8; 1Pe 2:4; Php 2:29),
common Greek word. Even though a slave he was dear to him. Was sick [kakōs
echōn]. Having it bad. Common idiom. See already Mt 4:24; 8:16; Mr 2:17; Lu 5:31, etc. Mt 8:6 notes that the slave was a paralytic. And at the point of death
[ēmellen teleutāin]. Imperfect active of [mellō] (note double augment
[ē] which is used either with the present infinitive as here, the aorist
(Re 3:16), or even the future because of the future idea in [mellō]
(Ac 11:28; 24:15). He was about to die.
7:3 Sent unto him elders of the Jews [apesteilen pros
auton presbouterous tōn Ioudaiōn]. Mt 8:5 says “the centurion came unto him.” For discussion of this famous
case of apparent discrepancy see discussion on Matthew. One possible solution is
that Luke tells the story as it happened with the details, whereas Matthew simply
presents a summary statement without the details. What one does through another
he does himself. Asking him [erōtōn auton]. Present active participle,
masculine singular nominative, of the verb [erōtaō] common for asking a question
as in the old Greek (Lu 22:68). But more frequently in the N.T. the
verb has the idea of making a request as here. This is not a Hebraism or an Aramaism,
but is a common meaning of the verb in the papyri (Deissmann, Light from the
Ancient East, p. 168). It is to be noted here that Luke represents the
centurion himself as “asking” through the elders of the Jews (leading citizens).
In Mt 8:6 the verb is [parakalōn] (beseeching). That he would
come and save [hopōs elthōn diasōsēi]. [Hina] is the more common
final or sub-final (as here) conjunction, but [hopōs] still occurs.
[Diasōsēi] is effective aorist active subjunctive, to bring safe through
as in a storm (Ac 28:1,4). Common word.
7:4 Besought [parekaloun]. Imperfect active, began
and kept on beseeching. This is the same verb used by Matthew in Mt 8:5 of the centurion himself. Earnestly [spoudaiōs]. From
[spoudē] haste. So eagerly, earnestly, zealously, for time was short.
That thou shouldst do this for him [hōi parexēi touto]. Second future
middle singular of [parechō]. Old and common verb, furnish on thy part. [Hōi]
is relative in dative case almost with notion of contemplated result (Robertson,
Grammar, p. 961).
7:5 For [gar]. This clause gives the reason why
the elders of the Jews consider him “worthy” [axios], drawing down the scale,
[axis], [ago]. He was hardly a proselyte, but was a Roman who had
shown his love for the Jews. Himself [autos]. All by himself and at
his own expense. Us [hēmin]. Dative case, for us. It is held by some
archaeologists that the black basalt ruins in Tell Hum are the remains of the very
synagogue [tēn sunagōgēn]. Literally, the synagogue, the one which
we have, the one for us.
7:6 Went with them [eporeueto sun autois]. Imperfect
indicative middle. He started to go along with them. Now [ēdē]. Already
like Latin jam.In 1Co 4:8 [nun ēdē] like jam nunc.Sent friends [epempsen
philous]. This second embassy also, wanting in Matthew’s narrative. He “puts
the message of both into the mouth of the centurion himself” (Plummer).
Note saying [legōn], present active singular participle, followed by direct
quotation from the centurion himself. Trouble not thyself [Mē skullou].
Present middle (direct use) imperative of [skullō], old verb originally
meaning to skin, to mangle, and then in later Greek to vex, trouble, annoy. Frequent
in the papyri in this latter sense. For I am not worthy that [ou gar hikanos
eimi hina]. The same word [hikanos], not [axios], as in Mt 8:8, which see for discussion, from [hikō, hikanō], to fit, to
reach, be adequate for. [Hina] in both places as common in late Greek. See Mt 8:8 also for “roof” [stegēn], covering).
7:7 Wherefore neither thought I myself worthy to come unto
thee [dio oude emauton ēxiōsa pros se elthein]. Not in Matthew because
he represents the centurion as coming to Jesus. Speak the word [eipe logōi].
As in Mt 8:8. Second aorist active imperative with instrumental case, speak with
a word. My servant shall be healed [iathētō ho pais mou]. Imperative
first aorist passive, let be healed. [Pais] literally means “boy,” an affectionate
term for the “slave,” [doulos] (verse 2), who was “dear” to him.
7:8 “Set” [tassomenos]. Genuine here, though doubtful
in Mt 8:9 where see discussion of this vivid and characteristic speech of the
centurion.
7:9 Turned [strapheis]. Second aorist passive participle
of [strephō], to turn. Common verb. A vivid touch not in Matthew’s account.
In both Matthew and Luke Jesus marvels at the great faith of this Roman centurion
beyond that among the Jews. As a military man he had learned how to receive orders
and to execute them and hence to expect obedience to his commands, He recognized
Jesus as Master over disease with power to compel obedience.
7:10 Whole [hugiainonta]. Sound, well. See Lu 5:31.
7:11 Soon afterwards [en toi hexēs]. According to
this reading supply [chronōi], time. Other MSS. read [tēi hexēs] (supply
[hēmerāi], day). [Hexēs] occurs in Luke and Acts in the N.T.
though old adverb of time. That [Hoti]. Not in the Greek, the two
verbs [egeneto] and [eporeuthē] having no connective (asyndeton).
Went with him [suneporeuonto autōi]. Imperfect middle picturing the
procession of disciples and the crowd with Jesus. Nain is not mentioned elsewhere
in the N.T. There is today a hamlet about two miles west of Endor on the north slope
of Little Hermon. There is a burying-place still in use. Robinson and Stanley think
that the very road on which the crowd with Jesus met the funeral procession can
be identified.
7:12 Behold [kai idou]. The [kai] introduces
the apodosis of the temporal sentence and has to be left out in translations. It
is a common idiom in Luke, [kai idou]. There was carried out [exekomizeto].
Imperfect passive indicative. Common verb in late Greek for carrying out a body
for burial, though here only in the N.T. [ekkomizō]. Rock tombs outside of
the village exist there today. One that was dead [tethnēkōs]. Perfect
active participle of [thnēskō], to die. The only son of his mother
[monogenēs huios tēi mētri auto–]. Only begotten son to his mother (dative
case). The compound adjective [monogenēs] [monos] and [genos]
is common in the old Greek and occurs in the N.T. about Jesus (Joh 3:16,18).
The “death of a widow’s only son was the greatest misfortune conceivable” (Easton).
And she was a widow [kai autē ēn chēra]. This word [chēra]
gives the finishing touch to the pathos of the situation. The word is from [chēros],
bereft. The mourning of a widow for an only son is the extremity of grief (Plummer).
Much people [ochlos hikanos]. Considerable crowd as often with this
adjective [hikanos]. Some were hired mourners, but the size of the crowd showed
the real sympathy of the town for her.
7:13 The Lord saw her [idōn autēn ho kurios]. The
Lord of Life confronts death (Plummer) and Luke may use [Kurios]
here purposely. Had compassion [esplagchthē]. First aorist (ingressive)
passive indicative of [splagchnizomai]. Often love and pity are mentioned
as the motives for Christ’s miracles (Mt 14:14; 15:32, etc.). It
is confined to the Synoptics in the N.T. and about Christ save in the parables by
Christ. Weep not [mē klaie]. Present imperative in a prohibition.
Cease weeping.
7:14 Touched the bier [hēpsato tou sorou]. An urn
for the bones or ashes of the dead in Homer, then the coffin (Ge 5:26),
then the funeral couch or bier as here. Only here in the N.T. Jesus touched the
bier to make the bearers stop, which they did (stood still, [estēsan], second
aorist active indicative of [histēmi].
7:15 Sat up [anekathisen]. First aorist active indicative.
The verb in the N.T. only here and Ac 9:40). Medical writers often used it of the sick sitting up in bed (Hobart,
Med. Lang. of St. Luke, p. 11). It is objected that the symmetry
of these cases (daughter of Jairus raised from the death-bed, this widow’s son raised
from the bier, Lazarus raised from the tomb) is suspicious, but no one Gospel
gives all three (Plummer). Gave him to his mother [edōken auton
tēi mētri autou]. Tender way of putting it. “For he had already ceased to belong
to his mother” (Bengel). So in Lu 9:42.
7:16 Fear seized all [elaben de phobos pantas].
Aorist active indicative. At once. They glorified God [edoxazon ton theon].
Imperfect active, inchoative, began and increased.
7:17 This report [ho logos houtos]. That God had
raised up a great prophet who had shown his call by raising the dead.
7:18 And the disciples of John told him [kai apēggeilan
Iōanēi hoi mathētai autou]. Literally, and his disciples announced to John.
Such news (verse 17) was bound to come to the ears of the Baptist languishing in the
dungeon of Machaerus (Lu 3:20). Lu 7:18-35 runs parallel with Mt 11:2-19, a specimen of Q, the non-Marcan portion of Matthew and Luke.
7:19 Calling unto him [proskalesamenos]. First aorist
middle (indirect) participle. Two [duo tinas]. Certain two.
Not in Mt 11:2. Saying [legōn]. John saying by the two messengers.
The message is given precisely alike in Mt 11:3, which see. In both we have [heteron] for “another,” either
a second or a different kind. In verse 20 Westcott and Hort read [allon] in the text, [heteron] in
the margin. [Prosdokōmen], may be present indicative or present subjunctive
(deliberative), the same contract form [ao= ō, aō ō].
7:21 In that hour he cured [en ekeinēi tēi horāi etherapeusen].
This item is not in Matthew. Jesus gave the two disciples of John an example of
the direct method. They had heard. Then they saw for themselves. Diseases
[nosōn], plagues [mastigōn], evil spirits [pneumatōn
ponērōn], all kinds of bodily ills, and he singles out the blind [tuphlois]
to whom in particular he bestowed sight [echarizato blepein], gave as a free
gift (from [charis], grace) seeing [blepein].
7:22 What things ye have seen and heard [ha eidete kai
ēkousate]. In Mt 11:4, present tense “which ye do hear and see.” Rest of verse 22, 23
as in Mt 11:4-6, which see for details. Luke mentions no raisings from the dead
in verse 21, but the language is mainly general, while here it is specific. [Skandalizomai]
used here has the double notion of to trip up and to entrap and in the N.T. always
means causing to sin.
7:24 When the messengers of John were departed [apelthontōn
tōn aggelōn Iōanou]. Genitive absolute of aorist active participle. Mt 11:7 has the present middle participle [poreuomenōn], suggesting
that Jesus began his eulogy of John as soon as the messengers (angels, Luke calls
them) were on their way. The vivid questions about the people’s interest
in John are precisely alike in both Matthew and Luke.
7:25 Gorgeously apparelled [en himatismōi endoxōi].
In splendid clothing. Here alone in this sense in the N.T. And live delicately
[truphēi]. From [thruptō] to break down, to enervate, an old word
for luxurious living. See the verb [truphaō] in Jas 5:5. In kings’ courts [en tois basileiois]. Only here in
the N.T. Mt 11:8 has it “in kings’ houses.” Verses 26, 27 are precisely alike in Mt 11:9,10,
which see for discussion.
7:26 A prophet? [prophētēn;]. A real prophet will
always get a hearing if he has a message from God. He is a for-speaker, forth-teller
[pro-phētēs]. He may or may not be a fore-teller. The main thing is for the
prophet to have a message from God which he is willing to tell at whatever cost
to himself. The word of God came to John in the wilderness of Judea (Lu 3:2).
That made him a prophet. There is a prophetic element in every real preacher of
the Gospel. Real prophets become leaders and moulders of men.
7:28 There is none [oudeis estin]. No one exists,
this means. Mt 11:11 has [ouk egēgertai] (hath not arisen). See Matthew
for discussion of “but little” and “greater.”
7:29 Justified God [edikaiōsan ton theon]. They
considered God just or righteous in making these demands of them. Even the publicans
did. They submitted to the baptism of John [baptisthentes to baptisma tou Iōanou].
First aorist passive participle with the cognate accusative retained in the passive.
Some writers consider verses 29, 30 a comment of Luke in the midst of the eulogy of John by Jesus. This
would be a remarkable thing for so long a comment to be interjected. It is perfectly
proper as the saying of Jesus.
7:30 Rejected for themselves [ēthetēsan eis heautous].
The first aorist active of [atheteō] first seen in LXX and Polybius. Occurs
in the papyri. These legalistic interpreters of the law refused to admit the need
of confession of sin on their part and so set aside the baptism of John. They annulled
God’s purposes of grace so far as they applied to them. Being not baptized by
him [mē baptisthentes hup’ autou]. First aorist passive participle. [Mē]
is the usual negative of the participle in the Koinē.
7:31 And to what are they like? [kai tini eisin homoioi;].
This second question is not in Mt 11:16. It sharpens the point. The case of [tini] is associative
instrumental after [homoioi]. See discussion of details in Matthew.
7:32 And ye did not weep [kai ouk eklausate]. Here Mt 1:17 has “and ye did not mourn (or beat your breast, [ouk ekopsasthe].
They all did it at funerals. These children would not play wedding or funeral.
7:33 John the Baptist is come [elēluthen]. Second
perfect active indicative where Mt 11:18 has [ēlthen] second aorist active indicative. So as to
verse 34. Luke alone has “bread” and “wine.” Otherwise these verses like Mt 11:18, 19, which see for discussion of details. There are actually critics
today who say that Jesus was called the friend of sinners and even of harlots because
he loved them and their ways and so deserved the slur cast upon him by his enemies.
If men can say that today we need not wonder that the Pharisees and lawyers said
it then to justify their own rejection of Jesus.
7:35 Of all her children [apo pantōn tōn teknōn autēs].
Here Mt 11:19 has “by her works” [apo tōn ergōn autēs]. Aleph has [ergōn]
here. The use of “children” personifies wisdom as in Pr 8; 9.
7:36 That he would eat with him [hina phagēi met’ autou].
Second aorist active subjunctive. The use of [hina] after [erōtaō]
(see also Lu 16:27) is on the border between the pure object clause and the
indirect question (Robertson, Grammar, p. 1046) and the pure final
clause. Luke has two other instances of Pharisees who invited Jesus to meals (11:37;
14:1) and he alone gives them. This is the Gospel of Hospitality (Ragg).
Jesus would dine with a Pharisee or with a publican (Lu 5:29; Mr 2:15; Mt
9:10) and even invited himself to be the guest of Zaccheus (Lu 9:5).
This Pharisee was not as hostile as the leaders in Jerusalem. It is not necessary
to think this Pharisee had any sinister motive in his invitation though he was not
overly friendly (Plummer).
7:37 A woman which was in the city, a sinner [gunē hētis
en tēi polei hamartōlos]. Probably in Capernaum. The use of [hētis] means
“Who was of such a character as to be” (cf. 8:3) and so more than merely the relative [hē], who, that
is, “who was a sinner in the city,” a woman of the town, in other words, and known
to be such. [Hamartōlos], from [hamartanō], to sin, means devoted
to sin and uses the same form for feminine and masculine. It is false and unjust
to Mary Magdalene, introduced as a new character in Lu 8:2, to identify this woman with her. Luke would have no motive in concealing
her name here and the life of a courtesan would be incompatible with the sevenfold
possession of demons. Still worse is it to identify this courtesan not only with
Mary Magdalene, but also with Mary of Bethany simply because it is a Simon who gives
there a feast to Jesus when Mary of Bethany does a beautiful deed somewhat like
this one here (Mr 14:3-9; Mt 26:6-13; Joh 12:2-8). Certainly Luke
knew full well the real character of Mary of Bethany (10:38-42) so
beautifully pictured by him. But a falsehood, once started, seems to have more lives
than the cat’s proverbial nine. The very name Magdalene has come to mean a repentant
courtesan. But we can at least refuse to countenance such a slander on Mary Magdalene
and on Mary of Bethany. This sinful woman had undoubtedly repented and changed her
life and wished to show her gratitude to Jesus who had rescued her. Her bad reputation
as a harlot clung to her and made her an unwelcome visitor in the Pharisee’s house.
When she knew [epignousa]. Second aorist active participle from [epiginōskō],
to know fully, to recognize. She came in by a curious custom of the time that allowed
strangers to enter a house uninvited at a feast, especially beggars seeking a gift.
This woman was an intruder whereas Mary of Bethany was an invited guest. “Many came
in and took their places on the side seats, uninvited and yet unchallenged. They
spoke to those at table on business or the news of the day, and our host spoke freely
to them” (Trench in his Parables, describing a dinner at a Consul’s house
at Damietta). He was sitting at meat [katakeitai]. Literally,
he is reclining (present tense retained in indirect discourse in Greek).
An alabaster cruse of ointment [alabastron murou]. See on Mt 26:7
for discussion of [alabastron] and [murou].
7:38 Standing behind at his feet [stāsa opisō para tous
podas autou]. Second aorist active participle from [histēmi] and intransitive,
first aorist [estēsa] being transitive. The guest removed his sandals before
the meal and he reclined on the left side with the feet outward. She was standing
beside [para] his feet weeping [klaiousa]. She was drawn irresistibly
by gratitude to Jesus and is overcome with emotion before she can use the ointment;
her tears [tois dakrusin], instrumental case of [dakru] take the place
of the ointment. Wiped them with the hair of her head [tais thrixin tēs
kephalēs autēs exemassen]. Inchoative imperfect of an old verb [ekmassō],
to rub out or off, began to wipe off, an act of impulse evidently and of embarrassment.
“Among the Jews it was a shameful thing for a woman to let down her hair in public;
but she makes this sacrifice” (Plummer). So Mary of Bethany wiped the feet
of Jesus with her hair (Joh 12:3) with a similar sacrifice out of
her great love for Jesus. This fact is relied on by some to prove that Mary of Bethany
had been a woman of bad character, surely an utter failure to recognize Mary’s motive
and act. Kissed [katephilei]. Imperfect active of [kataphileō],
to kiss repeatedly (force of [kata], and accented by the tense of continued
action here. The word in the N.T. occurs here, of the prodigal’s father (15:20),
of the kiss of Judas (Mr 14:45; Mt 26:49), of the Ephesian elders
(Ac 20:37). “ Kissing the feet was a common mark of deep reverence,
especially to leading rabbis” (Plummer). Anointed them with the ointment
[ēleiphen tōi murōi]. Imperfect active again of [aleiphō], a very common verb.
[Chriō] has a more religious sense. The anointing came after the burst of emotional
excitement.
7:39 This man [houtos]. Contemptuous, this fellow. If he were
a (the) prophet [ei ēn [ho] prophētēs]. Condition of the second class, determined
as unfulfilled. The Pharisee assumes that Jesus is not a prophet (or the prophet,
reading of B, that he claims to be). A Greek condition puts the thing from
the standpoint of the speaker or writer. It does not deal with the actual facts,
but only with the statement about the facts. Would have perceived [eginōsken
an]. Wrong translation, would now perceive or know (which he assumes that Jesus
does not do). The protasis is false and the conclusion also. He is wrong
in both. The conclusion (apodosis), like the condition, deals here with
the present situation and so both use the imperfect indicative [an] in the
conclusion, a mere device for making it plain that it is not a condition of the
first class). Who and what manner of woman [tis kai potapē hē
gunē]. She was notorious in person and character.
7:40 Answering [apokritheis]. First aorist passive
participle, redundant use with [eipen]. Jesus answers the thoughts and doubts
of Simon and so shows that he knows all about the woman also. Godet notes a tone
of Socratic irony here.
7:41 A certain lender [danistēi tini]. A lender
of money with interest. Here alone in the N.T. though a common word. Debtors
[chreophiletai]. From [chreō] (debt, obligation) and [opheilō],
to owe. Only here and 16:5 in the N.T., though common in late Greek writers. Owed [ōpheilen].
Imperfect active and so unpaid. Five hundred [dēnaria] and fifty like two
hundred and fifty dollars and twenty-five dollars.
7:42 Will love him most [pleion agapēsei auton].
Strictly, comparative more, [pleion], not superlative [pleista],
but most suits the English idiom best, even between two. Superlative forms are vanishing
before the comparative in the Koinē.This is the point of the parable, the
attitude of the two debtors toward the lender who forgave both of them (Plummer).
7:43 I suppose [hupolambanō]. Old verb, originally
to take up from under, to bear away as on high, to take up in speech (Lu
10:30), to take up in mind or to assume as here and Ac 2:15. Here with an air of supercilious indifference (Plummer).
The most [to pleion]. The more. Rightly [orthōs]. Correctly.
Socrates was fond of [panu orthōs]. The end of the argument.
7:44 Turning [strapheis]. Second aorist passive
participle. Seest thou [blepeis]. For the first time Jesus looks at
the woman and he asks the Pharisee to look at her. She was behind Jesus. Jesus was
an invited guest. The Pharisee had neglected some points of customary hospitality.
The contrasts here made have the rhythm of Hebrew poetry. In each contrast the first
word is the point of defect in Simon: water (44), kiss (45),
oil (46).
7:45 Hath not ceased to kiss [ou dielipen kataphilousa].
Supplementary participle.
7:46 With ointment [murōi]. Instrumental case. She
used the costly ointment even for the feet of Jesus.
7:47 Are forgiven [apheōntai]. Doric perfect passive
form. See Lu 5:21,23. For she loved much [hoti ēgapēsen polu]. Illustration
or proof, not reason for the forgiveness. Her sins had been already forgiven and
remained forgiven. But to whom little is forgiven, the same loveth little
[Hōi de oligon aphietai oligon agapāi]. This explanation proves that the
meaning of [hoti] preceding is proof, not cause.
7:48 Are forgiven [apheōntai]. As in verse 47. Remain forgiven,
Jesus means, in spite of the slur of the Pharisee.
7:49 Who even forgiveth sins [hos kai hamartias aphiēsin].
Present indicative active of same verb, [aphiēmi]. Once before the Pharisees
considered Jesus guilty of blasphemy in claiming the power to forgive sins (Lu
5:21). Jesus read their inmost thoughts as he always does.
Chapter 8
8:1 Soon afterwards [en tōi kathexēs]. In 7:11 we have [en tōi hexēs]. This word means one after the other, successively,
but that gives no definite data as to the time, only that this incident in 8:1-3 follows that in
7:36-50). Both in Luke alone. That [kai]. One of Luke’s idioms
with [kai egeneto] like Hebrew wav.Went about [diōdeuen]. Imperfect
active of [diodeuō], to make one’s way through [dia, hodos], common
in late Greek writers. In the N.T. here only and Ac 17:1. Through cities and villages [kata polin kai kōmēn].
Distributive use of [kata] (up and down). The clause is amphibolous
and goes equally well with [diōdeuen] or with [kērussōn] (heralding)
[kai euaggelizomenos] (evangelizing, gospelizing). This is the second
tour of Galilee, this time the Twelve with him.
8:2 Which had been healed [hai ēsan tetherapeumenai].
Periphrastic past perfect passive, suggesting that the healing had taken place some
time before this tour. These women all had personal grounds of gratitude to Jesus.
From whom seven devils (demons) had gone out [aph’ hēs daimonia
hepta exelēluthei]. Past perfect active third singular for the [daimonia]
are neuter plural. This first mention of Mary Magdalene describes her special cause
of gratitude. This fact is stated also in Mr 16:9 in the disputed close of the Gospel. The presence of seven demons
in one person indicates special malignity (Mr 5:9). See Mt 17:45 for the parable of the demon who came back with seven other demons
worse than the first. It is not known where Magdala was, whence Mary came.
8:3 Joanna [Iōana]. Her husband [Chuzā],
steward [epitropou] of Herod, is held by some to be the nobleman [basilikos]
of Joh 4:46-53 who believed and all his house. At any rate Christ had a follower
from the household of Herod Antipas who had such curiosity to see and hear him.
One may recall also Manaen (Ac 13:1), Herod’s foster brother. Joanna
is mentioned again with Mary Magdalene in Lu 24:10). Who ministered unto them [haitines diēkonoun autois].
Imperfect active of [diakoneō], common verb, but note augment as if from
[dia] and [akoneō], but from [diakonos] and that from [dia]
and [konis] (dust). The very fact that Jesus now had twelve men going
with him called for help from others and the women of means responded to the demand.
Of their substance [ek tōn huparchontōn autais]. From the things belonging
to them. This is the first woman’s missionary society for the support of missionaries
of the Gospel. They had difficulties in their way, but they overcame these, so great
was their gratitude and zeal.
8:4 By a parable [dia parabolēs]. Mr 4:2 says “in parables” as does Mt 13:3. This is the beginning of the first great group of parables as given
in Mr 4:1-34 and Mt 13:1-53. There are ten of these parables in Mark and Matthew and only
two in Lu 8:4-18 (The Sower and the Lamp, 8:16) though Luke also has the expression “in parables”
(8:10).
See Mt 13 and Mr 4 for discussion of the word parable and the details of the Parable of
the Sower. Luke does not locate the place, but he mentions the great crowds on hand,
while both Mark and Matthew name the seaside as the place where Jesus was at the
start of the series of parables.
8:5 His seed [ton sporon autou]. Peculiar to Luke.
Was trodden under foot [katepatēthē]. First aorist passive indicative
of [katapateō]. Peculiar to Luke here. Of the heavens [tou ouranou].
Added in Luke.
8:6 Upon the rock [epi tēn petran]. Mr 4:5 “the rocky ground” [epi to petrōdes], Mt 13:5 “the rocky places. As soon as it grew [phuen]. Second
aorist passive participle of [phuō], an old verb to spring up like a sprout.
Withered away [exēranthē]. First aorist passive indicative of [zērainō],
old verb, to dry up. Moisture [ikmada]. Here only in the N.T., though
common word.
8:7 Amidst the thorns [en mesōi tōn akanthōn]. Mr 4:7 has [eis] (among) and Mt 13:7 has [epi] “upon.” Grew with it [sunphueisai].
Same participle as [phuen] above with [sun-] (together).
Choked [apepnixan]. From [apopnigō], to choke off as in Mt 13:7. In Mr 4:7 the verb is [sunepnixan] (choked together).
8:8 A hundredfold [hekatonplasiona]. Luke omits
the thirty and sixty of Mr 4:8; Mt 13:8. He cried [ephōnei]. Imperfect active, and
in a loud voice, the verb means. The warning about hearing with the ears occurs
also in Mr 4:9; Mt 13:9.
8:9 Asked [epērōtōn]. Imperfect of [eperōtaō]
[epi] and [erōtaō] where Mr 4:10 has [ērōtōn] (uncompounded imperfect), both the tense
and the use of [epi] indicate eager and repeated questions on the part of
the disciples, perhaps dimly perceiving a possible reflection on their own growth.
What this parable might be [tis hautē eiē hē parabolē]. A mistranslation,
What this parable was (or meant). The optative [eiē] is merely due
to indirect discourse, changing the indicative [estin] (is) of the
direct question to the optative [eiē] of the indirect, a change entirely
with the writer or speaker and without any change of meaning (Robertson, Grammar,
pp. 1043f.).
8:10 The mysteries [ta mustēria]. See for this word
on Mt 13:11; Mr 4:11. Part of the mystery here explained is how so many people
who have the opportunity to enter the kingdom fail to do so because of manifest
unfitness. That [hina]. Here Mr 4:11 also has [hina] while Mt 13:13 has [hoti] (because). On the so-called causal use
of [hina] as here equal to [hoti] see discussion on Mt 13:13; Mr
4:11. Plummer sensibly argues that there is truth both in the causal [hoti]
of Matthew and the final [hina] of Mark and Matthew. “But the principle that
he who hath shall receive more, while he who hath not shall be deprived of what
he seemeth to have, explains both the [hina] and the [hoti]. Jesus
speaks in parables because the multitudes see without seeing and hear without hearing.
But He also speaks in parable in order that they may see without seeing and
hear without hearing.” Only for “hearing” Luke has “understand” [suniōsin],
present subjunctive from a late omega form [suniō] instead of the [-mi]
verb [suniēmi].
8:11 Is this [estin de hautē]. Means this. Jesus
now proceeds to interpret his own parable. The seed is the word of God [ho
sporos estin ho logos tou theou]. The article with both subject and predicate
as here means that they are interchangeable and can be turned round: The word of
God is the seed. The phrase “the word of God” does not appear in Matthew and only
once in Mark (Mr 7:13) and John (Joh 10:35), but four
times in Luke (5:1; 8:11, 21;
11:28) and twelve times in Acts. In Mr 4:14 we have only “the word.” In
Mr 3:31 we have “the will of God,” and in Mt 12:46 “the will of my Father” where
Lu 8:21 has “the word of God.” This seems to show that Luke has the subjective
genitive here and means the word that comes from God.
8:12 Those by the wayside [hoi para tēn hodon].
As in Mr 4:15; Mt 13:19 so here the people who hear the word = the seed are discussed
by metonymy. The devil [ho diabolos]. The slanderer. Here Mr 4:15 has Satan. From their heart [apo tēs kardias autōn].
Here Mark has “in them.” It is the devil’s business to snatch up the seed from the
heart before it sprouts and takes root. Every preacher knows how successful the
devil is with his auditors. Mt 13:19 has it “sown in the heart.” That they may not believe and be
saved [hina mē pisteusantes sōthōsin]. Peculiar to Luke. Negative purpose
with aorist active participle and first aorist (ingressive) passive subjunctive.
Many reasons are offered today for the failure of preachers to win souls. Here is
the main one, the activity of the devil during and after the preaching of the sermon.
No wonder then that the sower must have good seed and sow wisely, for even then
he can only win partial success.
8:13 Which for a while believe [hoi pros kairon pisteuousin].
Ostensibly they are sincere and have made a real start in the life of faith.
They fall away [aphistantai]. Present middle indicative. They stand off,
lose interest, stop coming to church, drop out of sight. It is positively amazing
the number of new church members who “stumble” as Mr 4:17 has it [skandalizontai], do not like the pastor, take offence
at something said or done by somebody, object to the appeals for money, feel slighted.
The “season of trial” becomes a “season of temptation” [en kairōi peirasmou]
for these superficial, emotional people who have to be periodically rounded up if
kept within the fold.
8:14 They are choked [sunpnigontai]. Present passive
indicative of this powerfully vivid compound verb [sunpnigō] used in Mr 4:19;
Mt 13:22, only there these worldly weeds choke the word while here
the victims themselves are choked. Both are true. Diphtheria will choke and strangle
the victim. Who has not seen the promise of fair flower and fruit choked into yellow
withered stalk without fruit “as they go on their way” [poreuomenoi].
Bring no fruit to perfection [ou telesphorousin]. Compound verb common
in the late writers [telos, phoreō]. To bring to completion. Used of fruits,
animals, pregnant women. Only here in the N.T.
8:15 In an honest and good heart [en kardiāi kalēi kai
agathēi]. Peculiar to Luke. In verse 8 the land [gēn] is called [agathēn] (really good, generous)
and in verse 15 we have [en tēi kalēi gēi] (in the beautiful or noble land).
So Luke uses both adjectives of the heart. The Greeks used [kalos k’ agathos]
of the high-minded gentleman. It is probable that Luke knew this idiom. It occurs
here alone in the N.T. It is not easy to translate. We have such phrases as “good
and true,” “sound and good,” “right and good,” no one of which quite suits the Greek.
Certainly Luke adds new moral qualities not in the Hellenic phrase. The English
word “honest” here is like the Latin honestus (fair, noble). The
words are to be connected with “hold fast” [katechousin], “hold it down”
so that the devil does not snatch it away, having depth of soil so that it does
not shrivel up under the sun, and is not choked by weeds and thorns. It bears fruit
[karpophorousin], an old expressive verb, [karpos] and [phoreō].
That is the proof of spiritual life. In patience [en hupomonēi]. There
is no other way for real fruit to come. Mushrooms spring up overnight, but they
are usually poisonous. The best fruits require time, cultivation, patience.
8:16 When he hath lighted a lamp [luchnon hapsas].
It is a portable lamp [luchnon] that one lights [hapsas] aorist active
participle of [haptō], to kindle, fasten to, light). With a vessel
[skeuei], instrumental case of [skeuos]. Here Mr 4:21 has the more definite figure “under the bushel” as has Mt 5:15. Under the bed [hupokatō klinēs]. Here Mr 4:21 has the regular [hupo tēn klinēn] instead of the late compound
[hupokatō]. Ragg notes that Matthew distributes the sayings of Jesus given
here by Lu 8:16-18; Mr 4:21-25 concerning the parable of the lamp and gives them
in three separate places (Mt 5:15; 10:26; 13:12). That is true, but
it does not follow that Mark and Luke have bunched together separate sayings or
that Matthew has scattered sayings delivered only on one occasion. One of the slowest
lessons for some critics to learn is that Jesus repeated favourite sayings on different
occasions and in different groupings just as every popular preacher and teacher
does today. See on Mr 4:21 for further discussion of the lamp and stand. May
see the light [Blepōsin to phōs]. In Mt 5:16 Jesus has it “may see your good works.” The purpose of light is to
let one see something else, not the light. Note present subjunctive [blepōsin],
linear action “Jesus had kindled a light within them. They must not hide it, but
must see that it spreads to others” (Plummer). The parable of the lamp throws
light on the parable of the sower.
8:17 That shall not be known [ho ou mē gnōsthēi].
Peculiar to Luke. First aorist passive subjunctive of [ginōskō] with the
strong double negative [ou mē]. See on Mr 4:22 for discussion of [krupton]
and [apokruphon].
8:18 How ye hear [pōs akouete]. The manner of hearing. Mr 4:24 has “what ye hear” [ti akouete], the matter that is heard.
Both are supremely important. Some things should not be heard at all. Some that
are heard should be forgotten. Others should be treasured and practised. For
whosoever hath [Hos an gar echēi]. Present active subjunctive of the
common verb [echō] which may mean “keep on having” or “acquiring.” See on
Mr 4:25 for discussion. Thinketh he hath [dokei echein], or seems
to acquire or to hold. Losses in business illustrate this saying as when we
see their riches take wings and fly away. So it is with hearing and heeding. Self-deception
is a common complaint.
8:19 His mother and brethren [hē mētēr kai hoi adelphoi
autou]. Mr 3:31-35; Mt 12:46-50 place the visit of the mother and brothers of Jesus
before the parable of the sower. Usually Luke follows Mark’s order, but he does
not do so here. At first the brothers of Jesus (younger sons of Joseph and Mary,
I take the words to mean, there being sisters also) were not unfriendly
to the work of Jesus as seen in Joh 2:12 when they with the mother of Jesus are with him and the small group
(half dozen) disciples in Capernaum after the wedding in Cana. But as Jesus
went on with his work and was rejected at Nazareth (Lu 4:16-31),
there developed an evident disbelief in his claims on the part of the brothers who
ridiculed him six months before the end (Joh 7:5). At this stage
they have apparently come with Mary to take Jesus home out of the excitement of
the crowds, perhaps thinking that he is beside himself (Mr 3:21.
They hardly believed the charge of the rabbis that Jesus was in league with Beelzebub.
Certainly the mother of Jesus could give no credence to that slander. But she herself
was deeply concerned and wanted to help him if possible. See discussion of the problem
in my little book The Mother of Jesus and also on Mr 3:31 and Mt 12:46.
Come to him [suntuchein]. Second aorist active infinitive of [suntugchanō],
an old verb, though here alone in the N.T., meaning to meet with, to fall in with
as if accidentally, here with associative instrumental case [autōi].
8:20 Was told [apēggelē]. Second aorist passive
indicative of [apaggellō], to bring word or tidings. Common verb. See on
Mr 3:32 and Mt 12:47 for details.
8:21 These which hear the word of God and do it [hoi
ton logon tou theou akouontes kai poiountes]. The absence of the article with
“mother” and “brothers” probably means, as Plummer argues, “Mother to me and brothers
to me are those who &c.” No one is a child of God because of human parentage (Joh
1:13). “Family ties are at best temporal; spiritual ties are eternal” (Plummer)
. Note the use of “hear and do” together here as in Mt 7:24; Lu 6:47 at the close of the Sermon on the Mount. The parable of
the sower is almost like a footnote to that sermon. Later Jesus will make “doing”
a test of friendship for him (Joh 15:14).
8:22 And they launched forth [kai anēchthēsan].
First aorist passive indicative of [anagō], an old verb, to lead up, to put
out to sea (looked at as going up from the land). This nautical sense of
the verb occurs only in Luke in the N.T. and especially in the Acts (Ac 13:13;
16:11; 18:21; 20:3,13; 21:1,2; 27:2, 4, 12, 21; 28:10f.).
8:23 He fell asleep [aphupnōsen]. First aorist (ingressive)
active indicative of [aphupnoō], to put to sleep, to fall off to sleep, a
late verb for which the older Greek used [kathupnoō]. Originally [aphupnoō]
meant to waken from sleep, then to fall off to sleep (possibly a medical use).
This is the only passage which speaks of the sleep of Jesus. Here only in the N.T.
Came down [katebē]. Second aorist active indicative of [katabainō],
common verb. It was literally true. These wind storms [lailaps]. So also Mr 4:37) rushed from Hermon down through the Jordan gorge upon the
Sea of Galilee and shook it like a tempest (Mt 8:24). Mark’s (Mr
4:37) vivid use of the dramatic present [ginetai] (ariseth)
is not so precise as Luke’s “came down.” See on Mt 8:24. These sudden squalls were
dangerous on this small lake. They were filling [suneplērounto]. Imperfect
passive. It was the boat that was being filled (Mr 4:37) and it is
here applied to the navigators as sailors sometimes spoke. An old verb, but in the
N.T. used only by Luke (8:23; 9:51; Ac 2:1). Were in jeopardy
[ekinduneuon]. Imperfect active, vivid description. Old verb, but in the
N.T. only here, Ac 19:27; 1Co 15:30).
8:24 Master, Master [Epistata, epistata]. See on
Lu 5:5 for discussion. Mr 4:38 has Teacher [Didaskale],
Mt 8:25 has Lord [Kurie]. The repetition here shows the uneasiness
of the disciples. We perish [apollumetha]. So in Mr 4:38; Mt 8:25. Linear present middle indicative, we are perishing.
The raging of the water [tōi kludoni tou hudatos]. [Kludōn], common
Greek word, is a boisterous surge, a violent agitation. Here only in the N.T. save Jas 1:6. [Kuma] (Mr 4:37) is the regular swell or wave.
A calm [galēnē]. Only in the parallels in the N.T., though common
word. Here Mr 4:39; Mt 8:26 add great [megalē]. That [hoti].
This use of [hoti] as explanatory of the demonstrative pronoun [houtos]
occurs in the parallels Mr 4:36; Mt 8:27 and also in Lu 4:36. It is almost result.
He commandeth [epitassei]. Peculiar
to Luke.
8:26 They arrived [katepleusan]. First aorist active
indicative of [katapleō], common verb, but here only in the N.T. Literally,
they sailed down from the sea to the land, the opposite of launched forth
[anēchthēsan] of verse 22. So we today use like nautical terms, to bear up, to bear down. The
Gerasenes [ton Gerasēnōn]. This is the correct text here as in Mr 5:1 while Gadarenes is correct in Mt 8:28. See there for explanation of this famous discrepancy, now cleared
up by Thomson’s discovery of Khersa [Gersa] on the steep eastern bank and
in the vicinity of Gadara. Over against Galilee [antipera tēs Galilaias].
Only here in the N.T. The later Greek form is [antiperan] (Polybius, etc.).
Some MSS. here have [peran] like Mr 5:1; Mt 8:28.
8:27 And for a long time [kai chronōi hikanōi].
The use of the associative instrumental case in expressions of time is a very old
Greek idiom that still appears in the papyri (Robertson, Grammar, p. 527).
He had worn no clothes [ouk enedusato himation]. First aorist middle
indicative, constative aorist, viewing the “long time” as a point. Not pluperfect
as English has it and not for the pluperfect, simply “and for a long time he did
not put on himself (indirect middle) any clothing.” The physician would
naturally note this item. Common verb [enduō] or [endunō]. This item
in Luke alone, though implied by Mr 5:15 “clothed” [himatismenon]. And abode not in any house
[kai en oikiāi ouk emenen]. Imperfect active. Peculiar to Luke, though implied
by the mention of tombs in all three (Mr 5:3; Mt 8:28; Lu 8:27).
8:28 Fell down [prosepesen]. Second aorist active
of [prospiptō], to fall forward, towards, prostrate before one as here. Common
verb. Mr 5:6 has [prosekunēsen] (worshipped). The Most High God
[tou theou tou hupsistou]. Uncertain whether [tou theou] genuine or
not. But “the Most High” clearly means God as already seen (Lu 1:32,35,36;
6:35). The phrase is common among heathen (Nu 24:16; Mic 6:6; Isa
14:14). The demoniac may have been a Gentile, but it is the demon here speaking.
See on Mr 2:7; Mt 8:29 for the Greek idiom [ti emoi kai soi]. “What have
I to do with thee?” See there also for “Torment me not.”
8:29 For he commanded [parēggellen gar]. Imperfect
active, correct text, for he was commanding. Often times [pollois chronois].
Or “for a long time” like [chronōi pollōi] of verse 27 (see Robertson, Grammar, p. 537, for the plural here).
It had seized [sunērpakei]. Past perfect active of [sunarpazō],
to lay hold by force. An old verb, but only in Luke in the N.T. (Lu 8:29;
Ac 6:12; 19:29; 27:15). Was kept under guard [edesmeueto].
Imperfect passive of [desmeuō] to put in chains, from [desmos], bond,
and that from [deō] to bind. Old, but rather rare verb. Only here and Ac 22:4 in this sense. In Mt 23:4 it means to bind together. Some MSS. read [desmeō] in Lu 8:29. Breaking the bands asunder [diarēssōn ta desma]. Old
verb, the preposition [dia] (in two) intensifying the meaning of
the simple verb [rēssō] or [rēgnumi], to rend. Was driven [ēlauneto].
Imperfect passive of [elaunō], to drive, to row, to march (Xenophon).
Only five times in the N.T. Here alone in Luke and peculiar to Luke in this incident.
8:30 Legion [Legiōn]. See on Mr 5:9.
8:31 Into the abyss [eis tēn abusson]. Rare old
word common in LXX from [a] privative and [bath–s] (deep).
So bottomless place (supply [chōra]. The deep sea in Ge 1:2; 7:11. The common receptacle of the dead in Ro 10:7 and especially the abode of demons as here and
Re 9:1-11; 11:7; 17:8; 20:1,3.
8:32 A herd of many swine [agelē choirōn hikanōn].
Word herd [agelē] old as Homer, but in N.T. only here and parallels
(Mr 5:11; Mt 8:30). Luke shows his fondness for adjective [hikanos]
here again (see verse 27) where Mark has [megalē] and Matthew [pollōn].
8:33 Rushed down the steep [hōrmēsen kata tou krēmnou].
Ablative with [kata] as in Mr 5:13; Mt 8:32 and the same vivid verb in each account, to hurl impetuously,
to rush. Were choked [apepnigē]. Second aorist (constative)
passive indicative third singular (collective singular) where Mr 5:13 has the picturesque imperfect [epnigonto].
8:34 Saw what had come to pass [idontes to gegonos].
This item only in Luke. Note the neat Greek idiom [to gegonos], articular
second perfect active participle of [ginomai]. Repeated in verse 35 and in Mr 5:14. Note numerous participles here in
verse 35 as in Mr 5:15.
8:36 He that was possessed with devils (demons)
(only two words in Greek, [ho daimonistheis], the demonized).
Was made whole [esōthē]. First aorist passive indicative of [sōzō]
to save from [sōs] (safe and sound). This is additional information
to the news carried to them in verse 34.
8:37 Were holden with great fear [phobōi megalōi suneichonto].
Imperfect passive of [sunechō] with the instrumental case of [phobos]. See
a similar use of this vigorous verb in Lu 12:50 of Jesus and in Php 1:23 of Paul.
8:38 From whom the devils (demons) were gone out
[aph’ hou exelēluthei ta daimonia]. Past perfect active of [exerchomai],
state of completion in the past. Prayed him [edeeito autou]. Imperfect
middle, kept on begging.
8:39 Throughout the whole city [kath’ holēn tēn polin]. Mr 5:20 has it “in Decapolis.” He had a great story to tell and he told it
with power. The rescue missions in our cities can match this incident with cases
of great sinners who have made witnesses for Christ.
8:40 Welcomed [apedexato]. Peculiar to Luke. To
receive with pleasure, from [apodechomai], a common verb. For they were
all waiting for him [ēsan gar pantes prosdokōntes auton]. Periphrastic
imperfect active of prosdokaō, an old verb for eager expectancy, a vivid
picture of the attitude of the people towards Jesus. Driven from Decapolis, he is
welcomed in Capernaum.
8:41 Was [hupērchen]. Imperfect of [huparchō]
in sense of [ēn] as in modern Greek. Common in Luke, and Acts, but not in
other Gospels.
8:42 An only daughter [thugatēr monogenēs]. The
same adjective used of the widow’s son (7:12) and the epileptic boy
(9:38) and of Jesus (Joh 1:18; 3:16). She lay a
dying [apethnēsken]. Imperfect active, she was dying. Mt 9:18 has it that she has just died. Thronged [sunepnigon].
