CHAPTER 9
Hebrews Chapter 9:1-5 | |
1. Then verily the first [covenant] had also ordinances of divine service, and a worldly sanctuary. | 1. Habebat quidem prius illud justificationes cultus et sanctum mundanum: |
2. For there was a tabernacle made; the first, wherein [was] the candlestick, and the table, and the shewbread; which is called the sanctuary. | 2. Tabernaculum enim primum compositum erat, in quo candelabrum et mensa et panum propositio; quod dicitur sanctuarium. |
3. And after the second veil, the tabernacle which is called the Holiest of all; | 3. Post secundum autem velum tabernaculum quod sancta sanctorum dicitur; |
4. Which had the golden censer, and the ark of the covenant overlaid round about with gold, wherein [was] the golden pot that had manna, and Aaron's rod that budded, and the tables of the covenant; | 4. Aureum habens thuribulum et arcam foederis undique coopertam auro, in qua urna aurea habens manna, et virga Aaronis quae floruerat, et tabulae testamenti; |
5. And over it the cherubims of glory shadowing the mercyseat; of which we cannot now speak particularly. | 5. Supra autem ipsam cherubin gloriae obumbrantes propitiatorium; de quibus non attinet nunc dicere sigillatim. |
1.
Some copies read,
Many take the word
2.
As to the first sanctuary, which was contiguous to the court of the people, he says that there were the
But he says that the pot in which Moses had deposited the manna, and Aaron's rod which had budded, were in the ark with the two tables; but this seems inconsistent with sacred history, which in 1 King s 8:9, relates that there was nothing in the ark but the two tables. But it is easy to reconcile these two passages: God had commanded the pot and Aaron's rod to be laid up before the testimony; it is hence probable that they were deposited in the ark, together with the tables. But when the Temple was built, these things were arranged in a different order, and certain history relates it as a thing new that the ark had nothing else but the two tables.6
5.
1 Rather, "Yet even the first," etc. It is connected with the last verse of the preceding chapter; as though he had said, -- "Though the covenant is become antiquated, yet it had many things divinely appointed connected with it." Me<n ou+n mean "yet," or however. See Art. 8:4. Macknight has "Now verily;" and Stuart, "Moreover." -- Ed.
2 It has since been discovered that it is not found in many of the best MSS., and is dismissed from the text by Griesbach and all modern critics. The noun understood is evidently "covenant," spoken of in the preceding chapter. -- Ed.
3 Many, such as Grotius, Beza, etc., consider that "ordinances" and "services" (not service) are distinct, and both in the objective case, and render the words "rituals, services, and a wordly sanctuary." And if the sequel is duly examined, it will be found that this is the right construction. The Apostle, according to the manner of the prophet, reverses the order, and speaks distinctly of these three particulars, -- first, "the wordly sanctuary" -- the tabernacle in verses 2, 3, 4, and 5; secondly, "the services" in verses 6 and 7; and thirdly, "the rituals" in verse 10, where the word "ordinances" again occur. There can therefore be hardly a doubt as to the construction of the first verse. The sanctuary is called worldly in contrast with what is heavenly or divine, not made with hands: see verse 11. -- Ed.
4 See Appendix F 2.
5 This is evidently a mistake, for the altar of incense was in the sanctuary -- the first tabernacle. See Exodus 30:1-6. The word is used in the Sept., for "censer," 2 Chronicles 26:19. There were many censors made, as it is supposed, of brass; for they were daily used in the sanctuary for incense; but this golden censor was probably used only on the day of expiation, when the chief priest entered the holiest place; and the probability is, though there is no account of this in the Old Testament, that it was laid up or deposited, as Stuart suggests, in the holy of holies. -- Ed.
6 Stuart observes, "Our author is speaking of the tabernacle, and not of the temple; still less of the second temple, which must have lacked even the tables of testimony. The probability is, that the ark, during its many removals, and in particular during its captivity by the Philistines, was deprived of those sacred deposits; for we hear no more concerning them." -- Ed.