THE EPISTLE TO THE ROMANS - Chapter 4 - Verse 9

Verse 9. Cometh, etc. The apostle has now prepared the way for an examination of the inquiry whether this came in consequence of obedience to the law? or whether it was without obedience to the law? Having shown that Abraham was justified by faith, in accordance with the doctrine which he was defending, the only remaining inquiry was, whether it was after he was circumcised or before; whether in consequence of his circumcision or not. If it was after his circumcision, the Jew might still maintain that it was by complying with the works of the law; but if it was before, the point of the apostle would be established, that it was without the works of the law. Still further, if he was justified by faith before he was circumcised, then here was an instance of justification and acceptance without conformity to the Jewish law; and if the father of the Jewish nation was so justified, and reckoned as a friend of God without being circumcised, i.e. in the condition in which the heathen world then was, then it would follow that the Gentiles might be justified in a similar way now. It would not be departing, therefore, from the spirit of the Old Testament itself to maintain, as the apostle had done, (Ro 3) that the Gentiles who had not been circumcised might obtain the favour of God as well as the Jew; that is, that it was independent of circumcision, and might be extended to all.

This blessedness. This happy state, or condition. This state of being justified by God, and of being regarded as his friends. This is the sum of all blessedness; the only state that can be truly pronounced happy.

Upon the circumcision only. The Jews alone, as they pretended.

Or upon the uncircumcision also. The Gentiles who believed as the apostle maintained.

For we say. We all admit. It is a conceded point. It was the doctrine of the apostle, as well as the Jews; and as much theirs as his. With this, then, as a conceded point, what is the fair inference to be drawn from it?