Imperfect active of [sumpnigō], to press together, the verb used of the thorns
choking the growing grain (Lu 8:14). It was a jam.
8:43 Had spent all her living upon physicians [eis iatrous
prosanalōsasa holon ton bion]. First aorist active participle of an old verb
[prosanaliskō], only here in the N.T. But Westcott and Hort reject this clause
because it is not in B D Syriac Sinaitic. Whether genuine or not, the other clause
in Mr 5:26 certainly is not in Luke: “had suffered many things of many physicians.”
Probably both are not genuine in Luke who takes care of the physicians by the simple
statement that it was a chronic case: could not be healed of any [ouk
ischusen ap’ oudenos therapeuthēnai]. He omitted also what Mark has: “and was
nothing bettered but rather grew worse.”
8:44 The border of his garment [tou kraspedou tou himatiou].
Probably the tassel of the overgarment. Of the four corners two were in front and
two behind. See on Mt 9:20). Stanched [estē]. Second aorist active
indicative, stopped at once (effective aorist).
8:45 Press thee and crush thee [sunechousin se kai apothlibousin].
Hold thee together, hold thee in [sunechō], see verse 37). Crush thee [apothlibō] here only in the N.T.,
a verb used of pressing out grapes in Diodorus and Josephus. Mr 5:31 has [sunthlibō], to press together.
8:46 For I perceived that power had gone forth from me
[egō gar egnōn dunamin exelēluthuian ap’ emou]. [Egnōn] is second
aorist active indicative of [ginōskō], knowledge by personal experience as
here. It is followed by the second perfect active participle [exelēluthuian]
in indirect discourse (Robertson, Grammar, pp. 1040-42). Jesus felt
the sensation of power already gone. Who does not know what this sense of “goneness”
or exhaustion of nervous energy means?
8:47 Trembling [tremousa]. Vivid touch of the feeling
of this sensitive woman who now had to tell everybody of her cure, “in the presence
of all the people” [enōpion pantos tou laou]. She faced the widest publicity
for her secret cure.
8:49 From the ruler of the synagogue’s house [para tou
archisunagōgou]. The word “house” is not in the Greek here as in Mr 5:35 where [apo] is used rather than [para], as here. But
the ruler himself had come to Jesus (Lu 8:41) and this is the real
idea. Trouble not [mēketi skulle]. See on Lu 7:6 for this verb and also Mr 5:35; Mt 9:36.
8:50 And she shall be made whole [kai sōthēsetai].
This promise in addition to the words in Mr 5:36. See there for discussion of details.
8:53 Knowing that she was dead [eidotes hoti apethanen].
That she died [apethanen], second aorist active indicative of [apothnēskō].
8:54 Called [ephōnēsen]. Certainly not to wake up
the dead, but to make it plain to all that she rose in response to his elevated
tone of voice. Some think that the remark of Jesus in verse 52 (Mr 5:39; Mt 9:24) proves that she was not really dead,
but only in a trance. It matters little. The touch of Christ’s hand and the power
of his voice restored her to life. Maiden [hē pais] rather than Mark’s
(Mr 5:41) [to korasion] (vernacular Koinē).
8:55 Her spirit returned [epestrepsen to pneuma autēs].
The life came back to her at once. Be given her to eat [autēi dothēnai
phagein]. The first infinitive [dothēnai] is an indirect command. The
second [phagein] (second aorist active of [esthiō] is epexegetic purpose.
Chapter 9
9:1 He called the twelve together [sunkalesamenos tous dōdeka]. Mr 6:7; Mt 10:1 have [proskaleōmai], to call to him. Both the indirect
middle voice.
9:2 He sent them forth [apesteilen autous]. First
aorist active indicative of [apostellō]. To preach the kingdom of God and
to heal the sick [kērussein tēn basileian tou theou kai iāsthai]. Present
indicative for the continuous functions during this campaign. This double office
of herald [kērussein] and healer [iāsthai] is stated directly in Mt 10:7-8. Note the verb [iaomai] for healing here, though [therapeuein]
in verse 1, apparently used interchangeably.
9:3 Neither staff [mēte rabdon]. For the apparent
contradiction between these words (Mt 10:10) and Mr 6:8 see discussion there. For [pēran] (wallet) see also
on Mr 6:8 (Mt 10:10) for this and other details here.
9:5 As many as receive you not [hosoi an mē dechōntai
humas]. Indefinite relative plural with [an] and present middle subjunctive
and the negative [mē]. Here Mt 10:14 has the singular (whosoever) and Mr 6:11 has “whatsoever place.” For a testimony against them [eis
marturion ep’ autous]. Note use of [ep’ autous] where Mr 6:11 has simply the dative [autois] (disadvantage), really
the same idea.
9:6 Went [diērchonto]. Imperfect middle, continuous
and repeated action made plainer also by three present participles [exerchomenoi,
euaggelizomenoi, therapeuontes], describing the wide extent of the work through
all the villages [kata tas kōmas], distributive use of [kata] everywhere
[pantachou] in Galilee.
9:7 All that was done [ta ginomena panta]. Present
middle participle, “all that was coming to pass.” He was much perplexed [diēporei].
Imperfect active of [diaporeō], to be thoroughly at a loss, unable to find
a way out [dia, a] privative, [poros], way), common ancient
verb, but only in Luke’s writings in the N.T. Because it was said [dia
to legesthai]. Neat Greek idiom, the articular passive infinitive after [dia]. Three
reports came to the ears of Herod as Luke has it, each introduced by [hoti]
(that) in indirect discourse: “By some” [hupo tinōn], “by some” [hupo
tinōn de], “by others” [allōn de, hupo] not here expressed, but carried
over). The verbs in the indirect discourse here (verses 7, 8) are all three aorists [ēgerthē] first passive; [ephanē]
second passive; [anestē] second active), not past perfects as the
English has them.
9:9 He sought [ezētei]. Imperfect active. He keep
on seeking to see Jesus. The rumours disturbed Herod because he was sure that he
had put him to death (“John I beheaded”).
9:10 Declared [diēgēsanto]. First aorist middle
of [diēgeomai], to carry a narrative through to the end. Jesus listened to
it all. They had done [epoiēsan]. Aorist active indicative, they did.
He took them [paralabōn autous]. Second aorist active participle of
[paralambanō]. Very common verb. Bethsaida [Bēthsaida]. Peculiar
to Luke. Bethsaida Julias is the territory of Philip, for it is on the other side
of the Sea of Galilee (Joh 6:1).
9:11 Spake [elalei]. Imperfect active, he continued
speaking. He healed [iāto]. Imperfect middle, he continued healing.
9:12 To wear away [klinein]. Old verb usually transitive,
to bend or bow down. Many compounds as in English decline, incline, recline, clinic
[klinē], bed), etc. Luke alone in the N.T. uses it intransitively
as here. The sun was turning down towards setting. Lodge [katalusōsin].
First aorist active subjunctive of [kataluō], a common verb, to dissolve,
destroy, overthrow, and then of travellers to break a journey, to lodge [kataluma],
inn, Lu 2:7). Only here and 19:7 in the N.T. in this sense. Get victuals [heurōsin episitismon].
Ingressive aorist active of [heuriskō], very common verb. Victuals
[episitismon], from [episitizomai], to provision oneself, [sitizō],
from [siton], wheat) only here in the N.T., though common in ancient
Greek, especially for provisions for a journey (snack). See on Mr 6:32-44;
Mt 14:13-21 for discussion of details.
9:13 Except we should go and buy food [ei mēti poreuthentes
hēmeis agorasōmen brōmata]. This is a condition of the third class with the
aorist subjunctive [agorasōmen], where the conjunction is usually [ean]
(with negative [ean mē], but not always or necessarily so especially in the
Koinē.So in 1Co 14:5 [ei mē diermēneuēi] and in Php 3:12 [ei kai katalabō]. ”Unless” is better here than “except.”
Food [brōmata], means eaten pieces from [bibrōskō], to eat,
somewhat like our “edibles” or vernacular “eats.”
9:14 About [hōsei]. Luke as Mt 14:21 adds this word to the definite statement of Mr 6:44
that there were 5,000 men, a hundred companies of fifty each.
Sit down [kataklinate]. First aorist active imperative. Recline, lie
down. Only in Luke in the N.T. See also verse 15. In companies [klisias]. Cognate accusative after kataklinate.
Only here in the N.T. A row of persons reclining at meals (table company).
About fifty each [hōsei ana pentēkonta]. Distributive use of [ana]
and approximate number again [hōsei].
9:16 The five . . . the two [tous pente ... tous duo].
Pointing back to verse 13, fine example of the Greek article. And gave [kai edidou].
Imperfect active of [didōmi], kept on giving. This picturesque imperfect
is preceded by the aorist [kateklasen] (brake), a single act. This
latter verb in the N.T. only here and the parallel in Mr 6:41, though common enough in ancient Greek. We say “break off” where
here the Greek has “break down” (or thoroughly), perfective use of [kata].
9:17 Twelve baskets [kophinoi dōdeka]. For discussion
of [kophonoi] and [sphurides] as well as of [klasmata] (broken
pieces) see on Mr 6:43; Mt 14:20).
9:18 As he was praying [en tōi einai auton proseuchomenon].
Common Lukan idiom of [en] with the articular infinitive for a temporal clause,
only here Luke has the periphrastic infinitive [einai proseuchomenon] as
also in 11:1. This item about Christ’s praying alone in Luke. Alone [kata
monas]. In the N.T. only here and Mr 4:10). Perhaps [chōras] (places) is to be supplied with
[monas] (lonely places). Were with him (sunēsan autōi].
This seems like a contradiction unless “alone” is to be taken with [sunēsan]. Westcott
and Hort put [sunēntēsan] in the margin. This would mean that as Jesus was
praying alone, the disciples fell in with him. At any rate he was praying apart
from them.
9:19 That I am [me einai]. Accusative and infinitive
in indirect assertion, a common Greek idiom. Mt 16:13 for “I” has “the Son of man” as identical in the consciousness of
Christ. The various opinions of men about Jesus here run parallel to the rumours
heard by Herod (verses 8, 9).
9:20 But who say ye? [Humeis de tina legete;]. Note
the emphatic proleptical position of [humeis\: “But ye who do ye say? This is
really what mattered now with Jesus. The Christ of God [Ton christon tou
theou]. The accusative though the infinitive is not expressed. The Anointed of God,
the Messiah of God. See on 2:26 for “the Anointed of the Lord.” See on Mt 16:17
for discussion of Peter’s testimony in full. Mr 6:29 has simply “the Christ.” It is clear from the previous narrative
that this is not a new discovery from Simon Peter, but simply the settled conviction
of the disciples after all the defections of the Galilean masses and the hostility
of the Jerusalem ecclesiastics. The disciples still believed in Jesus as the Messiah
of Jewish hope and prophecy. It will become plain that they do not grasp the spiritual
conception of the Messiah and his kingdom that Jesus taught, but they are clear
that he is the Messiah however faulty their view of the Messiah may be. There was
comfort in this for Jesus. They were loyal to him.
9:21 To tell this to no man [mēdeni legein touto]. Indirect
command with the negative infinitive after commanded [parēggeilen]. It had
been necessary for Jesus to cease using the word Messiah [Christos] about
himself because of the political meaning to the Jews. Its use by the disciples would
lead to revolution as was plain after the feeding of the five thousand (Joh
6:15).
9:22 Rejected [apodokimasthēnai]. First aorist passive
infinitive of [apodokimazō], to reject after trial. The third day
[tēi tritēi hēmerāi]. Locative case of time as in Mt 16:21. Here in the parallel passage Mr 8:31 has “after three days” [meta treis hēmeras] in precisely the
same sense. That is to say, “after three days” is just a free way of saying “on
the third day” and cannot mean “on the fourth day” if taken too literally. For discussion
of this plain prediction of the death of Christ with various details see discussion
on Mt 16:21; Mr 8:31. It was a melancholy outlook that depressed the disciples
as Mark and Matthew show in the protest of Peter and his rebuke.
9:23 He said unto all [elegen de pros pantas]. This
is like Luke (cf. verse 43). Jesus wanted all (the multitude with his disciples, as Mr 8:34 has it) to understand the lesson of self-sacrifice. They
could not yet understand the full meaning of Christ’s words as applied to his approaching
death of which he had been speaking. But certainly the shadow of the cross is already
across the path of Jesus as he is here speaking. For details (soul, life, forfeit,
gain, profit, lose, world) see discussion on Mt 16:24-26; Mr 8:34-37. The
word for lose [apolesei], from [apollumi], a very common verb)
is used in the sense of destroy, kill, lose, as here. Note the mercantile terms
in this passage (gain, lose, fine or forfeit, exchange). Daily [kath’
hēmeran]. Peculiar to Luke in this incident. Take up the cross (his own cross)
daily (aorist tense, [āratō], but keep on following me [akoloutheitō],
present tense). The cross was a familiar figure in Palestine. It was rising
before Jesus as his destiny. Each man has his own cross to meet and bear.
9:26 Whosoever shall be ashamed [hos an epaischunthēi].
Rather, Whosoever is ashamed as in Mr 8:38. The first aorist passive subjunctive in an indefinite relative clause
with [an]. The passive verb is transitive here also. This verb is from [epi]
and [aischunē], shame (in the eyes of men). Jesus endured the shame
of the cross (Heb 12:2). The man at the feast who had to take a lower
seat did it with shame (Lu 14:9). Paul is not ashamed of the Gospel
(Ro 1:16). Onesiphorus was not ashamed of Paul (2Ti 1:16).
In his own glory [en tēi doxēi autou]. This item added to what is
in Mr 8:38; Mt 16:27.
9:27 Till they see [heōs an idōsin]. Second aorist
active subjunctive with [heōs] and [an] referring to the future, an
idiomatic construction. So in Mr 9:1; Mt 16:28. In all three passages “shall not taste of death” [ou
mē geusōntai thanatou], double negative with aorist middle subjunctive)
occurs also. Rabbinical writings use this figure. Like a physician Christ tasted
death that we may see how to die. Jesus referred to the cross as “this cup” (Mr
14:36; Mt 26:39; Lu 22:42). Mark speaks of the kingdom of God as “come”
[elēluthuian], second perfect active participle). Matthew as “coming”
[erchomenon] referring to the Son of man, while Luke has neither form. See
Matthew and Mark for discussion of the theories of interpretation of this difficult
passage. The Transfiguration follows in a week and may be the first fulfilment in
the mind of Jesus. It may also symbolically point to the second coming.
9:28 About eight days [hōsei hēmerai oktō]. A
nominativus pendens without connexion or construction. Mr 9:2 (Mt 17:1) has “after six days” which agrees with the
general statement. Into the mountain [eis to oros]. Probably Mount
Hermon because we know that Jesus was near Caesarea Philippi when Peter made the
confession (Mr 8:27; Mt 16:13). Hermon is still the glory of Palestine
from whose heights one can view the whole of the land. It was a fit place for the
Transfiguration. To pray [proseuxasthai]. Peculiar to Luke who so
often mentions Christ’s habit of prayer (cf. 3:21). See also
verse 29 “as he was praying” [en tōi proseuchesthai], one of Luke’s favourite
idioms). His countenance was altered [egeneto to eidos tou prosōpou
autou heteron]. Literally, “the appearance of his face became different.” Mt 17:2 says that “his face did shine as the sun.” Luke does not use the
word “transfigured” [metemorphōthē] in Mr 9:2; Mt 17:2. He may have avoided this word because of the pagan associations
with this word as Ovid’s [Metamorphoses]. And his raiment became white
and dazzling [kai ho himatismos autou leukos exastraptōn]. Literally,
And his raiment white radiant. There is no and between “white” and
“dazzling.” The participle [exastraptōn] is from the compound verb meaning
to flash [astraptō] out or forth [ex]. The simple verb is common for
lightning flashes and bolts, but the compound in the LXX and here alone in the N.T.
See Mr 9:3 “exceeding white” and Mt 17:2 “white as the light.”
9:31 There talked with him [sunelaloun autōi]. Imperfect
active, were talking with him. Who appeared in glory [hoi ophthentes en
doxēi]. First aorist passive participle of [horaō]. This item peculiar
to Luke. Compare verse 26. Spake of his decease [elegon tēn exodon]. Imperfect active,
were talking about his [exodus] (departure from earth to heaven)
very much like our English word “decease” (Latin decessus, a going away).
The glorious light graphically revealed Moses and Elijah talking with Jesus about
the very subject concerning which Peter had dared to rebuke Jesus for mentioning
(Mr 8:32; Mt 16:22). This very word [exodus] (way out)
in the sense of death occurs in 2Pe 1:15 and is followed by a brief description of the Transfiguration glory.
Other words for death [thanatos] in the N.T. are [ekbasis], going
out as departure (Heb 13:7), [aphixis], departing (Ac
20:29), [analusis], loosening anchor (2Ti 4:6) and
[analusai] (Php 1:23). To accomplish [plēroun].
To fulfil. Moses had led the Exodus from Egypt. Jesus will accomplish the exodus
of God’s people into the Promised Land on high. See on Mark and Matthew for discussion
of significance of the appearance of Moses and Elijah as representatives of law
and prophecy and with a peculiar death. The purpose of the Transfiguration was to
strengthen the heart of Jesus as he was praying long about his approaching death
and to give these chosen three disciples a glimpse of his glory for the hour of
darkness coming. No one on earth understood the heart of Jesus and so Moses and
Elijah came. The poor disciples utterly failed to grasp the significance of it all.
9:32 Were heavy with sleep [ēsan bebarēmenoi hupnōi].
Periphrastic past perfect of [bareō], a late form for the ancient [barunō]
(not in N.T. save Textus Receptus in Lu 21:34). This form, rare and only in passive (present, aorist,
perfect) in the N.T., is like [barunō], from [barus], and
that from [baros], weight, burden (Ga 6:2). [Hupnōi]
is in the instrumental case. They had apparently climbed the mountain in the early
part of the night and were now overcome with sleep as Jesus prolonged his prayer.
Luke alone tells of their sleep. The same word is used of the eyes of these three
disciples in the Garden of Gethsemane (Mt 26:43) and of the hearts
of many (Lu 21:34). But when they were fully awake [diagrēgorēsantes
de]. First aorist active participle of this late (Herodian) and rare
compound verb (here alone in the N.T.), [diagrēgoreō] (Luke is fond
of compounds with [dia]. The simple verb [grēgoreō] (from the second
perfect active [egrēgora] is also late, but common in the LXX and the N.T.
The effect of [dia] can be either to remain awake in spite of desire to sleep
(margin of Revised Version) or to become thoroughly awake (ingressive aorist
tense also) as Revised Version has it. This is most likely correct. The
Syriac Sinaitic has it “When they awoke.” Certainly they had been through a strain.
His glory [tēn doxan autou]. See also verse 26 in the words of Jesus.
9:33 As they were departing from him [en tōi diachōrizesthai
autous ap’ autou]. Peculiar to Luke and another instance of Luke’s common idiom
of [en] with the articular infinitive in a temporal clause. This common verb
occurs here only in the N.T. The present middle voice means to separate oneself
fully (direct middle). This departing of Moses and Elijah apparently accompanied
Peter’s remark as given in all three Gospels. See for details on Mark and Matthew.
Master [Epistata] here, Rabbi (Mr 9:5), Lord
[Kurie], Mt 17:4). Let us make [poiēsōmen], first aorist active
subjunctive) as in Mr 9:5, but Mt 17:4 has “I will make” [poiēsō]. It was near the time of the feast
of the tabernacles. So Peter proposes that they celebrate it up here instead of
going to Jerusalem for it as they did a bit later (Joh 7). Not
knowing what he said [mē eidōs ho legei]. Literally, not understanding
what he was saying [mē], regular negative with participle and [legei],
present indicative retained in relative clause in indirect discourse). Luke
puts it more bluntly than Mark (Peter’s account), “For he wist not what
to answer; for they became sore afraid” (Mr 9:6). Peter acted according
to his impulsive nature and spoke up even though he did not know what to say or
even what he was saying when he spoke. He was only half awake as Luke explains and
he was sore afraid as Mark (Peter) explains. He had bewilderment enough
beyond a doubt, but it was Peter who spoke, not James and John.
9:34 Overshadowed them [epeskiazen autous]. Imperfect
active (aorist in Mt 17:5) as present participle in Mr 9:7, inchoative, the shadow began to come upon them. On Hermon as on many
high mountains a cloud will swiftly cover the cap. I have seen this very thing at
Blue Ridge, North Carolina. This same verb is used of the Holy Spirit upon Mary
(Lu 1:35). Nowhere else in the N.T., though an old verb [epi,
skiazō], from [skia], shadow). As they entered into the cloud
[en tōi eiselthein autous eis tēn nephelēn]. Luke’s idiom of [en]
with the articular infinitive again (aorist active this time, on the entering in
as to them). All six “entered into” the cloud, but only Peter, James, and
John “became afraid” [ephobēthēsan], ingressive first aorist passive).
9:35 If [ekeinous] be accepted here instead of [autous],
the three disciples would be outside of the cloud. Out of the cloud [ek
tēs nephelēs]. This voice was the voice of the Father like that at the baptism
of Jesus (Lu 3:22; Mr 1:11; Mt 3:17) and like that near the end (Joh
12:28-30) when the people thought it was a clap of thunder or an angel.
My son, my chosen [Ho huios mou, ho eklelegmenos]. So the best documents
(Aleph B L Syriac Sinaitic). The others make it “My Beloved” as in Mr 9:7;
Mt 17:5. These disciples are commanded to hear Jesus, God’s Son,
even when he predicts his death, a pointed rebuke to Simon Peter as to all.
9:36 When the voice came [en toi genesthai tēn phōnēn].
Another example of Luke’s idiom, this time with the second aorist middle infinitive.
Literally, “on the coming as to the voice” (accusative of general reference).
It does not mean that it was “after” the voice was past that Jesus was found alone,
but simultaneously with it (ingressive aorist tense). Alone [monos].
Same adjective in Mr 9:8; Mt 17:8 translated “only.” Should be rendered “alone” there also.
They held their peace [esigēsan]. Ingressive aorist active of common
verb [sigaō], became silent. In Mr 9:9; Mt 17:9, Jesus commanded them not to tell till His Resurrection from
the dead. Luke notes that they in awe obeyed that command and it turns out that
they finally forgot the lesson of this night’s great experience. By and by they
will be able to tell them, but not “in those days.” Which they had seen [hōn
heōrakan]. Attraction of the relative [ha] into the case of the unexpressed
antecedent [toutōn]. Perfect active indicative [heōrakan] with Koinē
(papyri) form for the ancient [heōrakāsin] changed by analogy to
the first aorist ending in [-an] instead of [-asin].
9:37 On the next day [tēi hexēs hēmerāi]. Alone
in Luke. It shows that the Transfiguration took place on the preceding night.
They were come down [katelthontōn autōn]. Genitive absolute of second
aorist active participle of [katerchomai], a common enough verb, but in the
N.T. only in Luke’s writings save Jas 3:15. Met him [sunēntēsen autōi]. First aorist active of
[sunantaō], common compound verb, to meet with, only in Luke’s writings in
the N.T. save Heb 7:1. With associative instrumental case [autōi].
9:38 Master [Didaskale]. Teacher as in Mr 9:17. Lord [kurie], Mt 17:15). To look upon [epiblepsai]. Aorist active
infinitive of [epiblepō] [epi], upon, [blepō], look),
common verb, but in the N.T. only here and Jas 2:3 except Lu 1:48 in quotation from LXX. This compound verb is common in medical writers
for examining carefully the patient. Mine only child [monogenēs moi].
Only in Luke as already about an only child in 7:12; 8:42.
9:39 Suddenly [exephnēs]. Old adverb, but in the
N.T. only in Luke’s writings save Mr 13:36. Used by medical writers of sudden attacks of disease like epilepsy.
It teareth him that he foameth [sparassei auton meta aphrou]. Literally,
“It tears him with (accompanied with, [meta] foam” (old word, [aphros],
only here in the N.T.). From [sparassō], to convulse, a common verb,
but in the N.T. only here and Mr 1:26; 9:26 (and [sunsparassō], Mr 9:20). See Mr 9:17; Mt 17:15; Lu 9:39 for variations in the symptoms in each Gospel.
The use of [meta aphrou] is a medical item. Hardly [molis].
Late word used in place of [mogis], the old Greek term (in some MSS. here)
and alone in Luke’s writings in the N.T. save 1Pe 4:18; Ro 5:7. Bruising him sorely [suntribon auton]. Common
verb for rubbing together, crushing together like chains (Mr 5:4)
or as a vase (Mr 14:3). See on Matthew and Mark for discussion of
details here.
9:41 How long shall I be with you and bear with you? [heōs
pote esomai pros humās kai anexomai humōn;]. Here the two questions of Mr 9:19 (only one in Mt 17:17) are combined in one sentence. Bear with [anexomai],
direct middle future) is, hold myself from you (ablative case [humōn].
Faithless [apistos] is disbelieving and perverse [diestrammenē],
perfect passive participle of [diastrephō], is twisted, turned, or torn in
two.
9:42 As he was yet a coming [eti proserchomenou autou].
Genitive absolute. While he was yet coming (the boy, that is, not Jesus).
Note quaint English “a coming” retained in the Revised Version. Dashed him
[errēxen auton]. First aorist active indicative of [rēgnumi] or [rēssō],
to rend or convulse, a common verb, used sometimes of boxers giving knockout blows.
Tare grievously [sunesparaxen]. Rare word as only here and Mr 9:20 in the N.T., which see. Gave him back to his father [apedōken
auton tōi patri autou]. Tender touch alone in Luke as in 7:15. They were all astonished [exeplēssonto de pantes]. Imperfect
passive of the common verb [ekplēssō] or [ekplēgnumi], to strike out,
a picturesque description of the amazement of all at the easy victory of Jesus where
the nine disciples had failed. At the majesty of God [epi tēi megaleiotēti
tou theou]. A late word from the adjective [megaleios] and that from
[megas] (great). In the N.T. only here and Ac 19:27 of Artemis and in 2Pe 1:16 of the Transfiguration. It came to be used by the emperors like
our word “Majesty.” Which he did [hois epoiei]. This is one of the
numerous poor verse divisions. This sentence has nothing to do with the first part
of the verse. The imperfect active [epoiei] covers a good deal not told by
Luke (see Mr 9:30; Mt 17:22). Note the attraction of the relative hois
into the case of pāsin, its antecedent.
9:44 Sink into your ears [Thesthe humeis eis ta ōta
humōn]. Second aorist imperative middle of [tithēmi], common verb. “Do
you (note emphatic position) yourselves (whatever others do) put
into your ears.” No word like “sink” here. The same prediction here as in Mr 9:31; Mt 17:22 about the Son of man only without mention of death and
resurrection as there, which see for discussion.
9:45 It was concealed from them [ēn parakekalummenon
ap’ autōn]. Periphrastic past perfect of [parakaluptō], a common verb,
but only here in the N.T., to cover up, to hide from. This item only in Luke.
That they should not perceive it [hina mē aisthōntai auto]. Second aorist
middle subjunctive of the common verb [aisthanomai] used with [hina mē],
negative purpose. This explanation at least relieves the disciples to some extent
of full responsibility for their ignorance about the death of Jesus as Mr 9:32 observes, as does Luke here that they were afraid to ask him. Plummer
says, “They were not allowed to understand the saying then, in order that they might
remember it afterwards, and see that Jesus had met His sufferings with full knowledge
and free will.” Perhaps also, if they had fully understood, they might have lacked
courage to hold on to the end. But it is a hard problem.
9:46 A reasoning [dialogismos]. A dispute. The word
is from [dialogizomai], the verb used in Mr 9:33 about this incident. In Luke this dispute follows immediately after
the words of Jesus about his death. They were afraid to ask Jesus about that subject,
but Mt 18:1 states that they came to Jesus to settle it. Which of them should
be greatest [to tis an eiē meizōn autōn]. Note the article with the indirect
question, the clause being in the accusative of general reference. The optative
with [an] is here because it was so in the direct question (potential optative
with [an] retained in the indirect). But Luke makes it plain that
it was not an abstract problem about greatness in the kingdom of heaven as they
put it to Jesus (Mt 18:1), but a personal problem in their own group.
Rivalries and jealousies had already come and now sharp words. By and by James and
John will be bold enough to ask for the first places for themselves in this political
kingdom which they expect (Mr 10:35; Mt 20:20). It is a sad spectacle.
9:47 Took a little child [epilabomenos paidion].
Second aorist middle participle of the common verb [epilambanō]. Strictly,
Taking a little child to himself (indirect middle). Mr 9:36 has merely the active [labōn] of the simple verb [lambanō]. Set
him by his side [estēsen auto par’ heautōi]. “In his arms” Mr 9:36 has it, “in the midst of them” Mt 18:3 says. All three attitudes following one another (the disciples probably
in a circle around Jesus anyhow) and now the little child (Peter’s child?)
was slipped down by the side of Jesus as he gave the disciples an object lesson
in humility which they sorely needed.
9:48 This little child [touto to paidion]. As Jesus
spoke he probably had his hand upon the head of the child. Mt 18:5 has “one such little child.” The honoured disciple, Jesus holds,
is the one who welcomes little children “in my name” [epi tōi onomati mou],
upon the basis of my name and my authority. It was a home-thrust against the selfish
ambition of the Twelve. Ministry to children is a mark of greatness. Have preachers
ever yet learned how to win children to Christ? They are allowed to slip away from
home, from Sunday school, from church, from Christ. For he that is least among
you all [ho gar mikroteros en pasin humin huparchōn]. Note the use of
[huparchō] as in 8:41; 23:50). The comparative [mikroteros] is in accord with the
Koinē idiom where the superlative is vanishing (nearly gone in modern Greek).
But great [megas] is positive and very strong. This saying peculiar
to Luke here.
9:49 And John answered [apokritheis de Iōanēs].
As if John wanted to change the subject after the embarrassment of the rebuke for
their dispute concerning greatness (Lu 9:46-48). Master [epistata].
Only in Luke in the N.T. as already four times (5:5; 8:24, 45;
9:33).
We forbade him [ekōluomen auton]. Conative imperfect as in Mr 9:38, We tried to hinder him. Because he followeth not with us
[hoti ouk akolouthei meth hēmōn]. Present tense preserved for vividness where
Mark has imperfect ēkolouthei. Note also here “with us” [meth’ hēmōn]
where Mark has associative instrumental [hēmin]. It is a pitiful specimen
of partisan narrowness and pride even in the Beloved Disciple, one of the Sons of
Thunder. The man was doing the Master’s work in the Master’s name and with the Master’s
power, but did not run with the group of the Twelve.
9:50 “Against you is for you” [kath’ h–mōn huper h–mōn]. Mr 9:40 has “against us is for us” [hēmōn ... hēmōn]. The Koinē
Greek [ē] and [–] were often pronounced alike and it was easy to interchange
them. So many MSS. here read just as in Mark. The point is precisely the same as
it is a proverbial saying. See a similar saying in Lu 11:23: “He that is not with me is against me.” The prohibition here as
in Mr 9:39 is general: “Stop hindering him” [mē kōluete, mē] and the
present imperative, not [mē] and the aorist subjunctive). The lesson
of toleration in methods of work for Christ is needed today.
9:51 When the days were well-nigh come [en tōi sumplērousthai
tas hēmeras]. Luke’s common idiom [en] with the articular infinitive,
“in the being fulfilled as to the days.” This common compound occurs in the N.T.
only here and Lu 8:23; Ac 2:1. The language here makes it plain that Jesus was fully conscious
of the time of his death as near as already stated (Lu 9:22,27,31).
That he should be received up [tēs analēmpseōs autou]. Literally,
“of his taking up.” It is an old word (from Hippocrates on), but here alone
in the N.T. It is derived from [analambanō] (the verb used of the Ascension, Ac 1:2,11,22; 1Ti 3:16) and refers here to the Ascension of Jesus
after His Resurrection. Not only in John’s Gospel (Joh 17:5) does
Jesus reveal a yearning for a return to the Father, but it is in the mind of Christ
here as evidently at the Transfiguration (9:31) and later in Lu 12:49f. He steadfastly set his face [autos to prosōpon estērisen].
Note emphatic [autos], he himself, with fixedness of purpose in the
face of difficulty and danger. This look on Christ’s face as he went to his doom
is noted later in Mr 10:32. It is a Hebraistic idiom (nine times in Ezekiel), this
use of face here, but the verb (effective aorist active) is an old one from
[stērizō] (from [stērigx], a support), to set fast, to fix.
To go to Jerusalem [tou poreuesthai eis Ierousalēm]. Genitive infinitive
of purpose. Luke three times mentions Christ making his way to Jerusalem (9:51;
13:22; 17:11) and John mentions three journeys to Jerusalem during the later
ministry (Joh 7:10; 11:17; 12:1). It is natural to take these journeys
to be the same in each of these Gospels. Luke does not make definite location of
each incident and John merely supplements here and there. But in a broad general
way they seem to correspond.
9:52 Sent messengers [apesteilen aggelous]. As a
precaution since he was going to Jerusalem through Samaria. The Samaritans did not
object when people went north from Jerusalem through their country. He was repudiating
Mount Gerizim by going by it to Jerusalem. This was an unusual precaution by Jesus
and we do not know who the messengers (angels) were. To make ready for
him [hōs hetoimasai autōi]. [Hōs] is correct here, not [hōste]. The
only examples of the final use of [hōs] with the infinitive in the N.T. are
this one and Heb 7:9 (absolute use). In Acts 20:24 Westcott and Hort read [hōs teleiōsō] and put [hōs teleiōsai]
in the margin (Robertson, Grammar, p. 1091).
9:53 And they did not receive him [kai ouk edexanto
auton]. Adversative use of [kai] = But. Because his face was going
to Jerusalem [hoti to prosōpon autou ēn poreuomenon eis Ierousalēm].
Periphrastic imperfect middle. It was reason enough to the churlish Samaritans.
9:54 Saw this [idontes]. Second aorist active participle
of [horaō]. Saw the messengers returning. We bid [theleis eipōmen].
Deliberative subjunctive [eipōmen] after [theleis] without [hina],
probably two questions, Dost thou wish? Shall we bid? Perhaps the recent appearance
of Elijah on the Mount of Transfiguration reminded James and John of the incident
in 2Ki 1:10-12. Some MSS. add here “as Elijah did.” The language of the LXX
is quoted by James and John, these fiery Sons of Thunder. Note the two aorist active
infinitives [katabēnai, analōsai], the first ingressive, the second effective).
9:55 But he turned [strapheis de]. Second aorist
passive participle of [strephō], common verb, to turn round. Dramatic act.
Some ancient MSS. have here: Ye know not what manner of spirit ye are of
[ouk oidate poiou pneumatos este]. This sounds like Christ and may be a genuine
saying though not a part of Luke’s Gospel. A smaller number of MSS. add also:
For the Son of Man came not to destroy men’s lives, but to save them [Ho
gar huios tou anthrōpou ouk ēlthen psuchas anthrōpōn apolesai alla sōsai], a
saying reminding us of Mt 5:17; Lu 19:10). Certain it is that here Jesus rebuked the bitterness of
James and John toward Samaritans as he had already chided John for his narrowness
towards a fellow-worker in the kingdom.
9:57 A certain man [tis]. Mt 8:19 calls him “a scribe.” Lu 9:57-60;
Mt 8:19-22, but not in Mark and so from Q or the Logia. Wherever
you go [hopou ean aperchēi] is the present middle subjunctive with the
indefinite relative adverb [ean], common Greek idiom. See on Matthew for
“holes,” “nests,” “Son of man.” The idiom “where to lay his head” [pou tēn kephalēn
klinēi] is the same in both, the deliberative subjunctive retained in the indirect
question. “Jesus knows the measure of the scribe’s enthusiasm” (Plummer).
The wandering life of Jesus explains this statement.
9:59 And he said unto another [eipen de pros heteron]. Mt 8:21
omits Christ’s “Follow me” [akolouthei moi] and makes this
man a volunteer instead of responding to the appeal of Jesus. There is no real opposition,
of course. In Matthew’s account the man is apologetic as in Luke. Plummer calls
him “one of the casual disciples” of whom there are always too many. The scribes
knew how to give plausible reasons for not being active disciples. First
[prōton]. One of the problems of life is the relation of duties to each other,
which comes first. The burial of one’s father was a sacred duty (Ge 25:9),
but, as in the case of Tobit 4:3, this scribe’s father probably was still alive.
What the scribe apparently meant was that he could not leave his father while still
alive to follow Jesus around over the country.
9:60 Leave the dead to bury their own dead [aphes tous
nekrous thapsai tous heautōn nekrous]. This paradox occurs so in Mt 8:22. The explanation is that the spiritually dead can bury the literally
dead. For such a quick change in the use of the same words see Joh 5:21-29 (spiritual resurrection from sin in Joh 5:21-27,
bodily resurrection from the grave, Joh 5:28, 29) and Joh 11:25f. The harshness of this proverb to the scribe probably is due to
the fact that he was manifestly using his aged father as an excuse for not giving
Christ active service. But go thou and publish abroad the kingdom of God
[su de apelthōn diaggelle tēn basileian tou theou]. The scribe’s duty is
put sharply [But do thou, su de]. Christ called him to preach, and he was
using pious phrases about his father as a pretext. Many a preacher has had to face
a similar delicate problem of duty to father, mother, brothers, sisters and the
call to preach. This was a clear case. Jesus will help any man called to preach
to see his duty. Certainly Jesus does not advocate renunciation of family duties
on the part of preachers.
9:61 And another also said [eipen de kai heteros].
A volunteer like the first. This third case is given by Luke alone, though the incident
may also come from the same Logia as the other two. [Heteros] does not here
mean one of a “different” sort as is sometimes true of this pronoun, but merely
another like [allos] (Robertson, Grammar, p. 749). But
first [prōton de]. He also had something that was to come “first.”
To bid farewell to them that are at my house [apotaxasthai tois eis ton oikon
mou]. In itself that was a good thing to do. This first aorist middle infinitive
is from [apotassō], an old verb, to detach, to separate, to assign as a detachment
of soldiers. In the N.T. it only appears in the middle voice with the meaning common
in late writers to bid adieu, to separate oneself from others. It is used in Ac 18:18 of Paul taking leave of the believers in Corinth.
See also Mr 6:46; 2Co 2:13. It is thus a formal function and this man meant to go
home and set things in order there and then in due time to come and follow Jesus.
9:62 Having put his hand to the plough [epibalōn tēn
cheira ep’ arotron]. Second aorist active participle of [epiballō], an
old and common verb, to place upon. Note repetition of preposition [epi]
before [arotron] (plough). This agricultural proverb is as old as
Hesiod. Pliny observes that the ploughman who does not bend attentively to his work
goes crooked. It has always been the ambition of the ploughman to run a straight
furrow. The Palestine fellah had good success at it. And looking back
[kai blepōn eis ta opisō]. Looking to the things behind. To do that is fatal
as any ploughman knows. The call to turn back is often urgent. Fit [euthetos].
From [eu] and [tithēmi] = well-placed, suited for, adapted to. “The first
case is that of inconsiderate impulse, the second that of conflicting duties, the
third that of a divided mind” (Bruce).
Chapter 10
10:1 Appointed [anedeixen]. First aorist active indicative of [anadeiknumi],
an old verb, not only common, but in LXX. In the N.T. only here and Ac 1:24. Cf. [anadeixis] in Lu 1:80). To show forth, display, proclaim, appoint. Seventy others
[heterous hebdomēkonta kai]. The “also” [kai] and the “others” point
back to the mission of the Twelve in Galilee (9:1-6). Some critics
think that Luke has confused this report of a mission in Judea with that in Galilee,
but needlessly so. What earthly objection can there be to two similar missions?
B D Syr. Cur. and Syr. Sin. have “seventy-two.” The seventy elders were counted
both ways and the Sanhedrin likewise and the nations of the earth. It is an evenly
balanced point. Two and two [ana duo]. For companionship as with the
Twelve though Mr 6:7 has it [duo] (vernacular idiom). B K have here [ana
duo], a combination of the idiom in Mr 6:7 and that here. He himself was about to come [ēmellen autos
erchesthai]. Imperfect of [mellō] with present infinitive and note [autos]. Jesus
was to follow after and investigate the work done. This was only a temporary appointment
and no names are given, but they could cover a deal of territory.
10:2 Harvest [therismos]. Late word for the older
[theros], summer, harvest. The language in this verse is verbatim what we
have in Mt 9:37,38 to the Twelve. Why not? The need is the same and prayer is the
answer in each case. Prayer for preachers is Christ’s method for increasing the
supply.
10:3 As lambs [hōs arnas]. Here again the same language
as that in Mt 10:16 except that there “sheep” [probata] appears instead of “lambs.”
Pathetic picture of the risks of missionaries for Christ. They take their life in
their hands.
10:4 Purse [ballantion]. Old word for money-bag,
sometimes a javelin as if from [ballō]. Only in Luke in the N.T. (10:4;
12:33; 22:35ff.).
See Lu 9:3; Mr 6:7f.; Mt 10:9f. for the other similar items. Salute no man
on the way [mēdena kata tēn hodon aspasēsthe]. First aorist (ingressive)
middle subjunctive with [mēdena]. The peril of such wayside salutations was
palaver and delay. The King’s business required haste. Elisha’s servant was not
to tarry for salutations or salaams (2Ki 4:29). These oriental greetings
were tedious, complicated, and often meddlesome if others were present or engaged
in a bargain.
10:5 First say [prōton legete]. Say first. The adverb
[prōton] can be construed with “enter” [eiselthēte], but probably
with [legete] is right. The word spoken is the usual oriental salutation.
10:6 A son of peace [huios eirēnēs]. A Hebraism,
though some examples occur in the vernacular Koinē papyri. It means one inclined
to peace, describing the head of the household. Shall rest [epanapaēsetai].
Second future passive of [epanapauō], a late double compound [epi, ana]
of the common verb [pauō]. It shall turn to you again [eph’ humās
anakampsei]. Common verb [anakamptō], to bend back, return. The peace
in that case will bend back with blessing upon the one who spoke it.
10:7 In that same house [en autēi tēi oikiāi]. Literally,
in the house itself, not “in the same house” [en tēi autēi oikiāi], a different
construction. A free rendering of the common Lukan idiom is, “in that very house.”
Eating [esthontes]. An old poetic verb [esthō] for [esthiō]
that survives in late Greek. Such things as they give [ta par’ autōn].
“The things from them.” For the labourer is worthy of his hire [axios
gar ho ergatēs tou misthou autou]. In Mt 10:10 we have [tēs trophēs autou] (his food). 1Ti 5:18 has this saying quoted as scripture. That is not impossible if Luke
wrote by A.D. 62. Paul there however may quote only De 25:4 as scripture and get this quotation either from Lu 10:7 or from a proverbial saying of Jesus. It is certainly not a real
objection against the Pauline authorship of First Timothy. Go not from house
to house [mē metabainete ex oikias eis oikian]. As a habit, [mē]
and the present imperative, and so avoid waste of time with such rounds of invitations
as would come.
10:8 Such things as are set before you [ta paratithemena
humin]. The things placed before you from time to time (present passive participle,
repetition). Every preacher needs this lesson of common politeness. These
directions may seem perfunctory and even commonplace, but every teacher of young
preachers knows how necessary they are. Hence they were given both to the Twelve
and to the Seventy.
10:9 Is come nigh unto you [ēggiken eph’ humās].
Perfect active indicative of [eggizō] as in Mt 3:2 of the Baptist and Mr 1:15 of Jesus. Note [eph’ humās] here.
10:10 Into the streets thereof [eis tas plateias autēs].
Out of the inhospitable houses into the broad open streets.
10:11 Even the dust [kai ton koniorton]. Old word
from [konis], dust, and [ornumi], to stir up. We have seen it already
in Mt 10:14; Lu 9:5. Dust is a plague in the east. Shake off even that. Cleaveth
[kollēthenta]. First aorist passive participle of [kollaō], to cling
as dust and mud do to shoes. Hence the orientals took off the sandals on entering
a house. We wipe off [apomassometha]. Middle voice of an old verb
[apomassō], to rub off with the hands. Nowhere else in the N.T. But [ekmassō],
occurs in Lu 7:38,44. Against you [Humin]. Fine example of the dative
of disadvantage (the case of personal interest, the dative).
10:12 More tolerable [anektoteron]. Comparative
of the verbal adjective [anektos] from [anechomai]. An old adjective,
but only the comparative in the N.T. and in this phrase (Mt 10:15; 11:22, 24;
Lu 10:12, 14).
10:13 Would have repented [an metenoēsan]. Conclusion
(apodosis) of second-class condition, determined as unfulfilled. Long
ago [palai]. Implies a considerable ministry in these cities of which
we are not told. Chorazin not mentioned save here and Mt 11:21. Perhaps [Karāzeh] near Tell Hum (Capernaum).
Sitting in sackcloth and ashes [en sakkōi kai spodoi kathēmenoi]. Pictorial
and graphic. The [sakkos] (sackcloth) was dark coarse cloth made
of goat’s hair and worn by penitents, mourners, suppliants. It is a Hebrew word,
sag.The rough cloth was used for sacks or bags. To cover oneself with ashes
was a mode of punishment as well as of voluntary humiliation.
10:15 Shalt thou be exalted? [mē hupsōthēsēi;].
[Mē] expects the answer No. The verb is future passive indicative second
singular of [hupsoō], to lift up, a late verb from [hupsos], height.
It is used by Jesus of the Cross (Joh 12:32). Unto Hades [heōs
Haidou]. See on Mt 16:18 for this word which is here in contrast to Heaven
as in Isa 14:13-15. Hades is not Gehenna. “The desolation of the whole neighbourhood,
and the difficulty of identifying even the site of these flourishing towns, is part
of the fulfilment of this prophecy” (Plummer). Ragg notes the omission of
Nazareth from this list of cities of neglected privilege and opportunity. “Is it
the tender memories of boyhood that keep from His lips the name of the arch-rejector
(4:28 sqq.) Nazareth?”
10:16 Rejecteth him that sent me [athetei ton aposteilanta
me]. These solemn words form a fit close for this discourse to the Seventy.
The fate of Chorazin, Bethsaida, Capernaum will befall those who set aside [a]
privative and [theteō], from [tithēmi] the mission and message of
these messengers of Christ. See this verb used in 7:30 of the attitude of the scribes and Pharisees toward John and Jesus.
It is this thought that makes it so grave a responsibility to be co-workers with
Christ, high privilege as it is (Joh 9:4).
10:17 Returned with joy [hupestrepsan meta charas].
They had profited by the directions of Jesus. Joy overflows their faces and their
words. Even the demons [kai ta daimonia]. This was a real test. The
Twelve had been expressly endowed with this power when they were sent out (Lu 9:1),
but the Seventy were only told to heal the sick (10:9).
It was better than they expected. The Gospel worked wonders and they were happy.
The demons were merely one sign of the conflict between Christ and Satan. Every
preacher has to grapple with demons in his work. Are subject [hupotassetai].
Present passive indicative (repetition).
10:18 I beheld Satan fallen [etheōroun ton Satanān pesonta].
Imperfect active (I was beholding) and second aorist (constative)
active participle of [piptō] (not fallen, [peptōkota], perfect active
participle, nor falling, [piptonta], present active participle, but fall,
[pesonta]. As a flash of lightning out of heaven, quick and startling, so
the victory of the Seventy over the demons, the agents of Satan, forecast his downfall
and Jesus in vision pictured it as a flash of lightning.
10:19 And over all the power of the enemy [kai epi pāsan
tēn dunamin tou echthrou]. This is the heart of “the authority” [tēn exousian]
here given by Jesus which is far beyond their expectations. The victory over demons
was one phase of it. The power to tread upon serpents is repeated in Mr 16:18 (the Appendix) and exemplified in Paul’s case in Malta (Ac
28:3-5). But protection from physical harm is not the main point in this
struggle with Satan “the enemy” (Mt 13:25; Ro 16:20; 1Pe 5:8).
Nothing shall in any wise hurt you [ouden humās ou mē adikēsei]. Text
has future active indicative, while some MSS. read [adikēsēi], aorist active
subjunctive of [adikeō], common verb from [adikos] [a] privative
and [dikos], to suffer wrong, to do wrong. The triple negative here is very
strong. Certainly Jesus does not mean this promise to create presumption or foolhardiness
for he repelled the enemy’s suggestion on the pinnacle of the temple.
10:20 Are written [engegraptai]. Perfect passive
indicative, state of completion, stand written, enrolled or engraved, from [engraphō],
common verb. “As citizens possessing the full privileges of the commonwealth” (Plummer).
10:21 In that same hour [en autēi tēi hōrāi]. Literally,
“at the hour itself,” almost a demonstrative use of [autos] (Robertson,
Grammar, p. 686) and in Luke alone in the N.T. (2:38; 10:21;
12:12; 20:19). Mt 11:25 uses the demonstrative here, “at that time” [en ekeinōi tōi kairōi].
Rejoiced in the Holy Spirit [ēgalliasato tōi pneumati tōi hagiōi].
First aorist middle of the late verb [agalliaō] for [agallō], to exult.
Always in the middle in the N.T. save Lu 1:47 in Mary’s Magnificat.This holy joy of Jesus was directly due
to the Holy Spirit. It is joy in the work of his followers, their victories over
Satan, and is akin to the joy felt by Jesus in Joh 4:32-38 when the vision of the harvest of the world stirred his heart.
The rest of this verse is precisely like Mt 11:25f., a peculiarly Johannine passage in Matthew and Luke, but not in
Mark, and so from Q (the Logia of Jesus). It has disturbed critics who are
unwilling to admit the Johannine style and type of teaching as genuine, but here
it is. See on Matthew for discussion. “That God had proved his independence of the
human intellect is a matter for thankfulness. Intellectual gifts, so far from being
necessary, are often a hindrance” (Plummer).
10:22 Knoweth who the Son is [ginōskei tis estin ho
huios]. Knows by experience, [ginōskei]. Here Mt 11:27 has [epiginōskei] (fully knows) and simply [ton
huion] (the Son) instead of the “who” [tis] clause. So also in
“who the Father is” [tis estin ho pater]. But the same use and contrast of
“the Father,” “the Son.” in both Matthew and Luke, “an aerolite from the Johannean
heaven” (Hase). No sane criticism can get rid of this Johannine bit in these
Gospels written long before the Fourth Gospel was composed. We are dealing here
with the oldest known document about Christ (the Logia) and the picture
is that drawn in the Fourth Gospel (see my The Christ of the Logia).
It is idle to try to whittle away by fantastic exegesis the high claims made by
Jesus in this passage. It is an ecstatic prayer in the presence of the Seventy under
the rapture of the Holy Spirit on terms of perfect equality and understanding between
the Father and the Son in the tone of the priestly prayer in Joh 17. We are justified in saying that this prayer of supreme Fellowship
with the Father in contemplation of final victory over Satan gives us a glimpse
of the prayers with the Father when the Son spent whole nights on the mountain alone
with the Father. Here is the Messianic consciousness in complete control and with
perfect confidence in the outcome. Here as in Mt 11:27 by the use of willeth to reveal him [boulētai apokalupsai].
The Son claims the power to reveal the Father “to whomsoever he wills” [hōi an
boulētai], indefinite relative and present subjunctive of [boulomai],
to will, not the future indicative). This is divine sovereignty most assuredly.
Human free agency is also true, but it is full divine sovereignty in salvation that
is here claimed along with possession [paredothē], timeless aorist passive
indicative) of all power from the Father. Let that supreme claim stand.
10:23 Turning to the disciples [strapheis pros tous
mathētas]. Second aorist passive of [strephō] as in 9:55. The prayer was a soliloquy though uttered in the presence of the Seventy
on their return. Now Jesus turned and spoke “privately” or to the disciples (the
Twelve, apparently), whether on this same occasion or a bit later. Blessed
[makarioi]. A beatitude, the same adjective as in Mt 5:3-11. A beatitude of privilege very much like that in Mt 5:13-16. Jesus often repeated his sayings.
10:24 Which ye see [ha humeis blepete]. The expression
of [humeis] makes “ye” very emphatic in contrast with the prophets and kings
of former days.
10:25 And tempted him [ekpeirazōn auton]. Present
active participle, conative idea, trying to tempt him. There is no “and” in the
Greek. He “stood up [anestē], ingressive second aorist active) trying
to tempt him.” [Peirazō] is a late form of [peiraō] and [ekpeirazō]
apparently only in the LXX, and N.T. (quoted by Jesus from De 6:16 in Mt 4:7; Lu 4:12 against Satan). Here and 1Co 10:9. The spirit of this lawyer was evil. He wanted to entrap Jesus if
possible. What shall I do to inherit eternal life? [Ti poiēsas zōēn aiōniou
klēronomēsō;]. Literally, “By doing what shall I inherit eternal life?” Note
the emphasis on “doing” [poiēsas]. The form of his question shows a wrong
idea as to how to get it. Eternal life [zōēn aiōnion] is endless life
as in John’s Gospel (Joh 16:9; 18:18, 30) and in Mt 25:46, which see.
10:26 How readest thou? [pōs anaginōskeis;]. As
a lawyer it was his business to know the facts in the law and the proper interpretation
of the law. See on Lu 7:30 about [nomikos] (lawyer). The rabbis
had a formula, “What readest thou?”
10:27 And he answering [ho de apokritheis]. First
aorist participle, no longer passive in idea. The lawyer’s answer is first from
the Shema (De 6:3; 11:13) which was written on the phylacteries.
The second part is from Le 19:18 and shows that the lawyer knew the law. At a later time Jesus himself
in the temple gives a like summary of the law to a lawyer (Mr 12:28-34; Mt
22:34-40) who wanted to catch Jesus by his question. There is no difficulty
in the two incidents. God is to be loved with all of man’s four powers (heart, soul,
strength, mind) here as in Mr 12:30).
10:28 Thou hast answered right [orthōs apekrithēs].
First aorist passive indicative second singular with the adverb [orthōs]. The
answer was correct so far as the words went. In Mr 12:34 Jesus commends the scribe for agreeing to his interpretation of
the first and the second commandments. That scribe was “not far from the kingdom
of God,” but this lawyer was “tempting” Jesus. Do this and thou shalt live
[touto poiei kai zēsēi]. Present imperative (keep on doing this forever)
and the future indicative middle as a natural result. There was only one trouble
with the lawyer’s answer. No one ever did or ever can “do” what the law lays down
towards God and man always. To slip once is to fail. So Jesus put the problem squarely
up to the lawyer who wanted to know by doing what. Of course, if he kept
the law perfectly always, he would inherit eternal life.
10:29 Desiring to justify himself [thelōn dikaiōsai
heauton]. The lawyer saw at once that he had convicted himself of asking a question
that he already knew. In his embarrassment he asks another question to show that
he did have some point at first: And who is my neighbour? [kai tis estin
mou plēsion;]. The Jews split hairs over this question and excluded from “neighbour”
Gentiles and especially Samaritans. So here was his loop-hole. A neighbour is a
nigh dweller to one, but the Jews made racial exceptions as many, alas, do today.
The word [plēsion] here is an adverb (neuter of the adjective [plēsios]
meaning [ho plēsion ōn] (the one who is near), but [ōn] was
usually not expressed and the adverb is here used as if a substantive.
10:30 Made answer [hupolabōn]. Second aorist active
participle of [hupolambanō] (see 7:43), to take up literally, and then in thought and speech, old
verb, but in this sense of interrupting in talk only in the N.T. Was going down
[katebainen]. Imperfect active describing the journey. Fell among robbers
[lēistais periepesen]. Second aorist ingressive active indicative of [peripiptō],
old verb with associative instrumental case, to fall among and to be encompassed
by [peri], around), to be surrounded by robbers. A common experience
to this day on the road to Jericho. The Romans placed a fort on this “red and bloody
way.” These were bandits, not petty thieves. Stripped [ekdusantes].
Of his clothing as well as of his money, the meanest sort of robbers. Beat him
[plēgas epithentes]. Second aorist active participle of [epitithēmi],
a common verb. Literally, “placing strokes or blows” [plēgas], plagues)
upon him. See Lu 12:48; Ac 16:23; Re 15:1,6,8 for “plagues.” Half-dead [hēmithanē].
Late word from [hēmi], half, and [thnēskō], to die. Only here in the
N.T. Vivid picture of the robbery.
10:31 By chance [kata sugkurian]. Here only in the
N.T., meaning rather, “by way of coincidence.” It is a rare word elsewhere and in
late writers like Hippocrates. It is from the verb [sugkureō], though [sugkurēsis]
is more common. Was going down [katebainen]. Imperfect active as in
verse 30). Passed by on the other side [antiparēlthen]. Second aorist active
indicative of [antiparerchomai], a late double compound here (verses 31, 32) only in the N.T., but in the papyri and late writers. It is
the ingressive aorist [ēlthen], came alongside [para], and then he
stepped over to the opposite side [anti] of the road to avoid ceremonial
contamination with a stranger. A vivid and powerful picture of the vice of Jewish
ceremonial cleanliness at the cost of moral principle and duty. The Levite in verse 32 behaved precisely as the priest had done and for the same reason.
10:33 A certain Samaritan [Samareitēs de tis]. Of
all men in the world to do a neighbourly act! As he journeyed [hodeuōn].
Making his way. Came where he was [ēlthen kat’ auton]. Literally,
“came down upon him.” He did not sidestep or dodge him, but had compassion on him.
10:34 Bound up his wounds [katedēsen ta traumata].
First aorist active indicative of [katadeō], old verb, but here only in the
N.T. The verb means “bound down.” We say “bind up.” Medical detail that interested
Luke. The word for “wounds” [traumata] here only in the N.T. Pouring on
them oil and wine [epicheōn elaion kai oinon]. Old verb again, but here
only in the N.T. Oil and wine were household remedies even for wounds (soothing
oil, antiseptic alcohol). Hippocrates prescribed for ulcers: “Bind with
soft wool, and sprinkle with wine and oil.” Set him [epibibasas].
An old verb [epibibazō] [epi], [bibazō], to cause to mount.
In the N.T. only here and Ac 19:35; 23:24, common in LXX. Beast [ktēnos]. Old word from
[ktaomai], to acquire, and so property [ktēma] especially cattle or
any beast of burden. An inn [pandocheion]. The old Attic form was
[pandokeion] (from [pan], all, and [dechomai], to receive).
A public place for receiving all comers and a more pretentious caravanserai than
a [kataluma] like that in Lu 2:7. Here only in the N.T. There are ruins of two inns about halfway between
Bethany and Jericho.
10:35 On the morrow [epi tēn aurion]. Towards the
morrow as in Ac 4:5. (Cf. also Ac 3:1). Syriac Sinaitic has it “at dawn of the day.” An unusual
use of [epi]. Took out [ekbalōn]. Second aorist active participle
of [ekballō]. It could mean, “fling out,” but probably only means “drew out.”
Common verb. Two pence [duo dēnaria]. About thirty-five cents, but
worth more in purchasing power. To the host [tōi pandochei]. The innkeeper.
Here only in the N.T. Whatsoever thou spendest more [hoti an prosdapanēsēis].
Indefinite relative clause with [an] and the aorist active subjunctive of
[prosdapanaō], to spend besides [pros], a late verb for the common
[prosanaliskō] and here only in the N.T. I will repay [ego apodōsō].
Emphatic. What he had paid was merely by way of pledge. He was a man of his word
and known to the innkeeper as reliable. When I come back again [en tōi
epanerchesthai me]. Luke’s favourite idiom of [en] and the articular
infinitive with accusative of general reference. Double compound verb [epanerchomai].
10:36 Proved neighbour to him that fell [plēsion gegonenai
tou empesontos]. Second perfect infinitive of [ginomai] and second aorist
active participle of [empiptō]. Objective genitive, became neighbour to the
one, etc. Jesus has changed the lawyer’s standpoint and has put it up to him to
decide which of “these three” [toutōn tōn triōn], priest, Levite, Samaritan)
acted like a neighbour to the wounded man.
10:37 On him [met’ autou]. With him, more exactly.
The lawyer saw the point and gave the correct answer, but he gulped at the word
“Samaritan” and refused to say that. Do thou [su poiei]. Emphasis
on “thou.” Would this Jewish lawyer act the neighbour to a Samaritan? This parable
of the Good Samaritan has built the world’s hospitals and, if understood and practised,
will remove race prejudice, national hatred and war, class jealousy.
10:38 Now as they went on their way [ēn de tōi poreuesthai
autous]. Luke’s favourite temporal clause again as in verse 35. Received him into her house [hupedexato auton eis tēn oikian].
Aorist middle indicative of [hupodechomai], an old verb to welcome as a guest
(in the N.T. only here and Lu 19:6; Ac 17:7; Jas 2:25). Martha is clearly the mistress of the
home and is probably the elder sister. There is no evidence that she was the wife
of Simon the leper (Joh 12:1f.). It is curious that in an old cemetery
at Bethany the names of Martha, Eleazar, and Simon have been found.
10:39 Which also sat [hē kai parakathestheisa].
First aorist passive participle of [parakathezomai], an old verb, but only
here in the N.T. It means to sit beside [para] and [pros] means right
in front of the feet of Jesus. It is not clear what the point is in [kai]
here. It may mean that Martha loved to sit here also as well as Mary. Heard
[ēkouen]. Imperfect active. She took her seat by the feet of Jesus and went
on listening to his talk.
10:40 Was cumbered [periespāto]. Imperfect passive
of [perispaō], an old verb with vivid metaphor, to draw around. One has sometimes
seen women whose faces are literally drawn round with anxiety, with a permanent
twist, distracted in mind and in looks. She came up to him [epistāsa].
Second aorist active participle of [ephistēmi], an old verb to place upon,
but in the N.T. only in the middle voice or the intransitive tenses of the active
(perfect and second aorist as here). It is the ingressive aorist here and
really means. stepping up to or bursting in or upon Jesus. It is an explosive act
as is the speech of Martha. Dost thou not care [ou melei soi]. This
was a reproach to Jesus for monopolizing Mary to Martha’s hurt. Did leave me
[me kateleipen]. Imperfect active, she kept on leaving me. Bid her
[eipon autēi]. Late form instead of [eipe], second aorist active imperative,
common in the papyri. Martha feels that Jesus is the key to Mary’s help. That
she help me [hina moi sunantilabētai]. Sub-final use of [hina]
with second aorist middle subjunctive of [sunantilambanomai], a double compound
verb [sun], with, [anti], at her end of the line, and [lambanomai],
middle voice of [lambanō], to take hold), a late compound appearing
in the LXX, Diodorus and Josephus. Deissmann (Light from the Ancient East,
p. 87) finds it in many widely scattered inscriptions “throughout the whole
extent of the Hellenistic world of the Mediterranean.” It appears only twice in
the N.T. (here and Ro 8:26). It is a beautiful word, to take hold oneself (middle voice)
at his end of the task [anti] together with [sun] one.
10:41 Art anxious [merimnāis]. An old verb for worry
and anxiety from [merizō] [meris], part) to be divided, distracted.
Jesus had warned against this in the Sermon on the Mount (Mt 6:25,28,31,34.
See also Lu 12:11,22,26). And troubled [kai thorubazēi]. From
[thorubazomai], a verb found nowhere else so far. Many MSS. here have the
usual form [turbazēi], from [turbazō]. Apparently from [thorubos],
a common enough word for tumult. Martha had both inward anxiety and outward agitation.
But one thing is needful [henos de estin chreia]. This is the reading
of A C and may be correct. A few manuscripts have: “There is need of few things.”
Aleph B L (and Westcott and Hort) have: “There is need of few things or
one,” which seems like a conflate reading though the readings are all old. See Robertson,
Introduction to Textual Criticism of the N.T., p. 190. Jesus seems to say
to Martha that only one dish was really necessary for the meal instead of the “many”
about which she was so anxious.
10:42 The good portion [tēn agathēn merida]. The
best dish on the table, fellowship with Jesus. This is the spiritual application
of the metaphor of the dishes on the table. Salvation is not “the good portion”
for Martha had that also. From her [autēs]. Ablative case after [aphairēthēsetai]
(future passive indicative). Jesus pointedly takes Mary’s side against Martha’s
fussiness.
Chapter 11
11:1 As he was praying in a certain place [en tōi einai auton en topōi
tini proseuchomenon]. Characteristically Lukan idiom: [en] with articular
periphrastic infinitive [einai proseuchomenon] with accusative of general
reference [auton]. That. Not in the Greek, asyndeton [kai egeneto
eipen]. When he ceased [hōs epausato]. Supply [proseuchomenos]
(praying), complementary or supplementary participle. Teach us [didaxon
hēmas]. Jesus had taught them by precept (Mt 6:7-15) and example
(Lu 9:29). Somehow the example of Jesus on this occasion stirred
them to fresh interest in the subject and to revival of interest in John’s teachings
(Lu 5:33). So Jesus gave them the substance of the Model Prayer in
Matthew, but in shorter form. Some of the MSS. have one or all of the phrases in
Matthew, but the oldest documents have it in the simplest form. See on Mt 6:7-15
for discussion of these details (Father, hallowed, kingdom, daily bread, forgiveness,
bringing us into temptation). In Mt 6:11 “give” is [dos] (second aorist active imperative second singular,
a single act) while here Lu 11:3 “give” is [didou] (present active imperative, both from [didōmi]
and means, “keep on giving.” So in Lu 11:4 we have “For we ourselves also forgive” [kai gar autoi aphiomen],
present active indicative of the late [ō] verb [aphiō] while Mt 6:12 has “as we also forgave” [hōs kai hēmeis aphēkamen], first
aorist [k] aorist) active of [aphiēmi]. So also where Mt 6:12 has “debts” [ta opheilēmata] Lu 11:4 has “sins” [tas hamartias]. But the spirit of each prayer
is the same. There is no evidence that Jesus meant either form to be a ritual. In
both Mt 6:13; Lu 11:4 [mē eisenegkēis] occurs (second aorist subjunctive
with [mē] in prohibition, ingressive aorist). “Bring us not” is a
better translation than “lead us not.” There is no such thing as God enticing one
to sin (Jas 1:13). Jesus urges us to pray not to be tempted as in Lu 22:40 in Gethsemane.
11:5 At midnight [mesonuktiou]. Genitive of time.
And say to him [kai eipēi autōi]. This is the deliberative subjunctive,
but it is preceded by two future indicatives that are deliberative also [hexei,
poreusetai]. Lend me [chrēson moi]. First aorist active imperative
second singular. Lend me now. From [kichrēmi], an old verb, to lend
as a matter of friendly interest as opposed to [daneizō], to lend on interest
as a business. Only here in the N.T.
11:6 To set before him [ho parathēsō autōi].
Which I shall place beside him. Future active of [paratithēmi]. See 9:16 for this same verb.
11:7 And he [kakeinos]. Emphatic. Shall say
(eipēi]. Still the aorist active deliberative subjunctive as in verse 5 (the same long and somewhat involved sentence). Trouble me not
[mē moi kopous pareche]. [Mē] and the present imperative active. Literally,
“Stop furnishing troubles to me.” On this use of [kopous parechō] see also Mt 26:10; Mr 14:6; Ga 6:17 and the singular [kopon], Lu 18:5. The door is now shut [ēdē hē thura kekleistai]. Perfect
passive indicative, shut to stay shut. Oriental locks are not easy to unlock. From
[kleiō], common verb. In bed [eis ten koitēn]. Note use of
[eis] in sense of [en]. Often a whole family would sleep in the same
room. I cannot [ou dunamai]. That is, I am not willing.
11:8 Though [ei kai]. [Kai ei] would be “Even
if,” a different idea. Because he is his friend [dia to einai philon autou].
[Dia] and the accusative articular infinitive with accusative of general
reference, a causal clause = “because of the being a friend of his.” Yet because
of his importunity [dia ge tēn anaidian autou]. From [anaidēs],
shameless, and that from [a] privative and [aidōs], shame, shamelessness,
impudence. An old word, but here alone in the N.T. Examples in the papyri. The use
of [ge] here, one of the intensive particles, is to be noted. It sharpens
the contrast to “though” by “yet.” As examples of importunate prayer Vincent notes
Abraham in behalf of Sodom (Ge 18:23-33) and the Syro-Phoenician
woman in behalf of her daughter (Mt 15:22-28).
11:9 Shall be opened [anoigēsetai]. Second future
passive third singular of [anoignumi] and the later [anoigō].
11:11 Of which of you that is a father [tina de ex humōn
ton patera]. There is a decided anacoluthon here. The MSS. differ a great deal.
The text of Westcott and Hort makes [ton patera] (the father) in
apposition with [tina] (of whom) and in the accusative the object
of [aitēsei] (shall ask) which has also another accusative (both
person and thing) “a loaf.” So far so good. But the rest of the sentence
is, will ye give him a stone? [mē lithon epidōsei autōi;]. [Mē]
shows that the answer No is expected, but the trouble is that the interrogative
[tina] in the first clause is in the accusative the object of [aitēsei]
while here the same man (he) is the subject of [epidōsei]. It is a
very awkward piece of Greek and yet it is intelligible. Some of the old MSS. do
not have the part about “loaf” and “stone,” but only the two remaining parts about
“fish” and “serpent,” “egg” and “scorpion.” The same difficult construction is carried
over into these questions also.
11:13 Know how to give [oidate didonai]. See on Mt 7:11 for this same saying. Only here Jesus adds the Holy Spirit [pneuma
hagion] as the great gift (the summum bonum) that the Father
is ready to bestow. Jesus is fond of “how much more” [posōi māllon], by how
much more, instrumental case).
11:14 When [tou daimoniou exelthontos]. Genitive
absolute ana asyndeton between [kai egeneto] and [elalēsen] as often
in Luke (no [hoti] or [kai].
11:15 Dumb [kōphon]. See on Mt 9:32. By Beelzebub
[en Beezeboul]. Blasphemous accusation here in Judea as in Galilee (Mr
3:22; Mt 12:24,27). See on Matthew for discussion of the form of this name
and the various items in the sin against the Holy Spirit involved in the charge.
It was useless to deny the fact of the miracles. So they were explained as wrought
by Satan himself, a most absurd explanation.
11:16 Tempting him [peirazontes]. These “others”
[heteroi] apparently realized the futility of the charge of being in league
with Beelzebub. Hence they put up to Jesus the demand for “a sign from heaven” just
as had been done in Galilee (Mt 12:38). By “sign” [sēmeion]
they meant a great spectacular display of heavenly power such as they expected the
Messiah to give and such as the devil suggested to Jesus on the pinnacle of the
temple. Sought [ezētoun]. Imperfect active, kept on seeking.
11:17 But he [autos de]. In contrast with them.
Knowing their thoughts [eidōs autōn ta dianoēmata]. From [dianoeō],
to think through or distinguish. This substantive is common in Plato, but occurs
nowhere else in the N.T. It means intent, purpose. Jesus knew that they were trying
to tempt him. And a house divided against a house falleth [kai oikos epi
oikon piptei]. It is not certain that [diameristheisa] (divided)
is to be repeated here as in Mt 12:25; Mr 3:25. It may mean, and house falls upon house, “one tumbling
house knocking down its neighbour, a graphic picture of what happens when a kingdom
is divided against itself” (Bruce).
11:18 Because ye say [hoti legete]. Jesus here repeats
in indirect discourse (accusative and infinitive) the charge made against
him in verse 15. The condition is of the first class, determined as fulfilled.
11:19 And if I by Beelzebub [ei de egō en Beezeboul].
Also a condition of the first class, determined as fulfilled. A Greek condition
deals only with the statement, not with the actual facts. For sake of argument,
Jesus here assumes that he casts out demons by Beelzebub. The conclusion is a
reductio ad absurdum.The Jewish exorcists practiced incantations against demons
(Ac 19:13).
11:20 By the finger of God [en daktulōi theou].
In distinction from the Jewish exorcists. Mt 12:28 has “by the Spirit of God.” Then is come [ara ephthasen].
[Phthanō] in late Greek comes to mean simply to come, not to come before.
The aorist indicative tense here is timeless. Note [ara] (accordingly)
in the conclusion [apodosis].
11:21 Fully armed [kathōplismenos]. Perfect passive
participle of [kathoplizō], an old verb, but here only in the N.T. Note perfective
use of [kata] in composition with [hoplizō], to arm (from [hopla],
arms). Note indefinite temporal clause [hotan] and present subjunctive
[phulassēi]. His own court [tēn heautou aulēn]. His own homestead. Mr 3:27; Mt 12:29 has “house” [oikian]. [Aulē] is used in the
N.T. in various senses (the court in front of the house, the court around which
the house is built, then the house as a whole). His goods [ta
huparchonta autou]. “His belongings.” Neuter plural present active participle
of [huparchō] used as substantive with genitive.
11:22 But when [epan de]. Note [hotan] in
verse 21. Stronger than he [ischuroteros autou]. Comparative of [ischuros]
followed by the ablative. Come upon him and overcome him [epelthōn nikēsēi
auton]. Second aorist active participle of [eperchomai] and first aorist
active subjunctive of [nikaō]. Aorist tense here because a single onset while
in verse 22 the guarding [phulassēi], present active subjunctive) is
continuous. His whole armour [tēn panoplian autou]. An old and common
word for all the soldier’s outfit (shield, sword, lance, helmet, greaves, breastplate).
Tyndale renders it “his harness.” In the N.T. only here and Eph 6:11,13 where the items are given. Wherein he trusted [eph’
hēi epepoithei]. Second past perfect active of [peithō], to persuade.
The second perfect [pepoitha] is intransitive, to trust. Old and common verb.
He trusted his weapons which had been so efficacious. His spoils [ta skula
autou]. It is not clear to what this figure refers. Strong as Satan is Jesus
is stronger and wins victories over him as he was doing then. In Col 2:15 Christ is pictured as triumphing openly over the powers of evil
by the Cross.
11:23 He that is not with me [ho mē ōn met’ emou].
This verse is just like Mt 12:30).
11:24 And finding none [kai mē heuriskon]. Here Mt 12:43 has [kai ouch heuriskei] (present active indicative instead
of present active participle). Lu 11:24-26 is almost verbatim like Mt 12:43-45, which see. Instead of just “taketh” [paralambanei] in
verse 26, Matthew has “taketh with himself” [paralambanei meth’ heautou].
And Luke omits: “Even so shall it be also unto this evil generation” of Mt 12:45. Than the first [tōn prōtōn]. Ablative case after
the comparative [cheirona]. The seven demons brought back remind one of the
seven that afflicted Mary Magdalene (Lu 8:2).
11:27 As he said these things [en tōi legein auton].
Luke’s common idiom, [en] with articular infinitive. Verses 27, 28 are peculiar to Luke. His Gospel in a special sense is the Gospel of
Woman. This woman “speaks well, but womanly” (Bengel). Her beatitude [makaria]
reminds us of Elisabeth’s words (Lu 1:42, [eulogēmenē]. She is fulfilling
Mary’s own prophecy in 1:48 [makariousin me], shall call me happy).
11:28 But he said [autos de eipen]. Jesus in contrast
turns attention to others and gives them a beatitude [makarioi]. “The originality
of Christ’s reply guarantees its historical character. Such a comment is beyond
the reach of an inventor” (Plummer).
11:29 Were gathering together unto him [epathroizomenōn].
Genitive absolute present middle participle of [epathroizō], a rare verb,
Plutarch and here only in the N.T., from [epi] and [athroizō] (a common
enough verb). It means to throng together [athroos], in throngs).
Vivid picture of the crowds around Jesus. But the sign of Jonah [ei mē
to sēmeion Iōnā]. Luke does not give here the burial and resurrection of Jesus
of which Jonah’s experience in the big fish was a type (Mt 12:39ff.),
but that is really implied (Plummer argues) by the use here of “shall be
given” [dothēsetai] and “shall be” [estai], for the resurrection of
Jesus is still future. The preaching of Jesus ought to have been sign enough as
in the case of Jonah, but the resurrection will be given. Luke’s report is much
briefer and omits what is in Mt 12:41.
11:31 With the men of this generation [meta tōn andrōn
tēs geneās tautēs]. Here Mt 12:42 has simply “with this generation,” which see.
11:32 At the preaching of Jonah [eis to kērugma Iōna].
Note this use of [eis] as in Mt 10:41; 12:41. Luke inserts the words about the Queen of the South (31)
in between the discussion of Jonah (verses 29f., 32). Both [Solomōnos] (31)
and [Iōnā]
(verse 32) are in the ablative case after the comparative [pleion]
(more, something more).
11:33 In a cellar [eis kruptēn]. A crypt (same word)
or hidden place from [kruptō], to hide. Late and rare word and here only
in the N.T. These other words (lamp, [luchnon], bushel, [modion],
stand, [luchnian] have all been discussed previously (Mt 5:15). Lu 11:33 is like
Mt 6:22f., which see for details.
11:35 Whether not [mē]. This use of [mē]
in an indirect question is good Greek (Robertson, Grammar, p. 1045).
It is a pitiful situation if the very light is darkness. This happens when the eye
of the soul is too diseased to see the light of Christ.
11:36 With its bright shining [tēi astrapēi]. Instrumental
case, as if by a flash of lightning the light is revealed in him. See on 10:18.
11:37 Now as he spake [en de tōi lalēsai]. Luke’s
common idiom, [en] with the articular infinitive (aorist active infinitive)
but it does not mean “after he had spoken” as Plummer argues, but simply “in the
speaking,” no time in the aorist infinitive. See 3:21 for similar use of aorist infinitive with [en]. Asketh
[erōtāi]. Present active indicative, dramatic present. Request, not question.
To dine [hopōs aristēsēi]. Note [hopōs] rather than the common
[hina]. Aorist active subjunctive rather than present, for a single meal.
The verb is from [ariston] (breakfast). See distinction between [ariston]
and [deipnon] (dinner or supper) in Lu 14:12. It is the morning meal (breakfast or lunch) after the return
from morning prayers in the synagogue (Mt 22:4), not the very early
meal called [akratisma]. The verb is, however, used for the early meal on
the seashore in Joh 21:12,15. With him [par’ autōi]. By his side. Sat down
to meat [anepesen]. Second aorist active indicative of [anapiptō],
old verb, to recline, to fall back on the sofa or lounge. No word here for “to meat.”
11:38 That he had not first washed before dinner [hoti
ou prōton ebaptisthē pro tou aristou]. The verb is first aorist passive indicative
of [baptizō], to dip or to immerse. Here it is applied to the hands. It was
the Jewish custom to dip the hands in water before eating and often between courses
for ceremonial purification. In Galilee the Pharisees and scribes had sharply criticized
the disciples for eating with unwashed hands (Mr 7:1-23; Mt 15:1-20)
when Jesus had defended their liberty and had opposed making a necessity of such
a custom (tradition) in opposition to the command of God. Apparently Jesus
on this occasion had himself reclined at the breakfast (not dinner) without
this ceremonial dipping of the hands in water. The Greek has “first before” [prōton
pro], a tautology not preserved in the translation.
11:39 The Lord [ho kurios]. The Lord Jesus plainly
and in the narrative portion of Luke. Now [nun]. Probably refers to
him. You Pharisees do now what was formerly done. The platter [tou pinakos].
The dish. Old word, rendered “the charger” in Mt 14:8. Another word for “platter” [paropsis] in Mt 23:25 means “side-dish.” But your inward part [to de esōthen
humōn]. The part within you (Pharisees). They keep the external regulations,
but their hearts are full of plunder [harpagēs], from [harpazō], to
seize) and wickedness [ponērias], from [ponēros], evil man).
See Mt 23:25 for a like indictment of the Pharisees for care for the outside
of the cup but neglect of what is on the inside. Both inside and outside should
be clean, but the inside first.
11:40 Howbeit [plēn]. See Lu 6:24. Instead of devoting so much attention to the outside. Those things
which are within [ta enonta]. Articular neuter plural participle from
[eneimi], to be in, common verb. This precise phrase only here in the N.T.
though in the papyri, and it is not clear what it means. Probably, give as alms
the things within the dishes, that is have inward righteousness with a brotherly
spirit and the outward becomes “clean” [kathara]. Properly understood, this
is not irony and is not Ebionism, but good Christianity (Plummer).
11:42 Tithe [apodekatoute]. Late verb for the more
common [dekateuō]. So in Mt 23:23. Take a tenth off [apo-]. Rue [pēganon]. Botanical
term in late writers from [pēgnumi], to make fast because of its thick leaves.
Here Mt 23:23 has “anise.” Every herb [pān lachanon]. General term
as in Mr 4:32. Matthew has “cummin.” Pass by [parerchesthe]. Present
middle indicative of [parerchomai], common verb, to go by or beside. Mt 23:23 has “ye have left undone” [aphēkate]. Luke here has “love”
[agapēn], not in Matthew. Ought [edei]. As in Matthew. Imperfect
of a present obligation, not lived up to just like our “ought” [owed], not
paid). [Pareinai], as in Matthew, the second aorist active infinitive
of [aphiēmi]. to leave off. Common verb. Luke does not have the remark about
straining out the gnat and swallowing the camel (Mt 23:34). It is
plain that the terrible exposure of the scribes and Pharisees in Mt 23 in the temple was simply the culmination of previous conflicts such
as this one.
11:43 The chief seats in the synagogues [tēn prōtokathedrian
en tais sunagōgais]. Singular here, plural in Mt 23:6. This semi-circular bench faced the congregation. Mt 23:6 has also the chief place at feasts given by Luke also in that discourse
(20:46) as well as in 14:7, a marked characteristic of the Pharisees.
11:44 The tombs which appear not [ta mnēneia ta adēla].
These hidden graves would give ceremonial defilement for seven days (Nu 19:16).
Hence they were usually whitewashed as a warning. So in Mt 23:27 the Pharisees are called “whited sepulchres.” Men do not know how
rotten they are. The word [adēlos] [a] privative and [dēlos],
apparent or plain) occurs in the N.T. only here and 1Co 14:8, though an old and common word. Here men walking around [peripatountes]
walk over the tombs without knowing it. These three woes cut to the quick and evidently
made the Pharisees wince.
11:45 Thou reproachest us also [kai hēmās hubrizeis].
Because the lawyers (scribes) were usually Pharisees. The verb [hubrizō]
is an old one and common for outrageous treatment, a positive insult (so Lu 18:32; Mt 22:6; Ac 14;5;
1Th 2:2). So Jesus proceeds to give the
lawyers three woes as he had done to the Pharisees.
11:46 Grievous to be borne [dusbastakta]. A late
word in LXX and Plutarch [dus] and [bastazō]. Here alone in text of
Westcott and Hort who reject it in Mt 23:4 where we have “heavy burdens” [phortia barea]. In Gal 6:2 we have [barē] with a distinction drawn. Here we have [phortizete]
(here only in the N.T. and Mt 11:28) for “lade,” [phortia] as cognate accusative and
then [phortiois] (dative after [ou prospsauete], touch not).
It is a fierce indictment of scribes (lawyers) for their pettifogging interpretations
of the written law in their oral teaching (later written down as Mishna and
then as Gemarah), a terrible load which these lawyers did not pretend
to carry themselves, not even “with one of their fingers” to “touch” [prospsauō],
old verb but only here in the N.T.), touch with the view to remove. Mt 23:4 has [kinēsai], to move. A physician would understand the meaning
of [prospauō] for feeling gently a sore spot or the pulse.
11:48 Consent [suneudokeite]. Double compound [sun,
eu, dokeō], to think well along with others, to give full approval. A late verb,
several times in the N.T., in Ac 8:1 of Saul’s consenting to and agreeing to Stephen’s death. It is a somewhat
subtle, but just, argument made here. Outwardly the lawyers build tombs for the
prophets whom their fathers (forefathers) killed as if they disapproved
what their fathers did. But in reality they neglect and oppose what the prophets
teach just as their fathers did. So they are “witnesses” [martures] against
themselves (Mt 23:31).
11:49 The wisdom of God [hē sophia tou theou]. In Mt 23:34
Jesus uses “I send” [egō apostellō] without this phrase “the
wisdom of God.” There is no book to which it can refer. Jesus is the wisdom of God
as Paul shows (1Co 1:30), but it is hardly likely that he so describes
himself here. Probably he means that God in his wisdom said, but even so “Jesus
here speaks with confident knowledge of the Divine counsels” (Plummer).
See Lu 10:22; 15:7,10). Here the future tense occurs, “I will send” [apostelō].
Some of them [ex autōn]. No “some” [tinas] in the Greek, but
understood. They will act as their fathers did. They will kill and persecute.
11:50 That . . . may be required [hina . . . ekzētēthēi].
Divinely ordered sequence, first aorist passive subjunctive of [ekzēteō],
a late and rare verb outside of LXX and N.T., requiring as a debt the blood of the
prophets. Which was shed [to ekkechumenon]. Perfect passive participle
of [ekcheō] and [ekchunnō] (an Aeolic form appearing in the margin
of Westcott and Hort here, [ekchunnomenon], present passive participle).
If the present passive is accepted, it means the blood which is perpetually shed
from time to time. From the foundation of the world [apo katabolēs kosmou].
See also Mt 25:34; Joh 17:24; Eph 1:4, etc. It is a bold metaphor for the purpose
of God.
11:51 From the blood of Abel to the blood of Zachariah
[apo haimatos Abel heōs haimatos Zachariou]. The blood of Abel is the first
shed in the Old Testament (Ge 4:10), that of Zacharias the last in
the O.T. canon which ended with Chronicles (2Ch 24:22). Chronologically
the murder of Uriah by Jehoiakim was later (Jer 26:23), but this
climax is from Genesis to II Chronicles (the last book in the canon). See
on Mt 23:35 for discussion of Zachariah as “the son of Barachiah” rather than “the
son of Jehoiada.” Between the altar and the sanctuary [metaxu tou thusiastēriou
kai tou oikou]. Literally, between the altar and the house (Mt 23:35
has temple, [naou].
11:52 Ye took away the key of knowledge [ērate tēn kleida
tēs gnōseōs]. First aorist active indicative of [airō], common verb.
But this is a flat charge of obscurantism on the part of these scribes (lawyers),
the teachers (rabbis) of the people. They themselves [autoi] refused
to go into the house of knowledge (beautiful figure) and learn. They then
locked the door and hid the key to the house of knowledge and hindered [ekōlusate],
effective aorist active) those who were trying to enter [tous eiserchomenous],
present participle, conative action). It is the most pitiful picture imaginable
of blind ecclesiastics trying to keep others as blind as they were, blind leaders
of the blind, both falling into the pit.
11:53 From thence [k’akeithen]. Out of the Pharisee’s
house. What became of the breakfast we are not told, but the rage of both Pharisees
and lawyers knew no bounds. To press upon him [enechein]. An old Greek
verb to hold in, to be enraged at, to have it in for one. It is the same verb used
of the relentless hatred of Herodias for John the Baptist (Mr 6:19).
To provoke him to speak [apostomatizein]. From [apo] and [stoma]
(mouth). Plato uses it of repeating to a pupil for him to recite from
memory, then to recite by heart (Plutarch). Here (alone in the N.T.)
the verb means to ply with questions, to entice to answers, to catechize. Of
many things [peri pleionōn]. “Concerning more (comparative) things.”
They were stung to the quick by these woes which laid bare their hollow hypocrisy.
11:54 Laying wait for him [enedreuontes auton].
An old verb from [en] and [hedra], a seat, so to lie in ambush for
one. Here only and Ac 23:21 in the N.T. Vivid picture of the anger of these rabbis who were
treating Jesus as if he were a beast of prey. To catch something out of his mouth
[thēreusai to ek tou stomatos autou]. An old Greek verb, though here only
in the N.T., from [thēra] (cf. Ro 11:9), to ensnare, to catch in hunting, to hunt. These graphic
words from the chase show the rage of the rabbis toward Jesus. Luke gives more details
here than in 20:45-47; Mt 23:1-7, but there is no reason at all why Jesus should not have
had this conflict at the Pharisee’s breakfast before that in the temple in the great
Tuesday debate.
Chapter 12
12:1 In the meantime [en hois]. It is a classic idiom to start
a sentence or even a paragraph as here with a relative, “in which things or circumstances,”
without any expressed antecedent other than the incidents in 11:53f. In 12:3 Luke actually begins the sentence with two relatives [anth’ hōn hosa]
(wherefore whatsoever). Many thousands [muriadōn]. Genitive
absolute with [episunachtheisōn] (first aorist passive participle feminine
plural because of [muriadōn], a double compound late verb, [episunagō],
to gather together unto. The word “myriads” is probably hyperbolical as in Ac 21:20, but in the sense of ten thousand, as in Ac 19:19, it means a very large crowd apparently drawn together by the violent
attacks of the rabbis against Jesus. Insomuch that they trode one upon another
[hōste katapatein allēlous]. The imagination must complete the picture of
this jam. Unto his disciples first of all [pros tous mathētas autou prōton].
This long discourse in Lu 12 is really a series of separate talks to various groups in the vast
crowds around Jesus. This particular talk goes through verse 12. Beware of [prosechete heautois apo]. Put your mind [noun]
understood) for yourselves (dative) and avoid [apo] with
the ablative). The leaven of the Pharisees which is hypocrisy [tēs
zumēs hētis estin hupocrisis tōn Pharisaiōn]. In Mr 8:15 Jesus had coupled the lesson of the Pharisees with that of Herod,
in Mt 16:6 with that of the Sadducees also. He had long ago called the Pharisees
hypocrites (Mt 6:2,5,16). The occasion was ripe here for this crisp
saying. In Mt 13:33 leaven does not have an evil sense as here, which see. See Mt 23:13 for hypocrites. Hypocrisy was the leading Pharisaic vice (Bruce)
and was a mark of sanctity to hide an evil heart.
12:2 Covered up [sugkekalummenon estin]. Periphrastic
perfect passive indicative of [sugkaluptō], an old verb, but here only in
the N.T., to cover up on all sides and so completely. Verses 2-9 here are parallel with Mt 10:26-33 spoken to the Twelve on their tour of Galilee, illustrating again
how often Jesus repeated his sayings unless we prefer to say that he never did so
and that the Gospels have hopelessly jumbled them as to time and place. See the
passage in Matthew for discussion of details.
12:3 In the inner chambers [en tois tameiois]. Old
form [tamieion], a store chamber (Lu 12:24), secret room (Mt
6:6; Lu 12:3).
12:4 Unto you my friends [humin tois philois]. As
opposed to the Pharisees and lawyers in 11:43, 46, 53. Be not afraid of [mē phobēthēte apo]. First aorist
passive subjunctive with [mē], ingressive aorist, do not become afraid of,
with [apo] and the ablative like the Hebrew min and the English “be
afraid of,” a translation Hebraism as in Mt 10:28 (Moulton, Prolegomena, p. 102). Have no more that
they can do [mē echontōn perissoteron ti poiēsai]. Luke often uses the
infinitive thus with [echō], a classic idiom (7:40, 42; 12:4,50;
14:14; Ac 4:14, etc.).
12:5 Whom ye shall fear [tina phobēthēte]. First
aorist passive subjunctive deliberative retained in the indirect question. [Tina]
is the accusative, the direct object of this transitive passive verb (note [apo]
in verse 4). Fear him who [phobēthēte ton]. First aorist passive
imperative, differing from the preceding form only in the accent and governing the
accusative also. After he hath killed [meta to apokteinai]. Preposition
[meta] with the articular infinitive. Literally, “After the killing” (first
aorist active infinitive of the common verb [apokteinō], to kill. Into hell[eis
tēn geennan]. See on Mt 5:22. Gehenna is a transliteration of Ge-Hinnom,
Valley of Hinnon where the children were thrown on to the red-hot arms of Molech.
Josiah (2Ki 23:10) abolished these abominations and then it was a
place for all kinds of refuse which burned ceaselessly and became a symbol of punishment
in the other world. This one fear [touton phobēthēte]. As above.
12:6 Is forgotten [estin epilelēsmenon]. Periphrastic
perfect passive indicative of [epilanthanomai], common verb to forget. See Mt 10:29 for a different construction.
12:7 Numbered [ērithmēntai]. Perfect passive indicative.
Periphrastic form in Mt 10:30 which see for details about sparrows, etc.
12:8 Everyone who shall confess me [pas hos an homologēsei
en emoi]. Just like Mt 10:32 except the use of [an] here which adds nothing. The Hebraistic
use of [en] after [homologeō] both here and in Matthew is admitted
by even Moulton (Prolegomena, p. 104). The Son of man [ho
huios tou anthrōpou]. Here Mt 10:32 has [k’agō] (I also) as the equivalent.
12:9 Shall be denied [aparnēthēsetai]. First future
passive of the compound verb [aparneomai]. Here Mt 10:33 has [arnēsomai] simply. Instead of “in the presence of the
angels of God” [emprosthen tōn aggelōn tou theou] Mt 10:33 has “before my Father who is in heaven.”
12:10 But unto him that blasphemeth against the Holy Spirit
[tōi de eis to hagion pneuma blasphēmēsanti]. This unpardonable sin is given
by Mr 3:28f.; Mt 12:31f. immediately after the charge that Jesus was in league
with Beelzebub. Luke here separates it from the same charge made in Judea (11:15-20).
As frequently said, there is no sound reason for saying that Jesus only spoke his
memorable sayings once. Luke apparently finds a different environment here. Note
the use of [eis] here in the sense of “against.”
12:11 Be not anxious [mē merimnēsēte]. First aorist
active subjunctive with [mē] in prohibition. Do not become anxious. See a
similar command to the Twelve on their Galilean tour (Mt 10:19f.)
and in the great discourse on the Mount of Olives at the end (Mr 13:11; Lu
21:14f.), given twice by Luke as we see. How or what ye shall answer
[pōs ē ti apologēsēsthe]. Indirect question and retaining the deliberative
subjunctive [apologēsēsthe] and also [eipēte] (say).
12:12 What ye ought to say [hā dei eipein]. Literally,
what things it is necessary [dei] to say. This is no excuse for neglect in
pulpit preparation. It is simply a word for courage in a crisis to play the man
for Christ and to trust the issue with God without fear.
12:13 Bid my brother [eipe tōi adelphōi mou]. This
volunteer from the crowd draws attention to the multitude (verses 13-21). He does not ask for arbitration and there is no evidence
that his brother was willing for that. He wants a decision by Jesus against his
brother. The law (De 21:17) was two-thirds to the elder, one-third
to the younger.
12:14 A judge or a divider [kritēn ē meristēn].
Jesus repudiates the position of judge or arbiter in this family fuss. The language
reminds one of Ex 2:14. Jesus is rendering unto Caesar the things of Caesar (Lu 20:25)
and shows that his kingdom is not of this world (Joh 18:36). The
word for divider or arbiter [meristēs] is a late word from [merizomai]
(verse 13) and occurs here only in the N.T.
12:15 From all covetousness [apo pasēs pleonexias].
Ablative case. From every kind of greedy desire for more [pleon], more, [hexia],
from [echō], to have) an old word which we have robbed of its sinful
aspects and refined to mean business thrift. In the abundance of the things which
he possesseth [en tōi perisseuein tini ek tōn huparchontōn autōi]. A
rather awkward Lukan idiom: “In the abounding (articular infinitive) to
one out of the things belonging (articular participle) to him.”
12:16 A parable unto them [parabolēn pros autous].
The multitude of verses 13, 15. A short and pungent parable suggested by the covetousness of the man
of verse 13. Brought forth plentifully [euphorēsen]. Late word from
[euphoros] (bearing well), in medical writers and Josephus, here
only in the N.T.
12:17 Reasoned within himself [dielogizeto en hautōi].
Imperfect middle, picturing his continued cogitations over his perplexity. Where
to bestow [pou sunaxō]. Future indicative deliberative, where I shall
gather together. My fruits [tous karpous mou]. So it is with the rich
fool: my fruits, my barns, my corn, my goods, just like Nabal whose very name means
fool (1Sa 25:11), whether a direct reference to him or not.
12:18 I will pull down [kathelō]. Future active
of [kathaireō], an old verb, the usual future being [kathairēsō]. This
second form from the second aorist [katheilon] (from obsolete [helō]
like [aphelei] in Re 22:19. My barns [mou tas apothēkas]. From [apotithēmi],
to lay by, to treasure. So a granary or storehouse, an old word, six times in the
N.T. (Mt 3:12; 6:26; 13:30; Lu 3:17; 12:18,24). All my corn
[panta ton siton]. Better grain (wheat, barley), not maize or Indian
corn. My goods [ta agatha mou]. Like the English, my good things.
So the English speak of goods (freight) train.
12:19 Laid up for many years [keimena eis etē polla].
Not in D and some other Latin MSS. The man’s apostrophe to his “soul” [psuchē]
is thoroughly Epicurean, for his soul feeds on his goods. The asyndeton here (take
thine ease, eat, drink, be merry) shows his eagerness. Note difference in
tenses [anapauou], keep on resting, [phage], eat at once, [pie],
drink thy fill, [euphrainou], keep on being merry), first and last
presents, the other two aorists.
12:20 Thou foolish one [aphrōn]. Fool, for lack
of sense [a] privative and [phrēn], sense) as in 11:40; 2Co 11:19. Old word, used by Socrates in Xenophon. Nominative form
as vocative. Is thy soul required of thee [tēn psuchēn sou aitousin apo
sou]. Plural active present, not passive: “They are demanding thy soul from
thee.” The impersonal plural (aitousin) is common enough (Lu 6:38;
12:11; 16:9; 23:31). The rabbis used “they” to avoid saying “God.”
12:21 Not rich toward God [mē eis theon ploutōn].
The only wealth that matters and that lasts. Cf. 16:9; Mt 6:19f.
Some MSS. do not have this verse. Westcott and Hort bracket it.
12:22 Unto his disciples [pros tous mathētas autou].
So Jesus turns from the crowd to the disciples (verses 22-40, when Peter interrupts the discourse). From here to the end
of the chapter Luke gives material that appears in Matthew, but not in one connection
as here. In Matthew part of it is in the charge to the Twelve on their tour in Galilee,
part in the eschatological discourse on the Mount of Olives. None of it is in Mark.
Hence Q or the Logia seems to be the source of it. The question recurs again whether
Jesus repeated on other occasions what is given here or whether Luke has here put
together separate discourses as Matthew is held by many to have done in the Sermon
on the Mount. We have no way of deciding these points. We can only say again that
Jesus would naturally repeat his favourite sayings like other popular preachers
and teachers. So Lu 12:22-31 corresponds to Mt 6:25-33, which see for detailed discussion. The parable of the rich fool
was spoken to the crowd, but this exhortation to freedom from care (22-31)
is to the disciples. So the language in Lu 12:22 is precisely that in Mt 6:25. See there for [mē merimnāte] (stop being anxious)
and the deliberative subjunctive retained in the indirect question [phagēte,
endusēsthe]. So verse 23 here is the same in Mt 6:25 except that there it is a question with [ouch] expecting the
affirmative answer, whereas here it is given as a reason [gar], for)
for the preceding command.
12:24 The ravens [tous korakas]. Nowhere else in
the N.T. The name includes the whole crow group of birds (rooks and jackdaws).
Like the vultures they are scavengers. Mt 6:26 has simply “the birds” [ta peteina]. Storechamber (tameion).
Not in Mt 6:26. Means secret chamber in Lu 12:3. Of how much more [posōi māllon]. Mt 6:26 has question, [ouch māllon].
12:25 A cubit [pēchun]. Mt 6:27 has [pēchun hena] (one cubit, though [hena] is sometimes
merely the indefinite article. Stature[hēlikian] as in Matthew, which see.
12:26 Not able to do even that which is least [oude
elachiston dunasthe]. Negative [oude] in the condition of the first class.
Elative superlative, very small. This verse not in Matthew and omitted in D. Verse 27 as in Mt 6:28, save that the verbs for toil and spin are plural in Matthew and
singular here (neuter plural subject, [ta krina].
12:28 Clothe [amphiazei]. Late Greek verb in the
Koinē (papyri) for the older form [amphiennumi] (Mt
6:30). See Matthew for discussion of details. Matthew has “the grass of
the field” instead of “the grass in the field” as here.
12:29 Seek not ye [humeis mē zēteite]. Note emphatic
position of “ye” [humeis]. Stop seeking [mē] and present imperative
active). Mt 6:31 has: “Do not become anxious” [mē merimnēsēte], [mē]
and ingressive subjunctive occur as direct questions (What are we to eat? What are
we to drink? What are we to put on?) whereas here they are in the indirect
form as in verse 22 save that the problem of clothing is not here mentioned: Neither be
ye of doubtful mind [kai mē meteōrizesthe]. [Mē] and present passive
imperative (stop being anxious) of [meteōrizō]. An old verb from [meteōros]
in midair, high (our meteor), to lift up on high, then to lift oneself up
with hopes (false sometimes), to be buoyed up, to be tossed like a ship
at sea, to be anxious, to be in doubt as in late writers (Polybius, Josephus).
This last meaning is probably true here. In the LXX and Philo, but here only in
the N.T.
12:31 See Mt 6:33 for this verse. Luke does not have “first” nor “his righteousness”
nor “all.”
12:32 Little flock [to mikron poimnion]. Vocative
with the article as used in Hebrew and often in the Koinē and so in the N.T.
See both [pater] and [ho patēr] in the vocative in Lu 10:21. See Robertson, Grammar, pp. 465f. [Poimnion] (flock)
is a contraction from [poimenion] from [poimēn] (shepherd)
instead of the usual [poimnē] (flock). So it is not a diminutive
and [mikron] is not superfluous, though it is pathetic. For it is your
Father’s good pleasure [hoti eudokēsen ho patēr humōn]. First aorist
active indicative of [eudokeō]. Timeless aorist as in Lu 3:22. This verse has no parallel in Matthew.
12:33 Sell that ye have [Pōlēsate ta huparchonta humōn].
Not in Matthew. Did Jesus mean this literally and always? Luke has been charged
with Ebionism, but Jesus does not condemn property as inherently sinful. “The attempt
to keep the letter of the rule here given (Ac 2:44, 45) had disastrous
effects on the church of Jerusalem, which speedily became a church of paupers, constantly
in need of alms (Ro 15:25,26; 1Co 16:3; 2Co 8:4; 9:1)” (Plummer).
Purses which wax not old [ballantia mē palaioumena]. So already [ballantion]
in Lu 10:4. Late verb [palaioō] from [palaios], old, to make old,
declare old as in Heb 8:13, is passive to become old as here and Heb 1:11. That faileth not [anekleipton]. Verbal from [a]
privative and [ekleipō], to fail. Late word in Diodorus and Plutarch. Only
here in the N.T. or LXX, but in papyri. “I prefer to believe that even Luke sees
in the words not a mechanical rule, but a law for the spirit” (Bruce).
Draweth near [eggizei]. Instead of Mt 6:19 “dig through and steal.” Destroyeth [diaphtheirei].
Instead of “doth consume” in Mt 6:19.
12:34 Will be [estai]. Last word in the sentence
in Luke. Otherwise like Mt 6:21. See 1Co 7:32-34 for similar principle.
12:35 Be girded about [estōsan periezōsmenai]. Periphrastic
perfect passive imperative third plural of the verb [perizōnnumi] or [perizōnnuō]
(later form), an old verb, to gird around, to fasten the garments with a
girdle. The long garments of the orientals made speed difficult. It was important
to use the girdle before starting. Cf. 17:8; Ac 12:8. Burning [kaiomenoi]. Periphrastic present middle
imperative, already burning and continuously burning. The same point of the Parable
of the Ten Virgins (Mt 25:1-13) is found here in condensed form.
This verse introduces the parable of the waiting servants (Lu 12:35-40).
12:36 When he shall return from the marriage feast [pote
analusēi ek tōn gamōn]. The interrogative conjunction [pote] and the
deliberative aorist subjunctive retained in the indirect question. The verb [analuō],
very common Greek verb, but only twice in the N.T. (here and Php 1:23). The figure is breaking up a camp or loosening the mooring
of a ship, to depart. Perhaps here the figure is from the standpoint of the wedding
feast (plural as used of a single wedding feast in Lu 14:8), departing from there. See on Mt 22:2. When he cometh
and knocketh [elthontos kai krousantos]. Genitive absolute of the aorist
active participle without [autou] and in spite of [autoi] (dative)
being used after [anoixōsin] (first aorist active subjunctive of [anoigō].
12:37 He shall gird himself [perizōsetai]. Direct
future middle. Jesus did this (Joh 13:4), not out of gratitude, but
to give the apostles an object lesson in humility. See the usual course in Lu 17:7-10 with also the direct middle
(verse 8) of [perisōnnuō].
12:38 And if [k’an = kai + ean]. Repeated. [Elthēi]
and [heurēi], both second aorist subjunctive with [ean], condition
of the third class, undetermined, but with prospect of being determined. Blessed
[makarioi]. Beatitude here as in verse 37.
12:39 The thief [ho kleptēs]. The change here almost
makes a new parable to illustrate the other, the parable of the housebreaking (verses 39, 40) to illustrate the parable of the waiting servants
(35-38).
This same language appears in Mt 24:43f. “The Master returning from a wedding is replaced by a thief whose
study it is to come to the house he means to plunder at an unexpected time” (Bruce).
The parallel in Mt 24:43-51 with Lu 12:39-46 does not have the interruption by Peter. He would have watched
[egrēgorēsen an]. Apodosis of second-class condition, determined as unfulfilled,
made plain by use of [an] with aorist indicative which is not repeated with
[ouk aphēken] (first aorist active indicative of [aphiēmi], [k]
aorist), though it is sometimes repeated (Mt 24:43).
12:40 Be ye [ginesthe]. Present middle imperative,
keep on becoming. Cometh [erchetai]. Futuristic present indicative.
See Mt 24:43-51 for details in the comparison with Luke.
12:41 Peter said [Eipen de ho Petros]. This whole
paragraph from verse 22-40 had been addressed directly to the disciples. Hence it is not surprising
to find Peter putting in a question. This incident confirms also the impression
that Luke is giving actual historical data in the environment of these discourses.
He is certain that the Twelve are meant, but he desires to know if others are included,
for he had spoken to the multitude in verses 13-21. Recall Mr 13:37. This interruption is somewhat like that on the Mount of Transfiguration
(Lu 9:33) and is characteristic of Peter. Was it the magnificent
promise in verse 37 that stirred Peter’s impulsiveness? It is certainly more than a literary
device of Luke. Peter’s question draws out a parabolic reply by Jesus (42-48).
12:42 Who then [tis ara]. Jesus introduces this
parable of the wise steward (42-48) by a rhetorical question that
answers itself. Peter is this wise steward, each of the Twelve is, anyone is who
acts thus. The faithful and wise steward [ho pistos oikonomos ho phronimos].
The faithful steward, the wise one. A steward is house manager [oikos, nemō],
to manage). Each man is a steward in his own responsibilities. Household
[therapeias]. Literally, service from [therapeuō]. medical service
as in Lu 9:11, by metonymy household (a body of those domestics who serve).
Their portion of food [to sitometrion]. Late word from [sitometreō]
(Ge 47:12) for the Attic [ton siton metreō], to measure the
food, the rations. Here only in the N.T. or anywhere else till Deissmann (Bible
Studies, p. 158) found it in an Egyptian papyrus and then an inscription
in Lycia (Light from the Ancient East, p. 104).
12:44 Over all [epi pāsin]. See Mt 24-47 for [epi] with locative in this sense. Usually with genitive
as in verse 42 and sometimes with accusative as in verse 14.
12:45 Shall say [eipēi]. Second aorist subjunctive,
with [ean], condition of the third class, undetermined, but with prospect
of being determined. Delayeth [chronizei]. From [chronos],
time, spends time, lingers. Shall begin [arxētai]. First aorist middle
subjunctive with [ean] and the same condition as [eipēi], above.
The menservants [tous paidas] and the maidservants [kai
tas paidiskas]. [Paidiskē] is a diminutive of [pais] for a young
female slave and occurs in the papyri, orginally just a damsel. Here [pais]
can mean slave also though strictly just a boy.
12:46 Shall cut him asunder [dichotomēsei]. An old
and somewhat rare word from [dichotomos] and that from [dicha] and
[temnō], to cut, to cut in two. Used literally here. In the N.T. only here
and Mt 24:51. With the unfaithful [meta tōn apistōn]. Not here
“the unbelieving” though that is a common meaning of [apistos] [a]
privative and [pistos], from [peithō], but the unreliable, the untrustworthy.
Here Mt 24:51 has “with the hypocrites,” the same point. The parallel with Mt 24:43-51 ends here. Mt 24:51 adds the saying about the wailing and the gnashing of teeth. Clearly
there Luke places the parable of the wise steward in this context while Matthew
has it in the great eschatological discourse. Once again we must either think that
Jesus repeated the parable or that one of the writers has misplaced it. Luke alone
preserves what he gives in verses 47, 48.
12:47 Which knew [ho gnous]. Articular participle
(second aorist active, punctiliar and timeless). The one who knows.
So as to [mē hetoimasas ē poiēsas] (does not make ready or do).
Shall be beaten with many stripes [darēsetai pollas]. Second future
passive of [derō], to skin, to beat, to flay (see on Mt 21:35; Mr 12:3,5). The passive voice retains here the accusative
[pollas] (supply [plēgas], present in Lu 10:30). The same explanation applies to [oligas] in
verse 48.
12:48 To whomsoever much is given [panti de hōi edothē
polu]. Here is inverse attraction from [hoi] to [panti] (Robertson,
Grammar, pp. 767f.). Note [par’ autou] (from him)
without any regard to [panti]. They commit [parethento]. Second
aorist middle indicative, timeless or gnomic aorist. Note the impersonal plural
after the passive voice just before.
12:49 I came to cast fire [Pur ēlthon balein]. Suddenly
Jesus lets the volcano in his own heart burst forth. The fire was already burning.
“Christ came to set the world on fire, and the conflagration had already begun”
(Plummer). The very passion in Christ’s heart would set his friends on fire
and his foes in opposition as we have just seen (Lu 11:53f.). It
is like the saying of Jesus that he came to bring not peace, but a sword, to bring
cleavage among men (Mt 10:34-36). And what will I, if it is already
kindled? [kai ti thelō ei ēdē anēphthē;]. It is not clear what this passage
means. Probably [ti] is be taken in the sense of “how” [pōs]. How
I wish. Then [ei] can be taken as equal to [hoti]. How I wish that
it were already kindled. [Anēphthē] is first aorist passive of [anaptō],
to set fire to, to kindle, to make blaze. Probably Luke means the conflagration
to come by his death on the Cross for he changes the figure and refers to that more
plainly.
12:50 I have a baptism [baptisma de echō]. Once
again Jesus will call his baptism the baptism of blood and will challenge James
and John to it (Mr 10:32f.; Mt 20:22f.). So here. “Having used the
metaphor of fire, Christ now uses the metaphor of water. The one sets forth the
result of his coming as it affects the world, the other as it affects himself. The
world is lit up with flames and Christ is bathed in blood” (Plummer).
And how I am straitened [kai pōs sunechomai]. See this same vivid verb
[sunechomai] in Lu 8:37; Ac 18:5; Php 1:23 where Paul uses it of his desire for death just
as Jesus does here. The urge of the Cross is upon Jesus at the moment of these words.
We catch a glimpse of the tremendous passion in his soul that drove him on. Till
it be accomplished [heōs hotou telesthēi]. First aorist passive subjunctive
of [teleō] with [heōs hotou] (until which time), the common
construction for the future with this conjunction.
12:51 But rather division [all’ ē diamerismon].
Peace at any price is not the purpose of Christ. It is a pity for family jars to
come, but loyalty to Christ counts more than all else. These ringing words (Lu
12:51-53) occur in Mt 10:34-36 in the address to the Twelve for the Galilean tour. See discussion
of details there. These family feuds are inevitable where only part cleave to Christ.
In Matthew we have [kata] with the genitive whereas in Luke it is [epi]
with the dative (and accusative once).
12:54 To the multitudes also [kai tois ochlois].
After the strong and stirring words just before with flash and force Jesus turns
finally in this series of discourses to the multitudes again as in verse 15. There are similar sayings to these
verses 54-59 in
Mt 16:1f; 5:25f. There is a good deal of difference in phraseology whether
that is due to difference of source or different use of the same source (Q or Logia)
we do not know. Not all the old MSS. give Mt 16:2,3. In Matthew the Pharisees and Sadducees were asking for a sign
from heaven as they often did. These signs of the weather, “a shower” [ombros], Lu 12:54) due to clouds in the west, “a hot wave” [kausōn],
verse 55) due to a south wind [noton] blowing, “fair weather” [eudia], Mt 16:2) when the sky is red, are appealed to today. They have a
more or less general application due to atmospheric and climatic conditions.
12:56 To interpret this time [ton kairon touton dokimazein].
To test [dokimazein] as spiritual chemists. No wonder that Jesus here calls
them “hypocrites” because of their blindness when looking at and hearing him. So
it is today with those who are willfully blind to the steps of God among men. This
ignorance of the signs of the times is colossal.
12:57 Even of yourselves [kai aph’ heautōn]. Without
the presence and teaching of Jesus they had light enough to tell what is right [to
dikaion] and so without excuse as Paul argued in Ro 1-3.
12:58 Give diligence to be quit of him [dos ergasian
apēllachthai ap’ autou]. Second aorist active imperative [dos] from [didōmi].
[Apēllachthai],
perfect passive infinitive of [apallassō] an old verb common, but only twice
in the N.T. (here and Ac 19:12). Used here in a legal sense and the tense emphasizes a
state of completion, to be rid of him for good. Hale thee [katasurēi].
Drag down forcibly, old verb, only here in the N.T. To the officer [tōi
praktori]. The doer, the proctor, the exactor of fines, the executor of punishment.
Old word, only here in the N.T.
12:59 Till thou have paid [heōs apodōis]. Second
aorist active subjunctive of [apodidōmi], to pay back in full. The last
mite [to eschaton lepton]. From [lepō], to peel off the bark.
Very small brass coin, one-eighth of an ounce. In the N.T. only here and Lu 21:2; Mr 12:42 (the poor widow’s mite) which see.
Chapter 13
13:1 At that very season [en autōi tōi kairōi]. Luke’s frequent
idiom, “at the season itself.” Apparently in close connexion with the preceding
discourses. Probably “were present” [parēsan], imperfect of [pareimi]
means “came,” “stepped to his side,” as often (Mt 26:50; Ac 12:20; Joh 11:28).
These people had a piece of news for Jesus. Whose blood Pilate had mingled with
their sacrifices [hōn to haima Peilatos emixen meta tōn thusiōn autōn].
The verb [emixen] is first aorist active (not past perfect) of [mignumi],
a common verb. The incident is recorded nowhere else, but is in entire harmony with
Pilate’s record for outrages. These Galileans at a feast in Jerusalem may have been
involved in some insurrection against the Roman government, the leaders of whom
Pilate had slain right in the temple courts where the sacrifices were going on.
Jesus comments on the incident, but not as the reporters had expected. Instead of
denunciation of Pilate he turned it into a parable for their own conduct in the
uncertainty of life.
13:2 Sinners above all [hamartōloi para pantas].
[Para] means “beside,” placed beside all the Galileans, and so beyond or
above (with the accusative). Have suffered [peponthasin].
Second perfect active indicative third plural from [paschō], common verb,
to experience, suffer. The tense notes that it is “an irrevocable fact” (Bruce).
13:3 Except ye repent [ean mē metanoēte]. Present
active subjunctive of [metanoeō], to change mind and conduct, linear action,
keep on changing. Condition of third class, undetermined, but with prospect of determination.
Ye shall perish [apoleisthe]. Future middle indicative of [apollumi]
and intransitive. Common verb.
13:4 The tower in Siloam [ho purgos en Silōam].
Few sites have been more clearly located than this. Jesus mentions this accident
(only in Luke) of his own accord to illustrate still further the responsibility
of his hearers. Jesus makes use of public events in both these incidents to teach
spiritual lessons. He gives the “moral” to the massacre of the Galilean pilgrims
and the “moral” of the catastrophe at Siloam. Offenders [opheiletai].
Literally, debtors, not sinners as in verse 2 and as the Authorized Version renders here. See
7:41; 11:4; Mt 6:12; 18:24-34.
13:5 Except ye repent [ean mē metanoēsēte]. First
aorist active subjunctive, immediate repentance in contrast to continued repentance,
[metanoēte] in verse 3, though Westcott and Hort put [metanoēte] in the margin here. The
interpretation of accidents is a difficult matter, but the moral pointed out by
Jesus is obvious.
13:6 Planted [pephuteumenēn]. Perfect passive participle
of [phuteuō], to plant, an old verb, from [phuton], a plant, and that
from [phuō], to grow. But this participle with [eichen] (imperfect
active of [echō] does not make a periphrastic past perfect like our English
“had planted.” It means rather, he had a fig tree, one already planted in his vineyard.
13:7 The vinedresser [ton ampelourgon]. Old word,
but here only in the N.T., from [ampelos], vine, and [ergon], work.
These three years I come [tria etē aph’ hou erchomai]. Literally,
“three years since (from which time) I come.” These three years, of course,
have nothing to do with the three years of Christ’s public ministry. The three years
are counted from the time when the fig tree would normally be expected to bear,
not from the time of planting. The Jewish nation is meant by this parable of the
barren fig tree. In the withering of the barren fig tree later at Jerusalem we see
parable changed to object lesson or fact (Mr 11:12-14; Mt 21:18f.).
Cut it down [ekkopson]. “Cut it out,” the Greek has it, out of the
vineyard, perfective use of [ek] with the effective aorist active imperative of
[koptō], where we prefer “down.” Why? [hina ti]. Ellipsis here of [genētai] of which
[ti] is subject (Robertson, Grammar, pp. 739,916). Also [kai].
Besides bearing no fruit. Doth cumber the ground [tēn gēn katargei].
Makes the ground completely idle, of no use [kata, argeō], from [argos],
[a] privative and [ergon], work). Late verb, here only in
the N.T. except in Paul’s Epistles.
13:8 Till I shall dig [heōs hotou skapsō]. First
aorist active subjunctive like [balō] (second aorist active subjunctive of
[ballō], both common verbs. Dung it [balō kopria]. Cast dung
around it, manure it. [Kopria], late word, here alone in the N.T.
13:9 And if it bear fruit thenceforth [k’an men poiēsēi
karpon eis to mellon]. Aposiopesis, sudden breaking off for effect (Robertson,
Grammar, p. 1203). See it also in Mr 11:32; Ac 23:9. Trench (Parables) tells a story like this
of intercession for the fig tree for one year more which is widely current among
the Arabs today who say that it will certainly bear fruit this time.
13:10 He was teaching [ēn didaskōn]. Periphrastic
imperfect active.
13:11 A spirit of infirmity [pneuma astheneias].
A spirit that caused the weakness [astheneias], lack of strength)
like a spirit of bondage (Ro 8:15), genitive case. She was bowed
together [ēn sunkuptousa]. Periphrastic imperfect active of [sunkuptō],
old verb, here only in the N.T., to bend together, medical word for curvature of
the spine. And could in no wise lift herself up [kai mē dunamenē anakupsai
eis to panteles]. Negative form of the previous statement. [Anakupsai],
first aorist active infinitive of [anakuptō] [ana, kuptō], same verb
above compounded with [sun]. Unable to bend herself up or back at all [eis
to panteles], wholly as in Heb 7:25 only other passage in the N.T. where it occurs). The poor
old woman had to come in all bent over.
13:12 He called her [prosephōnēsen]. To come to
him (pros]. Thou art loosed [apolelusai]. Perfect passive indicative
of [apoluō], common verb, loosed to stay free. Only N.T. example of use about
disease.
13:13 He laid his hands upon her [epethēken autēi tas
cheiras]. First aorist active indicative of [epitithēmi]. As the Great
Physician with gentle kindness. She was made straight [anōrthōthē].
First aorist (effective) passive indicative of [anorthoō], old verb,
but only three times in the N.T. (Lu 13:13; Heb 12:12; Ac 15:16),
to make straight again. Here it has the literal sense of making straight the old
woman’s crooked back. She glorified God [edoxazen ton theon]. Imperfect
active. Began it (inchoative) and kept it up.
13:14 Answered [apokritheis]. First aorist passive
participle of [apokrinomai]. No one had spoken to him, but he felt his importance
as the ruler of the synagogue and was indignant [aganaktōn], from [agan]
and [achomai], to feel much pain). His words have a ludicrous sound
as if all the people had to do to get their crooked backs straightened out was to
come round to his synagogue during the week. He forgot that this poor old woman
had been coming for eighteen years with no result. He was angry with Jesus, but
he spoke to the multitude [tōi ochlōi]. Ought [dei]. Really,
must, necessary, a direct hit at Jesus who had “worked” on the sabbath in healing
this old woman. And not [kai mē]. Instead of [kai ou], because
in the imperative clause.
13:15 The Lord answered him [apekrithē de autōi ho Kurios].
Note use of “the Lord” of Jesus again in Luke’s narrative. Jesus answered the ruler
of the synagogue who had spoken to the crowd, but about Jesus. It was a crushing
and overwhelming reply. Hypocrites [hupokritai]. This pretentious
faultfinder and all who agree with him. Each of you [hekastos humōn].
An argumentum ad hominen.These very critics of Jesus cared too much for an
ox or an ass to leave it all the sabbath without water. Stall [phatnēs].
Old word, in the N.T. only here and Lu 2:7,12,16 the manger where the infant Jesus was placed. To watering
[potizei]. Old verb, causative, to give to drink.
13:16 Daughter of Abraham [thugatera Abraam]. Triple
argument, human being and not an ox or ass, woman, daughter of Abraham (Jewess),
besides being old and ill. Ought not (ouk edei]. Imperfect active.
Of necessity. Jesus simply had to heal her even if on the sabbath. Whom Sātan
bound [hēn edēsen ho Satanas]. Definite statement that her disease was
due to Satan.
13:17 Were put to shame [katēischunonto]. Imperfect
passive of [kataischunō], old verb, to make ashamed, make one feel ashamed.
Passive here, to blush with shame at their predicament. Rejoiced [echairen].
Imperfect active. Sharp contrast in the emotions of the two groups. Were done
[ginomenois]. Present middle participle, were continually being done.
13:18 He said therefore [elegen oun]. It is not
clear to what to refer “therefore,” whether to the case of the woman in verse 11, the enthusiasm of the crowd in
verse 17, or to something not recorded by Luke.
13:19 A grain of mustard seed [kokkōi sinapeōs].
Either the sinapis nigra or the salvadora persica, both of which have
small seeds and grow to twelve feet at times. The Jews had a proverb: “Small as
a mustard seed.” Given by Mr 4:30-32; Mt 13:31f. in the first great group of parables, but just the
sort to be repeated. Cast into his own garden [ebalen eis kēpon heautou].
Different from “earth” (Mark) or “field” (Matthew.)” [Kēpos],
old word for garden, only here in the N.T. and Joh 19:1,26; 19:41. Became a tree [egeneto eis dendron]. Common
Hebraism, very frequent in LXX, only in Luke in the N.T., but does appear in
Koinē though rare in papyri; this use of [eis] after words like ginomai.It
is a translation Hebraism in Luke. Lodged [kateskēnōsen]. Mark and
Matthew have [kataskēnoin] infinitive of the same verb, to make tent (or
nest).
13:20 Whereunto shall I liken? [Tini homoiōsō;].
This question alone in Luke here as in verse 18. But the parable is precisely like that in Mt 13:33,
which see for details.
13:22 Journeying on unto Jerusalem [poreian poioumenos
eis Ierosoluma]. Making his way to Jerusalem. Note tenses here of continued
action, and distributive use of [kata] with cities and villages. This is
the second of the journeys to Jerusalem in this later ministry corresponding to
that in Joh 11.
13:23 Are they few that be saved? [ei oligoi hoi sōzomenoi;].
Note use of [ei] as an interrogative which can be explained as ellipsis or
as [ei=ē] (Robertson, Grammar, p. 1024). This was an academic
theological problem with the rabbis, the number of the elect.
13:24 Strive [agōnizesthe]. Jesus makes short shrift
of the question. He includes others (present middle plural of [agōnizomai],
common verb, our agonize). Originally it was to contend for a prize in the
games. The kindred word [agōnia] occurs of Christ’s struggle in Gethsemane
(Lu 22:44). The narrow gate appears also in Mt 7:13, only there it is an outside gate [pulēs] while here it is
the entrance to the house, “the narrow door” [thuras].
13:25 When once [aph’ hou an]. Possibly to be connected
without break with the preceding verse (so Westcott and Hort), though Bruce
argues for two parables here, the former (verse 24) about being in earnest, while this one
(verses 25-30) about not being too late. The two points are here undoubtedly.
It is an awkward construction, [aph’ hou = apo toutou hote] with [an]
and the aorist subjunctive [egerthēi] and [apokleisēi]. See Robertson,
Grammar, p. 978. Hath shut to [apokleisēi], first aorist active
subjunctive of [apokleiō], old verb, but only here in the N.T. Note effective
aorist tense and perfective use of [apo], slammed the door fast. And ye
begin [kai arxēsthe]. First aorist middle subjunctive of [archomai]
with [aph’ hou an] like [egerthēi] and [apokleisēi]. To stand
[hestanai]. Second perfect active infinitive of [histēmi], intransitive
tense and to knock [kai krouein]. Present active infinitive, to keep
on knocking. Open to us [anoixon hēmin]. First aorist active imperative,
at once and urgent. He shall say [erei]. Future active of [eipon]
(defective verb). This is probably the apodosis of the [aph’ hou]
clause.
13:26 Shall ye begin [arxesthe]. Future middle,
though Westcott and Hort put [arxēsthe] (aorist middle subjunctive of [archomai]
and in that case a continuation of the [aph’ hou] construction. It is a difficult
passage and the copyists had trouble with it. In thy presence [enōpion
sou]. As guests or hosts or neighbours some claim, or the master of the house.
It is grotesque to claim credit because Christ taught in their streets, but they
are hard run for excuses and claims.
13:27 I know not whence ye are [ouk oida pothen este].
This blunt statement cuts the matter short and sweeps away the flimsy cobwebs. Acquaintance
with Christ in the flesh does not open the door. Jesus quotes Ps 8:9 as in Mt 7:23, there as in the LXX, here with [pantes ergatai adikias],
there with [hoi ergazomenoi tēn anomian]. But [apostēte] (second aorist
active imperative) here, and there [apochōreite] (present active
imperative).
13:28 There [ekei]. Out there, outside the house
whence they are driven. When ye shall see [hotan opsēsthe]. First
aorist middle subjunctive (of a late aorist [ōpsamēn] of [horaō],
though [opsesthe] (future middle) in margin of Westcott and Hort,
unless we admit here a “future” subjunctive like Byzantine Greek (after Latin).
And yourselves cast forth without [humās de ekballomenous exō]. Present
passive participle, continuous action, “you being cast out” with the door shut.
See on Mt 8:11f. for this same picture.
13:29 Shall sit down [anaklithēsontai]. Future passive
indicative third plural. Recline, of course, is the figure of this heavenly banquet.
Jesus does not mean that these will be saved in different ways, but only that many
will come from all the four quarters of the earth.
13:30 Last [eschatoi]. This saying was repeated
many times (Mt 19:30; Mr 10:31; Mt 20:16).
13:31 In that very hour [en autēi tēi hōrāi]. Luke’s
favourite notation of time. Pharisees [Pharisaioi]. Here we see the
Pharisees in a new role, warning Jesus against the machinations of Herod, when they
are plotting themselves.
13:32 That fox [tēi alōpeki tautēi]. This epithet
for the cunning and cowardice of Herod shows clearly that Jesus understood the real
attitude and character of the man who had put John the Baptist to death and evidently
wanted to get Jesus into his power in spite of his superstitious fears that he might
be John the Baptist redivivus.The message of Jesus means that he is independent
of the plots and schemes of both Herod and the Pharisees. The preacher is often
put in a tight place by politicians who are quite willing to see him shorn of all
real power. Cures [iaseis]. Old word, but in the N.T. only here and Ac 4:22,30). I am perfected [teleioumai]. Present passive indicative
of [teleioō], old verb from [teleios], to bring to perfection, frequent
in the N.T. Used in Heb 2:10 of the Father’s purpose in the humanity of Christ. Perfect humanity
is a process and Jesus was passing through that, without sin, but not without temptation
and suffering. It is the prophetic present with the sense of the future.
13:33 The day following [tēi echomenēi]. See Ac 20:15. The same as the third day in
verse 32. A proverb. It cannot be [ouk endechetai]. It is not accepted,
it is inadmissible. A severely ironical indictment of Jerusalem. The shadow of the
Cross reaches Perea where Jesus now is as he starts toward Jerusalem.
13:34 O Jerusalem, Jerusalem [Ierousalēm, Ierousalēm].
In Mt 23:37f. Jesus utters a similar lament over Jerusalem. The connection suits
both there and here, but Plummer considers it “rather a violent hypothesis” to suppose
that Jesus spoke these words twice. It is possible, of course, though not like Luke’s
usual method, that he put the words here because of the mention of Jerusalem. In
itself it is not easy to see why Jesus could not have made the lament both here
and in Jerusalem. The language of the apostrophe is almost identical in both places
(Lu 13:34f.; Mt 23:37-39). For details see on Matthew. In Luke we
have [episunaxai] (late first aorist active infinitive) and in Matthew
[episunagagein] (second aorist active infinitive), both from [episunagō],
a double compound of late Greek (Polybius). Both have “How often would I”
[posakis ēthelēsa]. How often did I wish. Clearly showing that Jesus made
repeated visits to Jerusalem as we know otherwise only from John’s Gospel. Even
as [hon tropon]. Accusative of general reference and in Mt 23:37 also. Incorporation of antecedent into the relative clause. Brood
[nossian] is in Luke while Matthew has chickens [nossia], both
late forms for the older [neossia]. The adjective desolate [erēmos]
is wanting in Lu 13:35 and is doubtful in Mt 23:39.
Chapter 14
14:1 When he went [en tōi elthein auton]. Luke’s favourite temporal
clause = “on the going as to him.” That [kai]. Another common Lukan
idiom, [kai=hoti] after [egeneto], like Hebrew wav.They
[autoi]. Emphatic. Were watching [ēsan paratēroumenoi]. Periphrastic
imperfect middle. Note force of [autoi], middle voice, and [para-]. They
were themselves watching on the side (on the sly), watching insidiously,
with evil intent as in Mr 3:2 (active).
14:2 Which had the dropsy [hudrōpikos]. Late and
medical word from [hudōr] (water), one who has internal water [hudrōps].
Here only in the N.T. and only example of the disease healed by Jesus and recorded.
14:3 Answering [apokritheis]. First aorist passive
participle without the passive meaning. Jesus answered the thoughts of those mentioned
in verse 1. Here “lawyers and Pharisees” are treated as one class with one article
[tous] whereas in 7:30 they are treated as two classes with separate articles. Or not
[ē ou]. The dilemma forestalled any question by them. They held their
peace [hēsuchasan]. Ingressive aorist active of old verb [hēsuchazō]. They
became silent, more so than before.
14:4 Took him [epilabomenos]. Second aorist middle
participle of [epilambanō], an old verb, only in the middle in the N.T. It
is not redundant use, “took and healed,” but “took hold of him and healed him.”
Only instance in the N.T. of its use in a case of healing. Let him go [apelusen].
Probably, dismissed from the company to get him away from these critics.
14:5 An ass or an ox [onos ē bous]. But Westcott
and Hort [huios ē bous] (a son or an ox). The manuscripts are much
divided between [huios] (son) and [onos] (ass) which
in the abbreviated uncials looked much alike (TC, OC) and were much alike.
The sentence in the Greek reads literally thus: Whose ox or ass of you shall fall
[peseitai], future middle of [pipto] into a well and he (the man)
will not straightway draw him up [anaspasei], future active of [anaspaō]
on the sabbath day? The very form of the question is a powerful argument and puts
the lawyers and the Pharisees hopelessly on the defensive.
14:6 Could not answer again [ouk ischusan antapokrithēnai].
Did not have strength to answer back or in turn [anti-] as in Ro 9:20). They could not take up the argument and were helpless. They hated
to admit that they cared more for an ox or ass or even a son than for this poor
dropsical man.
14:7 A parable for those which were bidden [pros tous
keklēmenous parabolēn]. Perfect passive participle of [kaleō], to call,
to invite. This parable is for the guests who were there and who had been watching
Jesus. When he marked [epechōn]. Present active participle of [epechō]
with [ton noun] understood, holding the mind upon them, old verb and common.
They chose out [exelegonto]. Imperfect middle, were picking out for
themselves. The chief seats [tas prōtoklisias]. The first reclining
places at the table. Jesus condemned the Pharisees later for this very thing (Mt
23:6; Mr 12:39; Lu 20:46). On a couch holding three the middle place was
the chief one. At banquets today the name of the guests are usually placed at the
plates. The place next to the host on the right was then, as now, the post of honour.
14:8 Sit not down [mē kataklithēis]. First aorist
(ingressive) passive subjunctive of [kataklinō], to recline. Old
verb, but peculiar to Luke in the N.T. (7:36; 9:14;
14:8; 24:30).
Be bidden [ēi keklēmenos]. Periphrastic perfect passive subjunctive
of [kaleō] after [mē pote].
14:9 And say [kai erei]. Changes to future indicative
with [mē pote] as in 12:58. Shalt begin with shame [arxēi meta aischunēs]. The moment
of embarrassment. To take the lowest place [ton eschaton topon katechein].
To hold down the lowest place, all the intermediate ones being taken.
14:10 Sit down [anapese]. Second aorist active imperative
of [anapiptō], to fall up or back, to lie back or down. Late Greek word for
[anaklinō] (cf. [kataklinō] in verse 8). He that hath bidden thee [ho keklēkōs se]. Perfect
active participle as in verse 12 [tōi keklēkoti] with which compare [ho kalesas] in
verse 9 (first aorist active participle). He may say [erei].
The future indicative with [hina] does occur in the Koinē (papyri)
and so in the N.T. (Robertson, Grammar, p. 984). Go up higher
[prosanabēthi]. Second aorist active imperative second singular of [prosanabainō],
an old double compound verb, but here only in the N.T. Probably, “Come up higher,”
because the call comes from the host and because of [pros].
14:11 Shall be humbled [tapeinōthēsetai]. First
future passive. One of the repeated sayings of Jesus (18:14; Mt 23:12).
14:12 A dinner or a supper [ariston ē deipnon].
More exactly, a breakfast or a dinner with distinction between them as already shown.
This is a parable for the host as one had just been given for the guests, though
Luke does not term this a parable. Call not [mē phōnei]. [Mē]
and the present imperative active, prohibiting the habit of inviting only friends.
It is the exclusive invitation of such guests that Jesus condemns. There
is a striking parallel to this in Plato’s Phaedrus 233. Recompense
[antapodoma]. In the form of a return invitation. Like [anti] in “bid
thee again” [antikalesōsin].
14:13 When thou makest a feast [hotan dochēn poiēis].
[Hotan] and the present subjunctive in an indefinite temporal clause. [Dochē]
means reception as in Lu 5:29, late word, only in these two passages in the N.T. Note absence of
article with these adjectives in the Greek (poor people, maimed folks, lame people,
blind people).
14:14 To recompense thee [antapodounai soi]. Second
aorist active infinitive of this old and common double compound verb, to give back
in return. The reward will come at the resurrection if not before and thou shalt
be happy.
14:15 Blessed [makarios]. Happy, same word in the
Beatitudes of Jesus (Mt 5:3ff.). This pious platitude whether due
to ignorance or hypocrisy was called forth by Christ’s words about the resurrection.
It was a common figure among the rabbis, the use of a banquet for the bliss of heaven.
This man may mean that this is a prerogative of the Pharisees. He assumed complacently
that he will be among the number of the blest. Jesus himself uses this same figure
of the spiritual banquet for heavenly bliss (Lu 22:29). Shall
eat [phagetai]. Future middle from [esthiō], defective verb, from
stem of the aorist [ephagon] like [edomai] of the old Greek.
14:16 Made [epoiei]. Imperfect active, was on the
point of making (inchoative). Great supper [deipnon]. Or dinner,
a formal feast. Jesus takes up the conventional remark of the guest and by this
parable shows that such an attitude was no guarantee of godliness (Bruce).
This parable of the marriage of the King’s son (Lu 14:15-24) has
many points of likeness to the parable of the wedding garment (Mt 22:1-14)
and as many differences also. The occasions are very different, that in Matthew
grows out of the attempt to arrest Jesus while this one is due to the pious comment
of a guest at the feast and the wording is also quite different. Hence we conclude
that they are distinct parables. And he bade many [kai ekalesen pollous].
Aorist active, a distinct and definite act following the imperfect [epoiei].
14:17 His servant [ton doulon autou]. His bondservant.
Vocator or Summoner (Es 5:8; 6:14). This second summons was
the custom then as now with wealthy Arabs. Tristram (Eastern Customs, p.
82) says: “To refuse the second summons would be an insult, which is equivalent
among the Arab tribes to a declaration of war.”
14:18 With one consent [apo mias]. Some feminine
substantive like [gnōmēs] or [psuchēs] has to be supplied. This precise
idiom occurs nowhere else. It looked like a conspiracy for each one in his turn
did the same thing. To make excuse [paraiteisthai]. This common Greek
verb is used in various ways, to ask something from one (Mr 15:6),
to deprecate or ask to avert (Heb 12:19), to refuse or decline (Ac
25:11), to shun or to avoid (2Ti 2:23), to beg pardon
or to make excuses for not doing or to beg (Lu 14:18ff.). All these
ideas are variations of [aiteō], to ask in the middle voice with [para]
in composition. The first [ho prōtos]. In order of time. There are
three of the “many” (“all”), whose excuses are given, each more flimsy than
the other. I must needs [echō anagkēn]. I have necessity. The land
would still be there, a strange “necessity.” Have me excused [eche me
parēitēmenon]. An unusual idiom somewhat like the English perfect with the auxiliary
“have” and the modern Greek idiom with [echō], but certainly not here a Greek
periphrasis for [parēitēso]. This perfect passive participle is predicate
and agrees with [me]. See a like idiom in Mr 3:1; Lu 12:19 (Robertson, Grammar, pp. 902f.). The Latin
had a similar idiom, habe me excusatum.Same language in verse 19.
14:19 To prove them [dokimasai auta]. He could have
tested them before buying. The oxen would not run away or be stolen.
14:20 I cannot come [ou dunamai elthein]. Less polite
than the others but a more plausible pretence if he wanted to make it so. The law
excused a newly married man from war (De 24:5), “but not from social
courtesy” (Ragg). The new wife would probably have been glad to go with
him to the feast if asked. But see 1Co 7:33. There is here as often a sharp difference between the excuses offered
and the reasons behind them.
14:21 Being angry [orgistheis]. First aorist (ingressive)
passive, becoming angry. Quickly [tacheōs]. The dinner is ready and
no time is to be lost. The invitation goes still to those in the city. Streets
and lanes [tas plateias kai rhumas]. Broadways and runways (broad streets
and narrow lanes). Maimed [anapeirous]. So Westcott and Hort
for the old word [anapērous], due to itacism [ei=ē] in pronunciation).
The word is compounded of [ana] and [pēros], lame all the way up.
14:22 And yet there is room [kai eti topos estin].
The Master had invited “many” (verse 16) who had all declined. The servant knew the Master wished the
places to be filled.
14:23 The highways and hedges [tas hodous kai phragmous].
The public roads outside the city of Judaism just as the streets and lanes were
inside the city. The heathen are to be invited this time. Hedges is fenced
in places from [phrassō], to fence in (Ro 3:19). Compel
[anagkason]. First aorist active imperative of [anagkazō], from [anagkē]
(verse 18). By persuasion of course. There is no thought of compulsory salvation.
“Not to use force, but to constrain them against the reluctance which such poor
creatures would feel at accepting the invitation of a great lord” (Vincent).
As examples of such “constraint” in this verb see Mt 14:22; Ac 26:11; Ga 6:12. That my house may be filled [hina
gemisthēi mou ho oikos]. First aorist passive subjunctive of [gemizō],
to fill full, old verb from [gemō], to be full. Effective aorist. Subjunctive
with [hina] in final clause. The Gentiles are to take the place that the
Jews might have had (Ro 11:25). Bengel says: Nec natura nec gratia
patitur vacuum.
14:24 My supper [mou tou deipnou]. Here it is still
the Master of the feast who is summing up his reasons for his conduct. We do not
have to say that Jesus shuts the door now in the face of the Jews who may turn to
him.
14:25 And he turned [kai strapheis]. Second aorist
passive participle of [strephō], common verb. It is a dramatic act on the
part of Jesus, a deliberate effort to check the wild and unthinking enthusiasm of
the crowds who followed just to be following. Note “many multitudes” [ochloi
polloi] and the imperfect tense [suneporeuonto], were going along with
him.
14:26 Hateth not [ou misei]. An old and very strong
verb [miseō], to hate, detest. The orientals use strong language where cooler
spirits would speak of preference or indifference. But even so Jesus does not here
mean that one must hate his father or mother of necessity or as such, for Mt 15:4 proves the opposite. It is only where the element of choice comes
in (cf. Mt 6:24) as it sometimes does, when father or mother opposes Christ.
Then one must not hesitate. The language here is more sharply put than in Mt 10:37. The [ou] here coalesces with the verb [misei] in
this conditional clause of the first class determined as fulfilled. It is the language
of exaggerated contrast, it is true, but it must not be watered down till the point
is gone. In mentioning “and wife” Jesus has really made a comment on the excuse
given in verse 20 (I married a wife and so I am not able to come). And his own
life also [eti te kai tēn psuchēn heautou]. Note [te kai], both—and.
“The [te] (B L) binds all the particulars into one bundle of renuncianda”(Bruce).
Note this same triple group of conjunctions [eti te kai] in Ac 21:28, “And moreover also,” “even going as far as his own life.” Martyrdom
should be an ever-present possibility to the Christian, not to be courted, but not
to be shunned. Love for Christ takes precedence “over even the elemental instinct
of self-preservation” (Ragg).
14:27 His own cross [ton stauron heauto–]. This
familiar figure we have had already (Lu 9:23; Mr 8:34; Mt 10:38; 16:24).
Each follower has a cross which he must bear as Jesus did his. [Bastazō]
is used of cross bearing in the N.T. only here (figuratively) and Joh 19:17 literally of Jesus. Crucifixion was common enough in Palestine
since the days of Antiochus Epiphanes and Alexander Jannaeus.
14:28 Build a tower [purgon oikodomēsai]. A common
metaphor, either a tower in the city wall like that by the Pool of Siloam (Lu
13:4) or a watchtower in a vineyard (Mt 21:33) or a tower-shaped
building for refuge or ornament as here. This parable of the rash builder has the
lesson of counting the cost. Sit down [kathisas]. Attitude of deliberation.
First [prōton]. First things first. So in verse 31. Count [psēphizei]. Common verb in late writers, but only
here and Re 13:18 in the N.T. The verb is from [psēphos], a stone, which was
used in voting and so counting. Calculate is from the Latin calculus, a pebble.
To vote was to cast a pebble [tithēmi psēphon]. Luke has Paul using “deposit
a pebble” for casting his vote (Ac 26:10). The cost [tēn
dapanēn]. Old and common word, but here only in the N.T. from [daptō],
to tear, consume, devour. Expense is something which eats up one’s resources.
Whether he hath wherewith to complete it [ei echei eis apartismon]. If
he has anything for completion of it. [Apartismon] is a rare and late word
(in the papyri and only here in the N.T.). It is from [apartizō],
to finish off [ap-] and [artizō] like our articulate), to
make even or square. Cf. [exērtismenos] in 2Ti 3:17.
14:29 Lest haply [hina mēpote]. Double final particles
(positive and negative with addition of [pote]. Used here with aorist middle
subjunctive in [arxōntai] (begin). When he hath laid ... and was
not able [thentos autou ... kai mē ischuontos] to finish [ektelesai].
First aorist active infinitive. Note perfective use of [ek], to finish out
to the end. Two genitive absolutes, first, second aorist active participle [thentos];
second, present active participle [ischuontos]. To mock him [autōi
empaizein]. An old verb, [em-paizō], to play like a child [pais],
at or with, to mock, scoff at, to trifle with like Latin illudere.
14:30 This man [houtos ho anthrōpos]. This fellow,
contemptuous or sarcastic use of [houtos].
14:31 To encounter [sunbalein]. Second aorist active
infinitive of [sunballō], old and common verb, to throw or bring together,
to dispute, to clash in war as here. Another king [heterōi basilei],
to grapple with another king in war or for war [eis polemon]. Associative
instrumental case. Take counsel [bouleusetai]. Future middle indicative
of old and common verb [bouleuō], from [boulē], will, counsel. The
middle means to take counsel with oneself, to deliberate, to ponder. With ten
thousand [en deka chiliasin]. Literally, in ten thousand. See this so-called
instrumental use of [en] in Jude 1:14. Equipped in or with ten thousand. See Lu 1:17. Note [meta eikosi chiliadōn] just below (midst of twenty
thousand). To meet [hupantēsai]. Common verb (like [apantaō]
from [antaō] [anta], end, face to face, from which [anti] with
preposition [hupo] (or [apo], to go to meet. Here it has a military
meaning.
14:32 Or else [ei de mēge]. Same idiom in 5:36. Luke is fond of this formula. An ambassage [presbeian].
Old and common word for the office of ambassador, composed of old men [presbeis]
like Japanese Elder Statesmen who are supposed to possess wisdom. In the N.T. only
here and Lu 19:14. Asketh conditions of peace [erōtāi pros eirēnēn].
The use of [erōtaō] in this sense of beg or petition is common in the papyri
and Koinē generally. The original use of asking a question survives also.
The text is uncertain concerning [pros eirēnēn] which means with [erōtaō],
to ask negotiations for peace. In B we have [eis] instead of [pros]
like verse 28. Most MSS. have [ta] before [pros] or [eis], but
not in Aleph and B. It is possible that the [ta] was omitted because of preceding
[tai] [homoeoteleuton], but the sense is the same. See Ro 14:19 [ta tēs eirēnēs], the things of peace, which concern or look
towards peace, the preliminaries of peace.
14:33 Renounceth not [ouk apotassetai]. Old Greek
word to set apart as in a military camp, then in the middle voice to separate oneself
from, say good-bye to (Lu 9:61), to renounce, forsake, as here.
All that he hath [pasin tois heautou huparchousin]. Dative case, says
good-bye to all his property, “all his own belongings” (neuter plural participle
used as substantive) as named in verse 26. This verse gives the principle in the two parables of the rash builder
and of the rash king. The minor details do not matter. The spirit of self-sacrifice
is the point.
14:35 Dunghill [koprian]. Later word in the Koinē
vernacular. Here only in the N.T., though in the LXX. Men cast it out [exō
ballousin auto]. Impersonal plural. This saying about salt is another of Christ’s
repeated sayings (Mt 5:13; Mr 9:50). Another repeated saying is the
one here about having ears to hear (Lu 8:8; 14:35; Mt 11:15; 13:43).
Chapter 15
15:1 All the publicans and sinners [pantes hoi telōnai kai hoi hamartōloi].
The two articles separate the two classes (all the publicans and the sinners).
They are sometimes grouped together (5:30; Mt 9:11), but not here.
The publicans are put on the same level with the outcasts or sinners. So in verse 2 the repeated article separates Pharisees and scribes as not quite one.
The use of “all” here may be hyperbole for very many or the reference may be to
these two classes in the particular place where Jesus was from time to time.
Were drawing near unto him [ēsan autōi eggizontes]. Periphrastic imperfect
of [eggizō], from [eggus] (near), late verb. For to hear
[akouein]. Just the present active infinitive of purpose.
15:2 Both . . . and [te . . . kai]. United in the complaint.
Murmured [diegogguzon]. Imperfect active of [diagogguzō], late
Greek compound in the LXX and Byzantine writers. In the N.T. only here and Lu 19:7. The force of [dia] here is probably between or among themselves.
It spread (imperfect tense) whenever these two classes came in contact with
Jesus. As the publicans and the sinners were drawing near to Jesus just in that
proportion the Pharisees and the scribes increased their murmurings. The social
breach is here an open yawning chasm. This man [houtos]. A contemptuous
sneer in the use of the pronoun. They spoke out openly and probably pointed at Jesus.
Receiveth [prosdechetai]. Present middle indicative of the common
verb [prosdechomai]. In 12:36 we had it for expecting, here it is to give access to oneself, to welcome
like [hupedexato] of Martha’s welcome to Jesus (Lu 10:38).
The charge here is that this is the habit of Jesus. He shows no sense of social
superiority to these outcasts (like the Hindu “untouchables” in India).
And eateth with them [kai sunesthiei autois]. Associative instrumental
case [autois] after [sun-] in composition. This is an old charge (Lu
5:30) and a much more serious breach from the standpoint of the Pharisees.
The implication is that Jesus prefers these outcasts to the respectable classes
(the Pharisees and the scribes) because he is like them in character and
tastes, even with the harlots. There was a sting in the charge that he was the “friend”
[philos] of publicans and sinners (Lu 7:34).
15:3 This parable [tēn parabolēn tautēn]. The Parable
of the Lost Sheep (15:3-7). This is Christ’s way of answering the
cavilling of these chronic complainers. Jesus gave this same parable for another
purpose in another connection (Mt 18:12-14). The figure of the Good
Shepherd appears also in Joh 10:1-18. “No simile has taken more hold upon the mind of Christendom”
(Plummer). Jesus champions the lost and accepts the challenge and justifies
his conduct by these superb stories. “The three Episodes form a climax: The Pasture—the
House—the Home; the Herdsman—the Housewife—the Father; the Sheep—the Treasure—the
Beloved Son” (Ragg).
15:4 In the wilderness [en tēi erēmōi]. Their usual
pasturage, not a place of danger or peril. It is the owner of the hundred sheep
who cares so much for the one that is lost. He knows each one of the sheep and loves
each one. Go after that which is lost [poreuetai epi to apolōlos].
The one lost sheep [apolōlos], second perfect active participle of [apollumi],
to destroy, but intransitive, to be lost). There is nothing more helpless
than a lost sheep except a lost sinner. The sheep went off by its own ignorance
and folly. The use of [epi] for the goal occurs also in Mt 22:9; Ac 8:26; 9:11. Until he find it [heōs heurēi auto].
Second aorist active subjunctive of [heuriskō], common verb, with [heōs],
common Greek idiom. He keeps on going [poreuetai], linear present middle
indicative) until success comes (effective aorist, [heurēi].
15:5 On his shoulders [epi tous ōmous autou]. He
does it himself in exuberant affection and of necessity as the poor lost sheep is
helpless. Note the plural shoulders showing that the sheep was just back of the
shepherd’s neck and drawn around by both hands. The word for shoulder [ōmos]
is old and common, but in the N.T. only here and Mt 23:4. Rejoicing [chairōn]. “There is no upbraiding of the
wandering sheep, nor murmuring at the trouble” (Plummer).
15:6 Rejoice with me [suncharēte moi]. Second aorist
passive of [sunchairō], an old and common verb for mutual joy as in Php 2:17f. Joy demands fellowship. Same form in
verse 9. So the shepherd calls together [sunkalei], note [sun]
again) both his friends and his neighbours. This picture of the Good Shepherd
has captured the eye of many artists through the ages.
15:7 Over one sinner that repenteth [epi heni hamartōlōi
metanoounti]. The word sinner points to verse 1. Repenting is what these sinners were doing, these lost sheep brought to
the fold. The joy in heaven is in contrast with the grumbling Pharisees and scribes.
More than over [ē epi]. There is no comparative in the Greek. It is
only implied by a common idiom like our “rather than.” Which need no repentance
[hoitines ou chreian echousin metanoias]. Jesus does not mean to say that
the Pharisees and the scribes do not need repentance or are perfect. He for the
sake of argument accepts their claims about themselves and by their own words condemns
them for their criticism of his efforts to save the lost sheep. It is the same point
that he made against them when they criticized Jesus and the disciples for being
at Levi’s feast (Lu 5:31f.). They posed as “righteous.” Very well,
then. That shuts their mouths on the point of Christ’s saving the publicans and
sinners.
15:8 Ten pieces of silver [drachmas deka]. The only
instance in the N.T. of this old word for a coin of 65.5 grains about the value
of the common [dēnarius] (about eighteen cents), a quarter of a Jewish
shekel. The double drachma [didrachmon] occurs in the N.T. only in Mt 17:24. The root is from [drassomai], to grasp with the hand (1Co
3:19), and so a handful of coin. Ten drachmas would be equal to nearly two
dollars, but in purchasing power much more. Sweep [saroi]. A late
colloquial verb [saroō] for the earlier [sairō], to clear by sweeping.
Three times in the N.T. (Lu 11:25; 15:8; Mt 12:44). The house was
probably with out windows (only the door for light and hence the lamp lit)
and probably also a dirt floor. Hence Bengel says: non sine pulvere.This
parable is peculiar to Luke.
15:9 Her friends and neighbours [tas philas kai geitonas].
Note single article and female friends (feminine article and [philas]. [Heōs
hou eurēi] here as in verse 4, only [hou] added after [heōs] (until which time)
as often. Which I lost [hēn apōlesa]. First aorist active indicative
of [apollumi]. She lost the coin (note article). The shepherd did
not lose the one sheep.
15:10 There is joy [ginetai chara]. More exactly,
joy arises. Futuristic present of [ginomai] (cf. [estai] in verse 7). In the presence of the angels of God [enōpion tōn aggelōn
tou theou]. That is to say, the joy of God himself. The angels are in a sense
the neighbours of God.
15:11 Had [eichen]. Imperfect active. Note [echōn]
(verse 4), [echousa] (verse 8), and now [eichen]. The self-sacrificing care is that of
the owner in each case. Here (verses 11-32) we have the most famous of all the parables of Jesus, the
Prodigal Son, which is in Luke alone. We have had the Lost Sheep, the Lost Coin,
and now the Lost Son. Bruce notes that in the moral sphere there must be self-recovery
to give ethical value to the rescue of the son who wandered away. That comes out
beautifully in this allegory.
15:12 The portion [to meros]. The Jewish law alloted
one-half as much to the younger son as to the elder, that is to say one-third of
the estate (De 21:17) at the death of the father. The father did
not have to abdicate in favour of the sons, but “this very human parable here depicts
the impatience of home restraints and the optimistic ambition of youth” (Ragg).
And he divided [ho de dieilen]. The second aorist active indicative
of [diaireō], an old and common verb to part in two, cut asunder, divide,
but in the N.T. only here and 1Co 12:11. The elder son got his share also of the “substance” or property
or estate [tēs ousias], “the living” [ton bion] as in Mr 12:44, not “life” as in Lu 8:14.
15:13 Not many days after [met’ ou pollas hēmeras].
Literally, after not many days. Luke is fond of this idiom (7:6; Ac 1:5).
Took his journey [apedēmēsen]. First aorist active indicative of [apodēmeō]
(from [apodēmos], away from home). Common verb. In the N.T. here
and Mt 21:33; 25:14; Mr 12:1; Lu 20:9. He burned all his bridges behind him,
gathering together all that he had. Wasted [dieskorpisen]. First aorist
active indicative of [diaskorpizō], a somewhat rare verb, the very opposite
of “gathered together” [sunagogōn]. More exactly he scattered his property.
It is the word used of winnowing grain (Mt 25:24). With riotous
living [zōn asōtōs]. Living dissolutely or profligately. The late adverb
[asōtōs] (only here in the N.T.) from the common adjective [asōtos]
[a] privative and [sōzō], one that cannot be saved, one who does not
save, a spendthrift, an abandoned man, a profligate, a prodigal. He went the limit
of sinful excesses. It makes sense taken actively or passively (prodigus
or perditus), active probably here.
15:14 When he had spent [dapanēsantos autou]. Genitive
absolute. The verb is here used in a bad sense as in Jas 4:3. See on [dapanē\ Lu 14:28. He [autos]. Emphasis. To
be in want [hustereisthai]. The verb is from [husteros], behind or later (comparative).
We use “fall behind” (Vincent) of one in straitened circumstances. Plummer
notes the coincidences of Providence. The very land was in a famine when the boy
had spent all.
15:15 Joined himself [ekollēthē]. First aorist passive
of [kollaō], an old verb to glue together, to cleave to. In the N.T. only
the passive occurs. He was glued to, was joined to. It is not necessary to take
this passive in the middle reflexive sense. The citizens [tōn politōn].
Curiously enough this common word citizen [politēs] from [polis],
city) is found in the N.T. only in Luke’s writings (15:15; 19:14;
Ac 21:39) except in He 8:11 where it is quoted from Jer 38:34. To feed swine [boskein choirous]. A most degrading
occupation for anyone and for a Jew an unspeakable degradation.
15:16 He would fain have been filled [epethumei chortasthēnai].
Literally, he was desiring (longing) to be filled. Imperfect indicative
and first aorist passive infinitive. [Chortasthēnai] is from [chortazō]
and that from [chortos] (grass), and so to feed with grass or with
anything. Westcott and Hort put [gemisai tēn koilian autou] in the margin
(the Textus Receptus). With the husks [ek tōn keratiōn]. The
word occurs here alone in the N.T. and is a diminutive of [keras] (horn)
and so means little horn. It is used in various senses, but here refers to the pods
of the carob tree or locust tree still common in Palestine and around the Mediterannean,
so called from the shape of the pods like little horns, Bockshornbaum in
German or goat’s-horn tree. The gelatinous substance inside has a sweetish taste
and is used for feeding swine and even for food by the lower classes. It is sometimes
called Saint John’s Bread from the notion that the Baptist ate it in the wilderness.
No man gave unto him [oudeis edidou autōi]. Imperfect active. Continued
refusal of anyone to allow him even the food of the hogs.
15:17 But when he came to himself [eis heauton de elthōn].
As if he had been far from himself as he was from home. As a matter of fact he had
been away, out of his head, and now began to see things as they really were. Plato
is quoted by Ackerman (Christian Element in Plato) as thinking of
redemption as coming to oneself. Hired servants [misthioi]. A late
word from [misthos] (hire). In the N.T. only in this chapter. The
use of “many” here suggests a wealthy and luxurious home. Have bread enough and
to spare [perisseuontai artōn]. Old verb from [perissos] and that
from [peri] (around). Present passive here, “are surrounded by loaves”
like a flood. I perish [egō de limōi hōde apollumai]. Every word here
counts: While I on the other hand am here perishing with hunger. It is the linear
present middle of [apollumi]. Note [egō] expressed and [de]
of contrast.
15:18 I will arise and go [anastas proreusomai].
This determination is the act of the will after he comes to himself and sees his
real condition. I did sin [hēmarton]. That is the hard word to say
and he will say it first. The word means to miss the mark. I shot my bolt and I
missed my aim (compare the high-handed demand in verse 12).
15:19 No longer worthy [ouketi axios]. Confession
of the facts. He sees his own pitiful plight and is humble. As one [hōs
hena]. The hired servants in his father’s house are high above him now.
15:20 To his father [pros ton patera heautou]. Literally,
to his own father. He acted at once on his decision. Yet afar off [eti
autou makran apechontos]. Genitive absolute. [Makran] agrees with [hodon]
understood: While he was yet holding off a distant way. This shows that the father
had been looking for him to come back and was even looking at this very moment as
he came in sight. Ran [dramōn]. Second aorist active participle of
the defective verb [trechō]. The eager look and longing of the father.
Kissed [katephilēsen]. Note perfective use of [kata] kissed him
much, kissed him again and again. The verb occurs so in the older Greek.
15:21 The son made his speech of confession as planned, but it
is not certain that he was able to finish as a number of early manuscripts do not
have “Make me as one of the hired servants,” though Aleph B D do have them. It is
probable that the father interrupted him at this point before he could finish.
15:22 The best robe [stolēn tēn prōtēn]. [Stolē]
is an old word for a fine stately garment that comes down to the feet (from [stello],
to prepare, equip), the kind worn by kings (Mr 16:5; Lu 22:46).
Literally, “a robe the first.” But not the first that you find, but the first in
rank and value, the finest in the house. This in contrast with his shabby clothes.
A ring [daktulion]. Common in classical writers and the LXX, but here
only in the N.T. From [daktulos], finger. See [chrusodaktulios] in Jas 2:2. Shoes [hupodēmata]. Sandals, “bound under.” Both sandals
and ring are marks of the freeman as slaves were barefooted.
15:23 The fatted calf [ton moschon ton siteuton].
The calf the fatted one. [Siteuton] is the verbal adjective of [sileuō],
to feed with wheat [sitos]. The calf was kept fat for festive occasions,
possibly in the hope of the son’s return. Kill [thusate]. Not as a
sacrifice, but for the feast. Make merry [euphranthōmen]. First aorist
passive subjunctive (volitive). From [euphrainō], an old verb from
[eu] (well) and [phrēn] (mind).
15:24 And is alive [kai anezēsen]. First aorist
active indicative of [anazaō], to live again. Literally, he was dead and
he came back to life. He was lost [ēn apolōlōs], periphrastic past
perfect active of [apollumi] and intransitive, in a lost state) and
he was found [heurethē]. He was found, we have to say, but this aorist passive
is really timeless, he is found after long waiting (effective aorist) The
artists have vied with each other in picturing various items connected with this
wonderful parable.
15:25 As he came and drew nigh [hōs erchomenos ēggisen].
More exactly, “As, coming, he drew nigh,” for [erchomenos] is present middle
participle and [ēggisen] is aorist active indicative. Music [sumphōnias].
Our word “symphony.” An old Greek word from [sumphōnos] [sun], together,
and [phōnē], voice or sound), harmony, concord, by a band
of musicians. Here alone in the N.T. And dancing [kai chorōn]. An
old word again, but here alone in the N.T. Origin uncertain, possibly from [orchos]
by metathesis [orcheomai], to dance). A circular dance on the green.
15:26 Servants [paidōn]. Not [douloi] (bondslaves)
as in verse 22. The Greeks often used [pais] for servant like the Latin puer.It
could be either a hired servant [misthios], verse 17) or slave [doulos]. He inquired (epunthaneto].
Imperfect middle, inquired repeatedly and eagerly. What these things might be
[ti an eiē tauta]. Not “poor” Greek as Easton holds, but simply the form
of the direct question retained in the indirect. See the direct form as the apodosis
of a condition of the fourth class in Ac 17:18. In Ac 10:17 we have the construction with [an eiē] of the direct retained
in the indirect question. So also in Lu 1:62: See Robertson, Grammar, p. 1044.
15:27 Is come [hēkei]. Present indicative active,
but a stem with perfect sense, old verb [hēkō] retaining this use after perfect
tenses came into use (Robertson, Grammar, p. 893). Hath killed
[ethusen]. Aorist active indicative and literally means, did kill.
Difficult to handle in English for our tenses do not correspond with the Greek.
Hath received [apelaben]. Second aorist active indicative with similar
difficulty of translation. Note [apo] in compositions, like re- in
“receive,” hath gotten him back [ap-]. Safe and sound [hugiainonta].
Present active participle of [hugiainō] from [hugiēs], to be in good
health. In spite of all that he has gone through and in spite of the father’s fears.
15:28 But he was angry [ōrgisthē]. First aorist
(ingressive) passive indicative. But he became angry, he flew into a rage
[orgē]. This was the explosion as the result of long resentment towards the
wayward brother and suspicion of the father’s partiality for the erring son.
Would not go in [ouk ēthelen eiselthein]. Imperfect tense (was not willing,
refused) and aorist active (ingressive) infinitive. Entreated
[parekalei]. Imperfect tense, he kept on beseeching him.
15:29 Do I serve thee [douleuō soi]. Progressive
present tense of this old verb from [doulos] (slave) which the elder
son uses to picture his virtual slavery in staying at home and perhaps with longings
to follow the younger son (Robertson, Grammar, p. 879). Transgressed
[parēlthon]. Second aorist active indicative of [parerchomai], to
pass by. Not even once (aorist) in contrast with so many years of service
(linear present). A kid [eriphon]. Some MSS. have [eriphion],
diminutive, a little kid. So margin of Westcott and Hort. B has it also in Mt 25:32, the only other N.T. passage where the word occurs. That I might
make merry [hina euphranthō]. Final clause, first aorist passive subjunctive
of the same verb used in verses 23, 25.
15:30 This thy son [ho huios sou houtos]. Contempt
and sarcasm. He does not say: “This my brother.” Came [ēlthen]. He
does not even say, came back or came home. Devoured [kataphagōn].
We say, “eaten up,” but the Greek has, “eaten down” (perfective use of [kata-].
Suggested by the feasting going on. With harlots [meta pornōn]. This
may be true (verse 13), but the elder son did not know it to be true. He may reflect
what he would have done in like case.
15:31 Son [Teknon]. Child. Thou [su].
Expressed and in emphatic position in the sentence. He had not appreciated his privileges
at home with his father.
15:32 It was meet [edei]. Imperfect tense. It expressed
a necessity in the father’s heart and in the joy of the return that justifies the
feasting. [Euphranthēnai] is used again (first aorist passive infinitive)
and [charēnai] (second aorist passive infinitive) is more than mere
hilarity, deep-seated joy. The father repeats to the elder son the language of his
heart used in verse 24 to his servants. A real father could do no less. One can well imagine
how completely the Pharisees and scribes (verse 2) were put to silence by these three marvellous parables. The third
does it with a graphic picture of their own attitude in the case of the surly elder
brother. Luke was called a painter by the ancients. Certainly he has produced a
graphic pen picture here of God’s love for the lost that justifies forever the coming
of Christ to the world to seek and to save the lost. It glorifies also soul-saving
on the part of his followers who are willing to go with Jesus after the lost in
city and country, in every land and of every race.
Chapter 16
16:1 Unto the disciples [kai pros tous mathētas]. The three preceding
parables in chapter 15 exposed the special faults of the Pharisees, “their hard
exclusiveness, self-righteousness, and contempt for others” (Plummer). This
parable is given by Luke alone. The [kai] (also) is not translated
in the Revised Version. It seems to mean that at this same time, after speaking
to the Pharisees (chapter 15), Jesus proceeds to speak a parable to the
disciples (16:1-13), the parable of the Unjust Steward. It is a hard
parable to explain, but Jesus opens the door by the key in verse 9. Which had a steward [hos ēichen oikonomon]. Imperfect active,
continued to have. Steward is house-manager or overseer of an estate as already
seen in Lu 12:42. Was accused [dieblēthē]. First aorist indicative
passive, of [diaballō], an old verb, but here only in the N.T. It means to
throw across or back and forth, rocks or words and so to slander by gossip. The
word implies malice even if the thing said is true. The word [diabolos] (slanderer)
is this same root and it is used even of women, she-devils (1Ti 3:11.
That he was wasting [hōs diaskorpizōn]. For the verb see on 15:13.
The use of [hōs] with the participle is a fine Greek idiom for giving the
alleged ground of a charge against one. His goods [ta huparchonta autou].
“His belongings,” a Lukan idiom.
16:2 What is this that I hear? [ti touto akouō;].
There are several ways of understanding this terse Greek idiom. The Revised Version
(above) takes [ti] to be equal to [ti estin touto ho akouō];
That is a possible use of the predicate [touto]. Another way is to take [ti]
to be exclamatory, which is less likely. Still another view is that [ti]
is “ Why”: “Why do I hear this about thee?” See Ac 14:15 where that is the idiom employed. Render [apodos].
Second aorist active imperative of [apodidōmi], Give back (and at once).
The account [ton logon]. The reckoning or report. Common use of [logos]. Stewardship
[oikonomias]. Same root as [oikonomos] (steward). This
demand does not necessarily mean dismissal if investigation proved him innocent
of the charges. But the reason given implies that he is to be dismissed: Thou
canst no longer [ou gar dunēi].
16:3 Within himself [en heautōi]. As soon as he
had time to think the thing over carefully. He knew that he was guilty of embezzlement
of the Master’s funds. Taketh away [aphaireitai]. Present (linear)
middle indicative of [aphaireō], old verb to take away. Here the middle present
means, He is taking away for himself. To beg I am not ashamed [epaitein
aischunomai]. The infinitive with [aischunomai] means ashamed to begin
to beg. The participle, [epaitōn aischunomai] would mean, ashamed while begging,
ashamed of begging while doing it.
16:4 I am resolved [egnōn]. Second aorist active
indicative of [ginōskō]. A difficult tense to reproduce in English. I knew,
I know, I have known, all miss it a bit. It is a burst of daylight to the puzzled,
darkened man: I’ve got it, I see into it now, a sudden solution. What to do
[ti poiēsō]. Either deliberative first aorist active subjunctive or deliberative
future active indicative. When I am put out [hotan metastathō]. First
aorist passive subjunctive of [methistēmi], [meta, histēmi], old verb,
to transpose, transfer, remove. He is expecting to be put out. They may receive
me [dexōntai]. First aorist middle subjunctive of [dechomai],
common verb. Subjunctive with final particle [hina]. He wishes to put the
debtors under obligation to himself. Debtors [tōn chreophiletōn].
A late word. In the N.T. only here and Lu 7:41 from [chreos], loan, and [opheiletēs], debtor. It is
probable that he dealt with “each one” separately.
16:6 Measures [batous]. Transliterated word for
Hebrew bath, between eight and nine gallons. Here alone in the N.T. Not the
same word as [batos] (bush) in Lu 6:44. Thy bond [sou ta grammata]. Thy writings, thy contracts,
thy note. Quickly [tacheōs]. It was a secret arrangement and speed
was essential.
16:7 Measures [korous]. Another Hebrew word for
dry measure. The Hebrew cor was about ten bushels. Data are not clear about
the Hebrew measures whether liquid (bath) or dry (cor).
16:8 His lord commended [epēinesen ho kurios]. The
steward’s lord praised him though he himself had been wronged again (see verse 1 “wasting his goods”). The unrighteous steward [ton oikonomon
tēs adikias]. Literally, the steward of unrighteousness. The genitive is the
case of genus, species, the steward distinguished by unrighteousness as his characteristic.
See “the mammon of unrighteousness” in verse 9. See “the forgetful hearer” in Jas 1:25. It is a vernacular idiom common to Hebrew, Aramaic, and the
Koinē.Wisely [phronimōs]. An old adverb, though here alone in
the N.T. But the adjective [phronimos] from which it comes occurs a dozen
times as in Mt 10:16. It is from [phroneō] and that from [phrēn], the mind
(1Co 14:20), the discerning intellect. Perhaps “shrewdly” or “discreetly”
is better here than “wisely.” The lord does not absolve the steward from guilt and
he was apparently dismissed from his service. His shrewdness consisted in finding
a place to go by his shrewdness. He remained the steward of unrighteousness even
though his shrewdness was commended. For [hoti]. Probably by this
second [hoti] Jesus means to say that he cites this example of shrewdness
because it illustrates the point. “This is the moral of the whole parable. Men of
the world in their dealings with men like themselves are more prudent than the children
of light in their intercourse with one another” (Plummer). We all know how
stupid Christians can be in their co-operative work in the kingdom of God, to go
no further. Wiser than [phronimōteroi huper]. Shrewder beyond, a common
Greek idiom.
16:9 By the mammon of unrighteousness [ek tou mamōnā
tēs adikias]. By the use of what is so often evil (money). In Mt 6:24 mammon is set over against God as in Lu 16:13 below. Jesus knows the evil power in money, but servants of God
have to use it for the kingdom of God. They should use it discreetly and it is proper
to make friends by the use of it. When it shall fail [hotan eklipēi].
Second aorist active subjunctive with [hotan], future time. The mammon is
sure to fail. That they may receive you into the eternal tabernacles [hina
dexōntai humas eis tas aiōnious skēnas]. This is the purpose of Christ in giving
the advice about their making friends by the use of money. The purpose is that those
who have been blessed and helped by the money may give a welcome to their benefactors
when they reach heaven. There is no thought here of purchasing an entrance into
heaven by the use of money. That idea is wholly foreign to the context. These friends
will give a hearty welcome when one gives him mammon here. The wise way to lay up
treasure in heaven is to use one’s money for God here on earth. That will give a
cash account there of joyful welcome, not of purchased entrance.
16:10 Faithful in a very little [pistos en elachistōi].
Elative superlative. One of the profoundest sayings of Christ. We see it in business
life. The man who can be trusted in a very small thing will be promoted to large
responsibilities. That is the way men climb to the top. Men who embezzle in large
sums began with small sums. Verses 10-13 here explain the point of the preceding parables.
16:11 Faithful in the unrighteous mammon [en tōi adikōi
mamōnāi]. In the use of what is considered “unrighteous” as it so often is.
Condition of the first class, “if ye did not prove to be” [ei ouk egenesthe].
Failure here forfeits confidence in “the true riches” [to alēthinon]. There
is no sadder story than to see a preacher go down by the wrong use of money, caught
in this snare of the devil.
16:12 That which is your own [to h–meteron]. But
Westcott and Hort read [to hēmeteron] (our own) because of B L Origen.
The difference is due to itacism in the pronunciation of [h–-] and [hē]
alike (long [i]. But the point in the passage calls for “yours” as correct.
Earthly wealth is ours as a loan, a trust, withdrawn at any moment. It belongs to
another [en tōi allotriōi]. If you did not prove faithful in this, who will
give you what is really yours forever? Compare “rich toward God” (Lu 12:21).
16:13 Servant [oiketēs]. Household [oikos]
servant. This is the only addition to Mt 6:24 where otherwise the language is precisely the same, which see. Either
Matthew or Luke has put the [logion] in the wrong place or Jesus spoke it
twice. It suits perfectly each context. There is no real reason for objecting to
repetition of favourite sayings by Jesus.
16:14 Who were lovers of money [philarguroi huparchontes].
Literally, being lovers of money. [Philarguroi] is an old word, but in the
N.T. only here and 2Ti 3:2. It is from [philos] and [arguros]. Heard [ēkouon].
Imperfect active, were listening (all the while Jesus was talking to the disciples
(verses 1-13). And they scoffed at him[kai exemuktērizon]. Imperfect active
again of [ekmuktērizō]. LXX where late writers use simple verb. In the N.T.
only here and Lu 23:35. It means to turn out or up the nose at one, to sneer, to scoff.
The Romans had a phrase, naso adunco suspendere, to hang on the hooked nose
(the subject of ridicule). These money-loving Pharisees were quick to see
that the words of Jesus about the wise use of money applied to them. They had stood
without comment the three parables aimed directly at them (the lost sheep, the lost
coin, the lost son). But now they do not remain quiet while they hear the
fourth parable spoken to the disciples. No words were apparently spoken, but their
eyes, noses, faces were eloquent with a fine disdain.
16:15 That justify yourselves [hoi dikaiountes heautous].
They were past-masters at that and were doing it now by upturned noses. An abomination
in the sight of God [bdelugma enōpion tou theou]. See on Mt 24:15; Mr
13:14 for this LXX word for a detestable thing as when Antiochus Epiphanes set up
an altar to Zeus in place of that to Jehovah. There is withering scorn in the use
of this phrase by Jesus to these pious pretenders.
16:16 Entereth violently into it [eis autēn biazetai].
A corresponding saying occurs in Mt 11:12 in a very different context. In both the verb [biazetai],
occurs also, but nowhere else in the N.T. It is present middle here and can be middle
or passive in Matthew, which see. It is rare in late prose. Deissmann (Bible
Studies, p. 258) cites an inscription where [biazomai] is reflexive
middle and used absolutely. Here the meaning clearly is that everyone forces his
way into the kingdom of God, a plea for moral enthusiasm and spiritual passion and
energy that some today affect to despise.
16:17 One tittle [mian kerean]. See on Mt 5:18.
16:18 Committeth adultery [moicheuei]. Another repeated
saying of Christ (Mt 5:32; Mr 10:11f.; Mt 19:9f.). Adultery remains
adultery, divorce or no divorce, remarriage or no marriage.
16:19 He was clothed [enedidusketo]. Imperfect middle
of [endiduskō], a late intensive form of [enduō]. He clothed himself
in or with. It was his habit. Purple [porphuran]. This purple dye
was obtained from the purple fish, a species of mussel or [murex] (1Macc.
4:23). It was very costly and was used for the upper garment by the wealthy
and princes (royal purple). They had three shades of purple (deep violet,
deep scarlet or crimson, deep blue). See also Mr 15:17,20; Re 18:12. Fine linen [busson]. Byssus or
Egyptian flax (India and Achaia also). It is a yellowed flax from which
fine linen was made for undergarments. It was used for wrapping mummies. “Some of
the Egyptian linen was so fine that it was called woven air”(Vincent).
Here only in the N.T. for the adjective [bussinos] occurs in Re 18:12; 19:8,14. Faring sumptuously [euphrainomenos lamprōs].
Making merry brilliantly. The verb [euphrainomai] we have already
had in 12:19; 15:23,25,32. [Lamprōs] is an old adverb from [lampros],
brilliant, shining, splendid, magnificent. It occurs here only in the N.T. This
parable apparently was meant for the Pharisees (verse 14) who were lovers of money. It shows the wrong use of money and
opportunity.
16:20 Beggar [ptōchos]. Original meaning of this
old word. See on Mt 5:3. The name Lazarus is from [Eleazaros], “God a help,”
and was a common one. Lazar in English means one afflicted with a pestilential
disease. Was laid [ebeblēto]. Past perfect passive of the common verb
[ballō]. He had been flung there and was still there, “as if contemptuous
roughness is implied” (Plummer). At his gate [pros ton pulōna
autou]. Right in front of the large portico or gateway, not necessarily a part
of the grand house, porch in Mt 26:71. Full of sores [heilkōmenos]. Perfect passive participle
of [helkoō], to make sore, to ulcerate, from [helkos], ulcer (Latin
ulcus). See use of [helkos] in verse 21. Common in Hippocrates and other medical writers. Here only in the N.T.
16:21 With the crumbs that fell [apo tōn piptontōn].
From the things that fell from time to time. The language reminds one of Lu 15:16 (the prodigal son) and the Syro-Phoenician woman (Mr
7:28). Only it does not follow that this beggar did not get the scraps from
the rich man’s table. Probably he did, though nothing more. Even the wild street
dogs would get them also. Yea, even the dogs [alla kai hoi kunes].
For [alla kai] see also 12:7; 24:22. [Alla] can mean “yea,” though it often means “but.” Here
it depends on how one construes Luke’s meaning. If he means that he was dependent
on casual scraps and it was so bad that even the wild dogs moreover were his companions
in misery, the climax came that he was able to drive away the dogs. The other view
is that his hunger was unsatisfied, but even the dogs increased his misery. Licked
his sores [epeleichon ta helkē autou]. Imperfect active of [epileichō],
a late vernacular Koinē verb, to lick over the surface. It is not clear whether
the licking of the sores by the dogs added to the misery of Lazarus or gave a measure
of comfort, as he lay in his helpless condition. “Furrer speaks of witnessing dogs
and lepers waiting together for the refuse” (Bruce). It was a scramble between
the dogs and Lazarus.
16:22 Was borne [apenechthēnai]. First aorist passive
infinitive from [apopherō], a common compound defective verb. The accusative
case of general reference [auton] is common with the infinitive in such clauses
after [egeneto], like indirect discourse. It is his soul, of course, that
was so borne by the angels, not his body. Into Abraham’s bosom [eis ton
holpon Abraam]. To be in Abraham’s bosom is to the Jew to be in Paradise. In Joh 1:18 the Logos is in the bosom of the Father. Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob
are in heaven and welcome those who come (Mt 8:11; 4Macc. 14:17).
The beloved disciple reclined on the bosom of Jesus at the last passover (Joh
13:23) and this fact indicates special favour. So the welcome to Lazarus
was unusual. Was buried [etaphē]. Second aorist (effective)
passive of the common verb [thaptō]. Apparently in contrast with the angelic
visitation to the beggar.
16:23 In Hades [en tōi Hāidēi]. See on Mt 16:18 for discussion of this word. Lazarus was in Hades also for both
Paradise (Abraham’s bosom) and Gehenna are in the unseen world beyond the
grave. In torments [en basanois]. The touchstone by which gold and
other metals were tested, then the rack for torturing people. Old word, but in the
N.T. only here, Lu 16:28; Mt 4:24. Sees [horāi]. Dramatic present indicative.
The Jews believed that Gehenna and Paradise were close together. This detail in
the parable does not demand that we believe it. The picture calls for it. From
afar [apo makrothen]. Pleonastic use of [apo] as [makrothen]
means from afar.
16:24 That he may dip [hina bapsēi]. First aorist
active subjunctive of [baptō], common verb, to dip. In water [hudatos].
Genitive, the specifying case, water and not something else. Cool [katapsuxēi].
First aorist active subjunctive of [katapsuchō], a late Greek compound, to
cool off, to make cool. Only here in the N.T. but common in medical books. Note
perfective use of [kata-] (down). A small service that will be welcome.
For I am in anguish [hoti odunōmai]. The active has a causative sense
to cause intense pain, the middle to torment oneself (Lu 2:48; Ac 20:38),
the passive to be translated as here. Common verb, but no other examples in the
N.T.
16:25 Receivedst [apelabes]. Second aorist indicative
of [apolambanō], old verb to get back what is promised and in full. See also Lu 6:34; 18:30; 23:41. Evil things [ta kaka]. Not “his,” but
“the evil things” that came upon him. Thou art in anguish [odunāsai].
Like [kauchāsai] in Ro 2:17. They contracted [-aesai] without the loss of [s]. Common
in the Koinē.
16:26 Beside all this [en pāsi toutois]. In all
these things (or regions). Gulf [chasma]. An old word
from [chainō], to yawn, our chasm, a gaping opening. Only here in the N.T.
Is fixed [estēriktai]. Perfect passive indicative of [stērizō],
old verb (see on Lu 9:51). Permanent chasm. May not be able [mē
dunōntai]. Present middle subjunctive of [dunamai]. The chasm is there
on purpose (that not, [hopōs mē] to prevent communication.
16:27 That you send him [hina pempsēis auton]. As
if he had not had a fair warning and opportunity. The Roman Catholics probably justify
prayer to saints from this petition from the Rich Man to Abraham, but both are in
Hades (the other world). It is to be observed besides, that Abraham makes
no effort to communicate with the five brothers. But heavenly recognition is clearly
assumed. Dante has a famous description of his visit to the damned (Purg.iii,
114).
16:28 That he may testify [hopōs diamarturētai].
An old verb for solemn and thorough [dia-] witness. The Rich Man labours
under the delusion that his five brothers will believe the testimony of Lazarus
as a man from the dead.
16:29 Let them hear them [akousatōsan autōn]. Even
the heathen have the evidence of nature to show the existence of God as Paul argues
in Romans so that they are without excuse (Ro 1:20f.).
16:30 They will repent [metanoēsousin]. The Rich
Man had failed to do this and he now sees that it is the one thing lacking. It is
not wealth, not poverty, not alms, not influence, but repentance that is needed.
He had thought repentance was for others, not for all.
16:31 Neither will they be persuaded [oud’ peisthēsontai].
First future passive of [peithō]. Gressmann calls attention to the fact that
Jesus is saying this in the conclusion of the parable. It is a sharp discouragement
against efforts today to communicate with the dead. “Saul was not led to repentance
when he saw Samuel at Endor nor were the Pharisees when they saw Lazarus come forth
from the tomb. The Pharisees tried to put Lazarus to death and to explain away the
resurrection of Jesus” (Plummer). Alford comments on the curious fact that
Lazarus was the name of the one who did rise from the dead but whose return from
the dead “was the immediate exciting cause of their (Pharisees) crowning
act of unbelief.”
Chapter 17
17:1 It is impossible [anendekton estin]. See [ouk endechetai]
in 13:33. Alpha privative [an-] and [endektos], verbal adjective,
from [endechomai]. The word occurs only in late Greek and only here in the
N.T. The meaning is inadmissible, unallowable. But that occasions of stumbling
should come [tou ta skandala mē elthein]. This genitive articular infinitive
is not easy to explain. In Ac 10:25 there is another example where the genitive articular infinitive
seems to be used as a nominative (Robertson, Grammar, p. 1040). The
loose Hebrew infinitive construction may have a bearing here, but one may recall
that the original infinitives were either locatives [-eni] or datives [-ai].
[Ta skandala] is simply the accusative of general reference. Literally, the
not coming as to occasions of stumbling. For [skandalon] (a trap)
see on Mt 5:29; 16:23. It is here only in Luke. The positive form of this saying
appears in Mt 18:7, which see.
17:2 It were well for him [lusitelei autōi]. An
old word, but only here in the N.T., from [lusitelēs] and this from [luō],
to pay, and [ta telē], the taxes. So it pays the taxes, it returns expenses,
it is profitable. Literally here, “It is profitable for him” (dative case, [autōi].
Matthew has [sumpherei] (it is advantageous, bears together for).
If a millstone were hanged [ei lithos mulikos perikeitai]. Literally,
“if a millstone is hanged.” Present passive indicative from [perikeimai]
(to lie or be placed around). It is used as a perfect passive of [peritithēmi]. So
it is a first-class condition, determined as fulfilled, not second-class as the
English translations imply. [Mulikos] is simply a stone [lithos],
belonging to a mill. Here only in the text of Westcott and Hort, not in Mr 9:42 which is like Mt 18:6 [mulos onikos] where the upper millstone is turned by an ass,
which see. Were thrown [erriptai]. Perfect passive indicative from
[rhiptō], old verb. Literally, is thrown or has been thrown or cast or hurled.
Mark has [beblētai] and Matthew [katapontisthēi], which see, all three
verbs vivid and expressive. Rather than [ē]. The comparative is not here
expressed before [ē] as one would expect. It is implied in [lusitelei]. See
the same idiom in Lu 15:7.
17:3 If thy brother sin [ean hamartēi]. Second aorist
(ingressive) subjunctive in condition of third class.
17:4 Seven times in a day [heptakis tēs hēmeras].
Seven times within the day. On another occasion Peter’s question (Mt 18:21)
brought Christ’s answer “seventy times seven” (verse 22), which see. Seven times during the day would be hard enough for
the same offender.
17:5 Increase [prosthes]. Second aorist active imperative
of [prostithēmi], to add to. Bruce thinks that this sounds much like the
stereotyped petition in church prayers. A little reflection will show that they
should answer the prayer themselves.
17:6 If ye have [ei echete]. Condition of the first
class, assumed to be true. Ye would say [elegete an]. Imperfect active
with [an] and so a conclusion (apodosis) of the second class, determined
as unfulfilled, a mixed condition therefore. Sycamine tree [sukaminōi].
At the present time both the black mulberry (sycamine) and the white mulberry
(sycamore) exist in Palestine. Luke alone in the N.T. uses either word,
the sycamine here, the sycamore in 19:4. The distinction is not observed in the LXX, but it is observed in the
late Greek medical writers for both trees have medicinal properties. Hence it may
be assumed that Luke, as a physician, makes the distinction. Both trees differ from
the English sycamore. In Mt 17:20 we have “mountain” in place of “sycamine tree.” Be thou rooted
up [ekrizōthēti]. First aorist passive imperative as is [phuteuthēti]. Would
have obeyed [hupēkousen an]. First aorist active indicative with [an],
apodosis of a second-class condition (note aorist tense here, imperfect [elegete].
17:7 Sit down to meat [anapese]. Recline (for the
meal). Literally, fall up (or back).
17:8 And will not rather say [all’ ouk erei].
But will not say? [Ouk] in a question expects the affirmative answer.
Gird thyself [perizōsamenos]. Direct middle first aorist participle
of [perizōnnumi], to gird around. Till I have eaten and drunken [heōs
phagō kai piō]. More exactly, till I eat and drink. The second aorist subjunctives
are not future perfects in any sense, simply punctiliar action, effective aorist.
Thou shalt eat and drink [phagesai kai piesai]. Future middle indicative
second person singular, the uncontracted forms [-esai] as often in the
Koinē.These futures are from the aorist stems [ephagon] and [epion]
without sigma.
17:9 Does he thank? [mē echei charin;]. [Mē]
expects the negative answer. [Echō charin], to have gratitude toward one,
is an old Greek idiom (1Ti 1:12; 2Ti 1:3; Heb 12:28).
17:10 Unprofitable [achreioi]. The Syriac Sinaitic
omits “unprofitable.” The word is common in Greek literature, but in the N.T. only
here and Mt 25:30 where it means “useless” [a] privative and [chreios]
from [chraomai], to use). The slave who only does what he is commanded
by his master to do has gained no merit or credit. “In point of fact it is not commands,
but demands we have to deal with, arising out of special emergencies” (Bruce).
The slavish spirit gains no promotion in business life or in the kingdom of God.
17:11 Through the midst of Samaria and Galilee [dia
meson Samarias kai Galilaias]. This is the only instance in the N.T. of [dia]
with the accusative in the local sense of “through.” Xenophon and Plato use [dia
mesou] (genitive). Jesus was going from Ephraim (Joh 11:54)
north through the midst of Samaria and Galilee so as to cross over the Jordan near
Bethshean and join the Galilean caravan down through Perea to Jerusalem. The Samaritans
did not object to people going north away from Jerusalem, but did not like to see
them going south towards the city (Lu 9:51-56).
17:12 Which stood afar off [hoi anestēsan porrōthen].
The margin of Westcott and Hort reads simply [estēsan]. The compound read
by B means “rose up,” but they stood at a distance (Le 13:45f.).
The first healing of a leper (5:12-16) like this is given by Luke only.
17:13 Lifted up [ēran]. First aorist active of the
liquid verb [airō].
17:14 As they went [en tōi hupagein autous]. Favourite
Lukan idiom of [en] with articular infinitive as in 17:11 and often.
17:16 And he was a Samaritan [kai autos ēn Samareitēs].
This touch colours the whole incident. The one man who felt grateful enough to come
back and thank Jesus for the blessing was a despised Samaritan. The [autos]
has point here.
17:18 Save this stranger [ei mē ho allogenēs]. The
old word was [allophulos] (Ac 10:28), but [allogenēs]
occurs in the LXX, Josephus, and inscriptions. Deissmann (Light from the Ancient
East, p. 80) gives the inscription from the limestone block from the
Temple of Israel in Jerusalem which uses this very word which may have been read
by Jesus: Let no foreigner enter within the screen and enclosure surrounding
the sanctuary [Mēthena allogenē eisporeuesthai entos tou peri to hieron truphaktou
kai peribolou].
17:20 With observation [meta paratēseōs]. Late Greek
word from [paratēreō], to watch closely. Only here in the N.T. Medical writers
use it of watching the symptoms of disease. It is used also of close astronomical
observations. But close watching of external phenomena will not reveal the signs
of the kingdom of God.
17:21 Within you [entos humōn]. This is the obvious,
and, as I think, the necessary meaning of [entos]. The examples cited of the
use of [entos] in Xenophon and Plato where [entos] means “among” do
not bear that out when investigated. Field (Ot. Norv.) “contends
that there is no clear instance of [entos] in the sense of among” (Bruce),
and rightly so. What Jesus says to the Pharisees is that they, as others, are to
look for the kingdom of God within themselves, not in outward displays and supernatural
manifestations. It is not a localized display “Here” or “There.” It is in this sense
that in Lu 11:20 Jesus spoke of the kingdom of God as “come upon you” [ephthasen
eph’ humās], speaking to Pharisees. The only other instance of [entos]
in the N.T. (Mt 23:26) necessarily means “within” (“the inside of
the cup”). There is, beside, the use of [entos] meaning “within”
in the Oxyrhynchus Papyrus saying of Jesus of the Third Century (Deissmann, Light
from the Ancient East, p. 426) which is interesting: “The kingdom of
heaven is within you” [entos humōn] as here in Lu 17:21.
17:23 Go not away nor follow after them [mē apelthēte
mēde diōxēte]. Westcott and Hort bracket [apelthēte mēde]. Note aorist
subjunctive with [mē] in prohibition, ingressive aorist. Do not rush after
those who set times and places for the second advent. The Messiah was already present
in the first advent (verse 21) though the Pharisees did not know it.
17:24 Lighteneth [astraptousa]. An old and common
verb, though only here and 24:4 in the N.T. The second coming will be sudden and universally visible.
There are still some poor souls who are waiting in Jerusalem under the delusion
that Jesus will come there and nowhere else.
17:25 But first [prōton de]. The second coming will
be only after the Cross.
17:27 They ate, they drank, they married, they were given in
marriage [ēsthion, epinon, egamoun, egamizonto]. Imperfects all of them
vividly picturing the life of the time of Noah. But the other tenses are aorists
(Noah entered [eisēlthen], the flood came [ēlthen], destroyed [apōlesen].
17:28 Note the same sharp contrast between the imperfects here
(ate [ēsthion], drank [epinon], bought [ēgorazon], sold [epōloun],
planted [ephuteuon], builded [ōikodomoun] and the aorists in verse 29
(went out [exēlthen], rained [ebrexen], destroyed {apōlesen].
17:30 Is revealed [apokaluptetai]. Prophetic and
futuristic present passive indicative.
17:31 Let him not go down [mē katabatō]. Second
aorist active imperative of [katabainō] with [mē] in a prohibition
in the third person singular. The usual idiom here would be [mē] and the
aorist subjunctive. See Mr 13:15f.; Mt 24:17f. when these words occur in the great eschatological
discussion concerning flight before the destruction of Jerusalem. Here the application
is “absolute indifference to all worldly interests as the attitude of readiness
for the Son of Man” (Plummer).
17:32 Remember Lot’s wife [mnēmoneuete tēs gunaikos
Lōt]. Here only in the N.T. A pertinent illustration to warn against looking
back with yearning after what has been left behind (Ge 19:26).
17:33 Shall preserve it [zōogonēsei autēn]. Or save
it alive. Here only in the N.T. except 1Ti 6:13; Ac 7:19. It is a late word and common in medical writers, to bring
forth alive [zōos, genō] and here to keep alive.
17:34 In that night [tautēi tēi nukti]. More vivid
still, “on this night,” when Christ comes.
17:35 Shall be grinding [esontai alēthousai]. Periphrastic
future active indicative of [alēthō], an old verb only in the N.T. here and Mt 24:41. Together [epi to auto]. In the same place, near together
as in Ac 2:1.
17:37 The eagles [hoi aetoi]. Or the vultures attracted
by the carcass. This proverb is quoted also in Mt 24:28. See Job 39:27-30; Heb 1:8; Ho 8:1. Double compound [epi-sun-] in [epi-sun-achthēsontai]
completes the picture.
Chapter 18
18:1 To the end that [pros to dein]. With a view to the being
necessary, [pros] and the articular infinitive. The impersonal verb [dei]
here is in the infinitive and has another infinitive loosely connected with it [proseuchesthai],
to pray. Not to faint [mē enkakein]. Literally, not to give in to
evil [en, kakeō], from [kakos], bad or evil), to turn coward,
lose heart, behave badly. A late verb used several times in the N.T. (2Co
4:1, 16, etc.).
18:2 Regarded not [mē entrepomenos]. Present middle participle
of [entrepō], old verb, to turn one on himself, to shame one, to reverence
one. This was a “hard-boiled” judge who knew no one as his superior. See on Mt
21:37.
18:3 Came oft [ērcheto]. Imperfect tense denotes
repetitions, no adverb for “oft” in the Greek. Avenge me of [ekdikēson
me apo]. A late verb for doing justice, protecting one from another (note both
[ek] and [apo], here). Deissmann (Light from the Ancient
East, pp. 420ff.) quotes a [stēlē] of the second century B.C.
with a prayer for vengeance for a Jewish girl that had been murdered which has this
very verb [ekdikeō].
18:4 He would not [ouk ēthelen]. Imperfect tense
of continued refusal. Though [ei kai]. Concerning sentence, not [kai
ei] (even if).
18:5 Yet [ge]. Delicate intensive particle of deep
feeling as here. Because this widow troubleth me [dia to parechein moi
kopon tēn chēran tautēn]. Literally, because of the furnishing me trouble as
to this widow (accusative of general reference with the articular infinitive).
Lest she wear me out [hina mē hupōpiazēi me]. Some take it that the
judge is actually afraid that the widow may come and assault him, literally beat
him under the eye. That idea would be best expressed here by the aorist tense.
18:6 The unrighteous judge [ho kritēs tēs adikias].
The judge of unrighteousness (marked by unrighteousness), as in 16:8 we have “the steward of unrighteousness,” the same idiom.
18:7 And he is longsuffering [makrothumei]. This
present active indicative comes in awkwardly after the aorist subjunctive [poiēsēi]
after [ou mē], but this part of the question is positive. Probably [kai]
here means “and yet” as so often (Joh 9:30; 16:32, etc.). God delays
taking vengeance on behalf of his people, not through indifference, but through
patient forbearance.
18:8 Howbeit [plēn]. It is not clear whether this
sentence is also a question or a positive statement. There is no way to decide.
Either will make sense though not quite the same sense. The use of [āra]
before [heurēsei] seems to indicate a question expecting a negative answer
as in Ac 8:30; Ro 14:19. But here [āra] comes in the middle of the sentence
instead of near the beginning, an unusual position for either inferential [āra]
or interrogative [āra]. On the whole the interrogative [āra] is probably
correct, meaning to question if the Son will find a persistence of faith like that
of the widow.
18:9 Set all others at naught [exouthenountas tous loipous].
A late verb [exoutheneō], like [oudeneō], from [outhen] [ouden],
to consider or treat as nothing. In LXX and chiefly in Luke and Paul in the N.T.
18:10 Stood [statheis]. First aorist passive participle
of [histēmi]. Struck an attitude ostentatiously where he could be seen. Standing
was the common Jewish posture in prayer (Mt 6:5; Mr 11:25). Prayed
thus [tauta prosēucheto]. Imperfect middle, was praying these things
(given following). With himself [pros heauton]. A soliloquy
with his own soul, a complacent recital of his own virtues for his own self-satisfaction,
not fellowship with God, though he addresses God. I thank thee [eucharistō
soi]. But his gratitude to God is for his own virtues, not for God’s mercies
to him. One of the rabbis offers a prayer like this of gratitude that he was in
a class by himself because he was a Jew and not a Gentile, because he was a Pharisee
and not of the am-haaretz or common people, because he was a man and not
a woman. Extortioners [harpages]. An old word, [harpax] from
same root as [harpazō], to plunder. An adjective of only one gender, used
of robbers and plunderers, grafters, like the publicans (Lu 3:13),
whether wolves (Mt 7:15) or men (1Co 5:19f.). The
Pharisee cites the crimes of which he is not guilty. Or even [ē kai].
As the climax of iniquity (Bruce), he points to “this publican.” Zaccheus
will admit robbery (Lu 19:8). God [ho theos]. Nominative
form with the article as common with the vocative use of [theos] (so verse 13; Joh 20:28).
18:12 Twice in the week [dis tou sabbatou]. One
fast a year was required by the law (Le 16:29; Nu 29:7). The Pharisees
added others, twice a week between passover and pentecost, and between tabernacles
and dedication of the temple. I get [ktōmai]. Present middle indicative,
not perfect middle [kektēmai] (I possess). He gave a tithe of his
income, not of his property.
18:13 Standing afar off [makrothen hestōs]. Second
perfect active participle of [histēmi], intransitive like [statheis]
above. But no ostentation as with the Pharisee in verse 11. At a distance from the Pharisee, not from the sanctuary. Would not
lift [ouk ēthelen oude epārai]. Negatives (double) imperfect
of thelō, was not willing even to lift up, refused to lift [epārai],
first aorist active infinitive of the liquid compound verb, [ep-airō]. Smote
[etupte]. Imperfect active of [tuptō], old verb, kept on smiting or
beating. Worshippers usually lifted up their closed eyes to God. Be merciful
[hilasthēti]. First aorist passive imperative of [hilaskomai], an
old verb, found also in LXX and inscriptions [exhilaskomai], Deissmann,
Bible Studies, p. 224). A sinner [tōi hamartōlōi].
The sinner, not a sinner. It is curious how modern scholars ignore this Greek article.
The main point in the contrast lies in this article. The Pharisee thought of others
as sinners. The publican thinks of himself alone as the sinner, not of others at
all.
18:14 This man [houtos]. This despised publican
referred to contemptuously in verse 11 as “this” [houtos] publican. Rather than the other [par’
ekeinon]. In comparison with (placed beside) that one. A neat Greek
idiom after the perfect passive participle [dedikaiomenos]. For [hoti].
This moral maxim Christ had already used in 14:11. Plummer pertinently asks: “Why is it assumed that Jesus did not repeat
his sayings?”
18:15 They brought [prosepheron]. Imperfect active,
they were bringing. So Mr 10:13. Their babes [ta brephē]. Old word for infants.
Here Mr 10:13; Mt 19:13 have [paidia] (little children). Note “also”
[kai] in Luke, not in Mark and Matthew. That he should touch them
[hina autōn haptētai]. Present middle subjunctive (linear action, repeatedly
touch or one after the other), where Mr 10:13 has aorist middle subjunctive [hapsētai]. Rebuked
[epetimōn]. Imperfect indicative active. Either inchoative began to rebuke,
or continued, kept on rebuking. Matthew and Mark have the aorist [epetimēsan].
18:16 Called [prosekalesato]. Indirect middle aorist
indicative, called the children with their parents to himself and then rebuked the
disciples for their rebuke of the parents. The language of Jesus is precisely that
of Mr 10:14 which see, and nearly that of Mt 19:14 which see also. The plea of Jesus that children be allowed to come
to him is one that many parents need to heed. It is a tragedy to think of parents
“forbidding” their children or of preachers doing the same or of both being stumbling-blocks
to children.
18:17 As a little child [hōs paidion]. Jesus makes
the child the model for those who seek entrance into the kingdom of God, not the
adult the model for the child. He does not say that the child is already in the
kingdom without coming to him. Jesus has made the child’s world by understanding
the child and opening the door for him.
18:18 Ruler [archōn]. Not in Mr 10:17; Mt 19:16. What shall I do to inherit? [Ti poiēsas klēronomēsō;].
“By doing what shall I inherit?” Aorist active participle and future active indicative.
Precisely the same question is asked by the lawyer in Lu 10:25. This young man probably thought that by some one act he could obtain
eternal life. He was ready to make a large expenditure for it. Good [agathon].
See on Mr 10:17; Mt 19:16 for discussion of this adjective for absolute goodness.
Plummer observes that no Jewish rabbi was called “good” in direct address. The question
of Jesus will show whether it was merely fulsome flattery on the part of the young
man or whether he really put Jesus on a par with God. He must at any rate define
his attitude towards Christ.
18:22 One thing thou lackest yet [eti hen soi leipei].
Literally, one thing still fails thee or is wanting to thee. An old verb with the
dative of personal interest. Mr 10:21 has here [husterei se], which see. It was an amazing compliment
for one who was aiming at perfection (Mt 19:21). The youth evidently
had great charm and was sincere in his claims. Distribute [diados].
Second aorist active imperative of [diadidōmi] (give to various ones, [dia-].
Here Mark and Matthew simply have [dos] (give). The rest the same
in all three Gospels.
18:23 Became [egenēthē]. First aorist passive indicative
of [ginomai]. Like his countenance fell [stugnasas], in Mr 10:22. Exceedingly sorrowful [perilupos]. Old adjective
[peri, lupē] with perfective use of [peri]. Very rich [plousios
sphodra]. Rich exceedingly. Today, a multimillionaire.
18:24 Shall they enter [eisporeuontai]. Present
middle indicative, futuristic present.
18:25 Through a needle’s eye [dia trēmatos belonēs].
Both words are old. [Trēma] means a perforation or hole or eye and in the
N.T. only here and Mt 19:24. [Belonē] means originally the point of a spear and then
a surgeon’s needle. Here only in the N.T. Mr 10:25; Mt 19:24 have [rhaphidos] for needle. This is probably a
current proverb for the impossible. The Talmud twice speaks of an elephant passing
through the eye of a needle as being impossible.
18:26 Then who [kai tis]. Literally, and who.
The [kai] calls attention to what has just been said. Wealth was assumed
to be mark of divine favour, not a hindrance to salvation.
18:27 The impossible with men possible with God [ta
adunata para anthrōpois dunata para tōi theōi]. Paradoxical, but true. Take
your stand “beside” [para] God and the impossible becomes possible. Clearly
then Jesus meant the humanly impossible by the parabolic proverb about the camel
going through the needle’s eye. God can break the grip of gold on a man’s life,
but even Jesus failed with this young ruler.
18:28 Our own [ta idia]. Our own things (home, business,
etc.). Right here is where so many fail. Peter speaks here not in a spirit
of boastfulness, but rather with his reactions from their consternation at what
has happened and at the words of Jesus (Plummer).
18:30 Shall not receive [ouchi mē labēi]. Very strong
double negative with aorist active subjunctive of [lambanō]. Manifold more
[pollaplasiona]. Late Greek word, here alone in the N.T. save Mt 19:29 where Westcott and Hort have it though many MSS. there read [hekatonplasiona]
(a hundredfold) as in Mr 10:30).
18:31 Took unto him [paralabōn]. Second aorist active
participle of [paralambanō]. Taking along with himself. So Mr 10:32. Mt 20:17 adds [kat’ idian] (apart). Jesus is making a special
point of explaining his death to the Twelve. We go up [anabainomen].
Present active indicative, we are going up. Unto the Son of man [tōi huiōi
tou anthrōpou]. Dative case of personal interest. The position is amphibolous
and the construction makes sense either with “shall be accomplished” [telesthēsetai]
or “that are written” [ta gegrammena], probably the former. Compare these
minute details of the prophecy here (verses 32f.) with the words in Mr 10:33f.;
Mt 20:18f., which see.
18:33 The third day [tēi hēmerāi tēi tritēi]. The
day the third. In Mt 20:19 it is “the third day” while in Mr 10:34 “after three days” occurs in the same sense, which see.
18:34 And they perceived not [kai ouk eginōskon].
Imperfect active. They kept on not perceiving. Twice already Luke has said this
in the same sentence. They understood none of these things [ouden toutōn
sunēkan]. First aorist active indicative, a summary statement. This saying
was hid from them [ēn to rhēma touto kekrummenon ap’ autōn]. Past perfect
passive indicative (periphrastic), state of completion. It was a puzzling
experience. No wonder that Luke tries three times to explain the continued failure
of the apostles to understand Jesus. The words of Christ about his death ran counter
to all their hopes and beliefs.
18:35 Unto Jericho [eis Iereichō]. See on Mt 20:29;
Mr 10:46, for discussion of the two Jerichos in Mark and Matt. (the old and the
new as here). Begging [epaitōn]. Asking for something. He
probably was by the wayside between the old Jericho and the new Roman Jericho. Mark
gives his name Bartimaeus (10:46). Mt 20:30 mentions two.
18:36 Inquired [epunthaneto]. Imperfect middle.
Repeatedly inquired as he heard the tramp of the passing crowd going by [diaporeuomenou].
What this meant [Ti eiē touto]. Literally, What it was. Without [an]
the optative is due to indirect discourse, changed from [estin]. With [an]
(margin of Westcott and Hort) the potential optative of the direct discourse
is simply retained.
18:37 Passeth by [parerchetai]. Present middle indicative
retained in indirect discourse as [paragei] is in Mt 20:30). No reason for differences of English tenses in the two passages
(was passing by, passeth by).
18:38 He cried [eboēsen]. Old verb, [boaō],
to shout, as in 9:38. Son of David [huie Daueid]. Shows that he recognizes
Jesus as the Messiah.
18:39 That he should hold his peace [hina sigēsēi].
Ingressive aorist subjunctive. That he should become silent; as with [hina siōpēsēi]
in Mr 10:48. The more a great deal [pollōi māllon]. By much more
as in Mr 10:48.
18:40 Stood [statheis]. First aorist passive where Mr 10:49; Mt 20:32 have [stas] (second aorist active) translated
“stood still.” One is as “still” as the other. The first is that Jesus “ stopped.”
Be brought [achthēnai]. First aorist infinitive in indirect command.
18:41 What wilt thou that I should do unto thee? [Ti
soi theleis poiēsō;]. Same idiom in Mr 10:51; Mt 20:32 which see, the use of [thelō] without [hina]
with aorist subjunctive (or future indicative). See same references also
for [hina anablepsō] “that I may see again” without verb before [hina]. Three
uses of [anablepō] here (verses 41, 42, 43).
18:43 Followed [ēkolouthei]. Imperfect active as
in Mr 10:52. Either inchoative he began to follow, or descriptive, he was following.
Chapter 19
19:1 Was passing through [diērcheto]. Imperfect middle. Now Jesus
was inside the Roman Jericho with the procession.
19:2 Chief publican [architelōnēs]. The word occurs
nowhere else apparently but the meaning is clear from the other words with [archi-]
like [archiereus] (chief priest) [archipoimēn] (chief shepherd).
Jericho was an important trading point for balsam and other things and so Zacchaeus
was the head of the tax collections in this region, a sort of commissioner of taxes
who probably had other publicans serving under him.
19:3 He sought [ezētei]. Imperfect active. He was
seeking, conative idea. Jesus who he was [Iēsoun tis estin]. Prolepsis,
to see who Jesus was. He had heard so much about him. He wanted to see which one
of the crowd was Jesus. For the crowd [apo tou ochlou]. He was short
and the crowd was thick and close. Stature [tēi hēlikiāi]. No doubt
of that meaning here and possibly so in 2:52. Elsewhere “age” except Lu 12:25; Mt 6:27 where it is probably “stature” also.
19:4 Ran on before [prodramōn eis to emprosthen].
Second aorist active participle of [protrechō] (defective verb).
“Before” occurs twice [pro-] and [eis to emprosthen]. Into a sycamore
tree [epi sukomorean]. From [sukon], fig, and [moron],
mulberry. The fig-mulberry and quite a different tree from the sycamine tree in 17:6, which see. It bore a poor fruit which poor people ate (Am 7:14).
It was a wide open tree with low branches so that Zacchaeus could easily climb into
it. That way [ekeinēs]. Feminine for [hodos] (way)
is understood. Genitive case with [di] in composition [dierchesthai]
or as an adverbial use.
19:5 Make haste and come down [speusas katabēthi].
Simultaneous aorist active participle [speusas] with the second aorist active
imperative. “Come down in a hurry.”
19:6 He made haste and came down [speusas katebē].
Luke repeats the very words of Jesus with the same idiom. Received him joyfully
[hupedexato auton chairōn]. The very verb used of Martha’s welcome to Jesus
(10:38). “Joyfully” is the present active participle, “rejoicing”
[chairōn].
19:7 Murmured [diegogguzonto]. Imperfect middle
of this compound onomatopoetic word [dia-gogguzō]. In Lu 5:30 we have the simple [gogguzō], a late word like the cooing
doves or the hum of bees. This compound with [dia-] is still rarer, but more
expressive. To lodge [katalusai]. Jesus was the hero of this crowd
from Galilee on their way to the passover. But here he had shocked their sensibilities
and those of the people of Jericho by inviting himself to be the guest of this chief
publican and notorious sinner who had robbed nearly everybody in the city by exorbitant
taxes.
19:8 Stood [statheis]. Apparently Jesus and Zacchaeus
had come to the house of Zacchaeus and were about to enter when the murmur became
such a roar that Zacchaeus turned round and faced the crowd. If I have wrongfully
exacted aught of any man [ei tinos ti esukophantēsa]. A most significant
admission and confession. It is a condition of the first class [ei] and the
aorist active indicative) that assumes it to be true. His own conscience
was at work. He may have heard audible murmurs from the crowd. For the verb [sukophantein],
see discussion on 3:14, the only two instances in the N.T. He had extorted money
wrongfully as they all knew. I return fourfold [apodidōmi tetraploun].
I offer to do it here and now on this spot. This was the Mosaic law (Ex 22:1;
Nu 5:6f.). Restitution is good proof of a change of heart. D. L. Moody used
to preach it with great power. Without this the offer of Zacchaeus to give half
his goods to the poor would be less effective. “It is an odd coincidence, nothing
more, that the fig-mulberry (sycamore) should occur in connexion with the
fig-shewer (sycophant).”
19:10 The lost [to apolōlos]. The neuter as a collective
whole, second perfect active participle of [apollumi], to destroy. See Lu 15 for the idea of the lost.
19:11 He added and spake [prostheis eipen]. Second
aorist active participle of [prostithēmi] with [eipen]. It is a Hebrew
idiom seen also in Lu 20:1f. he added to send [prosetheto pempsai] and in Ac 12:3 “he added to seize” [prosetheto sullabein]. This undoubted
Hebraism occurs in the N.T. in Luke only, probably due to the influence of the LXX
on Luke the Greek Christian. To appear [anaphainesthai]. Present passive
infinitive of an old verb to be made manifest, to be shown up. In the N.T. only
here and Ac 21:3.
19:12 To take to himself a kingdom [labein heautōi basileian].
Second aorist active infinitive of [lambanō] with the dative reflexive [heautōi]
where the middle voice could have been used. Apparently this parable has the historical
basis of Archelaus who actually went from Jerusalem to Rome on this very errand
to get a kingdom in Palestine and to come back to it. This happened while Jesus
was a boy in Nazareth and it was a matter of common knowledge.
19:13 Trade ye herewith till I come [pragmateusasthe
en hōi erchomai]. First aorist middle imperative of [pragmateuomai],
an old verb from [prāgma], business. Here only in the N.T. Westcott and Hort
in their text read [pragmateusasthai], first aorist middle infinitive [-ai]
and [-e] were pronounced alike). The infinitive makes it indirect
discourse, the imperative direct. While I am coming is what [en hōi erchomai]
really means.
19:14 His citizens [hoi politai autou]. That actually
happened with Archelaus.
19:15 When he was come back again [en tōi epanelthein
auton]. “On the coming back again as to him.” Luke’s favourite idiom of the
articular infinitive after [en] and with the accusative of general reference.
Had given [dedōkei]. Past perfect active indicative without augment
of [didōmi]. That he might know [hina gnoi]. Second aorist active
subjunctive of [ginoskō]. The optative would be [gnoiē].
19:16 Hath made [prosērgasato]. Only here in the
N.T. Note [pros-] in addition, besides, more.
19:17 Have thou authority [isthi exousian echōn].
Periphrastic present active imperative. Keep on having authority.
19:19 Be thou also over [kai su epano ginou]. Present
middle imperative. Keep on becoming over. There is no real reason for identifying
this parable of the pounds with the parable of the talents in Mt 25. The versatility of Jesus needs to be remembered by those who seek
to flatten out everything.
19:20 I kept [eichon]. Imperfect active of [echō]. I
kept on keeping. Laid up [apokeimenēn]. Present passive participle
agreeing with [hēn] (which), used often as perfect passive of [tithēmi]
as here, laid away or off [apo]. It is not the periphrastic construction,
but two separate verbs, each with its own force. In a napkin [en soudariōi].
A Latin word sudarium from sudor (sweat) transliterated into
Greek, a sweatcloth handkerchief or napkin. Found in papyrus marriage contracts
as part of the dowry (second and third centuries A.D., Deissmann, Bible Studies,
p. 223). Used also for swathing the head of the dead (Joh 11:44;
20:7).
19:21 I feared [ephoboumēn]. Imperfect middle, I
continued to fear. Austere [austēros]. Old Greek word from [auō],
to dry up. Reproduced in Latin austeros and English austere.It means
rough to the taste, stringent. Here only in the N.T. Compare [sklēros] (hard)
in Mt 25:24. “Harsh in flavour, then in disposition” (Bruce). Thou
layedst not down [ouk ethēkas]. Probably a proverb for a grasping profiteer.
19:22 Thou knewest [ēideis]. Second past perfect
of [horaō], to see, used as imperfect of [oida], to know. Either it
must be taken as a question as Westcott and Hort do or be understood as sarcasm
as the Revised Version has it. The words of the wicked [ponēros] slave are
turned to his own condemnation.
19:23 Then wherefore [kai dia ti]. Note this inferential
use of [kai-] in that case. Into the bank [epi trapezan]. Literally,
upon a table. This old word [trapeza], from [tetrapeza] [tetra],
four, [pous], foot). It means then any table (Mr 7:28),
food on the table (Ac 16:34), feast or banquet (Ro 11:9),
table of the money-changers (Joh 2:15; Mr 11:15; Mt 21:12), or bank
as here. Our word bank is from Old English bench.With interest [sun
tokōi]. Not usury, but proper and legal interest. Old word from [tiktō],
to bring forth. In the N.T. only here and Mt 25:27. Should have required it [an auto epraxa]. Conclusion
of second-class condition the condition or apodosis being implied in the participle
“coming” [elthōn], and the previous question. On this technical use of [prassō]
[epraxa] see Lu 3:13.
19:25 And they said unto him [kai eipan autōi].
Probably the eager audience who had been listening to this wonderful parable interrupted
Jesus at this point because of this sudden turn when the one pound is given to the
man who has ten pounds. If so, it shows plainly how keenly they followed the story
which Jesus was giving because of their excitement about the kingdom (Lu
19:11).
19:26 That hath not [tou mē echontos]. The present
tense of [echō] here, that keeps on not having, probably approaches the idea
of acquiring or getting, the one who keeps on not acquiring. This is the law of
nature and of grace.
19:27 Reign [basileusai]. First aorist active infinitive,
ingressive aorist, come to rule. Slay [katasphaxate]. First aorist
active imperative of [katasphazō], to slaughter, an old verb, but only here
in the N.T.
19:28 Went on before [eporeueto emprosthen]. Imperfect
middle. Jesus left the parable to do its work and slowly went on his way up the
hill to Jerusalem.
19:29 Unto Bethphage and Bethany [eis Bēthphagē kai
Bēthania]. Both indeclinable forms of the Hebrew or Aramaic names. In Mr 11:1 “Bethany” is inflected regularly, which see. Of Olives [Elaiōn].
As in Mr 11:1; Mt 21:1, though some editors take it to be, not the genitive plural
of [elaia] (olive tree), but the name of the place Olivet. In the
Greek it is just a matter of accent (circumflex or acute) Olivet is correct
in Ac 1:12. See on Mt 21:1ff.; Mr 11:1ff. for details.
19:30 Whereon no man ever yet sat [eph’ hon oudeis pōpote
anthrōpōn ekathisen]. Plummer holds that this fact indicated to the disciples
a royal progress into the city of a piece with the Virgin Birth of Jesus and the
burial in a new tomb.
19:32 As he had said unto them [kathōs eipen autois].
Luke alone notes this item.
19:33 As they were loosing [luontōn autōn]. Genitive
absolute. The owners thereof [hoi kurioi autou]. The same word [kurios]
used of the Lord Jesus in verse 31 (and 34) and which these
“owners” would understand. See on Mt 21:3; Mr
11:3 for [kurios] used by Jesus about himself with the expectation that these
disciples would recognize him by that title as they did. The word in common use
for the Roman emperor and in the LXX to translate the Hebrew Elohim (God).
19:35 Set Jesus thereon [epebibasan ton Iēsoun].
First aorist active. Old verb, to cause to mount, causative verb from [bainō],
to go. In the N.T. only here and Lu 10:34; Ac 23:24.
19:36 They spread [hupestrōnnuon]. Imperfect active
describing the continued spreading as they went on. [Hupostrōnnuō] is a late
form of the old verb [hupostorennumi]. Here only in the N.T.
19:37 At the descent [pros tēi katabasei]. Epexegetic
of “drawing nigh.” They were going by the southern slope of the Mount of Olives.
As they turned down to the city, the grand view stirred the crowd to rapturous enthusiasm.
This was the first sight of the city on this route which is soon obscured in the
descent. The second view bursts out again (verse 41). It was a shout of triumph from the multitude with their long
pent-up enthusiasm (verse 11), restrained no longer by the parable of the pounds. For all
the mighty works which they had seen [peri pasōn eidon dunameōn]. Neat
Greek idiom, incorporation of the antecedent [dunameōn] into the relative
clause and attraction of the case of the relative from the accusative [has]
to the genitive [hōn]. And note “all.” The climax had come, Lazarus, Bartimaeus,
and the rest.
19:38 The king cometh [ho erchomenos, ho basileus].
The Messianic hopes of the people were now all ablaze with expectation of immediate
realization. A year ago in Galilee he had frustrated their plans for a revolutionary
movement “to take him by force to make him king” (Joh 6:15). The
phrase “the coming king” like “the coming prophet” (Joh 6:14; De 18:15)
expressed the hope of the long-looked-for Messiah. They are singing from the Hallel
in their joy that Jesus at last is making public proclamation of his Messiahship.
Peace in heaven, and glory in the highest [en ouranōi eirēnē kai doxa
en hupsistois]. This language reminds one strongly of the song of the angels
at the birth of Jesus (Lu 2:14). Mr 11:10; Mt 21:9 have “Hosannah in the highest.”
19:39 Some of the Pharisees [tines tōn Pharisaiōn].
Luke seems to imply by “from the multitude” [apo tou ochlou] that these Pharisees
were in the procession, perhaps half-hearted followers of the mob. But Joh 12:19 speaks of Pharisees who stood off from the procession and blamed
each other for their failure and the triumph of Jesus. These may represent the bolder
spirits of their same group who dared to demand of Jesus that he rebuke his disciples.
19:40 If these shall hold their peace [ean houtoi siōpēsousin].
A condition of the first class, determined as fulfilled. The use of [ean]
rather than [ei] cuts no figure in the case (see Ac 8:31; 1Th 3:8; 1Jo 5:15). The kind of condition is determined
by the mode which is here indicative. The future tense by its very nature does approximate
the aorist subjunctive, but after all it is the indicative. The stones will cry
out [hoi lithoi kraxousin]. A proverb for the impossible happening.
19:41 Wept [eklausen]. Ingressive aorist active
indicative, burst into tears. Probably audible weeping.
19:42 If thou hadst known [ei egnōs]. Second aorist
active indicative of [ginōskō]. Second-class condition, determined as unfulfilled.
Even thou [kai su]. Emphatic position of the subject. But now
[nun de]. Aposiopesis. The conclusion is not expressed and the sudden breaking
off and change of structure is most impressive. They are hid [ekrubē].
Second aorist passive indicative of [kruptō], common verb, to hide.
19:43 Shall cast up a bank [parembalousin charaka].
Future active indicative of [paremballō], a double compound [para, en,
ballō] of long usage, finally in a military sense of line of battle or in camp.
Here alone in the N.T. So also the word [charaka] [charax] for bank,
stake, palisade, rampart, is here alone in the N.T., though common enough in the
old Greek. Compass thee round [perikuklōsousin se]. Future active
indicative. Another common compound to make a circle [kuklos] around [peri],
though here only in the N.T. Keep thee in [sunexousin se]. Shall hold
thee together on every side [pantothen]. See about [sunechō] on 4:38.
19:44 Shall dash to the ground [edaphiousin]. Attic
future of [edaphizō], to beat level, to raze to the ground, a rare verb from
[edaphos], bottom, base, ground (Ac 22:7), here alone in the
N.T. Because [anth’ hōn]. “In return for which things.” Thou knewest
not [ouk egnōs]. Applying the very words of the lament in the condition
in verse 42. This vivid prophecy of the destruction of Jerusalem is used by those
who deny predictive prophecy even for Jesus as proof that Luke wrote the Gospel
after the destruction of Jerusalem. But it is no proof at all to those who concede
to Jesus adequate knowledge of his mission and claims.
19:45 Began to cast out [ērxato ekballein]. So Mr 11:15 whereas Mt 21:12 has simply “he cast out.” See Mark and Matthew for discussion of
this second cleansing of the temple at the close of the public ministry in relation
to the one at the beginning in Joh 2:14-22. There is nothing gained by accusing John or the Synoptics of
a gross chronological blunder. There was abundant time in these three years for
all the abuses to be revived.
19:47 He was teaching [ēn didaskōn]. Periphrastic
imperfect. Daily [to kath’ hēmeran]. Note the accusative neuter article,
“as to the according to the day,” very awkward English surely, but perfectly good
Greek. The same idiom occurs in 11:3. Sought [ezētoun]. Imperfect active, conative imperfect,
were seeking, trying to seek. The principal men of the people [hoi prōtoi
tou laou]. The first men of the people. The position after the verb and apart
from the chief priests and the scribes calls special attention to them. Some of
these “first men” were chief priests or scribes, but not all of them. The lights
and leaders of Jerusalem were bent on the destruction [apolesai] of Jesus.
The raising of Lazarus from the dead brought them together for this action (Joh
11:47-53; 12:9-11.
19:48 They could not find [ouch hēuriskon]. Imperfect
active. They kept on not finding. What they might do [to ti poiēsōsin].
First aorist active deliberative subjunctive in a direct question retained in the
indirect. Note the article [to] (neuter accusative) with the question.
Hung upon him [exekremeto autou]. Imperfect middle of [ekkremamai],
an old verb [mi] form) to hang from, here only in the N.T. The form
is an [omega] form from [ekkremomai], a constant tendency to the [omega]
form in the Koinē.It pictures the whole nation (save the leaders in verse 47) hanging upon the
words of Jesus as if in suspense in mid-air,
rapt attention that angered these same leaders. Tyndale renders it “stuck by him.”
Chapter 20
20:1 On one of the days [en miāi tōn hēmerōn]. Luke’s favourite
way of indicating time. It was the last day of the temple teaching (Tuesday). Lu 20:1-19 is to be compared with Mr 11:27-12:12; Mt 21:23-46. There came upon him [epestēsan].
Second aorist active indicative, ingressive aorist of [ephistēmi], old and
common verb, stood up against him, with the notion of sudden appearance. These leaders
(cf. 19:47) had determined to attack Jesus on this morning, both Sadducees
(chief priests) and Pharisees (scribes), a formal delegation from
the Sanhedrin.
20:2 Tell us [eipon hēmin]. Luke adds these words
to what Mark and Matthew have. Second aorist active imperative for the old form
[eipe] and with ending [-on] of the first aorist active. Westcott
and Hort punctuate the rest of the sentence as an indirect question after [eipon],
but the Revised Version puts a semicolon after “us” and retains the direct question.
The Greek manuscripts have no punctuation.
20:3 Question [logon]. Literally, word. So in Mr 11:29; Mt 21:24.
20:5 They reasoned with themselves [sunelogisanto].
First aorist middle of [sullogizomai], to bring together accounts, an old
word, only here in the N.T. Mark and Matthew have [dielogizonto] (imperfect
middle of [dialogizomai], a kindred verb, to reckon between one another,
confer). This form [dielogizonto] in verse 14 below. If we shall say [ean eipōmen]. Third-class condition
with second aorist active subjunctive. Suppose we say! So in verse 6.
20:6 Will stone us [katalithasei]. Late verb and
here only in the N.T. Literally, will throw stones down on us, stone us down, overwhelm
us with stones. They be persuaded [pepeismenos estin]. Periphrastic
perfect passive indicative of [peithō], to persuade, a settled state of persuasion,
“is persuaded” (no reason for use of “be” here). That John was a prophet
[Iōanēn prophētēn einai]. Accusative and infinitive in indirect assertion.
20:7 That they knew not [mē eidenai]. Accusative
and infinitive in indirect assertion again with the negative [mē] rather
than [ou].
20:9 Vineyard [ampelōna]. Late word from [ampelos]
(vine), place of vines. So in Mr 12:1; Mt 21:33. Let it out [exedeto]. Second aorist middle
of [ekdidōmi], but with variable vowel [e] in place of [o]
of the stem [do] [exedoto]. Same form in Mark and Matthew. For
a long time [chronous hikanous]. Accusative of extent of time, considerable
times or periods of time. Not in Mark and Matthew, though all three have [apedēmēsen]
(went off from home). See on Lu 7:6 for [hikanos].
20:10 At the season [kairōi]. The definite season
for the fruit like [ho kairos tōn karpōn] (Mt 21:34). That
they should give [hina dōsousin]. Future indicative with [hina] for
purpose like the aorist subjunctive, though not so frequent.
20:11 He sent yet another [prosetheto heteron pempsai].
Literally, he added to send another. A clear Hebraism repeated in verse 12 and also in
19:11.
20:12 They wounded [traumatisantes]. First aorist
active participle of [traumatizō]. An old verb, from [trauma], a wound,
but in the N.T. only here and Ac 19:16.
20:13 What shall I do? [Ti poiēsō;]. Deliberative
future indicative or aorist subjunctive (same form). This detail only in
Luke. Note the variations in all three Gospels. All three have “will reverence”
[entrapēsontai] for which see Matthew and Mark. It may be [isōs].
Perhaps, from [isos], equal. Old adverb, but only here in the N.T.
20:14 That the inheritance may be ours [hina hēmōn genētai
hē klēronomia]. That the inheritance may become [genētai], second aorist
middle subjunctive of [ginomai]. Here Mt 21:39 has [schōmen] “let us get, ingressive aorist active subjunctive.”
Cf. [echōmen], present subjunctive of the same verb [echō] in Ro 5:1; Mr 12:7 has “and it will be ours” [estai].
20:16 God forbid [mē genoito]. Optative of wish
about the future with [mē]. Literally, may it not happen. No word “God”
in the Greek. This was the pious protest of the defeated members of the Sanhedrin
who began to see the turn of the parable against themselves.
20:17 He looked upon them [emblepsas autois]. Not
in Mark and Matthew. First aorist active participle of [emblepō], to look
on. It was a piercing glance. The scripture quoted is from Ps 118:22 and is in Mr 11:10; Mt 21:42, which see for the inverted attraction of the case [lithon]
(stone) to that of the relative [hon] (which).
20:18 Shall be broken to pieces [sunthlasthēsetai].
Future passive indicative of [sunthlaō], a rather late compound, only here
in the N.T. unless Mt 21:44 is genuine. It means to shatter. Will scatter him as dust
[likmēsei]. From [likmaō], an old verb to winnow and then to grind
to powder. Only here in the N.T. unless in Mt 21:44 is genuine, which see.
20:19 To lay hands on him [epibalein ep’ auton tas cheiras].
Second aorist active infinitive of [epiballō], an old verb and either transitively
as here or intransitively as in Mr 4:37. Vivid picture here where Mr 12:12; Mt 21:46 has “to seize” [kratēsai]. In that very hour
[en autēi tēi hōrāi]. Luke’s favourite idiom, in the hour itself. Not in
Mark or Matthew and shows that the Sanhedrin were angry enough to force the climax
then. And they feared [kai ephobēthēsan]. Adversative use of [kai]
= but they feared. Hence they refrained. For they perceived [egnōsan gar].
The reason for their rage. Second aorist active indicative of [ginōskō]. Against
them [pros autous]. As in Mr 12:12. The cap fitted them and they saw it.
20:20 They watched him [paratērēsantes]. First aorist
active participle of [paratēreō], a common Greek verb to watch on the side
or insidiously or with evil intent as in Lu 6:7 [paretērounto] of the scribes and Pharisees. See on Mr 3:2.
There is no “him” in the Greek. They were watching their chance. Spies [enkathetous].
An old verbal adjective from [enkathiēmi], to send down in or secretly. It
means liers in wait who are suborned to spy out, one who is hired to trap one by
crafty words. Only here in the N.T. Feigned themselves [hupokrinomenous
heautous]. Hypocritically professing to be “righteous” [dikaious]. “They
posed as scrupulous persons with a difficulty of conscience” (Plummer).
That they might take hold of his speech [hina epilabōntai autou logou].
Second aorist middle of [epilambanō], an old verb for seizing hold with the
hands and uses as here the genitive case. These spies are for the purpose of [hina]
catching hold of the talk of Jesus if they can get a grip anywhere. This is their
direct purpose and the ultimate purpose or result is also stated, “so as to deliver
him up” [hōste paradounai auton]. Second aorist active infinitive of [paradidōmi],
to hand over, to give from one’s side to another. The trap is all set now and ready
to be sprung by these “spies.” Of the governor [tou hēgemonos]. The
Sanhedrin knew that Pilate would have to condemn Jesus if he were put to death.
So then all their plans focus on this point as the goal. Luke alone mentions this
item here.
20:21 Rightly [orthōs]. Matthew (Mt 22:16)
notes that these “spies” were “disciples” (students) of the Pharisees and
Mark (Mr 12:13) adds that the Herodians are also involved in the
plot. These bright theologues are full of palaver and flattery and openly endorse
the teaching of Jesus as part of their scheme. Acceptest not the person of any
[ou lambaneis prosōpon]. Dost not take the face (or personal appearance)
as the test. It is a Hebraism from which the word [prosōpolempsia] (Jas
2:1) comes. Originally it meant to lift the face, to lift the countenance,
to regard the face, to accept the face value. See Mr 12:13-17; Mt 22:15-22 for discussion of details here. They both have [blepeis]
here.
20:22 Tribute [phoron]. Old word for the annual
tax on land, houses, etc. Mark and Matthew have [kēnson], which see for this
Latin word in Greek letters. The picture on the coin may have been that of Tiberius.
20:23 Perceived [katanoēsas]. From [katanoeō],
to put the mind down on. Mark has [eidōs], “knowing,” and Matthew [gnous],
coming to know or grasping (second aorist active participle of [ginōskō].
Craftiness [panourgian]. Old word for doing any deed. Matthew has
“wickedness” [ponērian] and Mark “hypocrisy” [hupokrisin]. Unscrupulous
they certainly were. They would stoop to any trick and go the limit.
20:26 They were not able [ouk ischusan]. They did
not have strength. An old verb [ischuō] from [ischus] (strength).
They failed “to take hold (cf. verse 20) of the saying before the people.” These “crack” students had
made an ignominious failure and were not able to make a case for the surrender of
Jesus to Pilate. He had slipped through their net with the utmost ease. Held
their peace [esigēsan]. Ingressive aorist active of [sigaō]. They
became silent as they went back with the “dry grins.”
20:27 There is no resurrection [anastasin mē einai].
Accusative and infinitive with negative [mē] in indirect assertion. The Sadducees
rally after the complete discomfiture of the Pharisees and Herodians. They had a
stock conundrum with which they had often gotten a laugh on the Pharisees. So they
volunteer to try it on Jesus. For discussion of details here see on Mt 22:23-33;
Mr 12:18-27. Only a few striking items remain for Luke.
20:33 Had her [eschon]. Constative second aorist
indicative of [echō] including all seven seriatim. So Mt 22:28;
Mr 12:33 To wife [gunaika]. As wife, accusative in
apposition with “her.”
20:36 Equal unto the angels [isaggeloi]. A rare
and late word from [isos], equal, and [aggelos]. Only here in the N.T.
Mark and Matthew have “as angels” [hōs aggeloi]. Angels do not marry, there
is no marriage in heaven. Sons of God, being sons of the resurrection [huioi
theou tēs anastaseōs huioi ontes]. This Hebraistic phrase, “sons of the resurrection”
defines “sons of God” and is a direct answer to the Sadducees.
20:37 Even Moses [kai Mōusēs]. Moses was used by
the Sadducees to support their denial of the resurrection. This passage (Ex
3:6) Jesus skilfully uses as a proof of the resurrection. See discussion
on Mt 22:32; Mr 12:26f.
20:39 Certain of the scribes [tines tōn grammateōn].
Pharisees who greatly enjoyed this use by Jesus of a portion of the Pentateuch against
the position of the Sadducees. So they praise the reply of Jesus, hostile though
they are to him.
20:40 They durst not any more [ouketi etolmōn ouden].
Double negative and imperfect active of [tolmaō]. The courage of Pharisees,
Sadducees, Herodians vanished.
20:41 How say they? [Pōs legousin;]. The Pharisees
had rallied in glee and one of their number, a lawyer, had made a feeble contribution
to the controversy which resulted in his agreement with Jesus and in praise from
Jesus (Mr 12:28-34; Mt 27:34-40). Luke does not give this incident
which makes it plain that by “they say” [legousin] Jesus refers to the Pharisees
(rabbis, lawyers), carrying on the discussion and turning the tables on
them while the Pharisees are still gathered together (Mt 22:41).
The construction with [legousin] is the usual infinitive and the accusative
in indirect discourse. By “the Christ” [ton Christon] “the Messiah” is meant.
20:42 For David himself [autos gar Daueid]. This
language of Jesus clearly means that he treats David as the author of Ps 110). The inspiration of this Psalm is expressly stated in Mr 12:36; Mt 22:43 (which see) and the Messianic character of the
Psalm in all three Synoptics who all quote the LXX practically alike. Modern criticism
that denies the Davidic authorship of this Psalm has to say either that Jesus was
ignorant of the fact about it or that he declined to disturb the current acceptation
of the Davidic authorship. Certainly modern scholars are not agreed on the authorship
of Ps 110). Meanwhile one can certainly be excused for accepting the natural
implication of the words of Jesus here, “David himself.” In the book of the Psalms
[en biblōi Psalmōn]. Compare 3:4 “in the book of the words of Isaiah the prophet.”
20:44 David therefore [Daueid oun]. Without [ei]
as in Mt 22:45. On the basis of this definite piece of exegesis [oun], therefore)
Jesus presses the problem [pōs], how) for an explanation. The deity
and the humanity of the Messiah in Ps 110 are thus set forth, the very problems that disturbed the rabbis then
and that upset many critics today.
20:45 In the hearing of all the people [akouontos pantos
tou laou]. Genitive absolute, “while all the people were listening” (present
active participle). That is the time to speak. The details in this verse
and verse 47 are precisely those given in Mr 12:38f.,
which see for discussion of details. Mt 23:1-39 has a very full and rich description of this last phase of the
debate in the temple where Jesus drew a full-length portrait of the hypocrisy of
the Pharisees and scribes in their presence. It was a solemn climax to this last
public appearance of Christ in the temple when Jesus poured out the vials of his
indignation as he had done before (Mt 16:2; Lu 11:37-54; 12-1.
Chapter 21
21:1 And he looked up [Anablepsas de]. He had taken his seat, after
the debate was over and the Sanhedrin had slunk away in sheer defeat, “over against
the treasury” (Mr 12:41). The word for “treasury” [gazophulakion]
is a compound of [gaza] (Persian word for royal treasury) and [phulakē]
guard or protection. It is common in the LXX, but in the N.T. only here and Mr 12:41,43; Joh 8:20).
Jesus was watching (Mr 12:41) the rich
put in their gifts as a slight diversion from the intense strain of the hours before.
21:2 Poor [penichran]. A rare word from [penēs]
[penomai], to work for one’s living). Latin penuria and Greek
[peinaō], to be hungry are kin to it. Here only in the N.T. Mr 12:42 has [ptōchē], a more common word from [ptōssō], to
be frightened, to strike and hide from fear, to be in beggary. And Luke uses this
adjective also of her in verse 3.
21:3 More than they all [pleion pantōn]. Ablative
case after the comparative [pleion].
21:4 All these did cast [pantes houtoi ebalon].
Constative second aorist active indicative covering the whole crowd except the widow.
Living [bion]. Livelihood as in Mr 12:44, not [zōēn], principle of life.
21:5 As some spake [tinōn legontōn]. Genitive absolute.
The disciples we know from Mr 13:1; Mt 24:1. How [hoti]. Literally, “that.” It was
adorned [kekosmētai]. Perfect passive indicative, state of completion,
stands adorned, tense retained in indirect discourse, though English has to change
it. [Kosmeō], old and common verb for orderly arrangement and adorning.
With goodly stones and offerings [lithois kalois kai anathēmasin].
Instrumental case. Some of these stones in the substructure were enormous. “The
columns of the cloister or portico were monoliths of marble over forty feet high”
(Plummer). Cf. Josephus, War, V.5. The word [anathēma] (here
only in the N.T.) is not to be confused with [anathema] from the
same verb [anatithēmi], but which came to mean a curse (Ga 1:8; Ac
23:14). So [anathema] came to mean devoted in a bad sense, [anathēma]
in a good sense. “Thus knave, lad, becomes a rascal; villain, a
farmer, becomes a scoundrel; cunning, skilful, becomes crafty”(Vincent).
These offerings in the temple were very numerous and costly (2Macc. 3:2-7)
like the golden vine of Herod with branches as tall as a man (Josephus, Ant.XV.
ii.3).
21:6 As for these things [tauta]. Accusative of
general reference. One stone upon another [lithos epi lithōi]. Stone
upon stone (locative). Here both Mr 13:2; Mt 24:2 have [epi lithon] (accusative). Instead of
[ouk aphethēsetai] (future passive) they both have [ou mē aphethēi]
(double negative with aorist passive subjunctive). It was a shock to the
disciples to hear this after the triumphal entry.
21:8 That ye be not led astray [mē planēthēte].
First aorist passive subjunctive with [mē] (lest). This verb [planaō]
occurs here only in Luke though often in the rest of the N.T. (as Mt 24:4, 5, 11, 24, which see). Our word planet is from this
word. The time is at hand [ho kairos ēggiken]. Just as John the Baptist
did of the kingdom (Mt 3:2) and Jesus also (Mr 1:15).
Go ye not after them [mē poreuthēte opisō autōn]. First aorist passive
subjunctive with [mē]. A needed warning today with all the false cries in
the religious world.
21:9 Be not terrified [mē ptoēthēte]. First aorist
passive subjunctive with [mē] from [ptoeō] an old verb to terrify,
from [ptoa], terror. In the N.T. only here and Lu 24:37. First [Prōton]. It is so easy to forget this and
to insist that the end is “immediately” in spite of Christ’s explicit denial here.
See Mt 24:4-42; Mr 13:1-37 for discussion of details for Lu 21:8-36, the great eschatological discourse of Jesus
21:11 Famines and pestilences [loimoi kai limoi].
Play on the two words pronounced just alike in the Koinē (itacism).
And terrors [phobēthra te]. The use of [te ... te] in this
verse groups the two kinds of woes. This rare word [phobēthra] is only here
in the N.T. It is from [phobeō], to frighten, and occurs only in the plural
as here.
21:12 But before all these things [pro de toutōn pantōn].
In Mr 13:8; Mt 24:8 these things are termed “the beginning of travail.” That
may be the idea here. Plummer insists that priority of time is the point, not magnitude.
Bringing you [apagomenous]. Present passive participle from [apagō],
an old verb to lead off or away. But here the participle is in the accusative plural,
not the nominative like [paradidontes] (present active participle, delivering
you up), agreeing with [humas] not expressed the object of [paradidontes],
“you being brought before or led off.” “A technical term in Athenian legal language”
(Bruce).
21:13 It shall turn unto you [apobēsetai humin].
Future middle of [apobainō]. It will come off, turn out for you (dative of
advantage). For a testimony [eis marturion]. To their loyalty
to Christ. Besides, “the blood of the martyrs is the seed of the church.”
21:14 Not to meditate beforehand [mē promeletāin].
The classical word for conning a speech beforehand. Mr 13:11 has [promerimnaō], a later word which shows previous anxiety
rather than previous preparation. How to answer [apologēthēnai]. First
aorist passive infinitive. It is the preparation for the speech of defence (apology)
that Jesus here forbids, not the preparation of a sermon.
21:15 Your adversaries [hoi antikeimenoi humin].
Those who stand against, line up face to face with (note [anti-]. To withstand
or to gainsay [antistēnai ē anteipein]. Two second aorist active infinitives
with [anti-] in composition again. But these “antis” will go down before
the power of Christ.
21:16 Shall they cause to be put to death [thanatōsousin].
Future active of [thanatoō], to put to death or to make to die (causative).
Either makes sense here. Old and common verb.
21:17 Not a hair of your head shall perish [thrix ek
tēs kephalēs humōn ou mē apolētai]. Only in Luke. Second aorist middle subjunctive
of [apollumi] with [ou mē] (double negative). Jesus has just
said that some they will put to death. Hence it is spiritual safety here promised
such as Paul claimed about death in Php 1:21.
21:19 Ye shall win [ktēsesthe]. Future middle of
[ktaomai], to acquire. They will win their souls even if death does come.
21:20 Compassed with armies [kukloumenēn hupo stratopedōn].
Present passive participle of [kukloō], to circle, encircle, from [kuklos],
circle. Old verb, but only four times in N.T. The point of this warning is the present
tense, being encircled. It will be too late after the city is surrounded. It is
objected by some that Jesus, not to say Luke, could not have spoken (or written)
these words before the Roman armies came. One may ask why not, if such a thing as
predictive prophecy can exist and especially in the case of the Lord Jesus. The
word [stratopedōn] [stratos], army, [pedon], plain)
is a military camp and then an army in camp. Old word, but only here in the N.T.
Then know [tote gnōte]. Second aorist active imperative of [ginōskō]. Christians
did flee from Jerusalem to Pella before it was too late as directed in Lu 21:21; Mr 13:14f.;
Mt 24:16f.
21:22 That may be fulfilled [tou plēsthēnai]. Articular
infinitive passive to express purpose with accusative of general reference. The
O.T. has many such warnings (Ho 9:7; De 28:49-57, etc.).
21:24 Edge of the sword [stomati machairēs]. Instrumental
case of [stomati] which means “mouth” literally (Ge 34:26).
This verse like the close of verse 22 is only in Luke. Josephus (War, VI. 9.3) states that 1,100,000
Jews perished in the destruction of Jerusalem and 97,000 were taken captive. Surely
this is an exaggeration and yet the number must have been large. Shall be led
captive [aichmalōtisthēsontai]. Future passive of [aichmalōtizō]
from [aichmē], spear and [halōtos] [haliskomai]. Here alone
in the literal sense in the N.T. Shall be trodden under foot [estai patoumenē].
Future passive periphrastic of [pateō], to tread, old verb. Until the
times of the Gentiles be fulfilled [achri hou plērōthōsin kairoi ethnōn].
First aorist passive subjunctive with [achri hou] like [heōs hou]. What
this means is not clear except that Paul in Ro 11:25 shows that the punishment of the Jews has a limit. The same idiom
appears there also with [achri hou] and the aorist subjunctive.
21:25 Distress [sunochē]. From [sunechō]. In
the N.T. only here and 2Co 2:4. Anguish. In perplexity [en aporiāi]. State of one
who is [aporos], who has lost his way [a] privative and [poros].
Here only in the N.T. though an old and common word. For the roaring of the sea
[ēchous thalassēs]. Our word echo (Latin echo) is this word
[ēchos], a reverberating sound. Sense of rumour in Lu 4:37. Billows [salou]. Old word [salos] for the swell
of the sea. Here only in the N.T.
21:26 Men fainting [apopsuchontōn anthrōpōn]. Genitive
absolute of [apopsuchō], to expire, to breathe off or out. Old word. Here
only in N.T. Expectation [prosdokias]. Old word from [prosdokaō],
to look for or towards. In the N.T. only here and Ac 12:11. The world [tēi oikoumenēi]. Dative case, “the inhabited”
(earth, [gēi].
21:27 And then shall they see [kai tote opsontai].
As much as to say that it will be not till then. Clearly the promise of the second
coming of the Son of man in glory here (Mr 13:26f.; Mt 24:30f.) is
pictured as not one certain of immediate realization. The time element is left purposely
vague.
21:28 Look up [anakupsate]. First aorist active
imperative of [anakuptō], to raise up. Here of the soul as in Joh 8:7, 10, but in Lu 13:11 of the body. These the only N.T. examples of this common verb.
Redemption [apolutrōsis]. Act of redeeming from [apolutroō]. The
final act at the second coming of Christ, a glorious hope.
21:29 The fig tree, and all the trees [tēn sukēn kai
panta ta dendra]. This parable of the fig-tree (Mr 13:28-32; Mt 24:32-35)
Luke applies to “all the trees.” It is true about all of them, but the fig tree
was very common in Palestine.
21:30 Shoot forth [probalōsin]. Second aorist active
subjunctive of [proballō], common verb, but in the N.T. only here and Ac 19:33. Summer [theros]. Not harvest, but summer. Old word,
but in the N.T. only here (Mr 13:28; Mt 24:32).
21:31 Coming to pass [ginomena]. Present middle
participle of [ginomai] and so descriptive of the process. Nigh [eggus].
The consummation of the kingdom is here meant, not the beginning.
21:32 This generation [hē genea hautē]. Naturally
people then living. Shall not pass away [ou mē parelthēi]. Second
aorist active subjunctive of [parerchomai]. Strongest possible negative with
[ou mē]. Till all things be accomplished [heōs an panta genētai].
Second aorist middle subjunctive of [ginomai] with [heōs], common
idiom. The words give a great deal of trouble to critics. Some apply them to the
whole discourse including the destruction of the temple and Jerusalem, the second
coming and the end of the world. Some of these argue that Jesus was simply mistaken
in his eschatology, some that he has not been properly reported in the Gospels.
Others apply them only to the destruction of Jerusalem which did take place in A.D.
70 before that generation passed away. It must be said for this view that it is
not easy in this great eschatological discourse to tell clearly when Jesus is discussing
the destruction of Jerusalem and when the second coming. Plummer offers this solution:
“The reference, therefore, is to the destruction of Jerusalem regarded as the type
of the end of the world.”
21:33 My words shall not pass away [hoi logoi mou ou
mē pareleusontai]. Future middle indicative with [ou mē], a bit stronger
statement than the subjunctive. It is noteworthy that Jesus utters these words just
after the difficult prediction in verse 32.
21:34 Lest haply your hearts be overcharged [mē pote
barēthōsin hai kardiai humōn]. First aorist passive subjunctive of [bareō],
an old verb to weigh down, depress, with [mē pote]. With surfeiting
[en krepalēi]. A rather late word, common in medical writers for the nausea
that follows a debauch. Latin crapula, the giddiness caused by too much wine.
Here only in the N.T. Drunkenness [methēi]. From [methu] (wine).
Old word but in the N.T. only here and Ro 13:13; Ga 5:21. Cares of this life [merimnais biōtikais].
Anxieties of life. The adjective [biōtikos] is late and in the N.T. only
here and 1Co 6:3f. Come on you [epistēi]. Second aorist active subjunctive
of [ephistēmi], ingressive aorist. Construed also with [mē pote]. Suddenly
[ephnidios]. Adjective in predicate agreeing with [hēmera] (day).
As a snare [hōs pagis]. Old word from [pēgnumi], to make fast
a net or trap. Paul uses it several times of the devil’s snares for preachers (1Ti
3:7; 2Ti 2:26).
21:36 But watch ye [agrupneite de]. [Agrupneō]
is a late verb to be sleepless [a] privative and [hupnos], sleep).
Keep awake and be ready is the pith of Christ’s warning. That ye may prevail
to escape [hina katischusēte ekphugein]. First aorist active subjunctive
with [hina] of purpose. The verb [katischuō] means to have strength
against (cf. Mt 16:18). Common in later writers. [Ekphugein] is second
aorist active infinitive, to escape out. To stand before the Son of man [stathēnai
emprosthen tou huiou tou anthrōpou]. That is the goal. There will be no dread
of the Son then if one is ready. [Stathēnai] is first aorist passive infinitive
of [histēmi].
21:37 Every day [tas hēmeras]. During the days,
accusative of extent of time. Every night [tas nuktas]. “During the
nights,” accusative of extent of time. Lodged [ēulizeto]. Imperfect
middle, was lodging, [aulizomai] from [aulē] (court).
21:38 Came early [ōrthrizen]. Imperfect active of
[orthrizō] from [orthros], late form for [orthreuō], to rise
early. Only here in the N.T.
Chapter 22
22:1 The Passover [pascha] Both names (unleavened bread and passover)
are used here as in Mr 14:1. Strictly speaking the passover was Nisan 14 and the unleavened bread
15-21). This is the only place in the N.T. where the expression “the feast of unleavened
bread” (common in LXX, Ex. 23:15, etc.) occurs, for Mr 14:1 has just “the unleavened bread.” Mt 26:17 uses unleavened bread and passover interchangeably. Drew nigh
[ēggizen]. Imperfect active. Mr 14:1; Mt 26:2 mention “after two days” definitely.
22:2 Sought [ezētoun]. Imperfect active of [zēteō],
were seeking, conative imperfect. How they might put him to death [to
pōs anelōsin auton]. Second aorist active deliberative subjunctive (retained
in indirect question) of [anaireō], to take up, to make away with,
to slay. Common in Old Greek. Luke uses it so here and in 23:32 and eighteen times in the Acts, a favourite word with him. Note the
accusative neuter singular article [to] with the whole clause, “as to the
how, etc.” For they feared [ephobounto gar]. Imperfect middle describing
the delay of the “how.” The triumphal entry and the temple speeches of Jesus had
revealed his tremendous power with the people, especially the crowds from Galilee
at the feast. They were afraid to go on with their plan to kill him at the feast.
22:3 Satan entered into Judas [eisēlthen eis Ioudan].
Ingressive aorist active indicative. Satan was now renewing his attack on Jesus
suspended temporarily (Lu 4:13) “until a good chance.” He had come
back by the use of Simon Peter (Mr 8:33; Mt 16:23). The conflict
went on and Jesus won ultimate victory (Lu 10:18). Now Satan uses
Judas and has success with him for Judas allowed him to come again and again (Joh
13:27). Judas evidently opened the door to his heart and let Satan in. Then
Satan took charge and he became a devil as Jesus said (Joh 6:70).
This surrender to Satan in no way relieves Judas of his moral responsibility.
22:4 Went away [apelthōn]. Second aorist active
participle of [aperchomai]. He went off under the impulse of Satan and after
the indignation over the rebuke of Jesus at the feast in Simon’s house (Joh
12:4-6). Captains [stratēgois]. Leaders of the temple guards
(Ac 4:1), the full title, “captains of the temple,” occurs in verse 52. How he might deliver him unto them [to pōs autois paradōi auton].
The same construction as in verse 2, the article [to] with the indirect question and deliberative subjunctive
second aorist active [paradōi].
22:5 Were glad [echarēsan]. Second aorist passive
indicative of [chairō] as in Mr 14:11. Ingressive aorist, a natural exultation that one of the Twelve
had offered to do this thing. Covenanted [sunethento]. Second aorist
indicative middle of [suntithēmi]. An old verb to put together and in the
middle with one another. In the N.T. outside of Joh 9:22 only in Luke (here and Ac 23:20; 24:9). Luke only mentions “money” [argurion], but
not “thirty pieces” (Mt 26:15).
22:6 Consented [exōmologēsen]. Old verb, but the
ancients usually used the simple form for promise or consent rather than the compound.
This is the only instance of this sense in the N.T. It is from [homologos]
[homos], same, and [legō], to say), to say the same thing
with another and so agree. Opportunity [eukarian]. From [eukairos]
[eu, kairos], a good chance. Old word, but in the N.T. only here and parallel
passage Mt 26:16. In the absence of the multitude [ater ochlou]. [Ater]
is an old preposition, common in the poets, but rare in prose. Also in verse 35. It means “without,” “apart from,” like [chōris]. The point of Judas
was just this. He would get Jesus into the hands of the Sanhedrin during the feast
in spite of the crowd. It was necessary to avoid tumult (Mt 26:5)
because of the popularity of Jesus.
22:7 The day of unleavened bread came [ēlthen hē hēmera
tōn azumōn]. The day itself came, not simply was drawing nigh (verse 1. Must be sacrificed
[edei thuesthai]. This was Nisan 14 which began at sunset. Luke is a Gentile and this fact must be borne in mind.
The lamb must be slain by the head of the family (Ex 12:6). The controversy
about the day when Christ ate the last passover meal has already been discussed
(Mt 26:17; Mr 14:12). The Synoptics clearly present this as a fact.
Jesus was then crucified on Friday at the passover or Thursday (our time)
at the regular hour 6 P.M. (beginning of Friday). The five passages in John
(13:1f.; 13:27; 18:28;
19:14; 19:31) rightly interpreted teach the
same thing as shown in my Harmony of the Gospels for Students of the Life of
Christ (pp.279–284).
22:8 Peter and John [Petron kai Iōanēn]. Mr 14:13 has only “two” while Mt 26:17 makes the disciples take the initiative. The word passover in this
context is used either of the meal, the feast day, the whole period (including the
unleavened bread). “Eat the passover” can refer to the meal as here or to
the whole period of celebration (Joh 18:28).
22:9 Where wilt thou that we make ready? [Pou theleis
hetoimasōmen;]. Deliberative first aorist active subjunctive without [hina]
after [theleis], perhaps originally two separate questions.
22:10 When you are entered [eiselthontōn humōn].
Genitive absolute. Meet you [sunantēsei humin]. An old verb [sunantaō]
(from [sun], with, and [antaō], to face, [anti] with associative
instrumental [humin]. See on Mr 14:13 about the “man bearing a pitcher of
water.”
22:11 Goodman of the house [oikodespotēi]. Master
of the house as in Mr 14:14; Mt 10:25. A late word for the earlier [despotēs oikou]. I
shall eat [phagō]. Second aorist futuristic (or deliberative)
subjunctive as in Mr 14:14.
22:12 And he [k’akeinos]. [Kai] and [ekeinos]
[crasis] where Mr 14:15 has [kai autos]. Literally, And that one. See on Mark for
rest of the verse.
22:13 He had said [eirēkei]. Past perfect active
indicative of [eipon] where Mr 14:16 has [eipen] (second aorist).
22:14 Sat down [anepesen]. Reclined, fell back (or
up). Second aorist active of [anapiptō].
22:15 With desire I have desired [epithumiāi epethumēsa].
A Hebraism common in the LXX. Associative instrumental case of substantive and first
aorist active indicative of same like a cognate accusative. Peculiar to Luke is
all this verse. See this idiom in Joh 3:29; Ac 4:17. Before I suffer [pro tou me pathein]. Preposition
[pro] with articular infinitive and accusative of general reference, “before
the suffering as to me.” [Pathein] is second aorist active infinitive of
[paschō].
22:16 Until it be fulfilled [heōs hotou plērōthēi].
First aorist passive subjunctive of [plēroō] with [heōs] [hotou],
the usual construction about the future. It seems like a Messianic banquet that
Jesus has in mind (cf. 14:15).
22:17 He received a cup [dexamenos potērion]. This
cup is a diminutive of [potēr]. It seems that this is still one of the four
cups passed during the passover meal, though which one is uncertain. It is apparently
just before the formal introduction of the Lord’s Supper, though he gave thanks
here also [eucharistēsas]. It is from this verb [eucharisteō] (see
also verse 19) that our word Eucharist comes. It is a common verb for giving
thanks and was used also for “saying grace” as we call it.
22:18 The fruit of the vine [tou genēmatos tēs ampelou].
So Mr 14:25; Mt 26:29 and not [oinos] though it was wine undoubtedly.
But the language allows anything that is “the fruit of the vine.” Come [elthēi].
Second aorist active subjunctive with [heōs] as in verse 16. Here it is the consummation of the kingdom that Jesus has in mind, for
the kingdom had already come.
22:19 Which is given for you [to huper humōn didomenon].
Some MSS. omit these verses though probably genuine. The correct text in 1Co 11:24 has “which is for you,” not “which is broken for you.” It is curious
to find the word “broken” here preserved and justified so often, even by Easton
in his commentary on Luke, p. 320). In remembrance of me [eis tēn emēn
anamnēsin]. Objective use of the possessive pronoun [emēn], not the subjective.
This do [touto poieite]. Present active indicative, repetition, keep
on doing this.
22:20 After the supper [meta to deipnēsai]. Preposition
[meta] and the accusative articular infinitive. The textual situation here
is confusing, chiefly because of the two cups (verses 17, 20). Some of the documents omit the latter part of
verse 19 and all of
verse 20). It is possible, of course, that this part crept into the text of Luke
from 1Co 11:24f. But, if this part is omitted, Luke would then have the order
reversed, the cup before the bread. So there are difficulties whichever turn one
takes here with Luke’s text whether one cup or two cups. The New Covenant
[he kainē diathēkē]. See on Mt 26:28; Mr 14:24 for “covenant.” Westcott
and Hort reject “new” there, but accept it here and in 1Co 11:25. See on Lu 5:38 for difference between [kainē] and [nea]. ”The
ratification of a covenant was commonly associated with the shedding of blood; and
what was written in blood was believed to be indelible” (Plummer). Poured
out [ekchunnomenon]. Same word in Mr 14:24; Mt 26:28 translated “shed.” Late form present passive participle
of [ekchunnō] of [ekcheō], to pour out.
22:21 That betrayeth [tou paradidontos]. Present
active participle, actually engaged in doing it. The hand of Judas was resting on
the table at the moment. It should be noted that Luke narrates the institution of
the Lord’s Supper before the exposure of Judas as the traitor while Mark and Matthew
reverse this order.
22:22 As it hath been determined [kata to hōrismenon].
Perfect passive participle of [horizō], to limit or define, mark off the
border, our “horizon.” But this fact does not absolve Judas of his guilt as the
“woe” here makes plain.
22:23 Which of them it was [to tis ara eiē ex autōn].
Note the article [to] with the indirect question as in verses 2, 4. The optative [eiē] here is changed from the present active indicative
[estin], though it was not always done, for see [dokei] in verse 24 where the present indicative is retained. They all had their hands on
the table. Whose hand was it?
22:24 Contention [philoneikia]. An old word from
[philoneikos], fond of strife, eagerness to contend. Only here in the N.T.
Greatest [meizōn]. Common use of the comparative as superlative.
22:25 Have lordship over [kurieuousin]. From [kurios]. Common
verb, to lord it over. Benefactors [euergetai]. From [eu] and
[ergon]. Doer of good. Old word. Here only in the N.T. Latin Benefactor is
exact equivalent.
22:26 Become [ginesthō]. Present middle imperative
of [ginomai]. Act so. True greatness is in service, not in rank.
22:27 But I [Egō de]. Jesus dares to cite his own
conduct, though their leader, to prove his point and to put a stop to their jealous
contention for the chief place at this very feast, a wrangling that kept up till
Jesus had to arise and give them the object lesson of humility by washing their
feet (Joh 13:1-20).
22:28 In my temptations [en tois peirasmois mou].
Probably “trials” is better here as in Jas 1:2 though temptations clearly in Jas 1:13ff. This is the tragedy of the situation when Jesus is facing the
Cross with the traitor at the table and the rest chiefly concerned about their own
primacy and dignity.
22:29 And I appoint unto you [k’agō diatithēmai humin].
They had on the whole been loyal and so Jesus passes on to them [diathēmai]
verb from which [diathēkē] comes).
22:30 And ye shall sit [kathēsesthe]. But Westcott
and Hort read in the text [kathēsthe] (present middle subjunctive with [hina].
The picture seems to be that given in Mt 19:28 when Jesus replied to Peter’s inquiry. It is not clear how literally
this imagery is to be taken. But there is the promise of honour for the loyal among
these in the end.
22:31 Asked to have you [exēitēsato]. First aorist
indirect middle indicative of [exaiteō], an old verb to beg something of
one and (middle) for oneself. Only here in the N.T. The verb is used either
in the good or the bad sense, but it does not mean here “obtained by asking” as
margin in Revised Version has it. That he might sift you [tou siniasai].
Genitive articular infinitive of purpose. First aorist active infinitive of [siniazō],
to shake a sieve, to sift, from [sinion], a winnowing fan. Later word. Here
only in the N.T.
22:32 That thy faith fail not [hina mē eklipēi he pistis
mou]. Second aorist active subjunctive of purpose with [hina] after [edeēthēn]
(I prayed) of [ekleipō], old verb. Our word eclipse is this
word. Evidently Jesus could not keep Satan from attacking Peter. He had already
captured Judas. Did he not repeatedly attack Jesus? But he could and did pray for
Peter’s faith and his praying won in the end, though Peter stumbled and fell.
And do thou [kai su]. The words single out Peter sharply. Once thou
hast turned again [pote epistrepsas]. First aorist active participle
of [epistrephō], common verb to turn to, to return. But the use of this word
implied that Peter would fall though he would come back and “strengthen thy brethren.”
22:33 To prison and to death [eis phulakēn kai eis thanaton].
Evidently Peter was not flattered by the need of Christ’s earnest prayers for his
welfare and loyalty. Hence this loud boast.
22:34 Until thou shalt thrice deny that thou knowest me
[heōs tris me aparnēsēi eidenai]. “Thrice” is in all four Gospels here for
they all give this warning to Peter (Mr 14:30; Mt 26:34; Lu 22:34; Joh 18:38).
Peter will even deny knowing Jesus [eidenai].
22:35 Without purse [ater ballantiou]. Money bag
or purse. Old word, but in the N.T. only in Luke (10:4; 12:33;
22:35ff.).
Wallet [pēras]. See on Mt 10:10). Lacked ye anything [mē
tinos husterēsate;]. Answer No expected [outhenos] below). Ablative
case after [hustereō].
22:36 Buy a sword [agorasatō machairan]. This is
for defence clearly. The reference is to the special mission in Galilee (Lu
9:1-6; Mr 6:6-13; Mt 9:35-11:1. They are to expect persecution and bitter
hostility (Joh 15:18-21). Jesus does not mean that his disciples
are to repel force by force, but that they are to be ready to defend his cause against
attack. Changed conditions bring changed needs. This language can be misunderstood
as it was then.
22:38 Lord, behold, here are two swords [kurie idou
machairai hōde duo]. They took his words literally. And before this very night
is over Peter will use one of these very swords to try to cut off the head of Malchus
only to be sternly rebuked by Jesus (Mr 14:47; Mt 26:51f.; Lu 22:50f.;
Joh 18:10f.). Then Jesus will say: “For all that take the sword shall perish
with the sword” (Mt 26:52). Clearly Jesus did not mean his language
even about the sword to be pressed too literally. So he said: “It is enough” [Hikanon
estin]. It is with sad irony and sorrow that Jesus thus dismisses the subject.
They were in no humour now to understand the various sides of this complicated problem.
Every preacher and teacher understands this mood, not of impatience, but of closing
the subject for the present.
22:39 As his custom was [kata to ethos]. According
to the custom (of him). It was because Judas knew the habit of Jesus of
going to Gethsemane at night that he undertook to betray him without waiting for
the crowd to go home after the feast.
22:40 At the place [epi tou topou]. The place of
secret prayer which was dear to Jesus. Pray that ye enter not into temptation
[proseuchesthe mē eiselthein eis peirasmon]. “Keep on praying not to enter
(ingressive aorist infinitive, not even once) into temptation.” It is real
“temptation” here, not just “trial.” Jesus knew the power of temptation and the
need of prayer. These words throw a light on the meaning of his language in Mt 6:13. Jesus repeats this warning in
verse 46.
22:41 About a stone’s throw [hōsei lithou bolēn].
Accusative of extent of space. Luke does not tell of leaving eight disciples by
the entrance to Gethsemane nor about taking Peter, James, and John further in with
him. Kneeled down [theis ta gonata]. Second aorist active participle
from [tithēmi]. Mr 14:35 says “fell on the ground” and Mt 26:39 “fell on his face.” All could be true at different moments. Prayed
[prosēucheto]. Imperfect middle, was praying, kept on praying.
22:42 If thou be willing [ei boulei]. This condition
is in the first petition at the start. Be done [ginesthō]. Present
middle imperative, keep on being done, the Father’s will.
22:43 An angel [aggelos]. The angels visited Jesus
at the close of the three temptations at the beginning of his ministry (Mt
4:11). Here the angel comes during the conflict.
22:44 In an agony [en agōniāi]. It was conflict,
contest from [agōn]. An old word, but only here in the N.T. Satan pressed
Jesus harder than ever before. As it were great drops of blood [hōsei
thromboi haimatos]. Thick, clotted blood. An old word [thromboi] common
in medical works, but here only in the N.T. This passage (verses 43, 44) is absent from some ancient documents. Aristotle speaks of
a bloody sweat as does Theophrastus.
22:45 Sleeping for sorrow [koimōmenous apo tēs lupēs].
Luke does not tell of the three turnings of Jesus to the trusted three for human
sympathy.
22:46 Why sleep ye? [Ti katheudete;]. This reproach
Luke gives, but not the almost bitter details in Mr 14:37-42; Mt 26:40-46).
22:47 Went before them [proērcheto]. Imperfect middle.
Judas was leading the band for he knew the place well (Joh 18:2).
22:48 With a kiss [philēmati]. Instrumental case.
Jesus challenges the act of Judas openly and calls it betrayal, but it did not stop
him.
22:49 What would follow [to esomenon]. Article and
the future middle participle of [eimi], to be. Shall we smite with a sword?
[ei pataxomen en machairēi;]. Note [ei] in a direct question like
the Hebrew. Luke alone gives this question. Instrumental use of [en]. They
had the two swords already mentioned (22:38).
22:50 His right ear [to ous autou to dexion]. Mark 14:47; Mt 26:51 do not mention “right,” but Luke the Physician does. Joh 18:10 follows Luke in this item and also adds the names of Peter and
of Malchus since probably both were dead by that time and Peter would not be involved
in trouble.
22:51 Suffer us thus far [eāte heōs toutou]. Present
active imperative of [eaō], to allow. But the meaning is not clear. If addressed
to Peter and the other disciples it means that they are to suffer this much of violence
against Jesus. This is probably the idea. If it is addressed to the crowd, it means
that they are to excuse Peter for his rash act. He touched his ear and healed
him [hapsamenos tou otiou iasato auton]. Whether Jesus picked up the
piece of the ear and put it back is not said. He could have healed the wound without
that. This miracle of surgery is given alone by Luke.
22:52 As against a robber? [hōs epi lēistēn;]. They
were treating Jesus as if he were a bandit like Barabbas.
22:53 But this is your hour [all’ hautē estin humōn
hē hōra]. So Jesus surrenders. The moral value of his atoning sacrifice on the
Cross consists in the voluntariness of his death. He makes it clear that they have
taken undue advantage of him in this hour of secret prayer and had failed to seize
him in public in the temple. But “the power of darkness” [hē exousia tou skotous],
had its turn. A better day will come. The might, authority of darkness.
22:54 Into the high priest’s house [eis tēn oikian tou
archiereōs]. Luke alone mentions “the house.” Though it is implied in Mr 14:53; Mt 26:57. Followed [ēkolouthei]. Imperfect, was following,
as Mt 26:58; Joh 18:15. Curiously Mr 14:54 has the aorist.
22:55 When they had kindled a fire [periapsantōn pur].
Genitive absolute, first aorist active participle of [periaptō], an old verb,
but here only in the N.T. Kindle around, make a good fire that blazes all over.
It was April and cool at night. The servants made the fire. And had sat down
together [kai sunkathisantōn]. Genitive absolute again. Note [sun-]
(together), all had taken seats around the fire. Peter sat in the midst
of them [ekathēto ho Petros mesos autōn]. Imperfect tense, he was sitting,
and note [mesos], nominative predicate adjective with the genitive, like Joh 1:26, good Greek idiom.
22:56 In the light [pros to phōs]. Facing [pros]
the light, for the fire gave light as well as heat. Mr 14:65 has “warming himself in the light,” John (Joh 18:18,25)
“warming himself.” Looking steadfastly [atenisasa]. Favourite word
in Luke (4:20, etc.) for gazing steadily at one. This man also
[kai houtos]. As if pointing to Peter and talking about him. The other Gospels
(Mr 14:67; Mt 26:69; Joh 18:25) make a direct address to Peter. Both
could be true, as she turned to Peter.
22:57 I know him not [ouk oida auton]. Just as Jesus
had predicted that he would do (Lu 22:34).
22:58 After a little while another [meta brachu heteros]. Mt 26:71 makes it after Peter had gone out into the porch and mentions a
maid as speaking as does Mr 14:69, while here the “other” [heteros] is a man (masculine gender).
It is almost impossible to co-ordinate the three denials in the four accounts unless
we conceive of several joining in when one led off. This time Peter’s denial is
very blunt, “I am not.”
22:59 After the space of about one hour [diastasēs hōsei
hōras mias]. Genitive absolute with second aorist active participle feminine
singular of [diistēmi]. This classical verb in the N.T. is used only by Luke
(22:59; 24:51; Ac 27:28). It means standing in two or apart, about
an hour intervening. Confidently affirmed [diischurizeto]. Imperfect
middle, he kept affirming strongly. An old verb [dia, ischurizomai], to make
oneself strong, to make emphatic declaration. In the N.T. only here and Ac 12:15. For he is a Galilean [kai gar Galilaios estin]. Mt 26:73 makes it plain that it was his speech that gave him away, which
see.
22:60 I know not what thou sayest [ouk oida ho legeis].
Each denial tangles Peter more and more. While he yet spake [eti lalountos
autou]. Genitive absolute. Peter could hear the crowing all right.
22:61 The Lord turned [strapheis ho kurios]. Second
aorist passive participle of [strephō], coming verb. Graphic picture drawn
by Luke alone. Looked upon Peter [eneblepsen tōi Petrōi]. Ingressive
aorist active indicative of [enblepō], an old and vivid verb, to glance at.
Remembered [hupemnēsthē]. First aorist passive indicative of [hupomimnēskō],
common verb to remind one of something [hupo] giving a suggestion or hint).
The cock crowing and the look brought swiftly back to Peter’s mind the prophecy
of Jesus and his sad denials. The mystery is how he had forgotten that warning.
22:62 And he went out and wept bitterly [kai exelthōn
exō eklausen pikrōs]. A few old Latin documents omit this verse which is genuine
in Mt 26:75. It may be an insertion here from there, but the evidence for the
rejection is too slight. It is the ingressive aorist [eklausen], he burst
into tears. “Bitter” is a common expression for tears in all languages and in all
hearts.
22:63 That held [hoi sunechontes]. See on 8:45;
19:43 for this verb [sunechō]. Here alone in the N.T. for holding a prisoner
(holding together). The servants or soldiers, not the Sanhedrin. Mocked
[enepaizon]. Imperfect active, were mocking, inchoative, began to mock, to
play like boys. And beat him [derontes]. Present active participle
of [derō], to flay, tan, or hide. Literally, “beating.”
22:64 Blindfolded [perikalupsantes]. First aorist
active participle of [perikaluptō], old verb, to put a veil around. In the
N.T. only here and Mr 14:65. See Mr 14:65; Mt 26:67f. for further discussion.
22:65 Many other things [hetera polla]. These are
just samples.
22:66 As soon as it was day [hōs egeneto hēmera]. Mr 15:1 (Mt 27:1)
has “morning.” The assembly of the people
[to presbuterion tou laou]. The technical word for “the eldership” (from
[presbuteros], an old man or elder) or group of the elders composing
the Sanhedrin. The word occurs in the LXX for the Sanhedrin. In the N.T. occurs
only here and Ac 22:5 of the Sanhedrin. In 1Ti 4:14 Paul uses it of the elders in a church (or churches). The
Sanhedrin was composed of the elders and scribes and chief priests (Mr 15:1)
and all three groups are at this meeting. Luke’s language (both chief priests and
scribes, [te . . . kai] seems to apply the word [presbuterion] to the
whole Sanhedrin. Sadducees (chief priests) and Pharisees (scribes)
were nearly equally represented. Into their council [eis to sunedrion
autōn]. The place of the gathering is not given, but Jesus was led into the
council chamber.
22:67 If thou art the Christ [Ei su ei ho Christos].
The Messiah, they mean. The condition is the first class, assuming it to be true.
If I tell you [Ean humin eipō]. Condition of the third class, undetermined,
but with likelihood of being determined. This is the second appearance of Jesus
before the Sanhedrin merely mentioned by Mr 15:1; Mt 27:1 who give in detail the first appearance and trial. Luke
merely gives this so-called ratification meeting after daybreak to give the appearance
of legality to their vote of condemnation already taken (Mr 14:64; Mt 26:66).
Ye will not believe (ou mē pisteusēte]. Double negative with the aorist
subjunctive, strongest possible negative. So as to verse 68.
22:69 The Son of man [ho huios tou anthrōpou]. Jesus
really answers their demand about “the Messiah” by asserting that he is “the Son
of man” and they so understand him. He makes claims of equality with God also which
they take up.
22:70 Art thou the Son of God? [Su oun ei ho huios tou
theou;]. Note how these three epithets are used as practical equivalents. They
ask about “the Messiah.” Jesus affirms that he is the Son of Man and will sit at
the right hand of the power of God. They take this to be a claim to be the Son of
God (both humanity and deity). Jesus accepts the challenge and admits that
he claims to be all three (Messiah, the Son of man, the Son of God).
Ye say [Humeis legete]. Just a Greek idiom for “Yes” (compare “I am”
in Mr 14:62 with “Thou has said” in Mt 26:64).
22:71 For we ourselves have heard [autoi gar ēkousamen].
They were right if Jesus is not what he claimed to be. They were eternally wrong
for he is the Christ, the Son of man, the Son of God. They made their choice and
must face Christ as Judge.
Chapter 23
23:1 The whole company [hapan to plēthos]. All but Nicodemus and
Joseph of Arimathea who were probably not invited to this meeting.
23:2 Began to accuse [ērxanto katēgorein]. They
went at it and kept it up. Luke mentions three, but neither of them includes their
real reason nor do they mention their own condemnation of Jesus. They had indulged
their hatred in doing it, but they no longer have the power of life and death. Hence
they say nothing to Pilate of that. We found [heuramen]. Second aorist
active indicative with first aorist vowel [a]. Probably they mean that they
had caught Jesus in the act of doing these things (in flagrante delicto)
rather than discovery by formal trial. Perverting our nation [diastrephonta
to ethnos hēmōn]. Present active participle of [diastrephō], old verb
to turn this way and that, distort, disturb. In the N.T. only here and Ac 13:10). The Sanhedrin imply that the great popularity of Jesus was seditious.
Forbidding to give tribute to Caesar, [kōluonta phorous kaisari didonai].
Note object infinitive [didonai] after the participle [kōluonta]. Literally,
hindering giving tribute to Caesar. This was a flat untruth. Their bright young
students had tried desperately to get Jesus to say this very thing, but they had
failed utterly (Lu 20:25). Saying that he himself is Christ a
king [legonta hauton Christon basilea einai]. Note the indirect discourse
here after the participle [legonta] with the accusative [hauton] where
[auton] could have been used), and the infinitive. This charge is
true, but not in the sense meant by them. Jesus did claim to be the Christ and the
king of the kingdom of God. But the Sanhedrin wanted Pilate to think that he set
himself up as a rival to Caesar. Pilate would understand little from the word “Christ,”
but “King” was a different matter. He was compelled to take notice of this charge
else he himself would be accused to Caesar of winking at such a claim by Jesus.
23:3 Thou sayest [su legeis]. A real affirmative
as in 22:70). The Gospels all give Pilate’s question about Jesus asking of the Jews
in precisely the same words (Mr 15:2; Mt 27:11; Lu 23:3; Joh 18:33).
23:4 The multitude [tous ochlous]. The first mention
of them. It is now after daybreak. The procession of the Sanhedrin would draw a
crowd (Plummer) and some may have come to ask for the release of a prisoner
(Mr 15:8). There was need of haste if the condemnation went through
before friends of Jesus came. I find no fault [ouden heuriskō aition].
In the N.T. Luke alone uses this old adjective [aitios] (Lu 23:4,14,22;
Ac 19:40) except Heb. 5:9. It means one who is the author, the cause of or responsible for
anything. Luke does not give the explanation of this sudden decision of Pilate that
Jesus is innocent. Evidently he held a careful examination before he delivered his
judgment on the case. That conversation is given in Joh 18:33-38. Pilate took Jesus inside the palace from the upper gallery
(Joh 18:33) and then came out and rendered his decision to the Sanhedrin
(Joh 18:38) who would not go into the palace of Pilate (Joh
18:28).
23:5 But they were the more urgent [hoi de epischuon].
Imperfect active of [epischuō], to give added [epi] strength [ischuō].
And they kept insisting. Evidently Pilate had taken the thing too lightly. He
stirred up the people [anaseiei ton laon]. This compound is rare, though
old (Thucydides), to shake up (back and forth). This is a more vigorous
repetition of the first charge (verse 2, “perverting our nation”). Beginning from Galilee [arxamenos
apo tēs Galilaias]. These very words occur in the address of Peter to the group
in the house of Cornelius (Ac 10:37). The idiomatic use of [arxamenos]
appears also in Ac 1:22. Galilee (Grote) was the mother of seditious men (see Josephus).
23:6 A Galilean [Galilaios]. If so, here was a way
out for Herod without going back on his own decision.
23:7 When he knew [epignous]. Second aorist active
participle from [epiginōskō], having gained full [epi], added knowledge).
Of Herod’s jurisdiction [ek tēs exousias Hērōidou]. Herod was naturally
jealous of any encroachment by Pilate, the Roman Procurator of Judea. So here was
a chance to respect the prerogative [exousia] of Herod and get rid of this
troublesome case also. Sent him up [anepempsen]. First aorist active
indicative of [anapempō]. This common verb is used of sending back as in verse 11 or of sending up to a higher court as of Paul to Caesar (Ac 25:21).
Who himself also was [onta kai auton]. Being also himself in Jerusalem.
Present active participle of [eimi].
23:8 Was exceeding glad [echarē lian]. Second aorist
passive indicative of [chairō], ingressive aorist, became glad. Of a long
time [ex hikanōn chronōn]. For this idiom see 8:27;
20:9; Ac 8:11. He hoped [ēlpizen]. Imperfect active.
He was still hoping. He had long ago gotten over his fright that Jesus was John
the Baptist come to life again (9:7-9). Done [ginomenon].
Present middle participle. He wanted to see a miracle happening like a stunt of
a sleight-of-hand performer.
23:9 He questioned [epērōtā]. Imperfect active,
kept on questioning. In many words [en logois hikanois]. Same use
of [hikanos] as in verse 8.
23:10 Stood [histēkeisan]. Second perfect active
intransitive of [histēmi] with sense of imperfect. They stood by while Herod
quizzed Jesus and when he refused to answer, they broke loose with their accusations
like a pack of hounds with full voice [eutonōs], adverb from adjective [eutonos],
from [eu], well, and [teinō], to stretch, well tuned). Old
word, but in the N.T. only here and Ac 18:28.
23:11 Set him at nought [exouthenēsas]. First aorist
active participle from [exoutheneō], to count as nothing, to treat with utter
contempt, as zero. Arraying him in gorgeous apparel [peribalōn esthēta
lampran]. Second aorist active participle of [periballō], to fling around
one. [Lampran] is brilliant, shining as in Jas 2:2, so different from the modest dress of the Master. This was part
of the shame.
23:12 For before they were at enmity between themselves
[proupērchon gar en echthrāi ontes pros heautous]. A periphrastic imperfect
of the double compound [prouperchō], an old verb, to exist [huparchō]
previously [pro-], here alone in the N.T., with [ontes] (participle
of [eimi] added.
23:13 Called together [sunkalesamenos]. First aorist
middle participle (to himself). Pilate included “the people” in the hope
that Jesus might have some friends among them.
23:14 As one that perverteth the people [hōs apostrephonta
ton laon]. Pilate here condenses the three charges in verse 2 into one (Plummer). He uses a more common compound of [strephō]
here, [apostrephō], to turn away from, to seduce, to mislead, whereas [diastrephō]
in verse 2 has more the notion of disturbing (turning this way and that).
Note the use of [hōs] with the particle, the alleged reason. Pilate understands
the charge against Jesus to be that he is a revolutionary agitator and a dangerous
rival to Caesar, treason in plain words. Having examined him before you [enōpion
humōn anakrinas]. Right before your eyes I have given him a careful examination
[ana] up and down, [krinō], to judge, sift. Old and common verb in
the general sense and in the forensic sense as here and which Luke alone has in
the N.T. (Lu 23:14; 4:9; 12:19; 28:18; Ac 24:8) except 1Co 9:3. Whereof [hōn]. Attraction of the relative [ha]
to the case (genitive) of the unexpressed antecedent [toutōn].
23:15 No nor yet [all’ oude]. But not even. Hath
been done by him [estin pepragmenon autōi]. Periphrastic perfect passive
indicative of [prassō], common verb, to do. The case of [autōi] can
be regarded as either the dative or the instrumental (Robertson, Grammar,
pp. 534, 542).
23:16 Chastise [paideusas]. First aorist active
participle of [paideuō], to train a child [pais], and then, as a part
of the training, punishment. Our English word chasten is from the Latin castus,
pure, chaste, and means to purify (cf. Heb 12:6f.). Perhaps Pilate may have split a hair over the word as
Wycliff puts it: “I shall deliver him amended.” But, if Jesus was innocent, Pilate
had no doubt to “chastise” him to satisfy a mob. Verse 17
is omitted by Westcott and Hort as from Mr 15:6; Mt 27:15.
23:18 All together [panplēthei]. An adverb from
the adjective [panplēthēs], all together. Used by Dio Cassius. Only here
in the N.T. Away [aire]. Present active imperative, Take him on away
and keep him away as in Ac 21:36; 22:22, of Paul. But release [apoluson] is first aorist
active imperative, do it now and at once.
23:19 Insurrection [stasin]. An old word for sedition,
standing off, the very charge made against Jesus (and untrue). If Jesus
had raised insurrection against Caesar, these accusers would have rallied to his
standard. And for murder [kai phonon]. They cared nought for this.
In fact, the murderer was counted a hero like bandits and gangsters today with some
sentimentalists. Was cast [ēn blētheis]. Periphrastic aorist passive
indicative of [ballō], a quite unusual form.
23:21 But they shouted [hoi de epephōnoun]. Imperfect
active of [epiphōneō], to call to. Old verb and a verb pertinent here. They
kept on yelling. Crucify, crucify [staurou, staurou]. Present active
imperative. Go on with the crucifixion. Mr 15:13 has [staurōson] (first aorist active imperative),
do it now and be done with it. No doubt some shouted one form, some another.
23:22 Why, what evil? [Ti gar kakon;]. Note this
use of [gar] (explanatory and argumentative combined).
23:23 But they were instant [hoi de epekeinto].
Imperfect middle of [epikeimai], an old verb for the rush and swirl of a
tempest. With loud voices [phōnais megalais]. Instrumental case. Poor
Pilate was overwhelmed by this tornado. Prevailed [katischuon]. Imperfect
active of [katischuō] (see Mt 16:18; Lu 21:36). The tempest Pilate had invited
(23:13).
23:24 Gave sentence [epekrinen]. Pronounced the
final sentence. The usual verb for the final decision. Only here in the N.T.
23:25 Whom they asked for [hon ēitounto]. Imperfect
middle, for whom they had been asking for themselves. Luke repeats that Barabbas
was in prison “for insurrection and murder.” To their will [tōi thelēmati
autōn]. This is mob law by the judge who surrenders his own power and justice
to the clamour of the crowd.
23:26 They laid hold [epilabomenoi]. Second aorist
middle participle of the common verb [epilambanō]. The soldiers had no scruples
about taking hold of any one of themselves (middle voice). Mr 15:21; Lu 27:32 use the technical word for this process [aggareuō],
which see for discussion and also about Cyrene. Laid on him [epethēkan].
[K] first aorist of [epitithēmi]. To bear it [pherein].
Present infinitive, to go on bearing.
23:27 Followed [ēkolouthei]. Imperfect active, was
following. Verses 27-32 are peculiar to Luke. Bewailed [ekoptonto]. Imperfect
middle of [koptō], to cut, smite, old and common verb. Direct middle, they
were smiting themselves on the breast. “In the Gospels there is no instance of a
woman being hostile to Christ” (Plummer). Luke’s Gospel is appropriately
called the Gospel of Womanhood (1:39-56; 2:36-38;
7:11-15, 37-50; 8:1-3;
10:38-42; 11:27; 13:11-16). Lamented [ethrēnoun]. Imperfect
active of [thrēneō], old verb from [threomai], to cry aloud, lament.
23:28 Turning [strapheis]. Luke is fond of this
second aorist passive participle of [strephō] (7:9, 44, 55; 10:23).
If he had been still carrying the Cross, he could not have made this dramatic gesture.
Weep not [mē klaiete]. Present active imperative with [mē],
Stop weeping.
23:29 Blessed [makariai]. A beatitude to the barren,
the opposite of the hopes of Jewish mothers. Childless women are commiserated (1:25, 36).
To the hills [tois bounois]. A Cyrenaic word. In the N.T. only here
and 3:5. Quotation from Ho 10:8.
23:31 In the green tree [en hugrōi xulōi]. Green
wood is hard to burn and so is used for the innocent. In the dry [en tōi
xērōi]. Dry wood kindles easily and is a symbol for the guilty. This common
proverb has various applications. Here the point is that if they can put Jesus to
death, being who he is, what will happen to Jerusalem when its day of judgment comes?
What shall be done [ti genētai]. Deliberative subjunctive.
23:32 Were led (ēgonto). Imperfect passive of [agō],
were being led. Malefactors [kakourgoi]. Evil [kakon], doers
(work, [ergon]. Old word, but in the N.T. only in this passage (32, 33, 39)
and 2Ti 2:9. Luke does not call them “robbers” like Mr 15:27; Mt 27:38,44. To be put to death [anairethēnai]. First
aorist passive infinitive of [anaireō], old verb, to take up, to take away,
to kill.
23:33 The skull [to kranion]. Probably because it
looked like a skull. See on Mt 27:33; Mr 15:22. There they crucified him
[ekei estaurōsan]. There between the two robbers and on the very cross on
which Barabbas, the leader of the robber band, was to have been crucified. One
[hon men], the other [hon de]. Common idiom of contrast with
this old demonstrative [hos] and [men] and [de].
23:34 Father forgive them [Pater, aphes autois].
Second aorist active imperative of [aphiēmi], with dative case. Some of the
oldest and best documents do not contain this verse, and yet, while it is not certain
that it is a part of Luke’s Gospel, it is certain that Jesus spoke these words,
for they are utterly unlike any one else. Jesus evidently is praying for the Roman
soldiers, who were only obeying, but not for the Sanhedrin. Cast lots [ebalon
klēron]. Second aorist active indicative of [ballō]. See Mr 15:24; Mt 27:35.
Joh 19:23f. shows how the lot was cast for the seamless garment, the four
soldiers dividing the other garments.
23:35 The people stood beholding [histēkei]. Past
perfect active of [histēmi], intransitive and like imperfect. A graphic picture
of the dazed multitude, some of whom may have been in the Triumphal Entry on Sunday
morning. Scoffed [exemuktērizon]. Imperfect active, perhaps inchoative,
began to turn up (out, [ex] at the dying Christ. The language comes from Ps 22:7. The Christ of God [ho Christos tou theou]. He had
claimed to be just this (22:67, 70). The sarcastic sneer (he saved
others; let him save others, for himself he cannot save) is in Mr 15:31; Mt 27:42. Luke alone gives the contemptuous use of [houtos]
(this fellow) and the fling in “the elect” [ho eklektos]. These rulers
were having their day at last.
23:36 Mocked [enepaixan]. Even the soldiers yielded
to the spell and acted like boys in their jeers. Aorist tense here and different
verb also from that used of the rulers. They were not so bitter and persistent.
23:37 If [ei]. Condition of the first class as is
text in verse 35 used by the rulers. The soldiers pick out “the king of the Jews” as the
point of their sneer, the point on which Jesus was condemned. But both soldiers
and rulers fail to understand that Jesus could not save himself if he was to save
others.
23:38 A superscription [epigraphē]. Mr 15:26 has “the superscription of his accusation”
Mt 27:37, “his accusation,” Joh 19:19 “a title.” But they all refer to the charge written at the top
on the cross giving, as was the custom, the accusation on which the criminal was
condemned, with his name and residence. Put all the reports together and we have:
This is Jesus of Nazareth the King of the Jews. This full title appeared in Latin
for law, in Aramaic for the Jews, in Greek for everybody (Joh 19:20).
23:39 Railed [eblasphēmei]. Imperfect active, implying
that he kept it up. His question formally calls for an affirmative answer [ouchi],
but the ridicule is in his own answer: “Save thyself and us.” It was on a level
with an effort to break prison. Luke alone gives this incident (39-43),
though Mr 15:32; Mt 27:44 allude to it.
23:40 Rebuking [epitimōn]. From what Mark and Matthew
say both robbers sneered at Jesus at first, but this one came to himself and turned
on his fellow robber in a rage. Dost thou not even fear God? [Oude phobēi
ton theon;]. [Oude] here goes with the verb. [Phobēi] (second
person singular present indicative middle of [phobeomai]. Both of you will
soon appear before God. Jesus has nothing to answer for and you have added this
to your other sins.)
23:41 Nothing amiss [ouden atopon]. Nothing out
of place [a] privative, [topos], place). Old word, three times
in the N.T. (Lu 23:44; Ac 28:6; 2Th 3:2). This can only mean that
this robber accepts the claims of Jesus to be true. He is dying for claiming to
be Messiah, as he is.
23:42 In thy kingdom [eis tēn basileian sou], text
of Westcott and Hort or [en tei basileiāi sou], margin). Probably
no difference in sense is to be found, for [eis] and [en] are essentially
the same preposition. He refers to the Messianic rule of Jesus and begs that Jesus
will remember him. It is not clear whether he hopes for immediate blessing or only
at the judgment.
23:43 Today shalt thou be with me in Paradise [Sēmeron
met’ emou esēi en tōi paradeisōi]. However crude may have been the robber’s
Messianic ideas Jesus clears the path for him. He promises him immediate and conscious
fellowship after death with Christ in Paradise which is a Persian word and is used
here not for any supposed intermediate state; but the very bliss of heaven itself.
This Persian word was used for an enclosed park or pleasure ground (so Xenophon).
The word occurs in two other passages in the N.T. (2Co 12:4; Re 2:7),
in both of which the reference is plainly to heaven. Some Jews did use the word
for the abode of the pious dead till the resurrection, interpreting “Abraham’s bosom”
(Lu 16:22f.) in this sense also. But the evidence for such an intermediate
state is too weak to warrant belief in it.
23:45 The sun’s light failing [tou hēliou ekleipontos].
Genitive absolute of the present active participle of [ekleipō], an old verb,
to leave out, omit, pass by, to fail, to die. The word was used also of the eclipse
of the sun or moon. But this was impossible at this time because the moon was full
at the passover. Hence many documents change this correct text to “the sun was darkened”
[eskotisthē ho hēlios] to obviate the difficulty about the technical eclipse.
But the sun can be darkened in other ways. In a London fog at noon the street lights
are often turned on. The Revised Version translates it correctly, “the sun’s light
failing.” Leave the darkness unexplained. In the midst [meson]. In
the middle. Mr 15:38; Mt 27:51 have “in two” [eis duo].
23:46 Father [Pater]. Jesus dies with the words
of Ps 31:5 on his lips. Gave up the ghost [exepneusen]. First
aorist active indicative of [ekpneō], to breathe out, to expire, old word,
but in the N.T. only here and Mr 15:37,39. There is no special reason for retaining “ghost” in the English
as both Mt 27:50 (yielded up his spirit, [aphēken to pneuma] and Joh 19:30 (gave up his spirit, [paredōken to pneuma] use [pneuma]
which is the root of [ekpneō], the verb in Mark and Luke.
23:47 Glorified [edoxazen]. Imperfect active. Began
to glorify (inchoative) or kept on glorifying.
23:48 Certainly [ontōs]. Really, old adverb from
the participle [on] from [eimi], to be. Used also in 24:34 of the resurrection of Jesus. A righteous man [dikaios].
Mr 15:39 (Mt 27:54) which see, represents the centurion as
saying [theou huios] (God’s Son) which may mean to him little more
than “righteous man.” That came together [sunparagenomenoi]. Double
compound [sun], together, [para], along), that came along
together. To this sight [epi tēn theōrian tautēn]. This spectacle
[theōrian] from [theōreō], verse 35). Returned [hupestrephon]. Imperfect active of [hupostrephō]. See
them slowly wending their way back to the city from this Tragedy of the Ages which
they had witnessed in awe.
23:49 Stood afar off [histēkeisan apo makrothen].
Same verb as in verse 35. Melancholy picture of the inner circle of the acquaintances of Jesus
and the faithful band of women from Galilee. Seeing these things [horōsai
tauta]. And helpless either to prevent them or to understand them. They could
only stand and look with blinded eyes.
23:51 He had not consented to their counsel and deed [houtos
ouk ēn sunkatatetheimenos tēi boulēi kai tēi praxei autōn]. This parenthesis
is given by Luke alone and explains that, though a councillor [bouleutēs], Mr 5:43) he had not agreed to the vote of the Sanhedrin. It is fairly
certain that both Joseph and Nicodemus were suspected of sympathy with Jesus and
so were not invited to the trial of Jesus. Was looking for [prosedecheto].
Imperfect middle. Mr 15:43 has the periphrastic imperfect [ēn prosdechomenos].
23:52 Asked for [ēitēsato]. First aorist middle
(indirect) indicative as in Mr 15:43; Mt 27:58. The middle voice shows that Joseph of Arimathea asked
the body of Jesus as a personal favour.
23:53 Took it down [kathelōn]. Second aorist active
participle of [kathaireō] as in Mr 15:46. Wrapped [enetulixen], as in Mt 27:59 where Mr 15:46 has [eneilēsen] (wound), which see. Joh 19:40 has “bound” [edēsan]. See Matt. and Mark also for the linen
cloth [sindoni]. Hewn in stone [laxeutōi]. From [laxeuō]
[las], a stone, [xeō], to polish). In the LXX and here only
in the N.T. Nowhere else so far as known. See the usual Greek verb [latomeō]
in Mr 15:46; Mt 27:60). Where never man had yet lain [hou ouk en oudeis
oupō keimenos]. Triple negative and periphrastic past perfect passive in sense
[keimai], though periphrastic imperfect passive in form. Same item in Joh 19:40 who uses [ēn tetheimenos] (periphrastic past perfect passive
in form).
23:54 The day of the Preparation [hēmera paraskeuēs].
The technical Jewish phrase for the day before the sabbath for which see discussion
on Mt 27:62. Drew on [epephōsken]. Imperfect active, began to dawn
or give light. However, it was sundown, not sunrise when the Jewish sabbath (twenty-four-hour
day) began. The confusion is to us, not to the Jews or the readers of the
Greek New Testament. Luke is not speaking of the twelve-hour day which began with
sunrise, but the twenty-four-hour day which began with sunset.
23:55 Had come with him [ēsan sunelēluthuiai]. Periphrastic
past perfect active of [sunerchomai]. Followed after [katakolouthēsasai].
Aorist active participle of [katakoloutheō], an old verb, but in the N.T.
only here and Ac 16:17. It is possible that they followed after Joseph and Nicodemus so
that they “beheld the tomb,” [etheasanto to mnēmeion], and also “how his
body was laid” [hōs etethē to sōma autou]. First aorist passive indicative
of [tithēmi]. They may in fact, have witnessed the silent burial from a distance.
The Syriac Sinaitic and the Syriac Curetonian give it thus: “and the women, who
came with Him from Galilee went to the sepulchre in their footsteps, and saw the
body when they had brought it in there.” At any rate the women saw “that” and “how”
the body of Jesus was laid in this new tomb of Joseph in the rocks.
23:56 On the sabbath they rested [to sabbaton hēsuchasan].
They returned and prepared spices before the sabbath began. Then they rested all
during the sabbath (accusative of extent of time, [to sabbaton].
Chapter 24
24:1 At early dawn [orthrou batheos]. Genitive of time. Literally,
at deep dawn. The adjective [bathus] (deep) was often used of time. This
very idiom occurs in Aristophanes, Plato, et cetera. Joh 20:1 adds “while it was yet dark.” That is, when they started, for the
sun was risen when they arrived (Mr 16:2). Which they had prepared
[ha hētoimasan]. Mr 16:1 notes that they bought other spices after the sabbath was over besides
those which they already had (Lu 23:56).
24:2 Rolled away [apokekulismenon]. Perfect passive
participle of [apokuliō], late verb and in the N.T. only in this context
(Mr 16:3; Mt 28:2) while Joh 20:1 has [ērmenon] (taken away).
24:3 Of the Lord Jesus [tou kuriou Iēsou]. The Western
family of documents does not have these words and Westcott and Hort bracket them
as Western non-interpolations. There are numerous instances of this shorter Western
text in this chapter. For a discussion of the subject see my Introduction to
the Textual Criticism of the New Testament, pp. 225-237. This precise combination
(the Lord Jesus) is common in the Acts, but nowhere else in the Gospels.
24:4 While they were perplexed thereabout [en tōi aporeisthai
autas peri toutou]. Luke’s common Hebraistic idiom, [en] with the articular
infinitive (present passive [aporeisthai] from [aporeō], to lose one’s
way) and the accusative of general reference. Two men [andres duo].
Men, not women. Mr 16:5 speaks of a young man [neaniskon] while Mt 28:5 has “an angel.” We need not try to reconcile these varying accounts
which agree in the main thing. The angel looked like a man and some remembered two.
In verse 23 Cleopas and his companion call them “angels.” Stood by [epestēsan].
Second aorist active indicative of [ephistēmi]. This common verb usually means
to step up suddenly, to burst upon one. In dazzling apparel [en esthēti
astraptousēi]. This is the correct text. This common simplex verb occurs only
twice in the N.T., here and Lu 17:24 (the Transfiguration). It has the same root as [astrapē]
(lightning). The “men” had the garments of “angels.”
24:5 As they were affrighted [emphobōn genomenōn autōn].
Genitive absolute with second aorist middle of [ginomai], to become. Hence,
when they became affrighted. They had utterly forgotten the prediction of Jesus
that he would rise on the third day.
24:6 He is not here, but is risen [ouk estin hōde, alla
ēgerthē]. Another Western non-interpolation according to Westcott and Hort.
The words are genuine at any rate in Mr 16:6; Mt 28:7. The third day rise again [tēi tritēi hēmerāi
anastēnai]. See 9:22; 18:32, 33 where Jesus plainly foretold this fact. And yet they had forgotten
it, for it ran counter to all their ideas and hopes.
24:9 From the tomb [apo tou mnēmeiou]. Some documents
omit these words. This word for tomb is like our “memorial” from [mimnēskō],
to remind. Told [apēggeilan]. It was a wonderful proclamation. Luke
does not separate the story of Mary Magdalene from that of the other women as John
does (Joh 20:2-18).
24:11 As idle talk [hōs lēros]. Old word for nonsense,
only here in the N.T. Medical writers used it for the wild talk of those in delirium
or hysteria. Disbelieved (ēpistoun). Imperfect active of [apisteō],
old verb from [apistos], without confidence or faith in. They kept on distrusting
the story of the women.
24:12 This entire 9 is a Western non-interpolation. This incident
is given in complete form in Joh 18:2-10 and most of the words in this 9 are there also. It is of
a piece with many items in this chapter about which it is not easy to reach a final
conclusion. Stooping and looking in [parakupsas]. First aorist active
participle of [parakuptō], to stoop besides and peer into. Old verb used
also in Joh 20:5,11; Jas 1:25; 1Pe 1:12. By themselves [mona]. Without
the body. To his home [pros hauton]. Literally, “to himself.”
24:13 Were going [ēsan poreuomenoi]. Periphrastic
imperfect middle of [poreuomai]. Sixty stadia [stadious hexēkonta].
About seven miles.
24:14 They communed [hōmiloun]. Imperfect active
of [homileō], old and common verb (from [homilos], in company with).
In the N.T. only here (and verse 15) and Ac 20:11; 24:26. Our word homiletics is derived from this word for preaching
was at first largely conversational in style and not declamatory.
24:15 While they communed and questioned together [en
tōi homilein autous kai sunzētein]. Same idiom as in verse 14, which see. Note [sunzētein]; each questioned the other. Jesus
himself [autos Iēsous]. In actual person. Went with them [suneporeueto
autois]. Imperfect middle, was going along with them.
24:16 Were holden that they should not know him [ekratounto
tou mē epignōnai auton]. Imperfect passive of [krateō], continued being
held, with the ablative case of the articular infinitive, “from recognizing him,”
from knowing him fully [epi-gnōnai], ingressive aorist of [epiginōsko].
The [mē] is a redundant negative after the negative idea in [ekratounto].
24:17 That you have with another [hous antiballete pros
allēlous]. [Anti-ballō] is an old verb and means to throw in turn, back
and forth like a ball, from one to another, a beautiful picture of conversation
as a game of words. Only here in the N.T. They stood still [estathēsan].
First aorist passive of [histēmi], intransitive. They stopped. Looking
sad [skuthrōpoi]. This is the correct text. It is an old adjective from
[skuthros], gloomy and [ops], countenance. Only here in the N.T.
24:18 Dost thou alone sojourn? [su monos paroikeis;].
[Monos] is predicate adjective. “Hast thou been dwelling alone (all by thyself)?”
And not know? [kai ouk egnōs;]. Second aorist active indicative and
difficult to put into English as the aorist often is. The verb [paroikeō]
means to dwell beside one, then as a stranger like [paroikoi] (Eph
2:19). In Jerusalem everybody was talking about Jesus.
24:21 But we hoped [hēmeis de ēlpizomen]. Imperfect
active, we were hoping. Note emphasis in [hēmeis] (we). Redeem [lutrousthai].
From the bondage of Rome, no doubt. Yea and beside all this [alla ge kai
sun pāsin toutois]. Particles pile up to express their emotions. Yea
[alla] here affirmative, as in verse 22, not adversative) at least [ge] also [kai] together with
all these things [sun pāsin toutois]. Like Pelion on Ossa with them in their
perplexity. Now the third day [tritēn tautēn hēmeran agei]. A difficult
idiom for the English. “One is keeping this a third day.” And he is still dead and
we are still without hope.
24:22 Amazed us [exestēsan hēmas]. First aorist
active (transitive) indicative with accusative [hēmas] of [existēmi]. The
second aorist active is intransitive. Early [orthrinai]. A poetic
and late form for [orthrios]. In the N.T. only here and Re 24:22. Predicate adjective agreeing with the women.
24:23 Had seen [heōrakenai]. Perfect active infinitive
in indirect assertion after [legousai]. Same construction for [zēin]
after [legousin]. But all this was too indirect and uncertain (women and angels)
for Cleopas and his companion.
24:25 Foolish men [anoētoi]. Literally without sense
[nous], not understanding. Common word. Slow of heart [bradeis
tēi kardiāi]. Slow in heart (locative case). Old word for one dull, slow to
comprehend or to act. All that [pāsin hois]. Relative attracted from
the accusative [ha] to the case of the antecedent [pāsin] (dative).
They could only understand part of the prophecies, not all.
24:26 Behooved it not? [ouchi edei;]. Was it not
necessary? The very things about the death of Jesus that disturbed them so were
the strongest proof that he was the Messiah of the Old Testament.
24:27 Interpreted [diērmēneusen]. First aorist active
(constative aorist) indicative of [diermēneuō] (Margin has the imperfect
[diērmēneuen], intensive compound [dia] of [hermēneuō], the
old verb to interpret from [hermēneus], interpreter, and that from [Hermēs],
the messenger of the gods as the people of Lystra took Paul to be (Ac 14:12).
But what wonderful exegesis the two disciples were now hearing! Concerning himself
[peri heauton]. Jesus found himself in the Old Testament, a thing that some
modern scholars do not seem able to do.
24:28 Made as though [prosepoiēsato]. First aorist
active middle (Some MSS. have [prosepoieito] imperfect) indicative of [prospoieō],
old verb to conform oneself to, to pretend. Only here in the N.T. Of course he would
have gone on if the disciples had not urged him to stay.
24:29 Constrained [parebiasanto]. Strong verb [parabiazomai],
to compel by use of force (Polybius and LXX). In the N.T. only here and Ac 16:15. It was here compulsion of courteous words. Is far spent
[kekliken]. Perfect active indicative of [klinō]. The day “has turned”
toward setting.
24:30 When he had sat down [en tōi kataklithēnai auton].
Luke’s common idiom as in verses 4, 15. Note first aorist passive infinitive (on the reclining as to him).
Gave [epedidou]. Imperfect, inchoative idea, began to give to them,
in contrast with the preceding aorist (punctiliar) participles.
24:31 Were opened [diēnoichthēsan]. Ingressive first
aorist passive indicative of [dianoigō]. Knew [epegnōsan]. Effective
first aorist active indicative fully recognized him. Same word in verse 16. Vanished [aphantos egeneto]. Became invisible or unmanifested.
[Aphantos] from [a] privative and [phainomai], to appear. Old
word, only here in the N.T.
24:32 Was not our heart burning? [Ouchi hē kardia hemōn
kaiomenē ēn;]. Periphrastic imperfect middle. Spake [elalei].
Imperfect active, was speaking. This common verb [laleō] is onomatopoetic,
to utter a sound, [la-la] and was used of birds, children chattering, and
then for conversation, for preaching, for any public speech. Opened [diēnoigen].
Imperfect active indicative of the same verb used of the eyes in verse 31.
24:33 That very hour [autēi tēi hōrāi]. Locative
case and common Lukan idiom, at the hour itself. They could not wait. Gathered
[ēthroismenous]. Perfect passive participle of [athroizō], old verb
from [athroos] (copulative [a] and [throos], crowd). Only here
in the N.T.
24:34 Saying [legontas]. Accusative present active
participle agreeing with “the eleven and those with them” in verse 33. Indeed [ontōs]. Really, because “he has appeared to Simon”
[ōpthē Simōni]. First aorist passive indicative of [horaō]. This is
the crucial evidence that turned the scales with the disciples and explains “indeed.”
Paul also mentions it (1Co 15:5).
24:35 Rehearsed [exēgounto]. Imperfect middle indicative
of [exēgeomai], verb to lead out, to rehearse. Our word exegesis comes from
this verb. Their story was now confirmatory, not revolutionary. The women were right
then after all. Of them [autois]. To them, dative case. They did not
recognize Jesus in his exegesis, but did in the breaking of bread. One is reminded
of that saying in the Logia of Jesus: “Raise the stone and there thou shalt
find me, cleave the wood and there am I.”
24:36 He himself stood [autos estē]. He himself
stepped and stood. Some documents do not have “Peace be unto you.”
24:37 Terrified [ptoēthentes]. First aorist passive
participle of [ptoeō], old verb and in the N.T. only here and Lu 21:9 which see. Affrighted [emphoboi genomenoi]. Late adjective
from [en] and [phobos] (fear). Both these terms of fear are strong.
Supposed [edokoun]. Imperfect active of [dokeō], kept on thinking
so.
24:38 Why are ye troubled? [ti tetaragmenoi este;].
Periphrastic perfect passive indicative of [tarassō], old verb, to agitate,
to stir up, to get excited.
24:39 Myself [autos]. Jesus is patient with his
proof. They were convinced before he came into the room, but that psychological
shock had unnerved them all. Handle [psēlaphēsate]. This very word
is used in 1Jo 1:1 as proof of the actual human body of Jesus. It is an old verb for
touching with the hand. Flesh and bones [sarka kai ostea]. At least
this proves that he is not just a ghost and that Jesus had a real human body against
the Docetic Gnostics who denied it. But clearly we are not to understand that our
resurrection bodies will have “flesh and bones.” Jesus was in a transition state
and had not yet been glorified. The mystery remains unsolved, but it was proof to
the disciples of the identity of the Risen Christ with Jesus of Nazareth.
24:40 Another Western non-interpolation according to Westcott
and Hort. It is genuine in Joh 20:20).
24:41 Disbelieved for joy [apistountōn autōn apo tēs
charas]. Genitive absolute and a quite understandable attitude. They were slowly
reconvinced, but it was after all too good to be true. Anything to eat [brōsimon].
Only here in the N.T., though an old word from [bibrōskō], to eat.
24:42 A piece of broiled fish [ichthuos optou meros].
[Optos] is a verbal from [optaō], to cook, to roast, to broil. Common
word, but only here in the N.T. The best old documents omit “and a honeycomb” [kai
apo melissiou kēriou].
24:44 While I was yet with you [eti ōn sun humin].
Literally, Being yet with you. The participle [ōn] takes the time of the
principal verb.
24:45 Opened he their mind [diēnoixen autōn ton noun].
The same verb as that in verses 31, 32 about the eyes and the Scriptures. Jesus had all these years been trying
to open their minds that they might understand the Scriptures about the Messiah
and now at last he makes one more effort in the light of the Cross and the Resurrection.
They can now see better the will and way of God, but they will still need the power
of the Holy Spirit before they will fully know the mind of Christ.
24:46 It is written [gegraptai]. Perfect passive
indicative of [graphō], to write, the usual phrase for quoting Scripture.
Jesus now finds in the Old Testament his suffering, his resurrection, and the preaching
of repentance and forgiveness of sins to all nations. Note the infinitives [pathein,
anastēnai, kēruchthēnai].
24:47 Beginning [arxamenoi]. Aorist middle participle
of [archō], but the nominative plural with no syntactical connection (an
anacoluthon).
24:49 Until ye be clothed [heōs hou endusēsthe].
First aorist middle subjunctive of [enduō] or [endunō]. It is an old
verb for putting on a garment. It is here the indirect middle, put on yourselves
power from on high as a garment. They are to wait till this experience comes to
them. This is “the promise of the Father.” It is an old metaphor in Homer, Aristophanes,
Plutarch, and Paul uses it often.
24:50 Over against Bethany [heōs pros Bēthanian].
That is on Olivet. On this blessed spot near where he had delivered the great Eschatological
Discourse he could see Bethany and Jerusalem.
24:51 He parted from them [diestē ap’ autōn]. Second
aorist active (intransitive) indicative of [diistēmi]. He stood apart [dia]
and he was gone. Some manuscripts do not have the words “and was carried into heaven.”
But we know that Jesus was taken up into heaven on a cloud (Ac 1:9).
24:52 Worshipped him [proskunēsantes auton]. Here
again we have one of Westcott and Hort’s Western non-interpolations that may be
genuine or not. With great joy [meta charas megalēs]. Now that the
Ascension has come they are no longer in despair. Joy becomes the note of victory
as it is today. No other note can win victories for Christ. The bells rang in heaven
to greet the return of Jesus there, but he set the carillon of joy to ringing on
earth in human hearts in all lands and for all time.
Indexes
Index of Scripture References
Index of Scripture Commentary